EVE General Discussion

Yet another reason highsec reward needs to be nerfed, presence of neutrals does not hamper any activity in highsec.

Holy ******* ****, I just plus repped a marlona sky post.

I feel dirty...and my world no longer makes sense.

I am going to go drink wine, and then likely end up crying in the shower fully clothed.

If we could build supercaps in empire, we would.

The fact that industry is broken in null is CCP's fault. CCP takes a closed fist approach to null thinking the more harsh it is, the more people will move there. They are right. A bunch of people head there to find out that "player run ain't so fun." CCP should boost null and make it more fun, less tedious, and more rewarding. More will never break an economy. As rewarding as most folks claim high sec is, the economies there still work. High sec is fine, it could use more sites, but it definitely doesn't need a nerf.

The only thing that blows my mind is that you've actually realized Mittani doesn't even write most of those articles.

No, in your case I could write "the sky is blue" and then you'd reply it's green because someone up the command chain told you so.

People seem to think that allowing a hi class resteraunt to make a higher margin than MacDonads will drive Mc'D's out of business. It wont.

2. Figures, I'd never think you'd say that.

3. Yet you keep replying.

4. It does not make you an horrible person, it makes me think you are not enjoying the game and your zone goals at it should. For the rest, don't flatter yourself with the default stupid "I will say the guy says PvPers are sociopaths" because I PvP in all sorts of games since a decade+. ISK addicted people <> PvPer anyway.

5. 2-3 years ago that was exactly like you say, then CCP put soloable, farmable FW in direct competition for many "former good items" so there's no "dumb or smart", just "boned". To do what you say CCP would have to remove that FW overlap and this is not going to happen.

Wait. Now null sec doesn't want high seccers to head to null? That can't be accurate. After all this talk of risk/reward, balancing on principle and getting null industry alts to come home, "no one" wants high seccers to radiate to null? If that's true, then the proposed high sec nerf only translates to a massive influx of isk for null sov holders. So what happens after high sec is nerfed, if we then discover that characters in high sec were mostly there for the sec and its the risk that should've been nerfed - not the reward? Will the newly-enriched, null sec fatcats be here again next year pointing to charts and graphs showing us why high sec still has it too good? Where does it end? Call me crazy but when silver-tongued devils holding lit molotov cocktails are telling me that burning down my house is for my own good I'm just a little skeptical of the purity of their intent.

YK

1. I could imagine you would not see the difference between WoW and a PvP game if you were not an EvE player. But you ARE an EvE player how can you even compare WoW with a real PvP game? Ever played any of Darkfall, DAoC, Warhammer? Those are PvP games. Even GW2 is more of a PvP game than WoW and that's a theme park.

2. You and the other guys pretend all people have to fall to your boring bullcrap made just to raise rubble. No, I don't care about you being a PvPer, about yourself saying I say you are something bad IRL, about yourself saying I am going to do something with CSM. You are a LOBBY, clear and sharp, nothing ideological more, nothing ideological less. You do your interests and I could respect that if you did not keep painting yourself either as the "public enemy" or the "victim" or "selfless heroes out to save the game".
So, stop playing the "everyone hate us" role and similar bull, it really does not suit the richest and largest alliance in game.

3. Yes because saying an American knows what's a lobby is, it is clearly racist
I mentioned American because in other countries people don't know what a lobby is, they don't exist or are not legal nor allowed to officially exist.

4. I misrepresented what's not relevant (as I am not in the alliance) but wrote down what's relevant (an exploit *made* and derisive thread done to CCP).

5. Whatever suits you. I am trying to provide more details to try make it clearer, if to you that's moving goal posts, guess what I don't care. As I said, let's agree to disagre and be done with it.

6. Nope I never said the intended game play is to have progression from hi sec to null sec, you did.

7. Not my fault you 5-6 people keep enlarging this thread more than a Viagra carton.

8. Well since I am certainly not the most hard core nor most capable player in the world yet I seem to manage at what you find impossible / unbelievable then that anedoctal evidence becomes evidence.
I also would have called anedoctal evidence the possibility to grab drones off opponents then I have seen Kil2 doing it and thus it became evidence.

---

Anyway we are at the end of an argument ping pong and I got bored.
What I had to say, I said. Feel free to ignore it.