These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Hi-sec as we know it has to come to an end ASAP, and here´s why.

Author
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#161 - 2012-12-15 09:16:41 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
No More Heroes wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Could you please tell how much trit, pyerite and zydrine and mega volume have been traded today?

I cannot. We dont deal in minerals in 0.0 and I think you know why. My point was: our thriving market supplies all of our needs and most of our allies as well, thousands of players living and making war because of the skill and dedication of our jump freighter corp. But I know you like to take your shots when you can so do your best! Smile



Well, that was not exactly "taking my shots" but curiosity about your trading hub.
Unlike most "hi seccers" I never have issues moving to WHs / low sec and 0.0 to do business, if the hub is worth playing with I could slip an alt in there or something Pirate


Very unlikely.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#162 - 2012-12-15 09:29:22 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:


Well, that was not exactly "taking my shots" but curiosity about your trading hub.
Unlike most "hi seccers" I never have issues moving to WHs / low sec and 0.0 to do business, if the hub is worth playing with I could slip an alt in there or something Pirate


Very unlikely.


The more unlikely, the tastier to achieve.
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#163 - 2012-12-15 10:57:50 UTC
Risk/Regard is broken, Highsec needs changes.

The Tears Must Flow

Kurt Saken
Star Cluster Wanderer
#164 - 2012-12-15 12:44:26 UTC
I don't know what's worse, level 4s in hi sec or the Local chat mechanics of the Empire space in n(d)ull.
Both are bad things in my book, but of course this is a personal opinion and i don't give a damn about how other people play this game.

I play as i want, you play as you want, but at least i dont make daily whiny threads complaning about this or about that, open as usual by the same people: the hi sec miner/mission runner or the null slave of some nerdy directors or money makers.
Maelle LuzArdiden
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#165 - 2012-12-15 13:50:14 UTC
Highsec as faction islands would be fun!

At the same time introduce import/export taxes between empires :)
Macaya
Little Builders
#166 - 2012-12-15 13:56:52 UTC
Phil Da Agony wrote:
Ok guise, lets seriously talk about it. What Hi-sec has brought to us?


"seriously" I must trolllllllolololololol

Phil Da Agony wrote:

Breeds and breeds of people who sits down, take their brains off and wait for the drones till they hear the DING from the microwave so they could pick up another 4 and now, theyre unable to pull the drones back into the bay twice per mission. People who sells the ships they build under production cost because the ore they mine "it´s free". People who has been in the game for years and doesnt know what the d-scan is, or how it works.

This aberration is against the hearth and soul of this game, promoting single-player-esque behaviour in a harmful and dangerous way. We, people, have failed has a community.

Hi-sec should stop being a big fat island, and become an archipelage, as easy as that. A handful of small islands interconnected by low-sec and null-sec systems.

Think about it for a second and you´ll realize it, its a full-of-win idea.

Decentralizated market, hauling as a dignified profession, manufacturing accesible and profitable for the newbros, no more blue powerblock seas, everyone gettin involved into everything, in a truly, new and exciting single shard universe, harsh and dangerous as it was meant to be.

I know everyone needs his place, and hi-sec-only fellas would still be able to do their thing if they want to, even they will get benefits from this, as the faction and corp standings will become even more important.


Can I haz your stuffz ?
Haedonism Bot
People for the Ethical Treatment of Rogue Drones
#167 - 2012-12-15 14:16:51 UTC
I like highsec as faction islands. Not exactly an original idea but a good one. Highsec should also be like lowsec, but with big enough gate and station guns to discourage camps and instead of CONCORD as we know it, CONCORD should run in roving gangs that may or may not show up when you are doing something bad, a little more like real life police patrols than like instant punishment.

www.everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com

Vote Sabriz Adoudel and Tora Bushido for CSMX. Keep the Evil in EVE!

Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#168 - 2012-12-15 16:54:14 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Who doesn't love howling about us...

The howling got me to get on this game and somewhere else. The amount of "facts" people pull out of thier asses about you is ridiculous.

The thread that entices newbies to join has a selection of delectable tears on it.


As tasty as they are, they cost me money now. Damn crybabies getting in the way of my IRL inflating wallet!
Cat Troll
Incorruptibles
#169 - 2012-12-15 19:07:49 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Cat Troll wrote:
The problem with drone is that you have to use an EXPLOIT (which CCP said is a temporary fix) to make them useful.
Imagine having your guns blow up in the middle of the mission, would you like that?

If CCP says it is fine to use this method until things are fine tuned then it's not an exploit now is it...

Fine, call it a bug in the AI.
Same **** different name.

Lolwut: "Yes, you kids don't know how lucky you have it. These days noobs get given free tackle ships for PvP but back in the old days the only tackle ships we were given were our pods. We had to use them to bump their rookie ships out of alignment to stop them warping off."

Balthisus Filtch
RISE Inc.
#170 - 2012-12-16 05:59:33 UTC
Not sure whether your idea is a good or bad one.

The fundamental premise you built your idea on is utterly flawed though.

"This aberration is against the hearth and soul of this game"

The heart and soul of this game is Sandbox - "Do it your own way". If that choice for someone is be solo-esque so be it. It's only your personal perception that this is "wrong". I am sure it's not as rich an experience but who am I to judge that it's "not the way the game should be played".