These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why does nullsec care so much about what highsec is doing?

First post
Author
Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#381 - 2012-12-14 01:00:26 UTC
Some Rando wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:
It is a two way street. Butterfly effect and all. Which is why high sec has every right to care about what people do in null sec.

Has anyone said otherwise?

You must be new to the thread ehh?
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#382 - 2012-12-14 02:12:38 UTC
If, as nullbears like to lie claim, 75% of hisec is nothing but their own nullbear alts... what do they hope to gain from nerfing hisec? They'd only be nerfing themselves, right?

At least they could try to get their bullcrap consistent.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#383 - 2012-12-14 02:18:24 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

1) You see bullshit because you selectively read what your biased point of view makes you to.

Two proofs:

a) My own post stated "I bet that if they switched to just asking what they need"

bolded the word that matters. They not very long ago (and expecially after a discussion between me and Mynna) started to describe the stressful and lacking situation of nullsec which is under the eyes of everyone.

Before that, it's been James 315-alike manifestos and similar, for years, with pure despising for those dastardly guys who decided to play where casual players find the best chances to enjoy the game despite only being able to see a small part of it.


b) Years and years of gratuitous flaming, teasing and trolling high sec players with nothing but confrontational attitude, don't fit with your definition of "all I've seen is people asking for better facilities in null".

Sure, many hi seccers are "casual" / "randoms" whatever dire guilt so they WILL tend to cry for stupid stuff like having their barge popped but that grants a laugh, not ideological scorched earth campaigns.

As Hulkageddon supporter and hopefully (in the sense, I hope we'll have another in 2013) sponsor, I am all for popping idiots.
But that's PvP and that's where it ends for me.
Different than this, is those who setup vast hate campaigns, discrimination, ideological spite.
Those in my eyes are a case of harassment or "stalking" because it trascends PvP, it is a sad joke made by sad people even if it's claimed to be just metagame.


2) Me martyred? How can anyone martyr me? I play once every several days, when the markets align how I predicted and I do my (markets) nasty PvP at Jita IV CNAP.

I just can't stand GD being continuously filled by the same garbage. Hi seccers being usually the "slow child" posting once in their life about a popped barge vs an ARMADA of 5-9 years old super pro super elite players, expert at forum PvP and able to take every opportunity to twist, flame, troll and generally be asses to those slow childs.

Well said. This is what has always vexed me. One thing is to point, ridicule, and laugh like "cool" junior high kids in need of acceptance and another is the straight up hateful insulting demeaning vitriol that is spewed against "carebears" and casual players in general. And to be honest, I don't think, there really is anything to be understood about it, since there doesn't seem to be any logic behind these persecutions to begin with. Yes, there are attempts to justify the hate and vitriol, but that is all they are.

There's a drive and desire by some to make 'carebears' mad and frustrated to then point and insult them. And I'll be the first to admit that it's probably a minority that mostly do their 'PVPing' on the forums. But I believe it is a very loud minority.

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

Silath Slyver Silverpine
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#384 - 2012-12-14 03:36:45 UTC
It just occurred to me that this dichotomy is hardly unique to EvE.

In WoW, for example, there are those who feel all servers should be PvP servers, or there are hardcore raiding guilds that treat raiding as very srsbizness, and dismiss any less-dedicated guilds as pubbie trash.

But it even occurs in as broad a sense as 'hardcore' gamers vs. 'casual' gamers, or to put it another way; those who minmax the crap out of every possible aspect and those who are more focused on fun. Or, those who feel that story is more important than gameplay, and vice versa.
It can be any number of divisions, though it always comes down to the 'us vs. them' thing. Consoles vs PC's, Mac vs PC's, Iphone vs. Droid.

The list is endless and the difference equally arbitrary. The simple fact is that when it comes right down to it, the choice another person has in gaming, play style, hardware, or choice of dinner have a minute, if any, impact on your life. It might have some moderate effect on your choice of game, or a developers decision on which platform to release, or how many apps you have available . . . but it's hardly the end of the world. The cost of gas going up half a cent has a more profound impact on your life.

We make up these arbitrary differences in order to define ourselves and create peer groups in an increasingly socially homogenized world. There are no real differences that matter anymore; race, gender, and sexual orientation all matter far less than they did in the past. Income disparity, at least for anyone you're likely to meet with on a day-to-day basis, is almost nonexistent.
To make up for the lack of these real, physical (Though equally meaningless) differences, we create them practically out of thin air over the silliest of things, because then we can feel more secure about ourselves and our place in society. We can feel like we belong to a group, and have people that have our backs. We can feel like we belong; even if it is with a bunch of strangers thousands of miles away.

Our entire society has become obsessed with these petty and meaningless differences. Do we really need to bring it into EvE? Are you so desperate for 'lulz' and validation of self from your imaginary peer group that you need to troll around on the internet? If you are that unsure of your own self worth, then keep posting about how "It's all the carebears fault!" or how "It's all those griefing nullbears!"
Keep focusing on the imaginary 'others' are 'destroying EvE' and ignoring the real issues.
Quote:
"But again, truth be told...if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror."
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#385 - 2012-12-14 03:43:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Silath Slyver Silverpine wrote:
Our entire society has become obsessed with these petty and meaningless differences. Do we really need to bring it into EvE? Are you so desperate for 'lulz' and validation of self from your imaginary peer group that you need to troll around on the internet? If you are that unsure of your own self worth, then keep posting about how "It's all the carebears fault!" or how "It's all those griefing nullbears!"

Ok, thanks then.

It's all those griefing nullbears!
Silath Slyver Silverpine wrote:
because then we can feel more secure about ourselves and our place in society. We can feel like we belong to a group, and have people that have our backs. We can feel like we belong; even if it is with a bunch of strangers thousands of miles away.

Blobberssssss !!!! Cool

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Eight Two
SWIFT Inc.
#386 - 2012-12-14 04:01:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Eight Two
I can't believe I'm actually bothering with this... but here it goes.

So, a lot of this really boils down to the ballpark argument.

Kid A has a ball and is not willing to play, let alone hand off the ball to someone else. How about instead of picking on the kid and running to you parents crying to make them take the ball form the kid, have your parents buy you your own ball?

Seriously, this agenda-hump*ng has been going on way too long and it always comes down to taking stuff out of the game from one part and throwing it in again at another part. That's just not how it's gonna work out, neither for highsec dwellers nor nullbears.

Yes, it's massively easier to make isk in highsec with little risk involved, but then again instead of asking for a nerf why not ask for a rebalance or once? The difference between the two is insane and does actually matter.

Believe it or not, there's people that actually can't be arsed to pay supsription fees for a second job. That is like asking to pay someone to clean their toiltes in their free time and hoping to have fun with it. This place is going to go down that very same toilet that (since it has been mentioned here) i.e. Ultima Online did, yet a lot faster since the casual players will just move on and play something else.
Unfortunately that is all there is in nullsec - another lousy job for bad pay.

That means your 5 plexed alts will unfortunately not be enough to keep the servers running as there's no money in Eve anymore. Get over the stupid idead of Eve being CCP's welfare pet project because they make oh so much money elsewhere.

The more you try to force one player base out of the game to feed your own ego and/or wallets, the faster this place is gonna be gone.

If only half of the omganothernerfhighsec and the the nullbear crowd were as vocal about CCP fixing their goddamn game mechanics as they are about spitting their agenda driven nonsense (yes, that goes for both sides) all over the forums, Eve could actually become a better game.

But oh well, it will only take another million threadnoughts to finally see that happen. Roll
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#387 - 2012-12-14 04:29:53 UTC
Why can't we all just get along.jpeg
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#388 - 2012-12-14 04:35:48 UTC
Jake Warbird wrote:
Why can't we all just get along.jpeg

We have a massive list of blues ...

Our getting along with people is killing EVE.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#389 - 2012-12-14 05:07:06 UTC
I'm actually surprised the mega coalition has not demanded npc null be turned into player sov systems.
Nivyalon
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#390 - 2012-12-14 05:25:42 UTC
I don't know if this has been addressed, but this is is my most important point. To my knowledge all of the isk in EVE is generated by NPCs and distributed to the player population through player-npc interaction. Thus high sec is the source of nearly all the isk in player circulation. If the income of high sec (as a whole) was reduced less total isk would enter into player hands.
If the reduction was large enough the subsequent market fallout would be like the market effects after the chain failure of banks during the Great Depression.

For EVE's economy to be truly balanced the whole game would have to be null sec, but this runs into several problems. First video games de-humanize social contact so the average disposition tends to be more sadistic . Second reality can't be "broken" . Third no video game has ever reached a played population large enough so that the population alone can produce the stabilizing effect necessary to utilize a abstract currency, so a video game needs to have a ballast that can be leveraged to make up that short fall. Fourth this would result in a division of labor even more stratified that reality. In real life, except for entrepreneurship which is often very risky (financially) with sometimes incredible profits, risk whether financial or physical is inversely related to profit. This is because high paying jobs almost invariably require an intensive education, the analog of which in EVE is skills which can only be trained in a set amount of real time. So the new players would be stuck with risky low paying jobs and all the older players would have low risk, high paying jobs.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#391 - 2012-12-14 05:28:25 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
If, as nullbears like to lie claim, 75% of hisec is nothing but their own nullbear alts... what do they hope to gain from nerfing hisec? They'd only be nerfing themselves, right?


It's like this: the people who make the loudest noise about making activity X harder are usually the ones who feel most compelled to participate in activity X even though they don't enjoy it. So the noise that nullbears are making about hisec income being too high reflects their addiction to ISK injections into their wallets: they are grinding missions and incursions in hisec because they want the ISK, and they naturally gravitate to the ISK sources that require the least effort for a suitable ISK injection.

Think of it like fat kids asking the government to ban Macdonalds. The food is horrible, it's making them fat and giving them acne, but they still eat at Macdonalds because it's easier than cooking nourishing meals at home. They truly believe that banning fast food will give them the motivation to cook at home (because the other option is eating at proper restaurants where each meal costs as much as a week's food budget). Of course all that will happen is that they will gravitate to the next easiest thing to do (e.g.: slumming off their friends and then complaining that their friends have abandoned them, or eating at restaurants and then whining that restaurants cost too much).


Of course another option is that the null bears live on the pain and anguish of others. Having mired all of nullsec in NIPs and NAPs, the null bears are making noise about hisec incomes simply to get CCP to nerf hisec, because the null bears look forward to the tears that will flow from players and CCP alike when hisec carebears cancel accounts en masse.
SaKoil
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#392 - 2012-12-14 05:44:14 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:

But as to miners, sorry shooting people who you know cannot shoot back is just cowardice pure and simple.
They attack miners in hi-sec because they are worse carebears than the carebears, they hide behind concord protection to protect them from getting ganked, so that they are safe to gank the defenceless.


Nice hypocrisy, the miners using Concord is right and the gankers using Concord is wrong?

Do you understand that high-sec ganking is valid and perfectly legal way of enjoying the high-sec experience, just like mining or running missions? Or are you now dictating to everyone else which activities are acceptable and which are not?

Perhaps you should stick with the rules made by CCP.
Nivyalon
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#393 - 2012-12-14 05:58:09 UTC
1)If a police officer sees you assualt someone they will come after you
2)If a police officer sees you assault someone and people run to help that person the officer won't come after them as long as they don't get in the way
If you steal from someone and they try to get it back so you assault them see number 1
If you steal from someone and they try to get it back so you assault them and people come to your victims aid see number 2
Taking into account that real police aren't immortal/invincible
original eve legal system was not this
current eve legal system is this
Eurydia Vespasian
Storm Hunters
#394 - 2012-12-14 06:20:56 UTC
i dislike "bears" being being given a prefix and used and/or applied in a negative connotation towards groups of people.

poor bears. they just want to eat honey and salmon and scratch their backs against trees...and not be a associated with video game politics.

have a care for all bears everywhere.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#395 - 2012-12-14 06:25:45 UTC
Like I said earlier, if you..............


Ah heck, I just can't participate in this one.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#396 - 2012-12-14 07:33:26 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Jake Warbird wrote:
Why can't we all just get along.jpeg

We have a massive list of blues ...

Our getting along with people is killing EVE.

You guys are killing Eve.... again?
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#397 - 2012-12-14 07:33:27 UTC
Eurydia Vespasian wrote:
i dislike "bears" being being given a prefix and used and/or applied in a negative connotation towards groups of people.


But then there are the Care Bears™ who teach our youth that all the problems in the world can be solved by thinking happy thoughts and loving the people trying to kill you.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#398 - 2012-12-14 07:34:18 UTC
Jake Warbird wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Jake Warbird wrote:
Why can't we all just get along.jpeg

We have a massive list of blues ...

Our getting along with people is killing EVE.

You guys are killing Eve.... again?


s/again/still/
CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
#399 - 2012-12-14 09:19:41 UTC
I have removed some trolling from this thread.

EVE Online/DUST 514 Community Representative ※ EVE Illuminati ※ Fiction Adept

@CCP_Eterne ※ @EVE_LiveEvents

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#400 - 2012-12-14 09:33:48 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
But then there are the Care Bears™ who teach our youth that all the problems in the world can be solved by thinking happy thoughts and loving the people trying to kill you.


Hide your blade behind a smile? Ring a bell? I thought so... Blink

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)