These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

By what right?

Author
Seriphyn Inhonores
Elusenian Cooperative
#1 - 2012-12-09 14:03:02 UTC
By what right do Minmatar loyalist capsuleers get to claim that any Minmatar outside the Republic are "not Minmatar"? I refer specifically to the one-fifth of all Minmatar who live in the Federation. Like free Minmatar anywhere in New Eden, they still organize themselves into clans, still practice the Voluval, still call themselves Minmatar while forming Federation member states based on tribal democracy. Many have lived here since the Minmatar Rebellion, those who decided to use their free will granted to them by the blood spilled by both themselves and their brethren.

This is what we call absolutism, or the tool of tyrants. The Amarrians did the exact same thing when they first enslaved the Minmatar. "You do not believe in our religion and are thus not worthy" is not that different from "You do not believe in our tribes and are thus not Minmatar". One might say you are undermining the very freedoms that many Minmatar have died for, only to replace it with a different type of slavery regarding identity. You are no different from anti-religious Minmatar who murder their brethren for following the Amarr religion, especially those recently emancipated individuals from Jamyl I's 110 edict.

If Minmatar wish to live in the Federation, that is their choice. If they wish to live in the Republic, that is their choice. If they wish to not be called Minmatar at all, that is their choice. Who are you to say whether or not they're Minmatar? Are you worried about Gallentean influence? Last I checked, Minmatar culture is thriving more than ever. I don't see any evidence to suggest the Minmatar identity is being 'subsumed' by the Gallenteans (whoever they are).

By what right do *I* have to call certain Minmatar out on this? That is simply the paradox of free speech. However, the difference is that I'm not telling the Minmatar as a whole who they are and who they should be. That is their choice. I am calling out the minute number of potential absolutists and tyrants who wish to dictate to the Minmatar in a similar vein to how the Amarr dictated to them a generation ago.
DeadRow
State War Academy
Caldari State
#2 - 2012-12-09 14:06:01 UTC
If the number is minute, why does it matter?
Seriphyn Inhonores
Elusenian Cooperative
#3 - 2012-12-09 14:12:46 UTC
Minute compared to all of New Eden, granted. But this is a capsuleer forum, where we're all minute in number as it is.
Jace Sarice
#4 - 2012-12-09 15:05:53 UTC
I see no problem with calling into question the loyalty of those who decide to defect from their own people, especially in a time of conflict.
Astera Zandraki
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-12-09 15:50:06 UTC
How are they defecting? there have been Matari states in the Federation since the rebellion.

I am half Matari myself and I find the insinuation that my dad, who was Sebiestor in just about every way was not Matari to be bizarre.
Jace Sarice
#6 - 2012-12-09 16:02:26 UTC
I was referring to what could be seen as an essential defection. If one lives in foreign lands and does not contribute to one's own people in a time of conflict, it would seem reasonable that you could be considered to have defected.
Arnulf Ogunkoya
Clan Ogunkoya
Electus Matari
#7 - 2012-12-09 16:55:36 UTC
Has anyone in particular been voicing this opinion pilot Inhonores?

I don't hold to that way of thinking myself.

Regards, Arnulf Ogunkoya.

Ssakaa
Animatar Foundation
#8 - 2012-12-09 17:14:29 UTC
Arnulf Ogunkoya wrote:
Has anyone in particular been voicing this opinion pilot Inhonores?


A good question best asked early.

"Modern Life is Rubbish"

Rana Ash
Gradient
Electus Matari
#9 - 2012-12-09 17:59:05 UTC
I am most curious as to whom has claimd such, Pilot Inhonores
Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2012-12-09 18:33:28 UTC
That the Minmatarr as absolutist as we are will surprise no one. It's been so for more time than any of us have lived. They just fragmented their aparent absolutism into their tribes, but are as controlled and absolute as we are. Something I'm not criticizing, of course, just agreeing with your main point.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Streya Jormagdnir
Alexylva Paradox
#11 - 2012-12-09 18:51:59 UTC
I too have noticed this, Seriphyn. It is a painful shame that anyone who doesn't fall in line with the Republic's jingoistic war-drum is called a traitor. Every day I see people of Minmatar ethnicity (whetever their tribal and clan identities may be) furthering the well-being of the Minmatar people, or even all people, in ways no less important or spectacular than those of the Freedom Fighters.

The Brutor scientist living in the Federation who comes up with a cure for Vitoxin, or a way to raise many crops quickly and efficiently, is just as much the freedom fighter as the Republic-dwelling warrior in a Rifter. The fight may not be against the Amarr, but one does not always have to fight against something. One may simply fight for something, building up the people's strength and very soul. Because if our struggle is anything, it is for our very souls and identities, is it not? Are we doomed to simply be defined as "anti-Amarr", or will we rise up as equals of our own identity in the cluster? Will we become masters of our own fates, free of both human overlord and the blind fury of our tragic history? Now more than ever we must strike a careful balance between freeing our currently enslaved brethren and building a viable lifestyle and strong identity for ourselves, neglecting neither task in favor of the other. Yes, we have it tough, but not for the reasons most people think.

"We Rise to Our Future"

I am also a human, straggling between the present world... and our future. I am a regulator, a coordinator, one who is meant to guide the way.

Destination Unreachable: the worst Wspace blog ever

Jace Sarice
#12 - 2012-12-09 19:01:23 UTC
Streya Jormagdnir wrote:
Because if our struggle is anything, it is for our very souls and identities, is it not? Are we doomed to simply be defined as "anti-Amarr", or will we rise up as equals of our own identity in the cluster? Will we become masters of our own fates, free of both human overlord and the blind fury of our tragic history?


And you accomplish your own identity and soul from within the Federation? I have no investment in this argument, but I can understand criticism that claims you cannot develop your own identity as a people by leaving or living outside of your people.
Seriphyn Inhonores
Elusenian Cooperative
#13 - 2012-12-09 19:21:27 UTC
Ssakaa wrote:
Arnulf Ogunkoya wrote:
Has anyone in particular been voicing this opinion pilot Inhonores?


A good question best asked early.


Seen not in these channels, but figured to pre-empt such a discussion.

As Miss Jormagdnir has pointed out, one could easily argue the Minmatar are stronger than the idea of a Republic. Is it not to a Minmatar's credit that they can live anywhere and still call themselves Minmatar? Do they need to cling onto a political construct to define themselves? I do not believe they do. This is what separates them from, say, the Caldari, who do not believe you are Caldari if you are not a citizen of the State.

The Republic is the current incarnation of the Minmatar political framework. The same can be said about the Federation for the Gallente, Intaki, Mannar, and Jin-Mei, and the State for the Caldari (as much as corporate propaganda might whitewash details about non-State Caldari nations in the Federation). Who knows, perhaps it will evolve into the New Minmatar Empire? Perhaps it might join the Federation, then proceed to dominate it economically and politically.

Either way, my impressions of the Minmatar throughout my life is that they are far stronger than having to rely on a system to tell them what to be.
Streya Jormagdnir
Alexylva Paradox
#14 - 2012-12-09 19:25:24 UTC
Jace Sarice wrote:


And you accomplish your own identity and soul from within the Federation? I have no investment in this argument, but I can understand criticism that claims you cannot develop your own identity as a people by leaving or living outside of your people.


I personally do not live within the Federation. In any case, I believe you are trying to apply values here that do not fit in the cultural framework being discussed. If a clan, for example, resides within the Federation, then an individual living among their clan is still living among their people. It's not the place that matters, it's the people.

I am also a human, straggling between the present world... and our future. I am a regulator, a coordinator, one who is meant to guide the way.

Destination Unreachable: the worst Wspace blog ever

Gottii
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2012-12-09 19:42:44 UTC
I've known few Minmatar who voice this idea, even fewer of them wise or influential.

If we would shed blood and claim kinship with those Minmatar still held in the Empire, would we do less for those in the Federation?

Marius Goudiyah
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2012-12-09 21:22:41 UTC
I feel awkward agreeing with such a gallante point of view.

But I would have to say that Seriphyn Inhonores has been making rather on the mark statements lately.
Arnulf Ogunkoya
Clan Ogunkoya
Electus Matari
#17 - 2012-12-09 21:49:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Arnulf Ogunkoya
Well Pilot Inhonores.

Every group has it's hotheads and fools. It is hardly a surprise that the Republic has some.

Likewise every group has something to admire. It is harder to see with some of them, but it is usually there.

If you have met some Republican fools then I hope you can spend some time here and meet some of the not so foolish. Indeed a brief perusal of your employment record would tend to indicate that you already have. Fools are best ignored or taken as a source of amusement.

Regards, Arnulf Ogunkoya.

Los Muertas
HDYLTA
#18 - 2012-12-10 02:39:06 UTC
To claim that one of the People is not of the People, or is against the People because they do not live in nor serve the Republic is Foolish sir. I put no stake in the Republic and could care less if it burns. If a Minmatar is true to their Tribes, their nationality matters not.
Saede Riordan
Alexylva Paradox
#19 - 2012-12-10 08:10:57 UTC
I've noticed this sort of behaviour, both here on the IGS and in places like the summit. There are a lot of Republic loyalists out there who seem to have no problem painting me as a race traitor because I associate with groups their government doesn't like, and so doing relegates myself, and my entire clan, into this realm of 'other' that they don't need to consider as valid in any way. As if my associating with the Angel Cartel in any way besides shooting them completely negates my 'minmatarness' and invalidates my cultural perspective completely.
Halete
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#20 - 2012-12-10 08:36:53 UTC
The question is not whether a self-proclaimed Minmatar in the Federation can do good for the Tribes as a whole - yes, yes, of course they can.

But, many "Minmatar" in the Federation do in-fact turn their backs on our tribal ways - these are in no right Minmatar. In this case, it is understandable to see why many would think this way. It is not isolated to a Republican way of thinking.

Then, there's the Federation itself; a dangerous, reprehensible beast, that one. Much of the Minmatar population in the Federation may appear benign, but we will see what happens when the beast rears it's head.

Do not mistake me - I do not hate the Minmatar (who are Minmatar, and who have not turned their back on the ways and on their Tribe) in the Federation, it is the Federation itself I have a problem with. I will defend to the death my brothers' right to follow the Amarr faith, but I need not like the religion.

I am surprised to see such a hostile reaction to the notion by the same hypocrites who would brand me as a non-Minmatar. I suppose we're all entitled to be inconsistent in our beliefs.

"To know the true path, but yet, to never follow it. That is possibly the gravest sin" - The Scriptures, Book of Missions 13:21

123Next pageLast page