These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

why all the High sec haters?

First post
Author
starbelt stacy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-12-08 22:14:47 UTC
just as the topic title states.... Why all the mega haters seem to be out in force to slate Hi-Sec and the people who choose to dwell here?

i find it very telling how hi-sec systems always seem to be populated with many peeps kicking about doing something useful or the other ... meanwhile look at lowsec sparsely populated also the same for 0.0.

that should speak volumes for the community of haters who seem to get their meat on when it coms to trolling hi-sec peeps and their chosen funtime pastimes.... not to mention CCP staff should seriously take note of this and not keep throwing spanners into trip up the hi-sec community by nerfing level 4's for instance and other issues.

Hi-sec should be given some dev love and encouraged to grow instead of the complete opposite seems to be taking place by certain groups of players and staff.

most people like the resource gathering and the gaining of ingame iskies to spend on the market but it seems to be moving away from that in a big way, its got very clique now a lot worse than it was before when i first started playing eve online, now with level 4's being nerfed to which i feel is just the start of something awful in regards to hi-sec being frowned upon.

they (ccp) should put in more hi sec systems cos to me thats what the populations needs / wants and would be welcomed by the majority.

people should be free to play how they like as long as they obey the rules, and i would certainly do away with non-consensual pvp... its balls most of the time and just shows the predatory / trolling nature of a chunk of this playerbase.

this is not a rant

i would love to hear / read what others have to say.





Pretty GuyYeah
#2 - 2012-12-08 22:20:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Pretty GuyYeah
Because they want you to enter a gate to low/null sec so they may insta-kill you. (I wonder why people don't go ther, huheue)


CCP should buff low and null sec and nerf camping possibilities.

Post with your main.

A legend walks among us, a genius so significant he so dares to degrade himself as camouflage when you dispute.

Maximus Reborn
Assasinated Zombies
#3 - 2012-12-08 22:22:40 UTC
Im not gonna read alll you post its just too long


But I agree people knock high sec... atleast pvp

When 50% of pvp in low/null is blob fest that take no skill.

High sec on the other hand with war decs takes skill. Mainly small gang.. Add nuetral RR in the mix...


Real PVP is High sec small gang.


Low/Null ***** cause people are carebears in high sec... dont ***** war dec and then they are fair game... there would be no high sec.... oh wait you want it to be safe when its convinent for you bring moon goo up in haulers and ****...
Aria Ta'Rohk
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2012-12-08 22:23:42 UTC
Good thread, and why I appreciate your idea, I must ask this to everyone. Why are you never happy with what CCP does? So a new expansion comes out with loads of fixes, balances, and content. The next day, you are back to complaining and whining about this needs nerfing or that needs buffing. Why can't you just stop whining and as many of you tell other people, harden up? Instead of complaints, give some constructive critisicm for once. Low sec is unpopulated? Fine. People can either stay there complaining, or find a way to enjoy it by trying something new there. Nullsec is lifeless? I highly doubt that, just go to some more populated areas. Just please stop whining and complaining. The game works fine as it is. Let CCP change what they feel needs changing. It adds diversity, which is what keeps a game alive.

I'll take 2 carebears to go, with extra tears

Lipbite
Express Hauler
#5 - 2012-12-08 22:24:54 UTC
They hate our freedom.
Dave stark
#6 - 2012-12-08 22:25:38 UTC
because most high sec dwellers are the ignorant entitled types, at least the vocal ones anyway.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#7 - 2012-12-08 22:28:47 UTC
starbelt stacy wrote:
Why all the mega haters seem to be out in force to slate Hi-Sec and the people who choose to dwell here?
Because highsec is out of whack in terms of what it offers and because a sizeable number of the people who choose to dwell there are actively trying to break the game.

Quote:
Hi-sec should be given some dev love and encouraged to grow instead of the complete opposite seems to be taking place by certain groups of players and staff.
The problem is that highsec has already been given that love and encouragement, and it is proving detrimental to the game as a whole.

Quote:
they (ccp) should put in more hi sec systems cos to me thats what the populations needs / wants and would be welcomed by the majority.
What do you base those assumptions on?
Cap'n Tripps
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#8 - 2012-12-08 22:34:06 UTC
I think it's mainly because mocking somebody else makes them feel better about themselves...
starbelt stacy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#9 - 2012-12-08 22:41:58 UTC
Tippia wrote:
starbelt stacy wrote:
Why all the mega haters seem to be out in force to slate Hi-Sec and the people who choose to dwell here?
Because highsec is out of whack in terms of what it offers and because a sizeable number of the people who choose to dwell there are actively trying to break the game.

:in what way are hi-sec dwellers actively trying to break the game?



Quote:
Hi-sec should be given some dev love and encouraged to grow instead of the complete opposite seems to be taking place by certain groups of players and staff.
The problem is that highsec has already been given that love and encouragement, and it is proving detrimental to the game as a whole.


: how is it detrimental to the game?..... in what way exactly?




Quote:
they (ccp) should put in more hi sec systems cos to me thats what the populations needs / wants and would be welcomed by the majority.
What do you base those assumptions on?



i base that on the population in hi-sec.
Dark Long
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2012-12-08 22:44:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Dark Long
Tippia wrote:
starbelt stacy wrote:
Why all the mega haters seem to be out in force to slate Hi-Sec and the people who choose to dwell here?
Because highsec is out of whack in terms of what it offers and because a sizeable number of the people who choose to dwell there are actively trying to break the game.

Quote:
Hi-sec should be given some dev love and encouraged to grow instead of the complete opposite seems to be taking place by certain groups of players and staff.
The problem is that highsec has already been given that love and encouragement, and it is proving detrimental to the game as a whole.

Quote:
they (ccp) should put in more hi sec systems cos to me thats what the populations needs / wants and would be welcomed by the majority.
What do you base those assumptions on?



"Because highsec is out of whack in terms of what it offers and because a sizeable number of the people who choose to dwell there are actively trying to break the game."

"What do you base those assumptions" useing your own words. Low sec is were ganker gate camp so they are the one's that broke low sec. Why go low when the choke points have a gate camp 90% of the time what the point other then feeding gankers kill mails.

AS for 0.0 its ruled by huge allinace like it should be.

High sec of for those that like that part of the game not the whole huge allinace you have to play by there rules and live in game and have no life outside fo the game.

So in ending dont blame high sec for what its got blame the player that broke low sec and o.o and makeing usless to the rest of the player base.
Pyre leFay
Doomheim
#11 - 2012-12-08 22:45:21 UTC
Some people hate it when others wont play their ideal version of the game.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#12 - 2012-12-08 22:46:19 UTC
starbelt wrote:



i base that on the population in hi-sec.

You do know that a vast bulk of that number are alts of low sec and 0.0 don't you?
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#13 - 2012-12-08 22:47:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Dark Long wrote:
"What do you base those assumptions" useing your own words.
They're not assumptions. They're an observation of player behaviour and of basic maths regarding how to get the most out of the game.

Even people who would love to spend all their time in null or low choose not to because highsec offers such advantageous capabilities that it would be downright stupid to try to do stuff anywhere else.

Quote:
So in ending dont blame high sec for what its got blame the player that broke low secn and o.o and makeing usless to the rest of the player base.
No, the players had no hand in this — the fundamental design of what's available did, and there is no way for players to adjust that.

starbelt stacy wrote:
i base that on the population in hi-sec.
Ok. You do know that there is no statistic for the amount of players who live in different parts of space, right? The supposed highsec majority is a fable born out of a failure to read a simple chart, and there are nothing to back up that assumption. It is just as (or even more) likely that the highseccers are a minority.

…oh, and regardless, there are as many different views of how highsec should work as there are highseccers, so the assumption that this supposed majority also equates to a supposed majority just adds another layer to the fable.
Nylith Empyreal
Sutar Rein
#14 - 2012-12-08 22:51:11 UTC
An ode to irony.

Who's the more foolish the fool or the fool who replies to him?

Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
#15 - 2012-12-08 22:54:39 UTC
starbelt stacy wrote:
people should be free to play how they like as long as they obey the rules, and i would certainly do away with non-consensual pvp... its balls most of the time and just shows the predatory / trolling nature of a chunk of this playerbase.

Even though I'm a highsec dweller, I would certainly not "do away" with non-consensual pvp. It's a most essential part of the game.

Please do not try to tell me, how I should play the game. Thank you.

Remove standings and insurance.

starbelt stacy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#16 - 2012-12-08 22:57:46 UTC
Tippia wrote:

Even people who would love to spend all their time in null or low choose not to because highsec offers such advantageous capabilities that it would be downright stupid to try to do stuff anywhere else.



you mean like not being ganked fpr sh*tz n giggles and loosing their stuff they worked ingame for? Roll

were you aiming for a comedy response or what? Big smile
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#17 - 2012-12-08 22:59:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
TBH Hisec is fine as it is, it needs neither buff or nerf, the areas of the game that need do adjusting via a buff are both losec and nullsec, it's just plain wrong that a lo or null player can make more Isk in hisec on an alt than they can in the space they would normally occupy, given the potential risk in those areas of space and the resources available. Just to clarify, this character is what many lo and null dwellers detest, a hisec carebear, I do have 2 others, one is also a hisec carebear, the other is a former carebear that's embracing the darkside.

I would like to see changes to mineral content to make mining in lo and null profitable, Scordite being on a par with Arkanor & pretty much every other high end ore is ridiculous. I understand that the PI is considerably better outside of hisec, mining, production, even ratting should be to.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

starbelt stacy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#18 - 2012-12-08 23:01:08 UTC
Mara Pahrdi wrote:
starbelt stacy wrote:
people should be free to play how they like as long as they obey the rules, and i would certainly do away with non-consensual pvp... its balls most of the time and just shows the predatory / trolling nature of a chunk of this playerbase.

Even though I'm a highsec dweller, I would certainly not "do away" with non-consensual pvp. It's a most essential part of the game.

Please do not try to tell me, how I should play the game. Thank you.



lol? .. Shocked

did you actually read what i wrote? ...

i didnt stipulate / make demands how anyone should play their game, that's my entire point of this post.

this is about the only game i know of that has non-consenual pvp the other games have a designated server / area / zone for that.

and that is being taken away from high sec people too.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#19 - 2012-12-08 23:02:19 UTC
starbelt stacy wrote:
Tippia wrote:

Even people who would love to spend all their time in null or low choose not to because highsec offers such advantageous capabilities that it would be downright stupid to try to do stuff anywhere else.



you mean like not being ganked fpr sh*tz n giggles and loosing their stuff they worked ingame for? Roll

were you aiming for a comedy response or what? Big smile

Its very rare for someone to gank just for giggles. And when I say rare I mean as rare as finding a battlebarge activly hunting in low sec.
starbelt stacy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#20 - 2012-12-08 23:03:15 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
TBH Hisec is fine as it is, it needs neither buff or nerf, the areas of the game that need adjusting via a buff are both losec and nullsec, it's just plain wrong that a lo or null player can make more Isk in hisec on an alt than they can in the space they would normally occupy, given the potential risk in those areas of space and the resources available.

I would like to see changes to mineral content to make mining in lo and null profitable, Scordite being on a par with Arkanor & pretty much every other high end ore is ridiculous. I understand that the PI is considerably better outside of hisec, mining, production, even ratting should be to.



scordite is what it is cos its contains 2 of the most important base ores for building just about everything ingame.
123Next pageLast page