These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

So CSM guys, your too stuck in one part of the game.

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#21 - 2011-10-22 07:18:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Abrazzar
I'm sure we all can guess whose parts they're stuck in....

Sovereignty and Population

New Mining Mechanics
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#22 - 2011-10-22 07:28:51 UTC
Did we really need another thread .. what the hell is it with people these days that they think that every little thought is unique and has to be shared on that basis. Stop the damn spam already, everyone knows that one/two-party systems suck even in virtual worlds, no need to bring it up every hour.
The Mittani wrote:
can't nerf this - i'm wearing mc hammer pants

Not technically pants, believe they are classified as Adult Diapers ...
Nick Bison
Bison Industrial Inc
#23 - 2011-10-22 07:47:46 UTC
Guess I'll have to announce my candidacy for the next CSM early. Lol

Nothing clever at this time.
Embrace My Hate
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#24 - 2011-10-22 08:50:47 UTC
Regardless of whether or not your an industrialist, PvP'er or anything in between there is just one thing we need to concentrate on. Preserve the sandbox.

Less rules, More Tools.

Unlike almost any other MMO out there, it falls upon the players to dictate their own gameplay. If you don't like the current CSM and their apparent agenda then start your own alliance with several thousand playerbase for support and make your own run for CSM. Maybe find a creative new way to get support via tools provided and see if that works.

Anything short of the above is looking for a temporary solution to a permanent problem. That regardless of whose in positions of power the people doing the bitching are usually the people not willing to do anything and nothing will ever change.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#25 - 2011-10-22 09:02:13 UTC
Mirima Thurander wrote:
I mean clearly your not speaking for the hole of EvE any more, just for the null group, or his comment would be out of place.
No. What is clear is that he has noticed that some people are whining because the CSM is not trying to break the game economy the way the whiners would prefer.

His comment would only be “out of place” without those whiners, and whether or not the CSM “speaks for the whole of EVE” is not really a factor.
Lyrrashae
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#26 - 2011-10-22 09:30:26 UTC
Rhaegor Stormborn wrote:
0.0 makes Eve. All you empire chumps are worthless.


-10/10: Needs more originality. Keep practising, thoughBlink

Ni.
Bel Amar
Rules of Acquisition
#27 - 2011-10-22 09:43:37 UTC
Vetruvius Valinor wrote:
I've always thought CSM should have been a bit more diverse myself. They really should try to break it down into sections. Vote for Nullsec reps, low sec reps, high sec reps, and w-space reps. Would make sure no part of the game wasn't looked at.


Except the "whole game".

I don't want someone who is from a WH, or from null. I want someone who will push towards a riskier edgier game, driven by players rather than scripted content whenever game design discussion happens. I honestly don't care where that person comes from, because they'll make all areas of the game more to my liking
CCP Phantom
C C P
C C P Alliance
#28 - 2011-10-22 10:06:34 UTC
Please don't create duplicate threads.

Thread locked.

This topic is already covered here.

CCP Phantom - Senior Community Developer
Cidwm
Doomheim
#29 - 2011-10-22 10:08:26 UTC
The main problem with the current CSM is that its way too bisaed to one style of play. anyone that challenges that style basically gets the opinion that the delightful Rhaegor stormborn gave us amongst many others :- "0.0 makes Eve. All you empire chumps are worthless."... riiiight....
So were does a good proportion of industry and commerce take place?

Also, take a look at the current CSM especially its loudest members... 4-5 of them come from the same power bloc alone! Surely this is open to abuse as a result in some way or another?

I know what some of you are saying when you say that high seccers should have voted more/better... but have you ever tried to organise them? high sec life is very very different from 0.0 mainly because in high sec there alot more fractured. Ive operated in systems with over 50+ people from as many corps with little to no communication going on with them. They don't belong to a massive alliance or coalition were loyalty more than sense wavers votes for specific people within there own power bloc because that serves there best interest rather than somone who could think in the best interest of EVE as a whole.

I'm interested to see what CCP want to do in regards to the CSM. As long as the EVE player base doesnt lose its ability to communicate with CCP and get there point across without moaning too much then it could well be a good thing indeed!
Previous page12