These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Battlecruisers with battleship weapons? Evidence of a goon in charge of CSM.

First post
Author
The Mittani
State War Academy
Caldari State
#41 - 2011-10-22 06:37:06 UTC
the mittani likes to violence boats in space

DEMAND HIS RESIGNATION

boat violence is unacceptable in 'eve online', a game about ponies, orbiting asteroids and peace

~hi~

cr00ked
Coastal Carolina University
#42 - 2011-10-22 06:55:17 UTC  |  Edited by: cr00ked
The Mittani wrote:
the mittani likes to violence boats in space

DEMAND HIS RESIGNATION

boat violence is unacceptable in 'eve online', a game about ponies, orbiting asteroids and peace



From what i've seen, this guy seems pretty cool. I like his mind set. I would vote him back in.

*for the record I am not Goon affiliated in any manner.
Fille Balle
Ballbreakers R us
#43 - 2011-10-22 07:07:17 UTC
Hi there folks!

I just like to make one small correction.

Have a search around the old forums and you'll find a number of threads suggesting similar things. Amongst them was also the idea of destroyers with cruiser size weapons. In other words, this is a player suggestion being implemented, not a CSM nor a CCP original idea.

tl;dr: Not the CSM, this was a player suggestion

And after dropping that little gem in here, I'll just let myself out again.

*walks out*

Stop the spamming, not the scamming!

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#44 - 2011-10-22 07:11:32 UTC
cr00ked wrote:
The Mittani wrote:
the mittani likes to violence boats in space

DEMAND HIS RESIGNATION

boat violence is unacceptable in 'eve online', a game about ponies, orbiting asteroids and peace



From what i've seen, this guy seems pretty cool. I like his mind set. I would vote him back in.

*for the record I am not Goon affiliated in any manner.


Lol he will be voted back in... DCF has to vote for him
thats 72% of null right there. The only way he doesnt get re-elected is if he doesnt run.
Funny, the Goons that say they elect him chairman for life when he already is.

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Harold Tuphlos
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#45 - 2011-10-22 07:21:08 UTC
Kengutsi Akira wrote:
cr00ked wrote:
The Mittani wrote:
the mittani likes to violence boats in space

DEMAND HIS RESIGNATION

boat violence is unacceptable in 'eve online', a game about ponies, orbiting asteroids and peace



From what i've seen, this guy seems pretty cool. I like his mind set. I would vote him back in.

*for the record I am not Goon affiliated in any manner.


Lol he will be voted back in... DCF has to vote for him
thats 72% of null right there. The only way he doesnt get re-elected is if he doesnt run.
Funny, the Goons that say they elect him chairman for life when he already is.



You sound kind of mad, but I hope you're not.
Florestan Bronstein
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#46 - 2011-10-22 07:39:16 UTC
The CSM is a powerless PR farce.
Nick Bison
Bison Industrial Inc
#47 - 2011-10-22 07:51:49 UTC
I personally love the idea of the new Pocket Battleship class.
BC Tank makes you fit and fly smart.
BB firepower let's you hit hard.

If folk decided to use it for mission running or ganking, I really don't care ... enjoy your game.

Nothing clever at this time.

Nick Bison
Bison Industrial Inc
#48 - 2011-10-22 07:53:11 UTC
The Mittani wrote:
the mittani likes to violence boats in space

DEMAND HIS RESIGNATION

boat violence is unacceptable in 'eve online', a game about ponies, orbiting asteroids and peace



Now, THAT'S funny!

Nothing clever at this time.

Shin Dari
Covert Brigade
#49 - 2011-10-22 08:02:47 UTC
The Mittani wrote:
the mittani likes to violence boats in space

DEMAND HIS RESIGNATION

boat violence is unacceptable in 'eve online', a game about ponies, orbiting asteroids and peace
What about ponies that gank miners?
Amro One
One.
#50 - 2011-10-22 08:02:55 UTC
I did not think new ships in eve would be viable ISK wise for ganking.

How much did the first Tengu/noctis sell for when it first came out?

Thank god we don't have you people making EVE.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#51 - 2011-10-22 08:31:36 UTC
Amro One wrote:
I did not think new ships in eve would be viable ISK wise for ganking.

How much did the first Tengu/noctis sell for when it first came out?

Thank god we don't have you people making EVE.


Because comparing a T1 ship whose BPO will be seeded all over Empire and a ship that was released alongside the part of the game containing the materials required to make it (wormholes) is totally valid.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#52 - 2011-10-22 08:34:52 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
The issue with the tornado being a potential boon to hisec ganking is addressed by making changes such as no insurance for such activity and a large buff to CONCORD.
…as soon as someone can prove that there is some kind of issue with it and that insurance and/or CONCORD needs an kind of change.

Hasn't happened so far.
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#53 - 2011-10-22 09:49:00 UTC
Good grief, so much speculation.
Anyone playing this game could benefit, not just one group of people.
Calls for resignation, for disbanding, for this and that, holy krap.
Play Eve, not individuals.

--=--
Khazarn Areth
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#54 - 2011-10-22 09:57:46 UTC
Im waiting till the new ships are released before i draw any conclusions as to their uses

Bloody Omir's coming back Monsters from the endless black Wading through a crimson flood Omir's come to drink your blood

CCP Phantom
C C P
C C P Alliance
#55 - 2011-10-22 10:01:34 UTC
Please discuss feedback on the Tornado in the already existing feedback thread. Thank you!

CCP Phantom - Senior Community Developer

Previous page123