These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Megathron Model Change

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Shai Faetal
Faetal Interstellar Science Institute
#21 - 2012-11-14 19:32:14 UTC
if anything it looks like an artist went to work here who knows symmetry or witchcraft. the fins where always ridiculous, the new Galactica bay type things at the back look better.
Alxea
Unstable Pirate Sharks Of The Damed Sea
#22 - 2012-11-15 13:03:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Alxea
This is one model change I will not enjoy enough to ever fly a mega hull again... just wow. That is like totally not my type.
Jame Jarl Retief
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#23 - 2012-11-15 13:21:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Jame Jarl Retief
I'm in the "don't like it" camp. The fins really added some complexity to the rear of the ship to counterbalance the mass and simplicity of the front. Now, it just looks...simplistic somehow. Then again, I never really liked the look of the Mega all that much. But I suppose it's not bad either. I mean weight distribution looks better now.
Quiby San
#24 - 2012-11-15 13:52:22 UTC
I love the new design <3
Sirinda
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium
#25 - 2012-11-15 15:25:27 UTC
Regarding the new hardpoint on the Kronos:

lol wat?

That is all.
Temuken Radzu
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2012-11-15 16:00:39 UTC
Sirinda wrote:
Regarding the new hardpoint on the Kronos:

lol wat?

That is all.


Yeah... i would rather see the the hardpoint moved to the front, filling all four front hardpoints.
cool4nd
The Tuskers
The Tuskers Co.
#27 - 2012-12-02 11:08:26 UTC
From reading these comments here it seems a lot people dont know the difference between a model and a texture. As i said, texture is fine, the model is a joke for all Mega pilots (If there are any left).
Seriphyn Inhonores
Elusenian Cooperative
#28 - 2012-12-02 16:20:56 UTC
cool4nd wrote:
From reading these comments here it seems a lot people dont know the difference between a model and a texture. As i said, texture is fine, the model is a joke for all Mega pilots (If there are any left).


Nah, looks like people are fine with it. Don't worry too much.
Dark Long
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2012-12-03 07:17:09 UTC
cool4nd wrote:
From reading these comments here it seems a lot people dont know the difference between a model and a texture. As i said, texture is fine, the model is a joke for all Mega pilots (If there are any left).



good thing you dont speak for me i like the new hull alot.
marVLs
#30 - 2012-12-03 17:09:06 UTC
Hmm Kronos bridge is different than Megathron, cool
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#31 - 2012-12-04 01:51:00 UTC
cool4nd wrote:
From reading these comments here it seems a lot people dont know the difference between a model and a texture. As i said, texture is fine, the model is a joke for all Mega pilots (If there are any left).


It looks much better. Much, much better. They removed all the stupid looking bits (the random parts jutting out, the fins, etc) and made them look like parts of the ship. It looks far better from behind as well.
Leo Zetkin
Space Barracudas
#32 - 2012-12-05 19:26:35 UTC
It looks much, much, much worse now! I am really sad, it seems i am in the minority camp :-(

Megathron moved from 10 on a scale from 1 to 10 to 3 now or so... wtf?!

Why hasn't anyone prevented CCP from doing that!!!!
Nagarythe Tinurandir
Einheit X-6
#33 - 2012-12-06 11:13:54 UTC
Leo Zetkin wrote:
It looks much, much, much worse now! I am really sad, it seems i am in the minority camp :-(

Megathron moved from 10 on a scale from 1 to 10 to 3 now or so... wtf?!

Why hasn't anyone prevented CCP from doing that!!!!


why should anyone prevent ccp from implementing awesome art?
new mega and kronos are fine and fit right in with talos, the new destroyer and all the other nice gallente ships which do not look like space cancer
Previous page12