These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Great Article about Being Female and Gaming

First post
Author
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#21 - 2012-11-29 20:12:06 UTC
KrakizBad wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Why should there even be a perception of "Male Oriented" and "Female Oriented" content. It's not 1952.

Not sure if oblivious to the difference between men and women or just trolling. What?



No, but YOU are.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpaid Tactical Team
#22 - 2012-11-29 20:13:03 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Meryl SinGarda wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Mother Jones as forwarded by Roger Ebert (of all people).

http://www.motherjones.com/mixed-media/2012/11/women-video-game-industry-twitter-1reasonwhy

Please, no trolling. This topic is an issue in EVE esp after the article the other day at mittani.com


I'm wondering when people will realize it's 2012 and not 1952. By the way, could you link the Mittens article?



Note: NOT written by Mittens.

http://themittani.com/features/no-penises-allowed-eves-exclusionary-spaces


The footnote contained in the Mittani article (under the TL;DR), "We are going to ignore the oddity of the TGoE channel’s creation being proposed by someone who is not a member of the channel’s intended demographic audience," is a bit confusing.

Is the author saying that Xenuria, the channel owner, is not a member of the female demographic? Because I assure you, that would be wrong. Myself, Xenuria and a handful of others who aren't afraid to speak up and show themselves, identify as transgender females, which isn't any less valid than anything else. Even if a majority takes pride in invalidating such things on a daily basis. But such is the way of the misinformed and the bigots.

I make this reply, not in hostility but because I think a bit of awareness and understanding should be made of this issue as well. Cis-Females and Trans-Females really aren't all that different, unless you're one of those people who get all hung-up on someone's body parts.
Gundermann
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#23 - 2012-11-29 20:13:51 UTC
This is like posting on a handbags and clothes and makeup forum that there aren't enough men participating. Some things are just not gender-neutral and that's the end of it.
Demolishar
United Aggression
#24 - 2012-11-29 20:15:55 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Tyrozan
Edit - Rule 7 - Trolling is prohibited - ISD Tyrozan
Xenuria
#25 - 2012-11-29 20:20:15 UTC
I want to take a moment to point out that it should not be a internet forum or an article on a website that defines a persons gender. It should be the person themselves that defines their own gender.

Gender is not a tangible thing that you can just pick up and put in a box or on a shelf somewhere. Gender is not something easily measured, like most forums of identity it is specific to a person and part of a larger spectrum of expression.

Spectrum being the key word here.

Quote:

We are going to ignore the oddity of the TGoE channel’s creation being proposed by someone who is not a member of the channel’s intended demographic audience. ↩


This statement is bad m'kay.

I don't need an article telling me how I should identify. It should not be considered an "oddity" that I proposed the formation of TGoE.
Demolishar
United Aggression
#26 - 2012-11-29 20:23:45 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
I want to take a moment to point out that it should not be a internet forum or an article on a website that defines a persons gender. It should be the person themselves that defines their own gender.


I was under the impression that the chemical balance in your brain defines that.
Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#27 - 2012-11-29 20:26:55 UTC
Demolishar wrote:
I was under the impression that the chemical balance in your brain defines that.


Brain chemistry can be dictated by thoughts and beliefs.

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#28 - 2012-11-29 20:32:37 UTC
Gundermann wrote:
This is like posting on a handbags and clothes and makeup forum that there aren't enough men participating. Some things are just not gender-neutral and that's the end of it.



So, your point is that since EVE misses your qualifications for gender neutrality, the women should just go away and leave you alone in your locker room sandbox ?

Assigning gender to 'things' is pointless. Look at all the male clothing designers and make-up men in Hollywood, which you would assume are not gender neutral activities. they are PANgender.

Grow up.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#29 - 2012-11-29 20:38:08 UTC
Chribba wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Chribba wrote:
We need more female gamers to even the testosterone out.

/c


All we need to do is have CCP dump post from GD into the game, the sheer amount of estrogen flowing here will kill any manly instincts and we can all join together and sing Kumbyah while drinking Appletinis.... P

Tbh it would be a better place if guys stopped calling other guys girls just because they say stuff on the forum that some class as whining.

There's far too much sexist crap in both real life and the virtual world that makes me ashamed of being a man.

/c


There is surgery for that .....

(sorry, couldn't resist, please don't hit me with your dreadnaught)
Auric Veldfinger
Doomheim
#30 - 2012-11-29 20:38:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Auric Veldfinger
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Meryl SinGarda wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Mother Jones as forwarded by Roger Ebert (of all people).

http://www.motherjones.com/mixed-media/2012/11/women-video-game-industry-twitter-1reasonwhy

Please, no trolling. This topic is an issue in EVE esp after the article the other day at mittani.com


I'm wondering when people will realize it's 2012 and not 1952. By the way, could you link the Mittens article?



Note: NOT written by Mittens.

http://themittani.com/features/no-penises-allowed-eves-exclusionary-spaces


Quote:
Profanity, pornography, and sexual references permeate the text and voice comms. These could possibly be ignored or lessened by not clicking on links, using “no chatter” channels for fleet operations, and ignoring “Local”. It is much harder to ignore the unconscious denigration demonstrated through language usage: referring to women who have sex as whores or sluts; calling people cunts or bitches; or saying something is gay. It is not just women noticing these behaviours either. A corp CEO put his money where his mouth was, offering a PLEX via his blog to anyone creating a better term than “****-cage” (referring to the practice of completely engulfing the area of a POS's force field, plus some space outside of it, in large mobile warp disruption bubbles) while also linking other language usage directly to low female participation.


Quote:
This summer, Xenuria started a thread proposing the creation of Trans Gamers of EVE (TGoE), a channel using the WGoE pattern[3]. There is also dedicated channel for gay, lesbian, and bisexual players. If such enclave channels exist and have gated membership based on gender or sexual orientation, then it is discrimination. In the case of female-only channels, it is also sexist. Women feel forced to be what they allegedly abhor. They become sexist cows, practicing reverse discrimination—through the creation of their own channels—on a population seemingly blissfully unaware an issue exists.


What's that saying? "Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander"?

What the author (and anyone else for that matter making these kinds of cliche statements) really wants is for minorities to self-censor, shut up and be quiet.

If they want to stick around they must not whine or take umbrage at jokes about sex crimes and being called ******, because that would make them politically correct whiners. They mustn't talk too much about their personal lives because that "weird you out" and "hey dude, leave your private life private". If they go make their own groups they are being discriminatory.

Well tough, you're now on the ****-end of the stick regards discrimination, deal with it.
Lance Rossiter
CHAINS Corp
#31 - 2012-11-29 20:50:52 UTC
I don't see what's great about the article: isn't it just a bunch of unfortunate anecdotes grouped together by an arbitrary theme? There are plenty of people who've had bad experiences at work: picking a filter through which to view those anecdotes doesn't create a compelling argument or expose a deep, dark conspiracy. Yes, some people have overheard men making foolish comments about women: I've heard plenty of women making similar comments about men. Loaded questions get loaded responses, and the fact that bigoted men exist in the labour force does not make an entire industry institutionally bigoted. Some of the responses are factually uintrue: no one can claim that the Tomb Raider games weren't marketed well.

Then we have a brief nosstalgia trip for point and click adventures. I liked them too - plenty of people did, many of them men - and they didn't decline because they were too girly for a "dudified" world. It was a simple case of a cool, but limited concept reaching the natural end of its lifespan.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#32 - 2012-11-29 21:02:18 UTC
Yes, it's unfortunate that the article at themittani.com utterly lacked focus or a point, imho. It pretty much says to be quiet AND don't band together, all at the same time.

More pressure to smother coming from one side of the equation.

Here is my half-baked response over there:

"As a 47 y.o. gay male, I actually found this to be a poorly written article with no clear point.

My 2 cents is that until the white heterosexual male population finally decides to grow up and leave their illusion of self-entitlement to hostile and vulgar language and attitutes, these types of groups will be (and always have been historically) necessary.

It is their own fault that the situation even exists, and it is not the burden of these sub-groups to be the ones to adapt which is what I gather the article is trying to say.

The two corps I first joined before starting my own wound up being very accepting of me, and in fact the necessity of me coming out had only to do with the rampant misuse of the word "gay" in Local as applied to anything "bad". I absolutely had to say something. And when they found out about me it utterly stopped and embarrassment was all around.

We are all better than our language and attitudes....most of the time.

K I

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Skorpynekomimi
#33 - 2012-11-29 21:18:36 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
I let my girlfriend (not the inflatable one...never the 2 shall meet) pick out my clothes and never had any negative feedback.


Maybe she should have picked out your avatar's clothing and hair, as well?

Economic PVP

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#34 - 2012-11-29 21:33:22 UTC
I've found people tend to pay less attention to gender when you are consistently better at games than they are. If females want to be respected by males in video games, they should learn to become good at video games. I take any game I play very seriously and always strive to be among the best players and to be known for my skill and ability. It works for me.
Snow Axe
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2012-11-29 21:35:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Snow Axe
Riot Girl wrote:
I've found people tend to pay less attention to gender when you are consistently better at games than they are. If females want to be respected by males in video games, they should learn to become good at video games. I take any game I play very seriously and always strive to be among the best players and to be known for my skill and ability. It works for me.


Why should a woman have to be exceedingly good at something to avoid harassment and stereotyping?

Hell, go a step farther and replace "woman" with any group that's a target of harassment, if you like.

"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread["

Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpaid Tactical Team
#36 - 2012-11-29 21:36:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Meryl SinGarda
Riot Girl wrote:
I've found people tend to pay less attention to gender when you are consistently better at games than they are. If females want to be respected by males in video games, they should learn to become good at video games. I take any game I play very seriously and always strive to be among the best players and to be known for my skill and ability. It works for me.


So in order to destroy discrimination we should all just be less bad at EVE? Really?

edit: Snow Axe beat me to it
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#37 - 2012-11-29 21:42:29 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
I've found people tend to pay less attention to gender when you are consistently better at games than they are. If females want to be respected by males in video games, they should learn to become good at video games. I take any game I play very seriously and always strive to be among the best players and to be known for my skill and ability. It works for me.


THIS was Julia Childs' strategy when entering the male exclusive Cordon Bleu back in the day.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#38 - 2012-11-29 21:43:59 UTC
Snow Axe wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:
I've found people tend to pay less attention to gender when you are consistently better at games than they are. If females want to be respected by males in video games, they should learn to become good at video games. I take any game I play very seriously and always strive to be among the best players and to be known for my skill and ability. It works for me.


Why should a woman have to be exceedingly good at something to avoid harassment and stereotyping?

Hell, go a step farther and replace "woman" with any group that's a target of harassment, if you like.



They shouldn't have to be. It's a male observational andleadership perception issue that seemingly demands it.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#39 - 2012-11-29 21:44:36 UTC
I don't know about discrimination, it's never affected me and I've been playing online games since I was 8. Maybe I just don't feel it's a big deal or maybe I just don't put myself in a position where I'm open to it. Maybe I just take it for granted because I often make people really mad.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#40 - 2012-11-29 21:50:23 UTC
Here is an article that hit it on the head for me awhile back:

http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/2012/04/ministry-of-love-affair.html

"One of my last memories in LAWN was sitting in my alpha Maelstrom waiting for a fleet to begin when an actual human female had the temerity to say something to the FC on the Goon comms we were on. There was a three or four second delay, and then the comms from at least 60 or 70 Goon pilots opened and what poured fourth was a chorus of monkey-like howling, grunting, and moaning that went on for at least 20 seconds. I don't care if it was meant in jest or not, it was surreal... animalistic."

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882