Player Features and Ideas Discussion

This entire idea is just terrible for so many reasons, the least being trolling.

This is not STO.

…and this is needed, why, exactly?

So you want to have more time not "playing" the game while you "play" the game.

Interesting

I'd like it, if it worked slightly differently.

When you jump from one gate to the supergate, it's almost instant as now. But when you arrive, you have to wait in space 20 minutes for your ship to recover.

And you reply to everyone in the form of a question, why, exactly? I rarely see you giving an opinion, and more often see you just feigning intelligence by essentially asking "why" to everything. Seems to fool a lot of people judging by your likes though.

This idea is bad because EVE's lore is heavily built around the idea of stargates and their mechanics, and much of the gameplay is based on reliance upon stargates. Change/remove stargates and you massively alter the game, likely for the worse.

Excellent idea. AFKing is entirely too difficult and risk laden as it is currently iterated, CCP has ignored this for long enough. Additionally, for a game where "mini professions" and emergent gameplay are supposed to shine, I must say I feel marginalized in my preferred profession of ship spinning. Currently ship spinning earns zero ISK, zero LP, and zero officer loot dropzzz. Beyond this, its difficult to ship spin AFK, someone please explain to me why miners can go afk and make fortunes, while I am forced into abject poverty simply because I prefer ship spinning.

I propose a ship module that will spin my ship for me while I am afk, and additonally, 1 spin = 100 LP with a small chance for officer drops per spin as well. Perhaps add an officer module that increases the speed at which my ship spins.

If my ideas are implemented, you won't ever have to use a jumpgate again, you could simply sit in Jita raking in the phat lootz from the complete safety of your majestic captains quarters.

I think usually he's just using the socratic method, so that's why he tries to move things forward by asking questions.

In this case it's a good question to ask regardless. Surely if you propose a radical alteration to a current working mechanic, you should also be able to provide a good reason why the change should be done. If you can't, you're either trying to hide a bad reason or the idea isn't worth implementing.

Amarr, Dodixie, Rens, Hek (kind of)

Blasphemy! There is no forum other than the ONE TRUE FORUM. Praise GD, hallelujah, hallelujah in the highest. Be gone you belligerent undesirable you! Next we'll have people in here attempting to tell US that the earth is round or some other nonsense.