These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

How BF3's turn for the worse resembles EVE's

First post
Author
Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#61 - 2012-11-22 14:48:46 UTC
Terminal Insanity wrote:
Warning: This link is like 5 posts worth of information about bf3.
http://www.mordorhq.com/showthread.php?3880-The-True-Story-of-Battlefield-3-the-Battlefield-Franchise-Its-Community-amp-EA-DICE

The part i'm interested is near the end, i'll quote:
Quote:
If you are new to the Battlefield franchise (Bad Company 1 through Battlefield 3) you are part of the new audience. Players that have enjoyed Codename Eagle up to 2142 are part of the old fan base.

First let me say this to the new guard, if you are enjoying Battlefield 3… great. I’m glad that you are and I wouldn’t try to convince you that the game is not fun or that you shouldn’t be playing it. That being said, the new guard has absolutely no right to tell the old guard, “if you don’t like it, leave” or “quit complaining.”

Hear me out. I’ll tell you why I think so. The old fans are the reason the franchise has lasted to make the sequels you now enjoy. The old fans know the legacy the franchise has built. They know what makes the series unique and have certain expectations based on previous entries.

More than that though is the following point that I posit to you in a hypothetical. You enjoy Battlefield 3 for its insane amount of unlocks, the destruction, the vehicles. Let’s suppose Battlefield 4 removes all of those things. Whatever you liked about Battlefield 3 is removed from Battlefield 4 and a bunch of people new to the series end up loving it. It’s great, fun, better than anything else out there. Battlefield 4: Barbie’s IRS Lecture Seminar has nothing resembling your beloved Battlefield 3 but the fans won’t allow you to criticize because they love it. If you don’t like it, leave.


This right here is exactly how i've felt about the direction EVE has been taking regarding Highsec/Carebears.

We've got the oldschool eve pvp'ers who are the reason EVE is so successful, who know EVE is all about the ruthless PVP risk.
And then we have the newer players, who enjoy collecting things in highsec and doing their mining/missioning thing.

CCP has basically done what EA/Dice has done, and catered to the new crowd. Every patch increases CONCORD response times and limits pirating options. Players will shout "HTFU AND ADAPT" but this doesnt change the fact that PVP is being nerfed repeatedly in favor of carebear safety. The new players even say things like "but this is what i want to do", "pirates are ruining the game" etc...

How many PVP'ers have joined Hello Kitty Online and complained that the lack of PVP is destroying HKO? None. Because you dont play a game like HKO for the PVP. Its absurd to join it and then complain that there isnt pvp. Over at eve this is exactly whats going on though. We have a bunch of players who want to do nothing but grind for their 'best lvl 70 armors' for their highsec Golem and thats all they want to do, and they complain to CCP (successfull) to make fundamental mechanics changes to nerf PVP so that they can play WOW-in-Space.




BF3's turn for the worse was when they started offering "unlock packs" for sale
as CCP have no intention of ever DIRCTLY selling SP I don't really see any merit in any of your arguments.

your entire post is ....... redundant and irrelavent.

stoicfaux
#62 - 2012-11-22 14:51:52 UTC
Terminal Insanity wrote:

If you want an example of what im talking about, consider that ganking freighters in highsec will be a thing of the past after the new crimewatch system is in place.

I guess i should elaborate. Being a highsec ganker, many people have killrights on me. After the new crimewatch system, anyone anywhere will be able to rightclick me > activate killright. I'm now killable by anyone/everyone.


OMFG. You're scared! Ganking non-combat freighter alts was easy and now you're wetting your pants and want to cling to your mother's skirts because of Crimewatch.

AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAomfgwhatamoronAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAAHseriouslyIcan'tstoplaughingAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHmywife'sfamilyislookingatmeAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHH*gasp*air!*gasp*AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH....passingoutfromlackofair....eeehhhh.ehehehehehehhehhehehehehe... *giggle*.....


Sir, I have one word for you: "kek"

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

LujTic
Green Visstick High
#63 - 2012-11-22 14:55:49 UTC
Mara Pahrdi wrote:
I somehow doubt, that all the missioning / mining crowd is going to jump on you. Perhapy an ocassional, expereinced ninja looter with his buddies. But I think it will be rather fellow gankers competing with you. And that's pretty much ok I'd say Blink.

It's not just gankers. Say a group of Goons is sitting still in hisec near a gate in ships with no tank on it. There's 100 alliances in 0.0 and lowsec who'd love to form a fleet and shoot that without getting concorded, perhaps even getting some bounties as well. I doubt we'll see much of that in the near future, but send me a msg if you spot any.
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#64 - 2012-11-22 15:08:42 UTC
Absolutely agree with and support everything Terminal says, but by now I'm quite certain that we've lost the war. Old EVE is gone, and it's not coming back. The new guys might call it evolution, and righteously so. But like Terminal said, like we've all said, these new guys will some day become old vets, and will get just as angry and depressed when CCP decides to go after a newer generation's wallets by adding dragons, racing, and the word "extreme" to the exploration/mining simulator they've come to love.

What goes around, comes around.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#65 - 2012-11-22 15:13:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Kiteo Hatto
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Absolutely agree with and support everything Terminal says, but by now I'm quite certain that we've lost the war. Old EVE is gone, and it's not coming back. The new guys might call it evolution, and righteously so. But like Terminal said, like we've all said, these new guys will some day become old vets, and will get just as angry and depressed when CCP decides to go after a newer generation's wallets by adding dragons, racing, and the word "extreme" to the exploration/mining simulator they've come to love.

What goes around, comes around.


Please, do you honestly see CCP doing something drastic as this ? The most "extreme" thing they would do is add some more aur fashion items. Eve will always be a game for older niche crowd, its never going to attract 12 year olds as long as it has skill training. As much as i miss eve from 2007 I think it has improved for the better.

HOW is more PVP a bad thing for pvp guys ? The only difference is that you will probably be attacked by other players more often now. Please don't have double standards about pvp.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#66 - 2012-11-22 15:22:30 UTC
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Absolutely agree with and support everything Terminal says, but by now I'm quite certain that we've lost the war. Old EVE is gone, and it's not coming back. The new guys might call it evolution, and righteously so. But like Terminal said, like we've all said, these new guys will some day become old vets, and will get just as angry and depressed when CCP decides to go after a newer generation's wallets by adding dragons, racing, and the word "extreme" to the exploration/mining simulator they've come to love.

What goes around, comes around.


Please, do you honestly see CCP doing something drastic as this ? The most "extreme" thing they would do is add some more aur fashion items. Eve will always be a game for older niche crowd, its never going to attract 12 year olds as long as it has skill training. As much as i miss eve from 2007 I think it has improved for the better.

HOW is more PVP a bad thing for pvp guys ? The only difference is that you will probably be attacked by other players more often now. Please don't have double standards about pvp.

The barge buffs have left a nasty taste. They effectivly removed two lines of piracy and gave us a barge lineup just as unbalanced as before. As predicted, the people who whined about their untanked barges dying are now whining about bumping and freighter ganking.
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#67 - 2012-11-22 15:32:13 UTC
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
HOW is more PVP a bad thing for pvp guys ? The only difference is that you will probably be attacked by other players more often now. Please don't have double standards about pvp.

Why will I be attacked by other players more often now?

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#68 - 2012-11-22 15:42:15 UTC
baltec1 wrote:

The barge buffs have left a nasty taste. They effectivly removed two lines of piracy and gave us a barge lineup just as unbalanced as before. As predicted, the people who whined about their untanked barges dying are now whining about bumping and freighter ganking.


"What comes around goes around" i believe.

CCP reacted because it was becoming too popular and EVERYONE and their dog were doing it. This thing wouldn't have happened in the first place if people didn't die so much to suicide gankers.

Now there are extremes when it comes to playstyles in eve.
There are:
-Hardcore(by that i mean people with alts who do everything possible to gain some edge over others)
¬ PVPers and PLEXing tengus/mission runners with multiple accounts
- Normal people(with just 1 account, play when they feel like, do what they want without giving too much care about politics/drama)
-Casuals(just mine while watching movies/playing something on another screen, just in eve because its a scifi game)

The hardcore crowd feels entitled to dictate the other 2 just because they are somehow more "elite" hence the whole "eve is harsh HTFU, PVP or GTFO attitude" and narrow mindness that their playstyle is the "only right playstyle.

CCP is really having a hard time balancing these 3 groups because if hardcore abuse one game mechanic then it becomes no fun for the other 2, if the other 2 are having too easy of a time getting rich without risk then 1s are getting pissed off. Each group has their own vision of eve and you can't just change it. The whole "player content thing" exists because opinions clash.

Right now group 1 is whining about a change that will make their actions against hisec targets have more risky consequences even though i agree that you can't fix stupid and that those afking freighter/hulk pilots deserve to be shot down.

Really, eve is just getting better and better by providing more pew for everyone. You are not locked to 3 choices anymore if you are suicide ganked(attack them, wardec them or merc them).
Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#69 - 2012-11-22 15:43:12 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
HOW is more PVP a bad thing for pvp guys ? The only difference is that you will probably be attacked by other players more often now. Please don't have double standards about pvp.

Why will I be attacked by other players more often now?


Because you will be flagged for pvp to everyone now ?
KrakizBad
Section 8.
#70 - 2012-11-22 15:43:22 UTC
'It's a sandbox, it's a sandbox! It's a sandbox that just happens to have PVP!'

This stupidity seems to be well represented in this thread.
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#71 - 2012-11-22 15:43:39 UTC
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
HOW is more PVP a bad thing for pvp guys ? The only difference is that you will probably be attacked by other players more often now. Please don't have double standards about pvp.

Why will I be attacked by other players more often now?


Because you will be flagged for pvp to everyone now ?

For what reason?

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#72 - 2012-11-22 15:48:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Kiteo Hatto
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
HOW is more PVP a bad thing for pvp guys ? The only difference is that you will probably be attacked by other players more often now. Please don't have double standards about pvp.

Why will I be attacked by other players more often now?


Because you will be flagged for pvp to everyone now ?

For what reason?


http://www.eveonline.com/retribution/crimewatch/

Legality – This pilot has recently committed criminal or suspicious acts in Empire space. This flag has two states – SUSPECT (yellow) and CRIMNAL (red). The state is dependent on the severity of their actions and whether or not the actions were committed in Empire space. CONCORD will take action against pilots flagged as criminals in their space, but anyone with either state flagged is freely attackable by other capsuleers.

Meaning if you attack a non-wartarget in high sec everyone can shoot you....ccp is just making it clearer that you are a badboy and shouldnt break the law :D
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#73 - 2012-11-22 15:50:51 UTC
I'm not asking how the system will work; I already know that.

What I'm asking is why this system would apply to me, as in this character (my main).

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#74 - 2012-11-22 15:52:10 UTC
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
HOW is more PVP a bad thing for pvp guys ? The only difference is that you will probably be attacked by other players more often now. Please don't have double standards about pvp.

Why will I be attacked by other players more often now?


Because you will be flagged for pvp to everyone now ?

For what reason?


http://www.eveonline.com/retribution/crimewatch/

Legality – This pilot has recently committed criminal or suspicious acts in Empire space. This flag has two states – SUSPECT (yellow) and CRIMNAL (red). The state is dependent on the severity of their actions and whether or not the actions were committed in Empire space. CONCORD will take action against pilots flagged as criminals in their space, but anyone with either state flagged is freely attackable by other capsuleers.

Meaning if you attack a non-wartarget in high sec everyone can shoot you....ccp is just making it clearer that you are a badboy and shouldnt break the law :D


Also the whole thing about selling kill rights, if im not into pvp but i want to get you back for blowing up my stuff then i can just sell the rights to someone else....that alone makes you more attackable.
Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#75 - 2012-11-22 15:54:54 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
I'm not asking how the system will work; I already know that.

What I'm asking is why this system would apply to me, as in this character (my main).

If you are not suicide ganking then it won't apply to you, in that case you are a real pvp-er and should go on your merry way. This whole thread is about how apparently its the end of eve because carebears have 1 more counter against suicide gankers.
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#76 - 2012-11-22 15:55:18 UTC
I am suicide-ganking.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#77 - 2012-11-22 15:56:26 UTC  |  Edited by: March rabbit
Terminal Insanity wrote:
Silk daShocka wrote:
SO this is a nerf to PVP? Why because someone is going to blow your ship up instead of the other way around? Now maybe if you fight a tank on your gankships, you can actually have a fight here.

Are you trolling? I'm not quite sure.

tanking gankships is silly.

... and here we recall miners and infamous "tank mining ship".... Lol

thanks for good laughts

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar
#78 - 2012-11-22 15:56:35 UTC
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
cares about their audience about 10 times more.


What is ten times more than nothing?

Just sayin'.

Star Jump Drive A new way to traverse the galaxy.

I invented Tiericide

Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#79 - 2012-11-22 15:57:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Kiteo Hatto
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
I am suicide-ganking.

My brain hurts DC! :P
In that case:
You suicide gank a miner/freighter
>While concord is killing you(fast, others can also shoot you)
>Your victim doesnt feel like going after you directly, he sells his/her killrights
>YOU get attacked by someone who buys the rights.

MORE pew pew for you.

Val'Dore wrote:
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
cares about their audience about 10 times more.


What is ten times more than nothing?

Just sayin'.

Be glad EA doesn't own CCP
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#80 - 2012-11-22 16:05:20 UTC
Kiteo Hatto wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
I am suicide-ganking.

My brain hurts DC! :P
In that case:
You suicide gank a miner/freighter
>While concord is killing you(fast, others can also shoot you)
>Your victim doesnt feel like going after you directly, he sells his/her killrights
>YOU get attacked by someone who buys the rights.

MORE pew pew for you.

We're making progress here.

Okay, now, my next question is, why would I bother to gank on "DC," when I can outsource the activity fully to my gank alt(s)?

Let's introduce some constants here:

- I am indeed a person who up until the release of the next expansion has used main(s) for ganking, be it for convenience, extra damage from maxed-out skills, or whatever other reasons might exist.
- I am a person who requires main(s) to be able to move through empire with a moderate degree of freedom. For example, I do a lot of empire mercenary work and wars, and need to be able to go to any system to pursue my targets, including major hubs.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted