Jita Park Speakers Corner

Just scrapping moon goo completely is a step in the right direction

Hell just make them NPC goods till they get ring mining up and running, all the current setup is doing is making an alliance so rich it will never be removed externally as it can throw unlimited ships at any opponent and not care.

YO CCP FIX MOON GOO*

*Technetium**

**Goons***

*** **** Goons

Damn. I see you're right back to being an ass-hole.

Do we get to see Aleks the sweetheart again in the run-up to the CSM8 election?

There was no urgent list.

Reread the document.

They outlined a strategy and then picked a couple of example projects and wrote about how to apply the strategy in each case.

People who are upset about their issues not being talked about, don't understand the purpose of the document.

It was NOT work on these things because they are more important than everything else.

I direct you to this section:



Its all very fine to use it as a spring board for more conversation but please stop pulling your hair out. That never did me any good.

I actually read the document a couple times. I read where it was suggested to put moon minerals in belts but I did not see it taken out of moons in the document.

If I really wanted to make it a goon conspiracy it would have been worded different. It seems that some want it to stay in moons still and I do not agree with it because right now the bigger blob usually wins with current Sov Mechanics. On top of that I believe more power should be given to the majority of players rather than fatcat CEOs.

I was actually trying to reinforce the idea that Sov mechanics are not a healthy thing at this time. I appreciate that you value all opinions and thanks for the constructive reply though...

Re-balancing of everything that involves moongoo, even remotely, is going to take time, effort, and preparation. The worst thing that CCP could do would be going into changing moongoo without addressing every other aspect of the game that it effects and how the shock of moongoo being changed will affect everyone's game. That process is going to take more than a typical patch cycle. I wouldn't even begin to expect a full road map or full-on iteration until at least a year from now. If CCP did it hap-hazardly, we'd probably end up with a completely broken game.

And, of course, I will bring up age-old fact that if Highsec wants a good representative on the CSM, they need to put down the cheetos bag and vote. That is how ~democracy~ rolls. You don't vote and someone gets in that you don't like, it's 100% your fault and you have no room to complain. Deal with it or move to spaceship-Canada.

From my perspective the real solution is to make those materials mine-able as part of the mining revamp. The materials to mine to get things like tech should be in all regions with abundance based on system true sec.

Do that and all the isk printing goes away. Problem solved! (well changed at least! )

So based on what CCP shared there is a long term solution on the table.

Issler

Imagine an EVE where 0.0 is stagnated to oblivion and becomes completely deserted. No wars, no campaigns, no one gets conquered, no more blobs, no supercaps, just....nothing.

Meanwhile, in highsec- everyone is happily mining minerals and ice in a safe and secure society. They build things, they research things, they farm their isk in L4 missions, but no one seems to buy anything. 60b officer fit nightmares roam the belts, but no one seems to buy anything because nothing is getting destroyed? Do people actually lose their Golems to L4 missions?

Highsec needs 0.0 and needs massive conflict in 0.0 all you miners and traders and WH dudes and mission runners need to take a wider view of all these balance situations.

or CCP introduces L5 missions that regularly destroy everything and mysterious space anomalies that swallow mining fleets whole? And low sec becomes an awesome place to make drugs and smuggle! I'm not saying null isn't important but for every "we can't live without null being the most important part of Eve' i can come up with alternative futures focused on PvE and better PvP in low sec experience that would also provide rewarding game experiences to a large player base.

Any vision of Eve that is based on some idea that everyone will eventually get "cool" and want to move out to null is ignoring the reality of the broad range of players that populate Eve today.

What makes Eve as awesome as it can be is that there are a RANGE of play styles supported and the basic concept of risk and reward in proper balance. I don't see how the dead null, no risk high sec you suggested would ever come to be. If CCP really tries to take us in that direction I would not want to be a statue in Jita!!

By they way I've been playing Eve since before there was T2 or any capitals and it was more fun in my opinion than the eve we have today. Sign me up for a new server with the 2005 code base!

So null is important, and so is high sec, WHs, and please please please can we some day see low sec become relevant again!

Wanted to add this very spot on link to what truly is important to realize about how to keep Eve improving.. refusing to fall trap to the big lie.

Issler

P.S. A lot of null is totally deserted and always has been.

So therefore you are part of the reason that Null does not deserve as much funding, if you supported Null sec by having your alts there this would not be a problem. You can not expect that you only partly use Null like so many others and then reap the benifits as if all your characters where there.

And what of all the high sec people with PvP characters in NUll?

Oh and strangely all my alts support ME