These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

ISN vs TVP

First post
Author
Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#21 - 2012-11-16 12:44:38 UTC
Site contests are about the only fun thing in Incursions. Was my favourite reason for joining ISN way back when.

I should do Incursions again sometime.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Logix42
Taxation Damnation
#22 - 2012-11-16 14:33:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Logix42
Chandra K'ailar wrote:
Guys this is not a PvP fight here, u are all getting out of contest. The OP is trying to find a group to fly with not starting to see all that crap u typing abve. So with that said, Chukker u should try the groups stated above, see what u really want (shield or armor) and see where u fit and have fun!

Shield:
ISN Secondary
The Valhalla Project
SAQ.D
Din-Flotten

Armor:
The Ditanian Fleet

Have fun, and get rich. o7

Chan


This. Also, SAQD, Nut House and some others have recently merged to form the new channel Phoenix Incursions they seem to be fairly active so would be another good channel to join

Edit: it seems they've moved again. I guess if you want to fly with SAQD join SAQD.Pub and see their channel-of-the-day they've moved to. Not sure why they're moving so much.

Go beyond the edge of space... Explore

Zwo Zateki
Doomheim
#23 - 2012-11-19 01:34:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Zwo Zateki
Chukker wrote:
New to incursions and have only heard of these two parties

Who are they? And from what I saw in the incursion channel there is drama?

And since I would like to try an incursion I have a pirate BS shield tanked which would be better to fly with and how do I go about joining one of there fleets?

Thank you for your time

Basically ISN have started killing moms early and disrupting incursion farming. Hence the drama. As mentioned before, ISN are goons of incursions and outcasts so flying with them will get you nowhere. Join TVP for common fleets and DIN, SAQD and ICU for elite fleets.

http://cvmkr.com/R4JG

CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
#24 - 2012-11-19 09:55:22 UTC
Removed some trolling. Keep discussions civil.

EVE Online/DUST 514 Community Representative ※ EVE Illuminati ※ Fiction Adept

@CCP_Eterne ※ @EVE_LiveEvents

Mexan Caderu
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2012-11-19 09:57:36 UTC
maybe the agreement communities should change the agreed mom killing time from "Withdrawing" to "Mobilizing", to keep things interesting

I'm sure ISN will approve

rite? RITE?
Kodavor
Iz Doge Korp .
#26 - 2012-11-19 11:05:55 UTC
Mexan Caderu wrote:
maybe the agreement communities should change the agreed mom killing time from "Withdrawing" to "Mobilizing", to keep things interesting

I'm sure ISN will approve

rite? RITE?



Not really . For ISN it would not matter the least bit .

Best regards
Kodavor .
Zwo Zateki
Doomheim
#27 - 2012-11-19 11:19:21 UTC
Mexan Caderu wrote:
maybe the agreement communities should change the agreed mom killing time from "Withdrawing" to "Mobilizing", to keep things interesting

I'm sure ISN will approve

rite? RITE?

Then ISN will kill the mom as soon as it spawns. Even if there is no other highsec incursion. We have seen this before.

ISN = Brick Squad of 2011 = griefers.

http://cvmkr.com/R4JG

Snatch Pinion
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#28 - 2012-11-20 06:09:53 UTC
Zwo Zateki wrote:
Mexan Caderu wrote:
maybe the agreement communities should change the agreed mom killing time from "Withdrawing" to "Mobilizing", to keep things interesting

I'm sure ISN will approve

rite? RITE?

Then ISN will kill the mom as soon as it spawns. Even if there is no other highsec incursion. We have seen this before.

ISN = Brick Squad of 2011 = griefers.


Last time that happened, TVP did it and left incursions down for half a day. You are as terrible at lying as you are trolling. Your hatred and fear of ISN is irrational and downright silly. Enough so you feel as though you can just make stuff up, take all your problems then point and scream that it's the fault of "those poeple". Train some skills, encourage others to train skills, get better, fly better ships, then come at us in proper contest instead of wailing moaning and lying.
Luscius Uta
#29 - 2012-11-20 07:15:07 UTC
Incursions belong to everyone, so neither TVP or any other Incursion community should have a monopolly to killing moms. Finishing an Incursion before it starts withdrawing isn't griefing, griefing is to not finish it at all and leave all the people who participated without LPs. And I've seen a lot of highsec Incursions not finishing. So, for as long as TVP is not being able (or not willing) to focus on more than one Incursion at a time I will call them griefers instead of ISN.

Workarounds are not bugfixes.

Snatch Pinion
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2012-11-20 07:37:28 UTC
Luscius Uta wrote:
Incursions belong to everyone, so neither TVP or any other Incursion community should have a monopolly to killing moms. Finishing an Incursion before it starts withdrawing isn't griefing, griefing is to not finish it at all and leave all the people who participated without LPs. And I've seen a lot of highsec Incursions not finishing. So, for as long as TVP is not being able (or not willing) to focus on more than one Incursion at a time I will call them griefers instead of ISN.


Precisely. The reason it all came about. Reading 'ISN is doing "OUR HQ Sites" ' and 'ISN just killed "OUR MOMs" ' is exactly why ISN started contesting them, collecting "THEIR TEARS".
Salpad
Carebears with Attitude
#31 - 2012-11-20 08:50:58 UTC
Luscius Uta wrote:
Incursions belong to everyone, so neither TVP or any other Incursion community should have a monopolly to killing moms. Finishing an Incursion before it starts withdrawing isn't griefing, griefing is to not finish it at all and leave all the people who participated without LPs. And I've seen a lot of highsec Incursions not finishing. So, for as long as TVP is not being able (or not willing) to focus on more than one Incursion at a time I will call them griefers instead of ISN.


As far as I'm concerned, Incursions should be stopped as quickly as possible, because they disrupt most other PVE gameplay in the affected systems, such as mission running and mining.

So, if the game mechanics are such that stopping an Incursion ASAP is not encouraged, then they are badly designed.
Mexan Caderu
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2012-11-20 13:07:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Mexan Caderu
Game mechanics surrounding incursions are another discussion
My guess is CCP doesn't want to reduce potential conflict generators, and as such won't change the base incursion mechanics.


On topic:
ISN = incursion goons, think they own incursions.
A few days ago I even saw them 'reserve' a site by marking it with a can, then abandoning their current ongoing site to contest when their 'reserved' site was being ran.
Next days they decided it was time to kill their mom, and they formed up a fleet to get it down.

Yea ISN, incursions don't belong to you, they belong to everyb...err...this seems familiar somehow....think I red something along these lines a while ago...

Anyways, I stay by my opinion that ISN is a parasitic entity, always following the agreement communities from incursion to incursion, profiting from their work of keeping the influence down and killing the mom at their convenience. Then rubbing it in when entry level fleets loose contests and screaming on the forums that 'AMG big bad TVP&friends dictate the roools'...Yea...I smell a rat as well

Regards,
Mexan Caderu
Yimodo
Emphebion Emperium
#33 - 2012-11-20 14:04:38 UTC
I have heard everything in this topic over and over again, if it is in this topic or our own forum post that inform people about ISN, how we run fleets and what requerments we have in our fleets.

For some reason everyone is bitching about ISN and how the communitie is being run. The only thing we want is to run incursions, make ISK and do this as effective as we can. Not everyone agrees with this but this is how we run incursions.

Most of the other incursion communities made an agreement who can take the mom in what incursion, armor or shield (however half of the armor mom fleets is made out of shield fits because the armor communitie is much smaller). And most of these shield pilots come from alot of communities because they made the agreement about who is allowed to take the mom. (ISN isnt in this btw because we dont agree with the agreement they made)

So basicly what is comes to is that ISN want to be independent communitie not hold by the agreements of the other communities.

We kill incursions when we want to but never before an other good highsec incursion spawns, the last incursion we killed was in a system with 1 station in all the incursion systems, I dont believe that anyone in any of the other communities liked this so much that they wanted to stay here. And beside that, TVP was forming a fleet to end the incursion themselfs they where just slower with putting a fleet up.

I just wanted to make these points clear, I'm kinda sick of people making ISN the bad guy in everything.

What is more important to me is the pilots that fly with ISN like how we fly and enjoy flying with ISN.
On a second note we are always willing to help people with ship fits or extra info about incursions and if people cant fly the fits that are requered to join our fleets we point them towards TVP untill they are able to fly a pirate BS with T2 guns and modules.

Greetings,
Yimo


PS. I know I will get trolled alot because of this because people dont believe it

ISN - Incursion Shiny Network      Public channel: ISN Secondary

Mexan Caderu
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#34 - 2012-11-20 15:12:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Mexan Caderu
Yimodo wrote:

So basicly what is comes to is that ISN want to be independent communitie not hold by the agreements of the other communities.

Can you be a independent community in another incursion spawn ? If you are so independent then be independent the whole way, not only on the bits that are convenient to you.
Do that and all ISN complaints will dry out. Can't or won't go to another incursion if more than one is up? then you are not independent and claiming to be so is hypocritical of your part.

Quote:

We kill incursions when we want to but never before an other good highsec incursion spawns, the last incursion we killed was in a system with 1 station in all the incursion systems, I dont believe that anyone in any of the other communities liked this so much that they wanted to stay here. And beside that, TVP was forming a fleet to end the incursion themselfs they where just slower with putting a fleet up.

I do believe they were trying to form a mom response fleet to ISN, and not a "kill the mom ahead of the agreed time" fleet.

Your move.


Regards,
Mexan Caderu
Yimodo
Emphebion Emperium
#35 - 2012-11-20 15:56:47 UTC
Quote:
Can you be a independent community in another incursion spawn ? If you are so independent then be independent the whole way, not only on the bits that are convenient to you.
Do that and all ISN complaints will dry out. Can't or won't go to another incursion if more than one is up? then you are not independent and claiming to be so is hypocritical of your part.


Mostly there is only 1 good highsec incursion up the last couple of times and that aside we also like the contests, this is what makes incursions more fun to run. Sometimes you win one and sometimes you lose one, that is part of the game. (this is for both ISN and other communities, it's not like they are only fun if you win them)

Quote:
I do believe they were trying to form a mom response fleet to ISN, and not a "kill the mom ahead of the agreed time" fleet


I believe it was the other way around, most of us where still in the Tournament match with our heads and talking stuff over and joking around about making a mom fleet. When we got the word about TVP joining fleet with TDF to kill the mom we started forming up (But this can be an endless discussion because you think you are right and I think I'm right)



I mostly just want this crap to be over, we all want to fly incursions and let the pilots decide with who they fly, TVP, ISN, ICU, DIN, TDF or what other communities are out there. We all want the same thing, run incursions and make ISK, all in our own way.
I also dont like that people start trolling or saying bad things about ISN in our own advertising forumpost. (You always have people that do or do not like some people, alliances, corps or communities. That is never going to change)

ISN - Incursion Shiny Network      Public channel: ISN Secondary

Mexan Caderu
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2012-11-20 16:04:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Mexan Caderu
Yimodo wrote:


Quote:
I do believe they were trying to form a mom response fleet to ISN, and not a "kill the mom ahead of the agreed time" fleet


I believe it was the other way around, most of us where still in the Tournament match with our heads and talking stuff over and joking around about making a mom fleet. When we got the word about TVP joining fleet with TDF to kill the mom we started forming up (But this can be an endless discussion because you think you are right and I think I'm right)


That's odd ... I was in TDF at the last mom popping time looking for a replacement logi and no mom fleet was announced. Also TVP was business as usual.

Later I noticed mom formup messages in ISN secondary ... Maybe you got information about TVP/TDF management plans that the rest of us plebeians didn't get ? or did I miss TVP/TDF mom forming up O.o
Yimodo
Emphebion Emperium
#37 - 2012-11-20 16:16:58 UTC
Quote:
That's odd ... I was in TDF at the last mom popping time looking for a replacement logi and no mom fleet was announced. Also TVP was business as usual.

Later I noticed mom formup messages in ISN secondary ... Maybe you got information about TVP/TDF management plans that the rest of us plebeians didn't get ? or did I miss TVP/TDF mom forming up O.o


Like I said, I believe, and we can go back and forth with this over and over again, we both think we are right. That can happen I dont have a perfect memory but this is how I recall it. (I can be wrong of course)

And you dont need to put yourself or anyone else down like that. Non of us are more then the other, we just all have our own way of doing stuff. Every incursion communitie has their own way and some pilots feel comfortable with one communitie and other with an other one. Its all personal preference.

ISN - Incursion Shiny Network      Public channel: ISN Secondary

Tonali
Perkone
Caldari State
#38 - 2012-11-21 02:04:53 UTC



^ Hopefully all ISN members understand what the above symbolizes and what can / will happen if one such ISN member chooses to ignore it.

_kay
SkyMarshaller
SkyMarshaller Corp
#39 - 2012-11-21 02:38:15 UTC
As someone new to incursions, I find this whole debate pathetic & pointless.

As Yimodo said "...we all want to fly incursions and let the pilots decide with who they fly, TVP, ISN, ICU, DIN, TDF or what other communities are out there. We all want the same thing, run incursions and make ISK, all in our own way..."

When I first researched this matter, I decided on flying with ISN because I lked the way they ran their side of things. That was my personal choice & I'm glad of it. Other people may have different opinions, but that is their right.

I've only ventured outside the ISN fold once (Lv6) & got on well with the guys in that group. I will go back again, if & when ISN doesn't have a fleet going.

I will never fly with any group who appear to do nothing more than grief/troll these forums, canning ISN at any & every opportunity. I am sure that there are many other people out there like me who read this stuff & think to themselves that if ISN is so disliked by these trolling/griefing communities then maybe they (ISN) are doing something right!

I don't believe it is proper for anyone to sit here bad mouthing TVP v ISN (or vice versa). Each group will suit different people, so why not debate this sensibly & give people considering venturing into incursions (which after all this debate is all about) proper information with which to make a considered decision.
Snatch Pinion
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#40 - 2012-11-21 07:26:20 UTC
Contest a site while they leave one on hold? ISK efficiency? Contesting? Welcome to game mechanics.
Previous page123Next page