These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

In-Game Events and Gatherings

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Honorary Agents Nomination Voting Thread

Author
Johnny Aideron
Order of Rouvenor
#21 - 2012-11-18 10:27:52 UTC
For their revolutionary valour, blood and thunder, we should present these devs with the Iron Cross honourary membership of the New Order.

Shall CCP Eterne and CCP Falcon be named honorary Agents of the New Order?

[ X] Yes, they have taken a bold and unprecedented stand in favor of Order and against the nefarious space lawyers and carebears of the resistance.

[ ] No, they were just doing their jobs, the same as any GM who denied a petition against us.

[ ] Abstain.
Xavier Bandar
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2012-11-18 14:36:06 UTC
For bringing glory to and helping in the advancement of the New Order:

Shall CCP Eterne and CCP Falcon be named honorary Agents of the New Order?

[X ] Yes, they have taken a bold and unprecedented stand in favor of Order and against the nefarious space lawyers and carebears of the resistance.

[ ] No, they were just doing their jobs, the same as any GM who denied a petition against us.

[ ] Abstain.
Nanatoa
#23 - 2012-11-18 19:30:49 UTC
[1337] Yes

"Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011

BillMurray
Do Not Fear Jazz
Gooseflock Featheration
#24 - 2012-11-18 23:39:11 UTC
I'm tossing my 550 votes towards a Yes. They're doing the work of an Agent by bumping bad arguments.

Agent BillMurray, New Order of Highsec www.minerbumping.com

Mining Permits: 10m ISK per character for One (1) Year of mining in New Order systems. Contact an Agent today to purchase one!

Dervinus
Sunny Weather Mercenaries
The Initiative.
#25 - 2012-11-19 04:32:21 UTC
Shall CCP Eterne and CCP Falcon be named honorary Agents of the New Order?

[ x] Yes, they have taken a bold and unprecedented stand in favor of Order and against the nefarious space lawyers and carebears of the resistance.

[ ] No, they were just doing their jobs, the same as any GM who denied a petition against us.

[ ] Abstain.


I would also like to petition that CCP Dolan be made an honorary member of the New Order.

o7 toonies

Maleficas
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2012-11-19 18:40:49 UTC
My 20 votes for Order and Reason are as follows:

[X ] Yes, they have taken a bold and unprecedented stand in favor of Order and against the nefarious space lawyers and carebears of the resistance.

[ ] No, they were just doing their jobs, the same as any GM who denied a petition against us.

[ ] Abstain

Maleficas [REPO.] Security Officer http://www.repo-corp.net/ Recruitment is OPENĀ 

Jocindus
The Stonecutters
#27 - 2012-11-19 22:03:30 UTC
For my 200 shares:

[X ] Yes, they have taken a bold and unprecedented stand in favor of Order and against the nefarious space lawyers and carebears of the resistance.

[ ] No, they were just doing their jobs, the same as any GM who denied a petition against us.

[ ] Abstain
Nanatoa
#28 - 2012-11-19 22:06:01 UTC
This must be the most unanimous vote ever

"Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011

Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#29 - 2012-11-19 22:06:44 UTC
Nanatoa wrote:
This must be the most unanimous vote ever

No it isn't and it damned well shouldn't be.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2200498#post2200498
Nanatoa
#30 - 2012-11-19 22:07:23 UTC
Oh people changed their votes; can they do that?

"Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011

Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#31 - 2012-11-19 22:07:55 UTC
Nanatoa wrote:
Oh people changed their votes; can they do that?

I don't see why not, if votes are counted all at once at the very end.
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#32 - 2012-11-19 22:08:22 UTC
I'll allow vote-changing up until the deadline.
Nanatoa
#33 - 2012-11-19 22:15:03 UTC
My reasoning (which I didn't explain earlier) was that honoring CCP employees as agents would embarass them more than voting against them. That reasoning holds true even with this new information, so I won't change my vote.

"Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011

Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#34 - 2012-11-19 22:21:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Kainotomiu Ronuken
Nanatoa wrote:
My reasoning (which I didn't explain earlier) was that honoring CCP employees as agents would embarass them more than voting against them. That reasoning holds true even with this new information, so I won't change my vote.

It's obviously up t you, but as far as I can see it embarrasses us to worship and suck up to CCP employees like this when they clearly don't support our cause.
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#35 - 2012-11-20 02:01:00 UTC
Time's up! Vote's over.

I'll go tally the votes...

(cue dramatic music)
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#36 - 2012-11-20 02:32:48 UTC
The results are in! See this post on MinerBumping for details.
Previous page12