These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What is the lure for lo and null?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#101 - 2012-11-15 04:30:00 UTC
Torvin Yulus wrote:
thje is no lure

nullsec is the place aspie neckbeards who have delusions of godhood go and force people to be their servants.

no thanks


You think they'll ever figure this out?

You can reduce highsec to nothing but ship spinning and it'll be more fun then being part of the nullsec crowd.

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#102 - 2012-11-15 04:37:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Galaxy Pig
You phytoplankton are silly.

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
Charles Case
State War Academy
Caldari State
#103 - 2012-11-15 04:52:29 UTC
Nexus Day wrote:
Lo and null are going to have to give up trying to nerf hi-sec. CCP makes way too much money off it, and hey, it is pretty fun for alot of players. Nerfing hi-sec is not going to happen.

So c'mon, give hi-sec dwellers your best pitch. If you can't nerf them, how do you plan to get them to join you?

And no, using slave collars is not an option.


Destroying the Shipyards
Tarn Kugisa
Kugisa Dynamics
#104 - 2012-11-15 04:55:18 UTC
Ritsum wrote:

Anyone can use google without saying much and there is no anger I just do not like the way they wave killboards around like it really means something in the end and also the fact that most of them would spit on you if you piloted something that is not up to their standards in this case PVP fittings. I do not want to spend my time around the likes of those people.

Also just because I often don't talk to others does not mean I am not listening to every thing being said.


I like how if it's not a serious op, like defending/taking sov/structures/moons, then you can bring whatever the hell you want on a fleet, so long as you don't end up loosing a shitton of ISK stupidly. Like your pimped ratting boat on a roam.

So when they call for a roam, I take my lolfit frigates and throw wrenches.

Be polite. Be efficient. Have a plan to troll everyone you meet - KuroVolt
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#105 - 2012-11-15 06:17:47 UTC
Tarn Kugisa wrote:
Ritsum wrote:
Anyone can use google without saying much and there is no anger I just do not like the way they wave killboards around like it really means something in the end and also the fact that most of them would spit on you if you piloted something that is not up to their standards in this case PVP fittings. I do not want to spend my time around the likes of those people.

Also just because I often don't talk to others does not mean I am not listening to every thing being said.

I like how if it's not a serious op, like defending/taking sov/structures/moons, then you can bring whatever the hell you want on a fleet, so long as you don't end up loosing a shitton of ISK stupidly. Like your pimped ratting boat on a roam.

So when they call for a roam, I take my lolfit frigates and throw wrenches.

You guys are burning down -A-'s home, right?

I see the red penetrating their sov like a ... thing doing ... stuff.

Anyway, good job. Don't stop until they're all back in Stain, which I believe is their respawn point.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#106 - 2012-11-15 08:42:00 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Silver Plated
Care to answer any of my questions or just get all pissy? "Asking to be left alone is not cowardly." Why the he'll should I leave the phytoplankton alone? Why should they enjoy being the only ones in the game with the privilege of being left alone?!?


I took his point to simply be HTFU and stop bumping and start fighting. You know, engage in activities that allow people to fight back properly.

I mean, don't get me wrong, nothing says 'balls of steel' like bumping a miner...Bear
Speedkermit Damo
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#107 - 2012-11-15 10:45:26 UTC
Nexus Day wrote:
Lo and null are going to have to give up trying to nerf hi-sec. CCP makes way too much money off it, and hey, it is pretty fun for alot of players. Nerfing hi-sec is not going to happen.

So c'mon, give hi-sec dwellers your best pitch. If you can't nerf them, how do you plan to get them to join you?

And no, using slave collars is not an option.


Null/Low-sec is simply more exciting.

Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.
Diva Ex Machina
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#108 - 2012-11-15 10:53:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Diva Ex Machina
Nexus Day wrote:
Lo and null are going to have to give up trying to nerf hi-sec. CCP makes way too much money off it, and hey, it is pretty fun for alot of players. Nerfing hi-sec is not going to happen.

So c'mon, give hi-sec dwellers your best pitch. If you can't nerf them, how do you plan to get them to join you?

And no, using slave collars is not an option.


Nobody told me I could get a slave collar! Cry

On a personal level I don't care if high sec players don't want to go to low/null. I can see why high sec would appeal to a certain subset of players and there is nothing wrong with that. But if you're one of those people who have been playing Eve for a while and not really left high sec in that time, I think you're cheating yourself out of your sub money because there's a lot you aren't experiencing. I would urge you to give it a try and not to take comments on the forum so seriously, as there is a lot of hyperbole about 'blobs', 'blueballing' and so forth that aren't strictly true (in my experience). A lot of what happens out in null is not intrinsic to nullspace, it's more to do with the crowd you hang out with.

Oh and yeah, it's fun to be able to shoot people without the space police getting involved.
Josef Djugashvilis
#109 - 2012-11-15 11:26:19 UTC
Diva Ex Machina wrote:
Nexus Day wrote:
Lo and null are going to have to give up trying to nerf hi-sec. CCP makes way too much money off it, and hey, it is pretty fun for alot of players. Nerfing hi-sec is not going to happen.

So c'mon, give hi-sec dwellers your best pitch. If you can't nerf them, how do you plan to get them to join you?

And no, using slave collars is not an option.


Nobody told me I could get a slave collar! Cry

On a personal level I don't care if high sec players don't want to go to low/null. I can see why high sec would appeal to a certain subset of players and there is nothing wrong with that. But if you're one of those people who have been playing Eve for a while and not really left high sec in that time, I think you're cheating yourself out of your sub money because there's a lot you aren't experiencing. I would urge you to give it a try and not to take comments on the forum so seriously, as there is a lot of hyperbole about 'blobs', 'blueballing' and so forth that aren't strictly true (in my experience). A lot of what happens out in null is not intrinsic to nullspace, it's more to do with the crowd you hang out with.

Oh and yeah, it's fun to be able to shoot people without the space police getting involved.


Subset?

This is not a signature.
Zhao-luojao Shou
Doomheim
#110 - 2012-11-15 12:02:54 UTC
I read threw 4 pages before i came to posting. So im not playing the game to its fullest if i stay in highsec, or at least that is the general concensus. As has been stated many times HALF of sov based null is controled by one coalition. why then would i move out there and bang my head against something so big that can do what ever they want.

Btw i also dont go to null/lo because pvp to me is to fast. i cant react fast enough. so because i cant do pvp i am to be punished by making less isk than ppl who know who thier enemies are.

Let the flames begin Roll
octahexx Charante
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#111 - 2012-11-15 12:58:16 UTC
null just got served by the president of highsec?

we all knew this day would come.

dude just apply to a low/null corp and see what fuzz is about..its a game if your curious just try it.
Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#112 - 2012-11-15 13:02:27 UTC
Zhao-luojao Shou wrote:
I read threw 4 pages before i came to posting. So im not playing the game to its fullest if i stay in highsec, or at least that is the general concensus. As has been stated many times HALF of sov based null is controled by one coalition. why then would i move out there and bang my head against something so big that can do what ever they want.

Btw i also dont go to null/lo because pvp to me is to fast. i cant react fast enough. so because i cant do pvp i am to be punished by making less isk than ppl who know who thier enemies are.

Let the flames begin Roll



I never flame someone for saying that they don't want to take part in PvP because they think they are not good enough at it. I WOULD say that I think you should throw yourself in anyway as most people start out rubbish and get better, but if you still disagreed thats fine.

Coalitions are a Thing™ now and they wont be going. You don't just do to bang your head against a CFC/HBC wall, you go to join them and conquer the galaxy, or you go and find your own friends to fight them.

I reckon within the next 6 months there will be a third coalition risen to fight the HBC/CFC. The HBC/CFC are smart enough not to gang up on this third coalition, because if you conquer nullsec, what's left to fight?

Instead you'd get a situation of foreverwar. If you have ever read 1984 it's exactly like that. War carried out for the purpose of carrying out war, simply to destroy things that are produced to keep the economy moving and the citizens working.

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli
Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#113 - 2012-11-15 13:02:44 UTC
octahexx Charante wrote:
null just got served by the president of highsec?




James 315 hasn't posted in this thread yet has he?

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#114 - 2012-11-15 13:11:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Zhao-luojao Shou wrote:
I read threw 4 pages before i came to posting. So im not playing the game to its fullest if i stay in highsec, or at least that is the general concensus. As has been stated many times HALF of sov based null is controled by one coalition. why then would i move out there and bang my head against something so big that can do what ever they want.


If Luke Skywalker and Han Solo thought like you, all Ewoks would be dead and Vader would be telling more blond headed white kids he's their daddy...FOREVER.

Is that what you REALLY want sir? D.Vader slinging his "midi-clorians" all up into even more space princesses?

Quote:

Btw i also dont go to null/lo because pvp to me is to fast. i cant react fast enough. so because i cant do pvp i am to be punished by making less isk than ppl who know who thier enemies are.


Erm, YES.

EVE is almost as darwinesque as Darwin himself, survival of the fittest and all that.

Even so, wtf are you talking about, you can't click f1 at a high rate of speed (lol). This means "make friends who can click F1 for you as fast as a mofo.

All joking aside, why do you think people in space protected by the game itself should make as much isk as people who venture out into the Dark without a flashlight?