These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 
Author
Every One
Warp Nomads
#21 - 2012-11-14 09:35:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Every One
Luc Chastot wrote:
who think EVE is dying


Are you f... serious? Who the hell thinks EVE is dying ?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#22 - 2012-11-14 09:43:18 UTC
Mr Pragmatic wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
I heard a great idea, create a perfectly safe mining region where no combat is possible, let all the carebears flood in, then destroy the jumpgate. The carebears can mine to their hearts' content, and won't have to play with anyone else. Big smile


Oh fantastic idea, and by the way enjoy PVPing in your 500 mil punisher or your noob frigate.


We have more than enough industrialists that arn't carebears to live quite happily.
CCP Falcon
#23 - 2012-11-14 13:10:35 UTC
Ryhss wrote:
I think there should be two tranquility servers. One in the US the other for EU.
You now how hard it is to find other US players. It's easier lately but it's still tough.


Considering the US holds the largest percentage of our subscriber base by a long shot, you seem to be looking in the wrong places.

As for sharding, Tranquility is and always will be a single virtual world, this is what makes it unique.

Smile

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3

flakeys
Doomheim
#24 - 2012-11-14 13:24:18 UTC
Luc Chastot wrote:
No, don't go away! This is an awesome idea, honest.

What if CCP decided to build a new server cluster with hardware from 2003, hosting EVE as it was back then? Awesome, right? They could charge $20 a month for such a priviledge to people who played in that server; I'm sure all the people who think EVE is dying would love to play there, because EVE was so, so much better then.



Please don't , old eve is awsome in my mind and actually replaying it would show it was only awsome in my mind and nothing more.

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

T1nyMan
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2012-11-14 13:31:53 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:


As for sharding, Tranquility is and always will be a single virtual world, this is what makes it unique.

Smile



Damn it makes me happy to hear that..

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
#26 - 2012-11-14 13:37:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Talon SilverHawk
Luc Chastot wrote:
EVE was so, so much better then.



No just the community was (or at least more friendly and less f*ck tards)

Tal
MilitantMan
Doomheim
#27 - 2012-11-14 13:48:09 UTC
I really really hope CCP will add a new server! Eve has become totally saturated and now controlled by a few major alliances, everything is swallowed up by them and there is nothing anyone can do. Even becoming a pet doesnt. New players will never be able to have the same experience, opportunities etc because of this.

Please create a new shard please for the sake of eve! otherwise it will be dead. and no the same alliances wont be able to take over the new shard, because you should not be able to transfer ANYTHING from another, no isk, no players nothing.

eve is saturated CCP and its too late to do anythng, you add more space large alliances will just control that.

unless you do this

limit the amount of space an alliance can hold ( meaning they can only settle in one region)
limit the number of stations ( meaning the can hold max 51% of the stations in a region)
limit the number of people allowed in an alliance to 2000
limit the number of blues people can have

do this and eve might have a bit longer to live
MilitantMan
Doomheim
#28 - 2012-11-14 13:52:53 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
Ryhss wrote:
I think there should be two tranquility servers. One in the US the other for EU.
You now how hard it is to find other US players. It's easier lately but it's still tough.


Considering the US holds the largest percentage of our subscriber base by a long shot, you seem to be looking in the wrong places.

As for sharding, Tranquility is and always will be a single virtual world, this is what makes it unique.

Smile



Yes and thats going to be it death! seriously need to wake up, this was ok 5 years ago, no now. Why do you think that every single other MMO doesnt do this...eve is saturated and you are allowing just a few to control the whole game and not letting newer players not from 2003 to have the same chances

why do you think subs have gone down, new player retention is pathetic? if you dont change and stop being stubborn, can see you no longer have a job, cos the vets are getting bored and the new players and leaving, therefore eve will be non existent. Give it what 3 years max...they way its going.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#29 - 2012-11-14 13:55:13 UTC
MilitantMan wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Ryhss wrote:
I think there should be two tranquility servers. One in the US the other for EU.
You now how hard it is to find other US players. It's easier lately but it's still tough.


Considering the US holds the largest percentage of our subscriber base by a long shot, you seem to be looking in the wrong places.

As for sharding, Tranquility is and always will be a single virtual world, this is what makes it unique.

Smile



Yes and thats going to be it death! seriously need to wake up, this was ok 5 years ago, no now. Why do you think that every single other MMO doesnt do this...eve is saturated and you are allowing just a few to control the whole game and not letting newer players not from 2003 to have the same chances

why do you think subs have gone down, new player retention is pathetic? if you dont change and stop being stubborn, can see you no longer have a job, cos the vets are getting bored and the new players and leaving, therefore eve will be non existent. Give it what 3 years max...they way its going.


Yea, none of what you say is true lol.

I'm a 2007 player and i eat 2003 bitter vets for breakfast. Now I have bitter vet indigestion!
Azami Nevinyrall
172.0.0.1
#30 - 2012-11-14 13:58:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Azami Nevinyrall
Having multiple servers isn't a bad idea. If they were to do so, they should leave TQ alone. But create a new server, everyone starts from scratch, everything is 0.0, and anything goes...
-Edit-
No NPC space either...

...

MilitantMan
Doomheim
#31 - 2012-11-14 14:04:58 UTC
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
Having multiple servers isn't a bad idea. If they were to do so, they should leave TQ alone. But create a new server, everyone starts from scratch, everything is 0.0, and anything goes...
-Edit-
No NPC space either...


yep this, but actually i would say more NPC space, rather than null sec :) make it into a proper brawling pvp nullsec server
Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#32 - 2012-11-14 14:05:49 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Eterne
MilitantMan wrote:
I really really hope CCP will add a new server! Eve has become totally saturated and now controlled by a few major alliances, everything is swallowed up by them and there is nothing anyone can do. Even becoming a pet doesnt. New players will never be able to have the same experience, opportunities etc because of this.

Please create a new shard please for the sake of eve! otherwise it will be dead. and no the same alliances wont be able to take over the new shard, because you should not be able to transfer ANYTHING from another, no isk, no players nothing.

eve is saturated CCP and its too late to do anythng, you add more space large alliances will just control that.

unless you do this

limit the amount of space an alliance can hold ( meaning they can only settle in one region)
limit the number of stations ( meaning the can hold max 51% of the stations in a region)
limit the number of people allowed in an alliance to 2000
limit the number of blues people can have

do this and eve might have a bit longer to live


Snipped - CCP Eterne

Reality doesn't work like you think it does. If you're a loser or a nobody here, you're going to be that on a new server too. The limiting factor isn't your character, it's you as a person. The current powerblocks didn't become what they are just because of chance. They became that because they are better at this game then the rest. On the new server they know how to run things and have the organizations to make it happen on day 1. They have the numbers and knowhow to roflstomp you from day 1. Point being a new server doesn't solve your problems, it just turns back the clock a little and creates new ones. The same issues that the current server has will also be on the new server.

Every problem you can think of with the game can be solved on TQ. Your solutions aren't going to do that, because you're trying to limit social ties of groups who function outside the game by using in-game mechanics. All you would achieve is force people to use alt alliances to manage their holdings. This doesn't solve anything. It just creates a pointless hurdle for the players and does nothing to improve the actual game.
Azami Nevinyrall
172.0.0.1
#33 - 2012-11-14 14:20:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Azami Nevinyrall
MilitantMan wrote:
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
Having multiple servers isn't a bad idea. If they were to do so, they should leave TQ alone. But create a new server, everyone starts from scratch, everything is 0.0, and anything goes...
-Edit-
No NPC space either...


yep this, but actually i would say more NPC space, rather than null sec :) make it into a proper brawling pvp nullsec server

I'm still going on having no NPC space. UNLESS NPCs are active and invade unpopulated player owned space...

Also, have CCP own and actively defend/invade...

...

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#34 - 2012-11-14 14:36:47 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
Ryhss wrote:
I think there should be two tranquility servers. One in the US the other for EU.
You now how hard it is to find other US players. It's easier lately but it's still tough.


Considering the US holds the largest percentage of our subscriber base by a long shot, you seem to be looking in the wrong places.

As for sharding, Tranquility is and always will be a single virtual world, this is what makes it unique.

Smile



Is this another of your "personal opinions" or an official CCP statement?
Arline Kley
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#35 - 2012-11-14 14:38:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Arline Kley
Quote:

Is this another of your "personal opinions" or an official CCP statement?


Considering its part of their company ideal, mission statement or whatever middle management speak you want, I think its safe to say its pretty official.

If they wanted to have sharded they would have done it from the start.

"For it was said they had become like those peculiar demons, which dwell in matter but in whom no light may be found." - Father Grigori, Ravens 3:57

Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#36 - 2012-11-14 16:18:31 UTC
I sometimes wonder what a PvE shard would be like. For this thought experiment we can consider this to be a shard set up by CCP, another company that bought rights to Eve, or another production house that made its own Eve like game.

First, there could still be PvP space combat, it would just be consensual. Duels, or mutual wars. Also Pvp activities like the market and exploration would still be in the game.

Next, the economy needs a driver. With fewer ships exploding to players something needs to create demand for products and keep the ISK flowing. Most likely this would be ramped up NPCs. In a mission you would sometimes get a super spawn sufficient to stomp you. POSes would get attacked by NPCs. The POS revamp would be interesting here as part of it is allowing many more structures to be built, all stuff for NPCs to attack.

Then there is Sovereignty. It would have to be based on something other than blowing up other peoples stuff, like how good you are at fighting off the NPCs and doing industry.

The best part of something like this is it would give all those players who do not like non-consensual PvP a place to go. The current game would be cleansed.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Ryhss
#37 - 2012-11-14 18:08:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Ryhss
Every One wrote:
Luc Chastot wrote:
who think EVE is dying


Are you f... serious? Who the hell thinks EVE is dying ?

Eve is dying. Back in '07, every time I logged on there were ~45k players logged. Now a majority of times I log on, there's ~27k.

I just turned into an egg, did I level up? I spent an hour trying to salvage a wreck, when in local a guy said "Stop it, this is my Tempest, I was AFK"

Luc Chastot
#38 - 2012-11-14 18:21:56 UTC
Ryhss wrote:
Every One wrote:
Luc Chastot wrote:
who think EVE is dying


Are you f... serious? Who the hell thinks EVE is dying ?

Eve is dying. Back in '07, every time I logged on there were ~45k players logged. Now a majority of times I log on, there's ~27k.


The new server would be for people like you!


Also, I can't believe some people actually think this is a good idea.

Make it idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot.

Eli Green
The Arrow Project
#39 - 2012-11-14 18:56:32 UTC
CCP Falcon
#40 - 2012-11-14 19:00:26 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Falcon
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Ryhss wrote:
I think there should be two tranquility servers. One in the US the other for EU.
You now how hard it is to find other US players. It's easier lately but it's still tough.


Considering the US holds the largest percentage of our subscriber base by a long shot, you seem to be looking in the wrong places.

As for sharding, Tranquility is and always will be a single virtual world, this is what makes it unique.

Smile



Is this another of your "personal opinions" or an official CCP statement?


Nice try at trolling, but still not very good. I'll give you 2/10.

I'll let that post stand, as it's a valid question, but be aware that if you continue to choose to try and troll members of CCP or ISD, you're walking down a road that will end up being a problem for your ability to post.

For reference, and an answer to your question, take a look at the CCP Website.

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3