These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What is the lure for lo and null?

Author
Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#21 - 2012-11-14 10:14:08 UTC
Borascus wrote:

Pointlessly quoting pro-null pro-James315 alt with no history/killmails, that is also pointing at "risk averse" "noobs", til the main's lunchbreak



OK let me say it then:

For me the lure of null is that everything makes sense there.

When I lived in high I mined and manufactured but I wasn't really sure why, it make ISK, which was nice, but I only ever made what was most profitable.

Mining was boring, I'd just browse the web AFK.

I ninja'd a few dudes, that was the PVP, some of them got pretty pissed, there was no real reason to.

Null, by contrast, is amazing.

When you're in an alliance everything makes sense. I mine, PI, and manufacture to support the corp, we need more fuel blocks? I'm on it. Need more tackling rifters to fight our enemies? I'll make some.

And the PVP, it's everywhere, all the time, you gotta be smart and watchful. Yeah I live in a sea of blues and everyday there are neuts blowing people up deep in our space.

So for me the lure of null is that the game makes sense when you're there. Highsec, by contrast, is just a collection of mini-games.


Ps. Nerfing HIgh Sec is not about bashing noobs or the risk averse, it's about getting the old players who should have moved on to move on. The noobs and risk averse can stay forever, that's cool, they just shouldn't be getting rich for no risk.



Now I've said it after living in Null for 4 months does that satisfy you?

The guy is right, even if he turned out to still be sitting in high sec. Part of me wishes he was, because I'd love a guy in my corp who's attitude to doing what is to most people the "boring" logistics stuff is "Sure I'm on it" is amazing.

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
#22 - 2012-11-14 10:22:40 UTC
Ritsum wrote:
Meh Nerf High-sec all you want... It is still the place I will play since I don't enjoy socializing much and could not care any less about stupid blobs, gatecamps, CTA's and completely ******** people who think the game is just about Killboards and who has the biggest ship, such is the mindset of a low/null player from what I have seen.



Since you don't socialize much in the game - per your own statement - I don't see how you could know what is in the mindset of the low/null player. I am curious however, as to why you would come to have such anger issues with them though, and may be in need of counseling? Bear

Their reasons for staying in lo/null are as varied as those who choose to stay in hi sec.

I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE!  Now... where's Ken?

Borascus
#23 - 2012-11-14 10:34:54 UTC
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
Borascus wrote:

Pointlessly quoting pro-null pro-James315 alt with no history/killmails, that is also pointing at "risk averse" "noobs", til the main's lunchbreak



OK let me say it then:

For me the lure of null is that everything makes sense there.

When I lived in high I mined and manufactured but I wasn't really sure why, it make ISK, which was nice, but I only ever made what was most profitable.

Mining was boring, I'd just browse the web AFK.

I ninja'd a few dudes, that was the PVP, some of them got pretty pissed, there was no real reason to.

Null, by contrast, is amazing.

When you're in an alliance everything makes sense. I mine, PI, and manufacture to support the corp, we need more fuel blocks? I'm on it. Need more tackling rifters to fight our enemies? I'll make some.

And the PVP, it's everywhere, all the time, you gotta be smart and watchful. Yeah I live in a sea of blues and everyday there are neuts blowing people up deep in our space.

So for me the lure of null is that the game makes sense when you're there. Highsec, by contrast, is just a collection of mini-games.


Ps. Nerfing HIgh Sec is not about bashing noobs or the risk averse, it's about getting the old players who should have moved on to move on. The noobs and risk averse can stay forever, that's cool, they just shouldn't be getting rich for no risk.



Now I've said it after living in Null for 4 months does that satisfy you?

The guy is right, even if he turned out to still be sitting in high sec. Part of me wishes he was, because I'd love a guy in my corp who's attitude to doing what is to most people the "boring" logistics stuff is "Sure I'm on it" is amazing.


It is much better coming from someone that doesn't represent the post, I'll clarify as I half expected both posts to come under criticism, constructively:

It is more likely to be a troll post from someone that is days/weeks old, talking about the enjoyable null-sec pvp and the morally bent hi-sec "thrill seekers" that are "risk averse" when posting on an alt that has no visible ties to pvp, null-sec or any other topic that has just been described by him/her.

As for my time in null, yes enjoyable, time in hi-sec: clearly less to do. The difference between the two is the willingness to sit with a bunch of people playing a game whereby the goal is to blow up other ships, or whether its a time for recapitulation to prepare for the next period of time blowing up other ships.

Arguably the real reason null-sec supporters are pointing at hi-sec is to incite social division, socially divisive comments in this respect are closer to troll posts than perhaps discussing the motivations behind such posts.

Headhunting can easily be carried out from null (using killboard statistics, or jita-alt market monitoring)whereas its easier still looking for skilled pilots in hi-sec; the ones that are willing to adhere to "expose all api's", mandatory online times and blatant disregard for offline responsibilities would be the most likely to join a null-sec corporation whimsically and subsequently be the most likely to switch sides on a dime.

Patience is a virtue.


Ritsum
Perkone
Caldari State
#24 - 2012-11-14 10:43:39 UTC
BoSau Hotim wrote:
Ritsum wrote:
Meh Nerf High-sec all you want... It is still the place I will play since I don't enjoy socializing much and could not care any less about stupid blobs, gatecamps, CTA's and completely ******** people who think the game is just about Killboards and who has the biggest ship, such is the mindset of a low/null player from what I have seen.



Since you don't socialize much in the game - per your own statement - I don't see how you could know what is in the mindset of the low/null player. I am curious however, as to why you would come to have such anger issues with them though, and may be in need of counseling? Bear

Their reasons for staying in lo/null are as varied as those who choose to stay in hi sec.



Anyone can use google without saying much and there is no anger I just do not like the way they wave killboards around like it really means something in the end and also the fact that most of them would spit on you if you piloted something that is not up to their standards in this case PVP fittings. I do not want to spend my time around the likes of those people.

Also just because I often don't talk to others does not mean I am not listening to every thing being said.

Play EvE how you want to play it and do not let others dictate how you play. Evolve your playstyle to protect yourself from others! Even in "PVE", "PVP" is there, lurking in the shadows.

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
#25 - 2012-11-14 11:21:41 UTC
Ritsum wrote:
BoSau Hotim wrote:
Ritsum wrote:
Meh Nerf High-sec all you want... It is still the place I will play since I don't enjoy socializing much and could not care any less about stupid blobs, gatecamps, CTA's and completely ******** people who think the game is just about Killboards and who has the biggest ship, such is the mindset of a low/null player from what I have seen.



Since you don't socialize much in the game - per your own statement - I don't see how you could know what is in the mindset of the low/null player. I am curious however, as to why you would come to have such anger issues with them though, and may be in need of counseling? Bear

Their reasons for staying in lo/null are as varied as those who choose to stay in hi sec.



Anyone can use google without saying much and there is no anger I just do not like the way they wave killboards around like it really means something in the end and also the fact that most of them would spit on you if you piloted something that is not up to their standards in this case PVP fittings. I do not want to spend my time around the likes of those people.

Also just because I often don't talk to others does not mean I am not listening to every thing being said.


If you have not tried it then your opinion is not from personal experience. I have a different experience from null and not once have I heard anyone talk about their personal killboard - i've seen kills posted and good on them. I have never had anyone say anything rude to anyone else regarding their fits, in fact it has been quite the opposite where people help with your fits.

So basically you have formed an opinion of people you do not know is what it sounds like.

I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE!  Now... where's Ken?

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2012-11-14 11:31:47 UTC
Ritsum wrote:
Meh Nerf High-sec all you want... It is still the place I will play since I don't enjoy socializing much and could not care any less about stupid blobs, gatecamps, CTA's and completely ******** people who think the game is just about Killboards and who has the biggest ship, such is the mindset of a low/null player from what I have seen.


See this is the type of person that should live in high sec - antisocial individuals who don't understand what EVE is about. Let these guys run level 4 missions and AFK mine to their hearts content if that's what they want to do.

Some of the more intelligent/resourceful people currently living in high sec should be incentivised to move to low/null sec but, other than CCP inventing new game mechanics, how would you go about that without nerfing HS in some way?

Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#27 - 2012-11-14 12:18:00 UTC
I live in high sec due to convenience around my playing availability/patterns. It's nice to be able to relax when playing. I have another account for when I want to raise hell/am not weary and just looking for a pinyata to hit.


Plus the lack of politics and general other bullshit is a significant plus.

Sticks simply make people quit, what you need are carrots, however those with a mind to live in low/null will go there eventually.

Frankly I've yet to see a compelling reason to get more people out there that is not a (very) thinly veiled "we want more scrubs and carebears to shoot, force them out there!"
Ritsum
Perkone
Caldari State
#28 - 2012-11-14 12:27:19 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
Ritsum wrote:
Meh Nerf High-sec all you want... It is still the place I will play since I don't enjoy socializing much and could not care any less about stupid blobs, gatecamps, CTA's and completely ******** people who think the game is just about Killboards and who has the biggest ship, such is the mindset of a low/null player from what I have seen.


See this is the type of person that should live in high sec - antisocial individuals who don't understand what EVE is about. Let these guys run level 4 missions and AFK mine to their hearts content if that's what they want to do.

Some of the more intelligent/resourceful people currently living in high sec should be incentivised to move to low/null sec but, other than CCP inventing new game mechanics, how would you go about that without nerfing HS in some way?



Btw this is the attitude I was talking about... Because I find it hard to talk to others and generally socialize with other people due to medical reasons I am treated as if I do not matter.

Also who says that these "more intelligent/resourceful people" want more of a incentive to move into low/null, have you ever considered that they may not enjoy pvp 'Ship vs Ship' and all that low/null sec business.

The incentive to move into low/null is there it's just that a lot of high sec players do not want it and CCP has seen this and catered to them a bit by making it a fair bit safer to fly. So why would you need to result in nerfing high sec? Just to spite those that like the game but do not like the ship pvp side of it?

If you cannot find the incentive to move down to low/null by now then it is not the place for you.

Play EvE how you want to play it and do not let others dictate how you play. Evolve your playstyle to protect yourself from others! Even in "PVE", "PVP" is there, lurking in the shadows.

Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#29 - 2012-11-14 12:28:45 UTC
Borascus wrote:


It is much better coming from someone that doesn't represent the post, I'll clarify as I half expected both posts to come under criticism, constructively:

It is more likely to be a troll post from someone that is days/weeks old, talking about the enjoyable null-sec pvp and the morally bent hi-sec "thrill seekers" that are "risk averse" when posting on an alt that has no visible ties to pvp, null-sec or any other topic that has just been described by him/her.


Constructive and reasonable posts always win my respect even if I disagree with them.

Usually I would agree with you, I hate it when alts are claiming to have "years of pvp experience" or whatever. The main reason is if you feel your argument needs to be backed up with your years of experience, do so in such a way that shows that. However in the case of this poster he did not make any grandiose claims at all. No-where did he say how long he's been in null sec, neither did he say anything along the lines of "Yes my VAST EXPERIENCE in null sec has taught me that...".

To me if a 3 day old newbie finds null sec enjoyable thats just as valid as a 8 month old character or a 12 month old bitter vet. Enjoying something doesn't take experience.

On the other hand if he rattled off a bunch of stuff about mechanics of the game or his own long term experiences from an alt yes I would agree with you.

Quote:
As for my time in null, yes enjoyable, time in hi-sec: clearly less to do. The difference between the two is the willingness to sit with a bunch of people playing a game whereby the goal is to blow up other ships, or whether its a time for recapitulation to prepare for the next period of time blowing up other ships.


Why though?

Why can't you play with a group of people shooting ships and then, in between the PvP play with the same group of people in the system that is your "home" to make money for the next round.

it isn't a question of willingness, it's a question of logic. I can make nearly as much money in High Sec as I can do in null but with 0 risk. If I just wanted to pick the logical option I'd just go to high sec to make my money and then to Null to PvP. Instead I actually rat in Null because I feel I should, though if I was told to go run level 4s in High sec I easily could do. If I get myself a maurderer and some +4/+5 implants it would probably earn me nearly as much money as ratting in null with the added bonus of faster skill training (i dont use implants in null).

Quote:
Arguably the real reason null-sec supporters are pointing at hi-sec is to incite social division, socially divisive comments in this respect are closer to troll posts than perhaps discussing the motivations behind such posts.


No.

This is a conspiracy put out by high sec carebears who frequently comment on how they think null should be fixed (LOL remove local!) yet for some reason think that High Sec should be nerf free.

The fact is that there is an imbalance between risk and reward, whether you increase reward in null or decrease it in high sec the result will be the same: High sec people have to work for longer/harder to get the same thing they did before.

Once this is acknowledged by these High Seccers the join becomes clear: Do you buff Null rewards and cause massive inflation across the board and yet still pay more? Or do you nerf high income and avoid the inflation but still pay more? The latter gives you the option of moving into low or null, the former will lock you out. Either way though you'd have to work ahrder for what you want.

Quote:
Headhunting can easily be carried out from null (using killboard statistics, or jita-alt market monitoring)whereas its easier still looking for skilled pilots in hi-sec; the ones that are willing to adhere to "expose all api's", mandatory online times and blatant disregard for offline responsibilities would be the most likely to join a null-sec corporation whimsically and subsequently be the most likely to switch sides on a dime.

Patience is a virtue.


I literally have no idea what your point is here, that people joining high sec corps are more loyal?

I'd disagree. Genuine members of null sec corporations are some of the most loyal people I've ever seen. Even excluding Dreddit and GoonWaffe, as they recruit from an outside community, most genuine members of null sec corps generally only move when their corp/alliance is failcascading. There's no really strong reason to band together in high sec, nor is it dangerous to be corpless (unlike null where it's very dangerous). Sure you get spies, but thats only because you're worth spying on, whereas high sec corps aren't.

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

Silver Plated
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#30 - 2012-11-14 12:38:49 UTC
Null is a lot quieter than high-sec. Safer too. You can run anoms in peace with a wall of blues between you and anyone who might bother you and if you live in an out of the way system like I do you hardly see anyone anyway. No ninja looters, no gankers, no bumpers, no war targets, and the anoms pay bbetter than missions especially if you have a carrier assign fighters to your tengu/nightmare combo!


Too much honesty?


Ummm, PVP YOU GUYS! IT HAS PVP!
Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#31 - 2012-11-14 12:42:31 UTC
Silver Plated wrote:
Null is a lot quieter than high-sec. Safer too.



Says the guy who clearly has never lived in null sec.

Listen random alt scrub: If you want to try living in null sec for a bit let me know and I'll arrange it. After a month if you still think it's safer then I'll concede your point.

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

Matti Leijona
Brave Empire Inc.
Brave United
#32 - 2012-11-14 12:47:26 UTC
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
Silver Plated wrote:
Null is a lot quieter than high-sec. Safer too.



Says the guy who clearly has never lived in null sec.

Listen random alt scrub: If you want to try living in null sec for a bit let me know and I'll arrange it. After a month if you still think it's safer then I'll concede your point.




Nope, never lived in Null Sec, not once, not a member of ED, don't live in the Dronelands, never ever how sad I must be.


~Silver Plated

By the way I post on that alt, a cyno alt, because I like the name.
Silver Plated
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#33 - 2012-11-14 12:51:55 UTC
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
Silver Plated wrote:
Null is a lot quieter than high-sec. Safer too.



Says the guy who clearly has never lived in null sec.

Listen random alt scrub: If you want to try living in null sec for a bit let me know and I'll arrange it. After a month if you still think it's safer then I'll concede your point.



P.S. Look at my industry guys KB. I've lost one ship in Null on him. I did lose a Maelstrom on another character the other day because I got dumb on a gate. Other than those two instances I haven't lost a ship outside of a fleet. Null Sec really is pretty damn safe.
Generals4
#34 - 2012-11-14 13:01:04 UTC
Well i'll give a shot at making an unbiased pitch :

0.0: Are you tired to PVE/mine/haul/etc. for the sake of earning isks to be able to PVE/Mine/haul/etc. better to earn more isk, etc. Than join 0.0 and be part of something bigger. You can do all these things but for a greater purpose. (Your alliance's welfare)
Also interested in large scale PVP? Than 0.0 is definately for you. With huge battles between large entities occuring quite often you can be a part of epic battles.
However if you don't like bubbles, blobs and mandatory participation to certain activities you might want to rethink this. (or look closer at the alliance's adverts and what they demand from their members)

WH's: Do you want to live independently or as a kog of a small machine in a dangerous part of space than this is what you want. WH's offer the feeling of meaning something but on a smaller scale. WH's also have that unique mystery feeling to it (be aware: this feeling might fade away after time). But be aware, if you don't like to scan things down WH's might become very tedious for you! And on top of that WH's can be very very quiet and if you're looking for a lot of PVP WH's might not be the best choice. Don't get me wrong, WH's offer PVP opportunities but the intensity is very very variable.

Lowsec: Do you want to roam space and have small scale PVP without necessarily being part of something "bigger" ? Well this is for you than. Do mind low sec can be a burden Isk earning wise but it is very possible to earn enough to fund your PVP activities. If you're an industrialist however i strongly recommend NOT going to lowsec. (WH's and null sec are much better choices for that). Now here's the kicker, do you want small scale PVP, good isk earning opportunities and want to be a part of something bigger? Well join FW! FW is in a certain sense 0.0 lite. (PVP wise, for industrialists it's still crap)

High Sec: Don't you want to belong to something bigger or constantly be on the look out for predators who want to blow you up? Well than you should stay here.

_-Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. _

Admiralte Derezel
Interstellar Operations Conglomerate
#35 - 2012-11-14 13:04:01 UTC
I guess theres quite a lot of snobs on the forum. Not overly in this thread but if you lurk the forums for any length of time it paints a bad picture of a lot of lo/null dwellers. If you do not live in null you are an inferior Eve player?
Terms such as;
carebear
noob
risk-averse
less intelligent (used in this thread)

If for instance you were a high-sec dweller, perhaps you just wanted to skill up and get some money before exploring the universe some more, this would put you off wouldnt it? Oh look they are using derogatory terms for me...these are exactly the types of guys I want to play Eve with.
Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#36 - 2012-11-14 13:38:48 UTC
Matti Leijona wrote:


Nope, never lived in Null Sec, not once, not a member of ED, don't live in the Dronelands, never ever how sad I must be.


~Silver Plated

By the way I post on that alt, a cyno alt, because I like the name.


Silver Plated wrote:


P.S. Look at my industry guys KB. I've lost one ship in Null on him. I did lose a Maelstrom on another character the other day because I got dumb on a gate. Other than those two instances I haven't lost a ship outside of a fleet. Null Sec really is pretty damn safe.


Right so by my reckoning Ethereal Dawn, you live near solar and that yes?

So soon you're going to have the CFC right on your doorstep plus there's the whole hooha of the war between -A-/Solar and the Gypsy Wagon guys.

I'll wonder how safe you feel it is after a few weeks. Ultimately this highlights the risk of null sec: Everything is safe, right up until the moment it isn't, then you can lose everything.

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#37 - 2012-11-14 13:50:46 UTC
Nexus Day wrote:
Lo and null are going to have to give up trying to nerf hi-sec. CCP makes way too much money off it, and hey, it is pretty fun for alot of players. Nerfing hi-sec is not going to happen.

So c'mon, give hi-sec dwellers your best pitch. If you can't nerf them, how do you plan to get them to join you?

And no, using slave collars is not an option.


The incorrect belief is that "we" want them to join us. I personally don't care either way, i'm not one of those people who thinks null sec is dead or some sea of blue (if it were sa sea of blues, i'd still be "swimming" in Tribute rather than the waters of NPC Delve LOL).

It must be some carebear Ego thing, to believe that others actually care about you personally, rather than understanding the idea that those us who belive High Sec income needs looking at are simply worried about the state of the whole game.

I pretty much "live" off null anomalies and incursions, yet I did not oppose modification to those things because the gushing isk faucets those things had were screwing up the game in palpable ways. CCP did the right thing in modifying them (it is now MUCH easier to get into an incursion fleet now that all the fair weather isk farmers are gone lol), not just for me, but for the GAME. Not gonna lie though, I enjoyed the isk while it lasted lol.

But I digress. High sec people, stay where yo want to, play as you want to, cling to your narrow interests for dear life if you want to. That's not going to stop us players of the full game from advocating for the real spirit of EVE.
Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#38 - 2012-11-14 13:50:53 UTC
Generals4 wrote:
Well i'll give a shot at making an unbiased pitch :

0.0: Are you tired to PVE/mine/haul/etc. for the sake of earning isks to be able to PVE/Mine/haul/etc. better to earn more isk, etc. Than join 0.0 and be part of something bigger. You can do all these things but for a greater purpose. (Your alliance's welfare)
Also interested in large scale PVP? Than 0.0 is definately for you. With huge battles between large entities occuring quite often you can be a part of epic battles.
However if you don't like bubbles, blobs and mandatory participation to certain activities you might want to rethink this. (or look closer at the alliance's adverts and what they demand from their members)



The reference to mandatory participation is a little bit outdated.

A lot of people, especially outside of null, think that people still issue CTAs and that sort of rubbish and raise corp taxes to 100% during ops and stuff. No-one in the CFC/HBC does this and we control half of nullsec. The CTA calling alliances are all relics of a bygone era mainly, or the last vestiges of Elite PvP WulfPAx alliances.

Other then that you are broadly right. The problem is though when you explain Null Sec to someone you should be using the word "home". There are very few alliances with an actual "home" in null, (best example is Goons and VFK) but it should be a place where people can go and invest time and effort into a place.


Admiralte Derezel wrote:

If for instance you were a high-sec dweller, perhaps you just wanted to skill up and get some money before exploring the universe some more, this would put you off wouldnt it? Oh look they are using derogatory terms for me...these are exactly the types of guys I want to play Eve with.



If you were a high sec dweller looking to get into PvP I'd advise you to jump in head first. You're immortal what have you got to lose?

I've never not been full of advice for any newbie whos asked me about getting involved in null sec PvP, I've even suggested a few see about joining my corp if they want.

The derogatory terms are (largely) used to the high sec dwellers who come on the EVE-O forums and shoot their mouth off about things they have no idea about. They forget that a lot if not all of null sec players have spent time living in Empire, but most Empire dwellers havent spent time living in null (and btw roaming through null doesn't count, I mean making a living there).

Anyone genuinely interested in learning more about null sec PvP needs to realise their own worst enemy is these type of high sec people because they give the rest of you guys a bad name.

Just ask people how to get involved or what it's like. Hell drop me an eve mail message if you want to know that badly.

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#39 - 2012-11-14 13:52:42 UTC
Admiralte Derezel wrote:


If for instance you were a high-sec dweller, perhaps you just wanted to skill up and get some money before exploring the universe some more, this would put you off wouldnt it?


If a dude saying a thing on a forum can stop a Guy from exploring the universe, said Guy wasn't meant to explore the universe in the 1st place.
Borascus
#40 - 2012-11-14 14:15:07 UTC
I get to laugh at you Kitchener as you are currently in that driven microcosm of individual play amongst a group.

The whole purpose of the original quotation before you started obsessing was twofold, illustrating that the poster I quoted was hiding on an alt (the risk averse element) and had in depth knowledge of the ipso-facto 'decrease originality' group, supporting James315 - a paid scapegoat.



On top of your assessment of 4 months in null, I'd recruited upto and surpassing 100 pilots in 1ix, AH-B84 and other Branch systems, it doesn't change the fact that we were renting space, I can go further illustrating the wormhole experience, the time I lost a ship using a warp scrambler at a gate allowing a tengu on a CTA to escape, or even further still illustrating a move into Mercomesier, round through into Syndicate, round further still to Stain, and even further still around CVA space, each month increasing in ISK efficiency by losing 5, then 4, then 3, then 2 ships. I can also tell you that the corporation I was recruiting for in Branch surprisingly started to fold, around 1 month before a new baby was born IRL, in my family. I can illustrate that the majority have formed their own corps, or played in corps such as Nexe excercitus, or currently operate systems. I could even go so far to say my time is my time whether the same people are sat in a chat channel under a banner or spread around the entire New Eden bloc. In the same manner as being on 'group time' whenever logging in as part of a PvP corp.

One thing I wont do is say that being active in EVE is any more or less influential dependant on whether its null-sec or hi-sec that you move around in. I also wouldn't create a circular argument to discuss such matters in the same group. At which point I would presume that the Burn Jita (didn't affect me at all), Hulkageddon (didn't affect me at all), Hauler suicide ganks (didn't affect me at all) or random alliance defections or false promises, completely ineffectual in a sand box but funny all the same.