These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The new bounty system will be awesome

Author
Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#21 - 2012-11-13 02:56:37 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
GB2WOW you belligerent undesirable.

Yeah, I thought you were serious there for a minute. My mistake.

I know I haven't posted in a couple of weeks due to the hurricane, but do you seriously don't remember what my viewpoints are? Ugh

Alara IonStorm wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:

GB2WOW you belligerent undesirable.

Where did the "belligerent undesirable" meme come from?

This person.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Alara IonStorm
#22 - 2012-11-13 02:57:27 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:
Gonna laugh my ass off if being Concorded voids bounty payouts like insurance. Lol

Why should it?

Why shouldn't it?
Shederov Blood
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
#23 - 2012-11-13 03:00:18 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Giving anyone the ability to buy killrights is a good mechanic.
Giving anyone the ability to activate a 15 minute suspect timer on someone is not.

I still don't get why CCP thinks this is a good idea.

Consequences, duuuh.
Durrrr, but they're changing war-decs again because some leet pvpers couldn't handle a few consequences.

Who put the goat in there?

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#24 - 2012-11-13 03:00:48 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
I know I haven't posted in a couple of weeks due to the hurricane, but do you seriously don't remember what my viewpoints are? Ugh

I don't generally keep mental track of people's viewpoints on things. Some people are easier to remember than others. I'm sorry to say you're not one of them. Don't take it personally. :P

Alara IonStorm wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:
Gonna laugh my ass off if being Concorded voids bounty payouts like insurance. Lol

Why should it?

Why shouldn't it?

Why would CONCORD prevent a third party player to player contract from being fulfilled?

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#25 - 2012-11-13 03:03:36 UTC
Shederov Blood wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Giving anyone the ability to buy killrights is a good mechanic.
Giving anyone the ability to activate a 15 minute suspect timer on someone is not.

I still don't get why CCP thinks this is a good idea.

Consequences, duuuh.
Durrrr, but they're changing war-decs again because some leet pvpers couldn't handle a few consequences.


Nah, they're changing it because it was broken. Just like the Dec shield was supposed to show (or so they claimed. I'm sure they also had/are having a great deal of fun)

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Wivabel
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2012-11-13 03:03:40 UTC
bounty system will be game changing


Wivabel

I am not sure if I am going to log in anymore.......

Alara IonStorm
#27 - 2012-11-13 03:04:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Alara IonStorm
James Amril-Kesh wrote:

Why would CONCORD prevent a third party player to player contract from being fulfilled?

Because it was earned by committing a crime. Like if someone pays you too kill a man they don't let you keep the money.

There is ample justification to go either way.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#28 - 2012-11-13 03:05:17 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:

Why would CONCORD prevent a third party player to player contract from being fulfilled?

Because it was earned by committing a crime. Like if someone pays you too kill a man they don't let you keep the money.

EVE != real life

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Alara IonStorm
#29 - 2012-11-13 03:07:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Alara IonStorm
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Alara IonStorm wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:

Why would CONCORD prevent a third party player to player contract from being fulfilled?

Because it was earned by committing a crime. Like if someone pays you too kill a man they don't let you keep the money.

EVE != tries sometimes to emulate aspects of real life

Fixed.

Some things are unrealistic do too game mechanics, others try to get it closer too realism.

Again there is ample justification to go either way. Why is one way better then the other?
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2012-11-13 03:07:45 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Alara IonStorm wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:

Why would CONCORD prevent a third party player to player contract from being fulfilled?

Because it was earned by committing a crime. Like if someone pays you too kill a man they don't let you keep the money.

EVE != real life


shaddup

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2012-11-13 03:08:58 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Giving anyone the ability to buy killrights is a good mechanic.
Giving anyone the ability to activate a 15 minute suspect timer on someone is not.

I still don't get why CCP thinks this is a good idea.

Consequences, duuuh.

You could say the exact same thing if buying the killright made CONCORD instantly arrive and blow up their ship, but that doesn't mean the consequences are good for the game.


Not good for the game, or not good for you personally?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Shederov Blood
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
#32 - 2012-11-13 03:10:01 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
I know I haven't posted in a couple of weeks due to the hurricane, but do you seriously don't remember what my viewpoints are? Ugh

I don't generally keep mental track of people's viewpoints on things. Some people are easier to remember than others. I'm sorry to say you're not one of them. Don't take it personally. :P
This threadnaught might help refresh your memory. Big smile

Who put the goat in there?

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#33 - 2012-11-13 03:10:37 UTC
New currency added.
Blood isk. Its only a % displayed in your wallet.
Its no more worthwhile than normal isk, and its counted with normal isk. But its ill-gotten tainted isk.

Its only use is to be recirculated into the market and eventually spread though any and all hands. Much like some small bills in your wallet could have been in a strippers woohah a month ago. Well this money was used to murder a target not get a lap dance... that's a different WIS currency.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2012-11-13 03:12:52 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
EVE != tries sometimes to emulate real life

Fixed.

Some things are unrealistic do too game mechanics, others try to get it closer too realism.

Again there is ample justification to go either way. Why is one way better then the other?

You tell me. I'm not the one trying to make it so that CONCORD nullifies player bounty payouts.

Also, != means not equal to.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
You could say the exact same thing if buying the killright made CONCORD instantly arrive and blow up their ship, but that doesn't mean the consequences are good for the game.


Not good for the game, or not good for you personally?

Obviously I'm only talking about myself since I live in that section of space where killrights actually mean something and CONCORD patrols the skies.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Alara IonStorm
#35 - 2012-11-13 03:12:54 UTC
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:
New currency added.
Blood isk. Its only a % displayed in your wallet.
Its no more worthwhile than normal isk, and its counted with normal isk. But its ill-gotten tainted isk.

Its only use is to be recirculated into the market and eventually spread though any and all hands. Much like some small bills in your wallet could have been in a strippers woohah a month ago. Well this money was used to murder a target not get a lap dance... that's a different WIS currency.

Seriously or is this an idea stated as fact... ?
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#36 - 2012-11-13 03:13:48 UTC
Shederov Blood wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
I know I haven't posted in a couple of weeks due to the hurricane, but do you seriously don't remember what my viewpoints are? Ugh

I don't generally keep mental track of people's viewpoints on things. Some people are easier to remember than others. I'm sorry to say you're not one of them. Don't take it personally. :P
This threadnaught might help refresh your memory. Big smile

Ah, yes, thank you.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#37 - 2012-11-13 03:14:30 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:
New currency added.
Blood isk. Its only a % displayed in your wallet.
Its no more worthwhile than normal isk, and its counted with normal isk. But its ill-gotten tainted isk.

Its only use is to be recirculated into the market and eventually spread though any and all hands. Much like some small bills in your wallet could have been in a strippers woohah a month ago. Well this money was used to murder a target not get a lap dance... that's a different WIS currency.

Seriously or is this an idea stated as fact... ?

I guess I'm not the only one who completely misinterprets jokes around here.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Alara IonStorm
#38 - 2012-11-13 03:15:57 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:

You tell me. I'm not the one trying to make it so that CONCORD nullifies player bounty payouts.

Sure. Bounties should be retaliatory, Assassination should not be CCP regulated.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#39 - 2012-11-13 03:18:17 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:

You tell me. I'm not the one trying to make it so that CONCORD nullifies player bounty payouts.

Sure. Bounties should be retaliatory, Assassination should not be CCP regulated.

Why place arbitrary restrictions on what bounties should be for?
CCP's intent for bounties is, quite literally, for whatever the hell you want to do with them.
Including what many people here would consider "griefing".

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Alara IonStorm
#40 - 2012-11-13 03:22:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Alara IonStorm
James Amril-Kesh wrote:

Why place arbitrary restrictions on what bounties should be for?
CCP's intent for bounties is, quite literally, for whatever the hell you want to do with them.
Including what many people here would consider "griefing".

Too make it harder too commit or direct assaults in High Security Space.

Ya know like the entire reason for insurance Removal or Concord. Another road block to crime to get around.

You can still assassinate people but you have to pay someone in advance who might stiff you or convince them to do it while they risk being stiffed.