EVE General Discussion

i've had enough honors in my life to realize my place. Have you?

but w/e this is a stupid conversation now. Can you quit attacking me and start telling me why you think you should be able to annoy people while under the protection of concord?

GoonWaffe

Ah, how typical.

Leave it to a goon to claim the sky is black.

He's bumphurt, you mean?

Actually no he didn't, he was at least capable of holding a reasonable discourse and could see both sides of the argument.
He in no way validated your arguments by not agreeing with bumping, because he doesn't agree with afk mining either.

For years miners moaned about getting ganked while refusing to fit a tank, the gankers were even telling them how to not get ganked and still they moaned and did nothing, in short they refused to adapt because yield>not getting ganked. CCP then buffed barges to make them harder to gank, some miners have taken this to mean that they still don't have to fit a tank because it's more difficult to make them go squish, they still fit for max cargo and yield, another example of refusal to adapt.

The gankers have adapted, instead of making barges go squish constantly, they now make them go squish occasionally or they remove them from mining laser range via bumping, which is actually better for the miners as they no longer lose a couple of hundred million every time they explode, they just lose a mining cycle or three. Once again miners are moaning about people interfering in their "gameplay", there are counters to both bumping & ganking, miners have been informed of the counters to both and still they do nothing but moan on the forums.

If miners were subject to the rules of natural selection they would have long since gone the way of the Dodo.

Speaking of cowardly, please feel free to figure out who my mining alt is and try and pop him, make sure to bring lots of firepower, you'll need it because I actually value tank over yield.

We all remember the thread where the GM helpfully said to orbit the asteroid.

And its tears.

Actually, it was pretty clear what you said. I'll quote it again just incase you forgot:



You are also wrong again. People in nullsec who have lost nice stuff have considered it an issue aswell, only to be told it's working as intended. It is clear that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

Things change you know, not everything a gm says is set in stone. This is a good direction for EVE.

Apparently out of the two of us I'm the only one that can consistently state facts as opposed to making things up. Backtracking won't help you here.

Just bump him, I hear it makes people more lucid to be sent flying at a high velocity.

Wow. The concept of QED has really been taken on a rather far-reaching stretch here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q.E.D.