These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Miners of The Proveldtariat Rejoice!

First post
Author
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#321 - 2012-11-10 17:57:25 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:
If you weren't an awful player you would have been able to escape from that maller easily. I know your type. A cowardly "pvper" who somehow thinks you are entitled to annoy people while under the protection of the police. Pathetic.

unfortunate for you that dumb mechanics like t his are obviously going to get fixed. Complaining about dumb mechanics is only natural. Deal with it and stop crying about ppl complaining about dumb mechanics that obviously need fixing.


I accept your statement that an awful player would not have escaped from a maller under those circumstances. The fact I "escaped", which is to say my drones whored on the Concord killmail, therefore (by your logic) proves that I am not an awful player. Thank you for recognising my lack of awfulness.

Also, thank-you for clarifying that you're happy to whine, but not to actually do anything. You, sir, are a credit to AFK miners everywhere.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#322 - 2012-11-10 17:59:04 UTC
I would love to know how fabulous rod thinks crimewatch 2 is going to affect hisec PvP, yes it'll mean that people with a suspect flag can get shot at, bounties will be able to be placed on people etc, here's the kickers.

Bumping will not raise a suspect flag.
Unless you have kill rights, or have purchased kill rights you won't be able to collect on bounties without concord kicking you into touch, usually at the end of an infinipoint, infiniweb, infinineut and instapwnage dps.

The bumpers take the same risk as everyone else in hisec everytime they undock, there's a cottage industry built around suicide ganking them. Bumping is not a zero risk activity, afk mining isn't these days either. It's a sandbox, you can build a castle and then some obnoxious undesirable belligerent bastard can come and knock it down, deal with it.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#323 - 2012-11-10 18:00:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
I would love to know how fabulous rod thinks crimewatch 2 is going to affect hisec PvP, yes it'll mean that people with a suspect flag can get shot at, bounties will be able to be placed on people etc, here's the kickers.

Bumping will not raise a suspect flag.
Unless you have kill rights, or have purchased kill rights you won't be able to collect on bounties without concord kicking you into touch, usually at the end of an infinipoint, infiniweb, infinineut and instapwnage dps.

The bumpers take the same risk as everyone else in hisec everytime they undock, there's a cottage industry built around suicide ganking them. Bumping is not a zero risk activity, afk mining isn't these days either. It's a sandbox, you can build a castle and then some obnoxious undesirable belligerent bastard can come and knock it down, deal with it.


wow, you are a smart one. lol. yes, there is some risk in undocking, but its low enough to be negligible. Don't think in extremes and use common sense. Key word "essentially" zero risk.
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#324 - 2012-11-10 18:05:52 UTC
admiral root wrote:

Also, thank-you for clarifying that you're happy to whine, but not to actually do anything. You, sir, are a credit to AFK miners everywhere.


oh, i am doing something. These discussions are what prompts change within the game. Right now I'm proving your ridiculous arguments invalid. You think you should be able to annoy people in high sec under the protection of crimewatch.

It should be common sense that I win by default.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#325 - 2012-11-10 18:10:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Fabulous Rod wrote:


wow, you are a smart one. lol.

assume much?



Nope I don't assume much, I read the Dev Blogs, obviously something you have failed to do.

Please enlighten everybody on how CW2.0 is going to make people grow a balzac?
Your one liners, while pithy, do not actually explain your thinking.

Last time I checked, Eve isn't seen as a joke in the gaming community, it's seen by many as one of the few true sandboxes out there, here the players provide the content, both bumping and suicide ganking are player driven emergent content, i.e. something CCP never envisaged happening when they gave us the tools and game mechanics.

There's a reason that Eve doesn't have the sub figures of titles like World Of Warcraft, it's a niche game in a market flooded with avatars with oversized swords, funny ears and games with no lasting consequences or influence resulting from a players actions, some of the people that play the likes of WOW etc don't like the idea of losing all their uber gear when they die, hence they don't play Eve.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

admiral root
Red Galaxy
#326 - 2012-11-10 18:11:58 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:
oh, i am doing something.


Yes, you're whining.

Fabulous Rod wrote:
These discussions are what prompts change within the game.


This isn't a discussion, it's a one-sided slaughter of whiners, like you.

Fabulous Rod wrote:
Right now I'm proving your ridiculous arguments invalid. You think you should be able to annoy people in high sec under the protection of crimewatch.


Actually, you've proven nothing, other than your inability to provide any substantive argument proving the existance of your mythical "problem" and your absolute unwillingness to fire up your game client and become the solution.

Fabulous Rod wrote:
It should be common sense that I win by default.


You're the last person who should be talking about common sense given that you appear to have none.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#327 - 2012-11-10 18:13:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
admiral root wrote:
Fabulous Rod wrote:
oh, i am doing something.


Yes, you're whining.

Fabulous Rod wrote:
These discussions are what prompts change within the game.


This isn't a discussion, it's a one-sided slaughter of whiners, like you.

Fabulous Rod wrote:
Right now I'm proving your ridiculous arguments invalid. You think you should be able to annoy people in high sec under the protection of crimewatch.


Actually, you've proven nothing, other than your inability to provide any substantive argument proving the existance of your mythical "problem" and your absolute unwillingness to fire up your game client and become the solution.

Fabulous Rod wrote:
It should be common sense that I win by default.


You're the last person who should be talking about common sense given that you appear to have none.



no logic behind those arguments. I guess I win. Learn to pvp, baddy, and you wont feel the need to defend your ability to annoy people while under the protection of concord. People like you are such a joke to me.
Zak Fey
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#328 - 2012-11-10 18:17:28 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:
admiral root wrote:

Also, thank-you for clarifying that you're happy to whine, but not to actually do anything. You, sir, are a credit to AFK miners everywhere.


oh, i am doing something. These discussions are what prompts change within the game. Right now I'm proving your ridiculous arguments invalid. You think you should be able to annoy people in high sec under the protection of crimewatch.

It should be common sense that I win by default.

You clearly haven't read the dev blogs. Most of the changes are for can flipping, neutral logistics and kill rights. Nothing of which will effect bumpers at all. This isn't going to be a blanket of safety for high sec, thinking so will just dissappoint you later on.
Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#329 - 2012-11-10 18:18:35 UTC
Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly.
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#330 - 2012-11-10 18:20:10 UTC
Zak Fey wrote:
Fabulous Rod wrote:
admiral root wrote:

Also, thank-you for clarifying that you're happy to whine, but not to actually do anything. You, sir, are a credit to AFK miners everywhere.


oh, i am doing something. These discussions are what prompts change within the game. Right now I'm proving your ridiculous arguments invalid. You think you should be able to annoy people in high sec under the protection of crimewatch.

It should be common sense that I win by default.

You clearly haven't read the dev blogs. Most of the changes are for can flipping, neutral logistics and kill rights. Nothing of which will effect bumpers at all. This isn't going to be a blanket of safety for high sec, thinking so will just dissappoint you later on.


I understand all that. You made some foolish assumptions.
Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#331 - 2012-11-10 18:20:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:
Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly.


thank you, voice of reason.

Cementing my victory.Cool
Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#332 - 2012-11-10 18:22:20 UTC
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:
It's cowardly.

vOv

Making appeals to e-honour isn't going to stop bumpers.

CCP has no sense of humour.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#333 - 2012-11-10 18:22:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:
Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly.


AFK mining is a way that someone discovered as a method of printing ISK while not actually playing the game, it griefs other miners without concord interference by devaluing their labours and time to the lowest common denominator.

Fabulous Rod wrote:
Zak Fey wrote:

You clearly haven't read the dev blogs. Most of the changes are for can flipping, neutral logistics and kill rights. Nothing of which will effect bumpers at all. This isn't going to be a blanket of safety for high sec, thinking so will just dissappoint you later on.


I understand all that. You made some foolish assumptions.


Foolish assumptions? please explain the errors in our interpretation of the published Dev blogs.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#334 - 2012-11-10 18:23:28 UTC
Some Rando wrote:
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:
It's cowardly.

vOv

Making appeals to e-honour isn't going to stop bumpers.


Since I don't mine ice very much, I'd hardly call it an appeal. It's just an observation.
Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#335 - 2012-11-10 18:24:22 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:
Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly.


AFK mining is a way that someone discovered as a method of printing ISK while not actually playing the game, it griefs other miners without concord interference by devaluing their labours and time to the lowest common denominator


I agree.
Zak Fey
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#336 - 2012-11-10 18:26:29 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:
Some Rando wrote:
Fabulous Rod wrote:
the thing about EVE, its one of those games where ppl aren't supposed to be able to **** with you without any risk.

Other players provide that risk. If you don't understand that, you don't understand EVE.

Or you're just a terrible troll.



not in high-sec, derp. Try again.

Fortunately Crimewatch is fixing this joke of a pvp game.

Did I really misunderstood you Fabulous Rod?
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#337 - 2012-11-10 18:27:09 UTC
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:
Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly.


Griefing is bannable, and quite rightly so. You should petition griefers without hesitation and let the GMs take care of business. Sadly, for you, we are not griefing. Everything the new order does complies with the EULA.

As for cowardly, no, it's just people adapting and reacting to changes made by CCP. The real cowards are the miners, like Jacob Amaris, who whines like a little girl in local pleading for someone else to kill us, but who wouldn't dream of turning off his mining lasers long enough to do it himself. It's an isk per hour thing, you see? Better to leave that barge AFK mining and come to the forum to whine to the devs.

I might also add that it's fun! Many of our "victims" have a damn good time with us in their system, sharing laughs and great conversation, while they tediously chip away at that ice cube in the hope that this cycle will finish the bugger off. Big smile

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
#338 - 2012-11-10 18:29:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Fabulous Rod
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:
Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly.


AFK mining is a way that someone discovered as a method of printing ISK while not actually playing the game, it griefs other miners without concord interference by devaluing their labours and time to the lowest common denominator.

Fabulous Rod wrote:
Zak Fey wrote:

You clearly haven't read the dev blogs. Most of the changes are for can flipping, neutral logistics and kill rights. Nothing of which will effect bumpers at all. This isn't going to be a blanket of safety for high sec, thinking so will just dissappoint you later on.


I understand all that. You made some foolish assumptions.


Foolish assumptions? please explain the errors in our interpretation of the published Dev blogs.


haha, such a derpish argument. There are plenty of AFK activities that will earn you isk in EVE,planetary interaction, research and datacores just to name a few. Its part of the game, just the only part you cowardly scrubs are able to **** with. I guess CCP just didn't foresee that people would actually dedicate their time to annoying people to such an extent. I certainly didn't. Just goes to show you what pathetic losers so many EVE denizens really are.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#339 - 2012-11-10 18:30:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:
Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly.


AFK mining is a way that someone discovered as a method of printing ISK while not actually playing the game, it griefs other miners without concord interference by devaluing their labours and time to the lowest common denominator


I agree.


I salute you sir, you can see both sides of the argument, bumping is taking advantage of aggression mechanics but at the same time AFK mining is taking advantage of the cycle times and the recent EHP buff of the vessels used to do it, the latter of which made it considerably more difficult to pop mining barges, bumping is a reaction to the buff.

Fabulous Rod wrote:


haha, such a derpish argument. There are plenty of AFK activities that will earn you isk in EVE,planetary interaction, research and datacores just to name a few. Its part of the game, just the only part you cowardly scrubs are able to **** with. I guess CCP just didn't foresee that people would actually dedicate their time to annoying people to such an extent. I certainly didn't. Just goes to show you what pathetic losers so many EVE denizens really are.


So basically you can't point out any errors in our interpretation, you just decide to dismiss the question completely . PI, research & datacores on the whole don't require undocking your ship unless you're on a collection run, mining requires that you undock everytime.

Take for example a vessel at a customs office that is untanked and carrying a fortune in product, that ship is open to being ganked if it's spotted and ship scanned, a frigate full of datacores is open to being ganked, a frigate full of BPCs on its way to market from a research pos is open to being ganked. All of those AFK activities carry a risk, albeit a lesser one. Your argument is moot, every activity in Eve can be messed with, it's just catching some of them at the right time.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Zak Fey
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#340 - 2012-11-10 18:31:52 UTC
Fabulous Rod wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:
Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly.


AFK mining is a way that someone discovered as a method of printing ISK while not actually playing the game, it griefs other miners without concord interference by devaluing their labours and time to the lowest common denominator.

Fabulous Rod wrote:
Zak Fey wrote:

You clearly haven't read the dev blogs. Most of the changes are for can flipping, neutral logistics and kill rights. Nothing of which will effect bumpers at all. This isn't going to be a blanket of safety for high sec, thinking so will just dissappoint you later on.


I understand all that. You made some foolish assumptions.


Foolish assumptions? please explain the errors in our interpretation of the published Dev blogs.


haha, such a derpish argument. There are plenty of AFK activities that will earn you isk in EVE,planetary interaction, research and datacores just to name a few. Its part of the game, just the only part you cowardly scrubs are able to **** with. I guess CCP just didn't foresee that people would actually dedicate their time to annoying people to such an extent. I certainly didn't. Just goes to show you what pathetic losers so many EVE denizens really are.

That didn't answer the question...