These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Nerfing the Margin Trading Skill - OP potential for invisible, unavoidable scams

Author
Crimeo Khamsi
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2012-11-09 16:04:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Crimeo Khamsi
Right now, there is a fairly straightforward scam that is made possible by the margin trading skill. It is unique among scams in that it can be made to be completely invisible and unavoidable, even for seasoned trading veterans who know all about it. It goes like this, in one incarnation (there are other ways)

1) You find some product with a low amount of global stock but moderate turnover.
2) You buy all of it, and then relist it all in a sell order for some artificially high price.
3) You then move most of your isk to a corp wallet or alternate account.
4) You place bogus buy offers in a nearby system for an even MORE artificially high price. Make sure you have less than the amount of money it would require to cover that transaction in your wallet (using the margin trading skill)
5) Somebody sees the potential for profit, buys your stock, moves it to the other location, and then tries to sell it, but the order cancels automatically since your wallet can't cover it. They are left holding a bunch of inflated stock that they can't sell without taking a loss, and you made however much profit you artificially inflated it by.

The problem with this scam as opposed to other scams is that it can be set up so that it is literally completely invisible and impossible to detect, even if you're looking for it. The person can set up multiple buy or sell orders that differ by 0.01 isk or whatever, to simulate a normal set of goods with multiple healthy-looking buyers and sellers. And since they lose nothing other than their broker's fees on the buying end, they can profit handsomely and still run the scam with a margin as small as 3-5% or so (just anything higher than broker's fees).

Thus, the scam would totally blend in. Same margins as almost all other legitimate transactions, same healthy looking spread of offers, same everything. And it could even be a trusted product that you as the victim have trades just 2 days ago for a reasonable profit successfully.

Personally, I think this is unacceptable and needs some sort of nerf to make it not work. I fully support scams that require the person to be dumb or naive or to take somebody at their word to fall for (for instance, "i'm quitting the game" scams or pyramid schemes, etc.). But the market screen is supposed to be a secure third party brokering system:
1) It is advertised as a secure medium. The trading tutorials say "When you place an order, you'll get that much isk." They DONT say "When you place an order, you roll some dice, and you may or may not get that much isk..."
2) A trusted and secure market is crucial to a healthy game economy. If more people were to do this scam, then trading would become virtually dead, because nobody would be able to make a decent living hauling things, without losing all their profit margins to undetectable scammers every 20th trade.
3) If somebody wants to trade on credit, they should be allowed to riskily do so. But trading on credit should never be crammed down somebody's throat unwillingly and invisibly without them having ANY way of knowing that they are in fact trading on credit.


How to solve this? Well there are only three ways I can think of to fairly solve it, without simply removing the margin trading skill (also an option...).

SOLUTION 1) Simply make it so that any buy order on the market screen that does not have enough escrow to cover it is color coded to indicate this to the trader. E.g., all orders with less than 100% of their list price in escrow show up as orange, or have an icon next to them with an exclamation point or something. This still allows people to place such orders, but it fairly advertises that they are risky investments, that might be bogus or fall through. [bAgain, people have the right to know whether they are trading on credit or not.[/b] Bonus points if the market screen specifically lists how much escrow has been placed on the trade.

SOLUTION 2) Make it so that IF somebody attempts to sell you the item that you placed a buy order for, and IF your wallet + escrow cannot cover the cost, you forfeit all the escrow that you did pay. With maximum margin trading skill, you still have to pay 25% of the escrow, which means that you would lose a lot of money if you tried to run this scam. And it would mean that traders could confidently trust any trading profit with a buy/sell spread of 25% or less (which is almost all trades). Ideally, the forfeited money would go to the person who attempted to fill the buy order. But it could also simply be destroyed forever ("goes to the brokers") if that seems more fair.

SOLUTION 3) Add information about the true dangers of market trading into all of the newbie trading tutorials. Specifically advertise to everybody that you cannot trust the market orders to actually go through. And see how well that affects game sales... (hint: it will go over like a lead balloon). Not telling anybody that this is possible, and also not changing the mechanics to make it visible or cost more than 0.5% broker's fees to run the scam, is to straight up lie to all new players about a "secure" third party broker system that is not actually secure at all. PLAYERS lying to other players is great. CCP lying to new players is not so great.
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#2 - 2012-11-09 16:09:19 UTC
What the hell is everybody's problem with margin trade scam recently? Win some, lose some - who cares? If you can't learn on somebody else's mistakes you will learn on yours eventually. Stop whining and go play that damn game.

Invalid signature format

Buzzy Warstl
Quantum Flux Foundry
#3 - 2012-11-09 16:09:45 UTC
IRL there are consequences to failing to meet a margin call, I think that failing to make a margin call in-game should cost you skill points.

http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm Richard Bartle: Players who suit MUDs

Crimeo Khamsi
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2012-11-09 16:12:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Crimeo Khamsi
Schmata Bastanold wrote:
What the hell is everybody's problem with margin trade scam recently? Win some, lose some - who cares? If you can't learn on somebody else's mistakes you will learn on yours eventually. Stop whining and go play that damn game.

The problem is that you cannot, in fact, learn from your mistakes with this scam, like you suggest that people can.

That's why it is special. The scam deals can be made to be completely indistinguishable from the non-scam deals, so even if you have been burned before, and know all about it, you STILL cannot avoid it, unless you stop trading entirely (and if everybody did that, the game would obviously die)

When you are trapped by this scam, you are NOT necessarily even making a "mistake" at all, in fact. Depending on how skillfully it is set up, it can become a situation where you are literally just rolling the dice any time you make a trade, even if there are no warning signs.

Like I said, I fully support scams that actually result from the victim being dumb or naive. But not scams that are unedetectable, even to people who know about them. And especially not one that undermines confidence in the all-important market screen system as a result.

Quote:
IRL there are consequences to failing to meet a margin call, I think that failing to make a margin call in-game should cost you skill points.

That is not a bad idea.
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#5 - 2012-11-09 16:19:27 UTC
Crimeo Khamsi wrote:

The problem is that you cannot, in fact, learn from your mistakes with this scam, like you suggest that people can.


At least you can learn how to use search button, 3 threads before yours there was whine about very same thing. But reading is hard, right?

As I said in that thread, I never felt for this scam but I know how it works. Does it mean I just won Eve?

Invalid signature format

Mirima Thurander
#6 - 2012-11-09 17:16:55 UTC
I work on the fact if a buy order required more than One item at a time its a scam.

All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.

Crimeo Khamsi
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2012-11-09 17:20:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Crimeo Khamsi
Perhaps I am misunderstanding how the market mechanics work. If a person put up an order for 1000 units with a minimum of 1, and didnt have any money in their wallet, and only 25% escrow with margin trading, and you tried to buy all of them, which outcome would happen, mechanistically?:

A) The first item can't be filled, so all 1000 units of order cancel? OR
B) The escrow is pooled, and the seller successfully sells however many units the escrow can pay for (25% of them), then the remaining items are canceled?

Even if B is true, there are at least TWO entirely distinct ways that you can still run the scam just fine, which I will explain in a little bit if that's the case. But can somebody please inform me which of these happens first?
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#8 - 2012-11-09 20:07:01 UTC
Crimeo Khamsi wrote:

How to solve this? Well there are only three ways I can think of to fairly solve it, without simply removing the margin trading skill (also an option...).

SOLUTION 1) Simply make it so that any buy order on the market screen that does not have enough escrow to cover it is color coded to indicate this to the trader. E.g., all orders with less than 100% of their list price in escrow show up as orange, or have an icon next to them with an exclamation point or something. This still allows people to place such orders, but it fairly advertises that they are risky investments, that might be bogus or fall through. [bAgain, people have the right to know whether they are trading on credit or not.[/b] Bonus points if the market screen specifically lists how much escrow has been placed on the trade.


Most serious traders do not have isk on hand to cover their buy orders. For example, I am NOT a margin trader, and I usually have 2b in buy orders and 6b in sell orders and 1b+/- on hand.... your suggestion would mean all my buy orders get color coded as "warning, not legit" just becuase I don't have enough isk to cover all my buy orders.... In reality, the majority of buy orders would be flagged as such.... meaning this warning becomes just a standard thing, thereby providing you no true warning as to when a market order is going to fail.

Crimeo Khamsi wrote:

SOLUTION 2) Make it so that IF somebody attempts to sell you the item that you placed a buy order for, and IF your wallet + escrow cannot cover the cost, you forfeit all the escrow that you did pay. With maximum margin trading skill, you still have to pay 25% of the escrow, which means that you would lose a lot of money if you tried to run this scam. And it would mean that traders could confidently trust any trading profit with a buy/sell spread of 25% or less (which is almost all trades). Ideally, the forfeited money would go to the person who attempted to fill the buy order. But it could also simply be destroyed forever ("goes to the brokers") if that seems more fair.


There are several problems with this:
A.) If my market order fails, why should I be punished? Why should I forfeit isk? If a buy order fails, the buyer doesn't gain any goods, and the seller doesn't lose any goods. So why is punishment needed.

B.) Money in escrow is used first.... so you can drain escrow funds completely, thereby circumventing this "solution", and not hurting true Margin Trade Scammers.

Crimeo Khamsi wrote:

SOLUTION 3) Add information about the true dangers of market trading into all of the newbie trading tutorials. Specifically advertise to everybody that you cannot trust the market orders to actually go through. And see how well that affects game sales... (hint: it will go over like a lead balloon). Not telling anybody that this is possible, and also not changing the mechanics to make it visible or cost more than 0.5% broker's fees to run the scam, is to straight up lie to all new players about a "secure" third party broker system that is not actually secure at all. PLAYERS lying to other players is great. CCP lying to new players is not so great.


more information to everyone is good.... I suggest they add a scamming tutorial, that covers the most common types of scams in game, how they work, and how to avoid them.
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#9 - 2012-11-09 20:15:30 UTC
Crimeo Khamsi wrote:
Schmata Bastanold wrote:
What the hell is everybody's problem with margin trade scam recently? Win some, lose some - who cares? If you can't learn on somebody else's mistakes you will learn on yours eventually. Stop whining and go play that damn game.

The problem is that you cannot, in fact, learn from your mistakes with this scam, like you suggest that people can.

That's why it is special. The scam deals can be made to be completely indistinguishable from the non-scam deals, so even if you have been burned before, and know all about it, you STILL cannot avoid it, unless you stop trading entirely (and if everybody did that, the game would obviously die)

When you are trapped by this scam, you are NOT necessarily even making a "mistake" at all, in fact. Depending on how skillfully it is set up, it can become a situation where you are literally just rolling the dice any time you make a trade, even if there are no warning signs.

Like I said, I fully support scams that actually result from the victim being dumb or naive. But not scams that are unedetectable, even to people who know about them. And especially not one that undermines confidence in the all-important market screen system as a result.

Quote:
IRL there are consequences to failing to meet a margin call, I think that failing to make a margin call in-game should cost you skill points.

That is not a bad idea.


But you can avoid the market trade scam.... If an order has a minimum buy amount greater than 1, it is a suspicious order. Whenever fulfilling a suspicious order, DONT BUY GOOD ABOVE MARKET COST. To determine market cost, do some research and don't just assume what you see on the market is a good price. Markets prices are manipulated ALL THE TIME in eve, so learning to identify when market manipulation is happening is something you should learn to do....

Realize, the only way a market scammer makes money is if you buy overpriced goods from them in a completely, separate and independent transaction. You can take advantage of their market scam by just bringing in enough goods to fulfill the order and selling them for profit while undercutting their sell orders... and wallah, you just screwed over the Margin scammer and made a profit for yourself.... Margin traders are not a problem. The ONLY reason you get scammed is because you take a shortcut to make a quick buck. Don't make shortcuts and you wont' lose out....
Crimeo Khamsi
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2012-11-09 20:24:19 UTC
Quote:
A.) If my market order fails, why should I be punished? Why should I forfeit isk? If a buy order fails, the buyer doesn't gain any goods, and the seller doesn't lose any goods. So why is punishment needed.

Because the seller DOES lose something: They now have goods on hand that they can't get rid of, which they might have only bought in the first place due to you misleading them. If no other buyers exist, then essentially, they're screwed.

You're right though that this wouldn't actually solve the problem, due to the second point you mentioned. But I think you're wrong about not deserving to be punished at all. It does real harm, and either some punishment is needed, OR sufficient information available to allow people to avoid such deals if desired (the punishment is for unavoidably misleading the person, not for not having escrow, so more info makes it a moot point)

Quote:
Most serious traders do not have isk on hand to cover their buy orders. For example, I am NOT a margin trader, and I usually have 2b in buy orders and 6b in sell orders and 1b+/- on hand.... your suggestion would mean all my buy orders get color coded as "warning, not legit" just becuase I don't have enough isk to cover all my buy orders.... In reality, the majority of buy orders would be flagged as such.... meaning this warning becomes just a standard thing, thereby providing you no true warning as to when a market order is going to fail.

It's not a "this is a scam" flag. it's a "This has less than 100% escrow" flag.

You might be correct that this would flag a large number of orders, but that's not the point... It would still completely solve the problem, because if it's a legitimate margin deal, then I wouldn't be selling the WHOLE amount to that person anyway. The whole point of margin trading is to allow people to trickle in orders over a long time without you tying up your capital.

For all those people, if it said right on the order how much escrow was available, then they could choose to safely and confidently trade with that person, as long as their volume was less than the % of the buy order covered by escrow at the moment. So it WOULDN'T hurt people like you, or people who want to trade with people like you.

And at the same time, though, it would completely destroy the scam potential, because it would be self evident that something was fishy to anybody who had never even heard of the scam, when and if something was indeed fishy (like requiring 100% items to be bought but only having 30% escrow, duh). And it would also solve the subtler versions of this scam that do not require more than minimum orders of 1.
Crimeo Khamsi
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2012-11-09 20:31:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Crimeo Khamsi
Quote:
But you can avoid the market trade scam.... If an order has a minimum buy amount greater than 1, it is a suspicious order.

Yes, but the scam still works, even with minimum buy orders of 1.

For instance, let's say the original market value for something was 10,000 isk. The scammer buys up all 500 units, and then relists them at 14,000 isk. Then places a buy order for 500 units at 15,000 isk, with a minimum order of 1 (NOT 500). Even if they end up having to pay out the full 25% escrow, they'll still scam you for a net profit. Because they made 2 million from the sale, and then only paid out 1,875,000 in lost escrow. Then they can still sell those 125 units they bought again at 11,000 isk each or whatever the actual normal market price is for 1,375,000. They can even do this immediately, as long as the amount of units in the scam was less than the amount that legitimate buyers wanted at the buy location (the victim will sell all their leftovers to these people, but then there would still be legit. buyers remaining for the scammer to dump their 25% of leftovers onto)

Total scam profit = 2,000,000 - 1,875,000 escrow + 1,375,000 resale of leftovers = 1.5 million isk. If you want to consider the opportunity cost of having sold them legitimately at 11,000, then it comes out to 1 million net, or 200% more profit than they would have gotten by trading the same units non-scammingly.

Definitely still worth doing, and traders who operate under the rule of thumb "don't do any trades with minimum units greater than 1" will still fall victim to it.

Quote:
Whenever fulfilling a suspicious order, DONT BUY GOOD ABOVE MARKET COST.

Never buying goods above market cost would certainly protect you, but due to scenarios like that above, you don't necessarily have any way of knowing that it's a SUSPICIOUS order, in particular.

So your only protection would be to never buy anything above historical market cost by more than about 30%, no matter what ("suspicious" or not), which would make you lose out on a lot of legitimate deals. Also, it would make you unable to trade safely in any good that has been naturally climbing in value recently, without an even smaller threshold (if it has been rising 10% a day recently, then you have to set your protective threshold at something like 20% instead of 30, ruling out even more products). Slash that threshold yet AGAIN for any product with any amount of daily volatility.

This is a silly constraint to put on all traders purely to avoid posting information about escrow % on the market screen. Such a solution would hurt literally nobody but scammers, and would make trading more sophisticated and interesting anyway.
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#12 - 2012-11-09 21:26:46 UTC
Crimeo Khamsi wrote:

Yes, but the scam still works, even with minimum buy orders of 1.


Are you sure this scenario is a scam?

If I place a buy order for 15,000 units of something, and then for whatever reason the market value of that item crashes. Crashed values take time to equalize through the market universe, so it's quite likely my order (when not placed in some supertrade hub) remains active until some trader like you notices my buy order that's now above the current market value. You attempt to fulfill my order, and it fails when I don't have the isk to buy it all...

From your perspective, you bought goods at price A, and attempted to sell them to me at price B, which failed. You were NOT wronged, harmed, or scammed by the person with the buy order.

1.) The person with the buy order that fails, dos NOT gain anything... they lose broker fees.... end of story....

2.) The person that sold you items at Price A made profit... but that is YOUR FAULT. Let me explain:

--- You want to be the standard middleman business man. You buy goods at Price A to sell at Price B for a profit. When you buy the goods at Price A, you take a RISK. You risk being able to successfully sell those goods at Price B. In real life, those risks include having the goods spoil before you sell them, having them stolen or broken, and the biggest risk, you risk NOT finding customers to buy them at Price B. When you buy a shipment of Coke from Coca-Cola, do you really think they guarantee that you can sell them at 1.50/bottle? There are NO GUARANTEES when playing the middleman, and buying and selling involves taking on risks...

--- You have these same issues in game (ok, no spoilage).... but you can have them stolen, or destroyed when transporting them, and most importantly, you risk not being able to sell them for a profit. As such, you NEED to be careful ALWAYS when buying goods to resell for profit. I'm telling you now, albeit a little late for you, that market buy orders are not guaranteed to go through. Now you know... so, anytime you buy something in game to resell for a profit, you need to understand that buy orders are not guaranteed to go through... and that when you buy goods at Price A, YOU RISK not being able to sell them for a profit.... ALWAYS....

If you want to be a successful middleman, you need to find a level of risk that is acceptable to you on every goods you buy. You can play it safe: Watch market histories, volume of goods moved, estimated item utility, etc... and only make safe buys for moderate profits. You can play it risky, not bother with market histories, and make quick rash buys and sells, and make larger profits. Or you can do something in the middle.... At the end of the day, YOU are responsible for the risks you take on when you buy a product to resell, and if you get burned, its your own FAULT.... Margin scammers do NOT HARM YOU... They only make a profit when you accept the risk of buying their goods at above market costs.... By purchasing their stuff, YOU accept the risk, and YOU are responsible for any losses you incur!
Spy 21
Doomheim
#13 - 2012-11-09 21:48:25 UTC
Margin scams are the easiest of all of them avoid.
If a buy order has a minimum quantity it's a scam and will fail if you try to hit it.
Period.


Second point...
If it sounds too be good to be true, it isn't.


S

Obfuscation for the WIN on page 3...

Crimeo Khamsi
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2012-11-09 22:32:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Crimeo Khamsi
Quote:
when you buy goods at Price A, YOU RISK not being able to sell them for a profit.... ALWAYS....

Yes, that's true. And my suggested fix does not change that fact, nor is that what I was complaining about at any point in the thread. This is a straw man.

My solution was simply to write on the screen "This order has 47% escrow posted." That's it. Nothing about that guarantees anything about having a customer for your goods. It just stops people from being able to LIE about being a customer when they're not.

The ability to flat out lie about orders on the market screen is the problem here, not risk about finding customers or not. If you can't even know whether a trade will go through, even if you're sitting right there in the station looking at an offer with goods in hand, it is not "fun." It is, rather, replacing actual economic savvy and rewards for intelligent choices with dumb dice rolling. That's poor game design, period. Poor game design that should and can be easily fixed by giving out simple information.


Furthermore, I don't see anybody who has suggested any downside to that solution so far...
1) It is very easy to code in.
2) It doesn't negatively affect legitimate margin traders at all.
3) You still have full risk of not finding customers (people could manually pull their bids or you could get scooped, or if you are speculating on future customers, then you could be wrong, of course).
4) It would actually allow more sophisticated and interesting legitimate trading activity, since it would provide more information about how much speculation surrounds a product, etc.
5) It doesn't even stop the scammers from scamming. It simply gives their victims a reasonable chance to avoid the scam if they are intelligent, logical people (as opposed to now, where avoiding the scam is not always possible even if you know about it and consider all available information).

What exactly is the downside you are concerned about here? I'm simply suggesting additional data to be provided that nobody but scammers even has an incentive to hide in the first place...
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#15 - 2012-11-09 23:46:51 UTC
Crimeo Khamsi wrote:
Quote:
when you buy goods at Price A, YOU RISK not being able to sell them for a profit.... ALWAYS....

Yes, that's true. And my suggested fix does not change that fact, nor is that what I was complaining about at any point in the thread. This is a straw man.

My solution was simply to write on the screen "This order has 47% escrow posted." That's it. Nothing about that guarantees anything about having a customer for your goods. It just stops people from being able to LIE about being a customer when they're not.

The ability to flat out lie about orders on the market screen is the problem here, not risk about finding customers or not. If you can't even know whether a trade will go through, even if you're sitting right there in the station looking at an offer with goods in hand, it is not "fun." It is, rather, replacing actual economic savvy and rewards for intelligent choices with dumb dice rolling. That's poor game design, period. Poor game design that should and can be easily fixed by giving out simple information.


Furthermore, I don't see anybody who has suggested any downside to that solution so far...
1) It is very easy to code in.
2) It doesn't negatively affect legitimate margin traders at all.
3) You still have full risk of not finding customers (people could manually pull their bids or you could get scooped, or if you are speculating on future customers, then you could be wrong, of course).
4) It would actually allow more sophisticated and interesting legitimate trading activity, since it would provide more information about how much speculation surrounds a product, etc.
5) It doesn't even stop the scammers from scamming. It simply gives their victims a reasonable chance to avoid the scam if they are intelligent, logical people (as opposed to now, where avoiding the scam is not always possible even if you know about it and consider all available information).

What exactly is the downside you are concerned about here? I'm simply suggesting additional data to be provided that nobody but scammers even has an incentive to hide in the first place...


Some reasons why I'm against it:

1.) It dumbs down the market game (explained below).

2.) It gives out information on your competitors. I can use the information to estimate how much isk someone has...

3.) It ?might? require significant additional server workload. i.e. To get your percentage, the server would have to total the isk required to fulfill my buy order, subtract the value in escrow, and compare that value to my wallet value. It would need to perform this check every time my wallet changes or every time my escrow account changes. It would need to store this information next to every buy order I have, provide this addition information to your client, for every market buy order within the region, every time you check the market on an item. It might be easy to code (it might not be too), and, more importantly, there is a good chance it will result in a significant increase in overhead, especially in regions like the forge!

4.) The margin trading scam transfers money from the ignorant to the schemers... which is a GOOD THING....

5.) I'd rather the developers spend their time on fixing wardecs, or the POS system, or . . . EvE's market system is very solid at the moment, and fixing margin trading scams is a very low priority as far as I'm concerned.

I know exactly what you want. You want a tool or queue to identify which buy orders have funds backing them up. This way you can insure that a buy order is valid, and essentially eliminate the "no customer wants to buy it at price B" risks you have when buying goods to sell. Somehow, you think that since you don't know if a buy order is legit, we are "Replacing economic savvy and rewards for intelligent choices with dump dice rolling." Frankly, you are wrong.... If you see a buy order for 15k isk.... there is nothing suave about buying those items at 10k isk and delivering them to the buy order.... that just basic buy low, sell high, unintelligent monkey-see-monkey-do activity. If you look at a screen and know you can sell for 15k isk, then you're dumbing down the market system...

On the other hand, if you don't know which buy orders are legit, and which buy orders are illegit, then you actually NEED some economic savvy. A player with economic savvy knows the value of a product they are purchasing, and will know there is something fishy about an 8k isk/unit being sold at 10k / unit next to a buy order of 15k / unit. Frankly, an economically savvy player doesn't fall for the margin trade scam....

Margin trade scams, like the lotto, are a tax on the stupid. You should be happy people actually put them up because:
a.) When you see them, they create economic opportunity for you to exploit at the margin trade scammer's expense.
b.) They drive your monkey-see-monkey-do un-savvy competitors out of business...
Gypsio III
State War Academy
Caldari State
#16 - 2012-11-10 00:00:18 UTC
Crimeo Khamsi wrote:
Quote:
But you can avoid the market trade scam.... If an order has a minimum buy amount greater than 1, it is a suspicious order.

Yes, but the scam still works, even with minimum buy orders of 1.

For instance, let's say the original market value for something was 10,000 isk. The scammer buys up all 500 units, and then relists them at 14,000 isk. Then places a buy order for 500 units at 15,000 isk, with a minimum order of 1 (NOT 500).


So our "scammer" ends up paying himself 15k per unit for all 500 items and both orders disappear. Oh god he scammed himself!