These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Ok so really weird question but...

First post First post
Author
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#41 - 2012-11-06 12:55:34 UTC
Wait, racism isn't allowed?

You mean I can't hate on those nasty, slaver, hyper oppressive Amarr scum?

Because surely no one is silly enough to bring out of game race into it when you have no way of knowing what race the other guy is behind his monitor.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

TriadSte
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#42 - 2012-11-06 12:56:29 UTC
All great replies and indeed keep them coming, this post especially cool!!

Malcanis wrote:
EVE permits every form of in-game villainy. But bringing in real life conflicts and bigotry is, as should be obvious, a no-no. In short: my character can do anything that he can get away with to your character (and vice-versa, of course). But there are very strict limits on what I can do to you. CCP's rules aren't there to make us play nice characters, only to be nice people.

The important distinction is that if I scam you out of everything in game, then you can escape the consequences of that by simply closing the client: Poof! Your losses - and my "crime" - are now as meaningless as losing a piece in a game of checkers. But I think you'll agree that anyone who started spewing racial epithets or making real life threats because he lost a piece in a game of checkers had failed to understand something very important about playing competitive games.

May I perhaps ask a question then that requires a little more thought.

Obviously what a phrase means to one isn't the same for another. I am the type of guy that laughs things off, very rarely does something bother me properly.

How does CCP define what crosses the line? If someone said to me in game "your an absolute spastic, your face resembles melted cheese and you have no d|ck" I would laugh and do nothing.

Perhaps there's a player who was unfortunate and was in a house fire at some point yet saved his family. He had to have his penis removed due to severe burns. An absolute hero but CCP would treat this petition the same as any other when I feel that it requires a permanent ban even thought the offended player wouldn't have known these details.

I want to know how CCP deal with these situations.

Back to the scamming..

Im always thinking about this kind of stuff so theres always opinions on this kind of thing and I really feel that scamming new players is out of order. New players should have some form of "shield" to protect from scammers etc.

Imagine...

New player, plays Eve really hard for the first month....hes hooked! He has enough ISK for a plex -

"WOW I earned enough to play for free" he thinks...

He goes to buy a plex - WTH theres one here for just 380 million.......DAMN only the 1 left....BUY BUY BUY

he is then bemused,,,,,,"I dont understand he thinks" then it dawns on him...

He fell for the plex scam!!

For a new player that is a huge kick in the balls, and I think this would and does indeed drive players away.

Its this sort of thing that needs looking at.

ALSO CCP the BOTS in Jita just keep reoccuring....do something about it?
Sephira Galamore
Inner Beard Society
Kvitravn.
#43 - 2012-11-06 13:35:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Sephira Galamore
CCP Falcon wrote:
The thing is, that whether or not we admit to it, the beauty of EVE is that every single one of us is a roleplayer.

When you log in, you play the role of a Capsuleer, regardless of what your motives are. True, there is a distinction between those who simply play the game and those who choose to immerse themselves in EVE's setting and backstory, but the end result is the same.

We're all playing a role, and are fleshing out our own histories and storylines, whatever they may be.

Scamming, playing the con man, the pirate or rip off merchant are all parts of the sandbox game play that makes EVE stand out with such a rich and colourful history. Understanding that this is an IN GAME action and in no way reflects on the player behind the character is the first step to mentally surviving the morality black hole that is New Eden.


Ok, while I'm not a fan of scamming and even less so a fan of verbal abuse..

Where is the difference between scamming a character or insulting a character?

E.g. a statement like "You frecking Minmatar scum, I hope your whole family ends up in slavery. Your mom certainly has sucked enough dicks to be of great value.", while racial and very insulting, is obviously targeted at the character.
On the other hand a statement like "You frecking [insert RL nationality slur]. Your mom [insert insult]" is clearly targeted at the player behind the screen.

So, is the first example actually violating the rules? What is with statements that are ambigious? In dubio pro reo?

And if we are all basically roleplaying future capsuleers, would such a future capsuleer not be equally mad at beeing scammed (or podded, or ganked, or bumped, ... :p) and might react in an insulting way?
Peri Simone
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2012-11-06 16:35:15 UTC
Tallian Saotome wrote:

Because surely no one is silly enough to...


Someone always is.
CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
#45 - 2012-11-06 16:40:46 UTC
Musaab Osman wrote:
There are corporations in EVE based on race. Or to be more specific, based on the hatred of other races. I have seen several White Supremacist corporations.

If we are going to get into this subject, should those corporations and their names be illegal?


If you see this, please petition them and we will deal with it appropriately.

EVE Online/DUST 514 Community Representative ※ EVE Illuminati ※ Fiction Adept

@CCP_Eterne ※ @EVE_LiveEvents

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#46 - 2012-11-06 16:46:14 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:


You sir, understand EVE to its black hearted, capitalist, dog eat dog core, with an awesome separation between in game and out of game actions.


Huh? But I thought EVE was the land of Rainbows and Chocolate Covered Unicorns (which are both delicious and nutritious) where we all join hands in trust and solidarity and sing happy happy folks songs about how we never fight with each other and share everything.

You're telling me it's not? Now im going to have to change every single fit I got (taking off the rainbow and candy launchers) so I too can be a capitalist/Imperialist space pirate. Anyone making a Jita run soon?

:) :)
Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#47 - 2012-11-06 16:56:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Lors Dornick
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Wait, racism isn't allowed?

You mean I can't hate on those nasty, slaver, hyper oppressive Amarr scum?

Because surely no one is silly enough to bring out of game race into it when you have no way of knowing what race the other guy is behind his monitor.


Doing this, and dropping snide remarks about backwards, rust loving barbarians are all ok.

Since it's done within the game's concept.

Getting mad in RL and shouting/typing stuff about some other players' nationality, race, religion, sexual orientation and/or size of shoes is just simply bad and shows that whoever using this is a moron.

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

Yatama Kautsuo
Tencus
#48 - 2012-11-06 16:59:41 UTC
so bottom line is when i ever get scammed (*giggles* as if) i can throw insults at the offender when it comes from my ingame character.

so i can tell them where exactly my character would penetrate theirs and how and after all that carnage i would seek out his ingame family to destroy them? of course only ingame :)

just kidding. i find it quite ok that offensive language isn't tollerated in eve BUT i also find that a scammer who petitions a victim after receiving some hate messages is a big hypocrit.

mind you! not like "i kill you" but like "you must be a real ******* in real life and have probably a little *peep* and that's why you play so much eve". you know, the standard tells)

in my opinion the victim of a scam is still a victim be it because of stupidity, lazyness or just not knowing how game mechanics work. and it's not fair to say things like "100% self inflicted loss". that shows some guilt right here if you have to think in that way.

scammers are bad, mmmkay? a really empathic person in real life could not become an ashole in game, just not possible when you know you have real people in there... now if you have the mindset of an ashole in real life like 98% of the rest, then yeah, that would not be a problem.

definition of an empathic person: playing fallout 3 on bad (forced) but still feeling some kind of guilt when doing stuff you wouldn't do normaly like when you have to trick a small girl out of their hiding spot to give them to slavers... WHY, WHY DID YOU DO THIS TO ME BETHESDA?????????
TriadSte
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#49 - 2012-11-06 17:00:17 UTC
I think the point is everyone deals with certain things differently, therefore where does CCP draw the line in the sand?

Just because something is deemed "ok" by CCP does not mean it "ok" to player X therefore whos line is correct? Is the customer always right? or is there something different?

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#50 - 2012-11-06 17:04:28 UTC
TriadSte wrote:
I think the point is everyone deals with certain things differently, therefore where does CCP draw the line in the sand?

Just because something is deemed "ok" by CCP does not mean it "ok" to player X therefore whos line is correct? Is the customer always right? or is there something different?



This is why you and me didn't get along in your postings in the missions and complexes section, because you largely just don't "get" it.

CCP makes the rules (in other words, CCPs opinion on where to draw the behavior lines is the ON, abide by them or GTFO.
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#51 - 2012-11-06 17:13:21 UTC
TriadSte wrote:
I think the point is everyone deals with certain things differently, therefore where does CCP draw the line in the sand?

Just because something is deemed "ok" by CCP does not mean it "ok" to player X therefore whos line is correct? Is the customer always right? or is there something different?


The line is interpretive spirit.

If you can't tell obviously spiteful from RP spiteful through context, then you are not very good an communication.

At least, thats how we did it as WoW GMs(and yes, WoW GMs are terrible griefers and people, which is why so many play eve)

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#52 - 2012-11-06 17:13:30 UTC
Yatama Kautsuo wrote:

just kidding. i find it quite ok that offensive language isn't tollerated in eve BUT i also find that a scammer who petitions a victim after receiving some hate messages is a big hypocrit.

mind you! not like "i kill you" but like "you must be a real ******* in real life and have probably a little *peep* and that's why you play so much eve". you know, the standard tells)

No, if I play a game, and adhere to the rules of that game, I see no reason why some other player should question my RL personality nor the size and/or function of my reproductional organs.

Yatama Kautsuo wrote:

in my opinion the victim of a scam is still a victim be it because of stupidity, lazyness or just not knowing how game mechanics work. and it's not fair to say things like "100% self inflicted loss". that shows some guilt right here if you have to think in that way.

scammers are bad, mmmkay?

No, scammers are playing a role in a roleplaying game.

Yatama Kautsuo wrote:

a really empathic person in real life could not become an ashole in game, just not possible when you know you have real people in there... now if you have the mindset of an ashole in real life like 98% of the rest, then yeah, that would not be a problem.

definition of an empathic person: playing fallout 3 on bad (forced) but still feeling some kind of guilt when doing stuff you wouldn't do normaly like when you have to trick a small girl out of their hiding spot to give them to slavers... WHY, WHY DID YOU DO THIS TO ME BETHESDA?????????


Actually, a really empathic person in real life might very well vent her/his/its frustration over their un-empathic real life surroundings by role playing an absolute sphincter ani externus in the game.

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#53 - 2012-11-06 17:37:47 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
EVE permits every form of in-game villainy. But bringing in real life conflicts and bigotry is, as should be obvious, a no-no. In short: my character can do anything that he can get away with to your character (and vice-versa, of course). But there are very strict limits on what I can do to you. CCP's rules aren't there to make us play nice characters, only to be nice people.

So what about doing in game actions for the express purposes of "tear extraction"? Is not that a direct attack on the player, not the character?

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
#54 - 2012-11-06 17:40:52 UTC
TriadSte wrote:


I have not been scammed but I think in a sandbox its either strike first and get the kill or die. Its a dog eat dog world. If scamming is ok I think "everything" should be ok.



Even sandboxes have boundaries. That is why it is called a sand-box.
Expending Doom
#55 - 2012-11-06 17:45:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Expending Doom
Could someone please explain to me what's inherently wrong with racism and sexism?

It seems a very juvenile thing to be upset about... "did you just get out of finger painting class at your kindergarten, baby?"

Someone has an opinion based on the distinctions between the races or the sexes

This goes both ways, women regarding men negatively, blacks regarding whites negatively. But in the end these are just an individual's opinions.

Please tell me why they are "wrong".
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#56 - 2012-11-06 18:50:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Roll Sizzle Beef
Expending Doom wrote:
Could someone please explain to me what's inherently wrong with racism and sexism?

It seems a very juvenile thing to be upset about... "did you just get out of finger painting class at your kindergarten, baby?"

Someone has an opinion based on the distinctions between the races or the sexes

This goes both ways, women regarding men negatively, blacks regarding whites negatively. But in the end these are just an individual's opinions.

Please tell me why they are "wrong".


Being a specific sex or race is not an opinion. To many of us and CCP they are ignorant thoughts of supremacy giving a specific values on what you are, not who you are. Anyone can be a a-hole, or a angel. Sex, race, religion has no bearing on it. Specially the last one, as with people there are "good" and "bad" sects in personal view to everything.
Labeling a questionable position to one group as simply "opinion" does not make it okay. Its the social acceptance of that position. For some groups sexism and racism may be tolerated or encouraged, but CCP runs this boat and your going to get keelhauled going against their codes of conduct. Their views as the organization who owns and operates this service don't need to be followed, as you can simply not log on if you don't accept them.
Know your audience and the social opinions of those you choose to hang out with. Here, it is not acceptable.
Expending Doom
#57 - 2012-11-06 18:54:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Expending Doom
That's kind of exactly what I'm talking about not making sense

These things are just

-FORBIDDEN-

You know people don't choose to be mentally ******** either. Does that mean that anyone who says ******** things should be tip-toed around?
Expending Doom
#58 - 2012-11-06 18:55:15 UTC
Possibly so considering the *********
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#59 - 2012-11-06 19:07:02 UTC
Expending Doom wrote:
That's kind of exactly what I'm talking about not making sense

These things are just

-FORBIDDEN-

You know people don't choose to be mentally ******** either. Does that mean that anyone who says ******** things should be tip-toed around?

Going to have to give a better example to that in game. If there is a real mentally challenged player, they have to follow the same rules as anyone else. If they can't handle the concept of what is or isn't allowed in the game, this sadly just isn't the place for them.
Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#60 - 2012-11-06 19:10:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Dersen Lowery
Expending Doom wrote:
You know people don't choose to be mentally ******** either. Does that mean that anyone who says ******** things should be tip-toed around?


And there it is, right there.

These things are forbidden because they don't make sense. They're purely and needlessly hurtful. 99.999% of the things that are described as "********," in one version or another, are nothing that someone with one of a certain set of diseases would actually do. It's demeaning an entire demographic by using their congenital condition as a perjorative.

Tear extraction is an interesting case, because while it is always directed at the person, it is also only effective if the target is a poor sport, i.e., if they reject EVE's social contract. I don't think it helps anything, to be honest, but to use a tabletop analogy, what do you do with the guy who bawls and pitches a huge fit because he got a bad roll and his character died?

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!