These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Updated][Winter] Missile Rebalance 2.0 + Hurricane tweak

First post First post First post
Author
OT Smithers
A Farewell To Kings...
Dock Workers
#5861 - 2012-11-04 15:33:08 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:


Hybrid buff, ever heard of this ? That was a year ago.

So here we are again : caldari players are even more fanatic than any amarr NPC could be, and they are stuck in their mind with using missiles only. OR, maybe they only didn't heard about the hybrid buff and CCP should have had sent them all a letter.

PS for statistics : observing is the good first thing to do. Then, it will be time to analyse. No cruise missiles in the stats, so what are the problems of cruise missiles ?


And around and around and around we go.

If you want to ignore the hundreds of posts that have explained this already, that's fine, but don't then assume that no explanation is avaialable.

Hybrids were buffed a year ago. If a Caldari pilot stopped whatever he had been training prior to that buff, and instead immediately began training for those hybrid turrets, including gunnery support skills, he would have finished a few months ago now.

The Minmatar pilot spends seven or eight months training gunnery support and projectiles and he can fly an entire fleet worth of marvelous ships. I know because I fly Minmatar. The same could also be said of Amarr or (today) Gallente. But Caldari?

His seven or eight months gets him the Drake and a bunch of clowns on the forums telling him he should devote ANOTHER seven or eight months towards training gunnery skills so he can add the Rokh to his ship lineup. How in the world is that a reasonable thing to suggest? And why in the hell would a Caldari player do that? Why not instead train projectiles or lasers and have a complete fleet of ships at his diisposal?

The Caldari pilot who was silly enough to follow your suggestion would have invested months and hundreds of dollars, and at the end of this weapons marathon he would be able to pilot.... what? One decent ship? Maybe two? You think the Rokh is WORTH devoting that time for? You think the Moa is that nice? Are you freaking high?
OT Smithers
A Farewell To Kings...
Dock Workers
#5862 - 2012-11-04 15:40:02 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:
Cazador 64 wrote:
Yup and those are just overloading the top 20 over all the other better options out there right?
You see so many of these great combos used so often that they are never even breaking top 20 ever.
So again my point still stands.

Logic fail : if a usable weapon system had to be in the top 20, there could only be 20 good weapon systems at one time, and all the others wouldn't be usable. That's obviously wrong...

For the Raven, I was affraid you bring these "arguments" back.

* Cruise missile velocity is higher than HML velocity, and the same than tengu HML velocity. If it's not a problem for tengu or drake, it shouldn't be a problem for the Raven.

* Raven can have the same or a better tank than a fleet Maelstrom, with the same resists.

* Raven have the same stability than all other BS.

* Raven is faster than an armor abaddon, a Rokh or a Maelstrom.

* Raven cruise dps at 70km is better than tengu, Drake, Rokh, Maelstrom or Abaddon.

* Cruise Raven can have a heavy and a medium neutralizers.

If it's not a single thing, it's a combination of things, or something else. My bet is that the Tengu and the Drake obsolete it completely because of their whole caracteristics. Though, IMO, HML having comparable performances with CML is high on the list of these obsoleting reasons.


Post this great Raven fit please!

I want to see a full rack of cruise missiles, heavy neut, speed, cap booster, MWD, long point, and tank.
Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#5863 - 2012-11-04 16:00:03 UTC
OT Smithers wrote:
Bouh Revetoile wrote:
Cazador 64 wrote:
Yup and those are just overloading the top 20 over all the other better options out there right?
You see so many of these great combos used so often that they are never even breaking top 20 ever.
So again my point still stands.

Logic fail : if a usable weapon system had to be in the top 20, there could only be 20 good weapon systems at one time, and all the others wouldn't be usable. That's obviously wrong...

For the Raven, I was affraid you bring these "arguments" back.

* Cruise missile velocity is higher than HML velocity, and the same than tengu HML velocity. If it's not a problem for tengu or drake, it shouldn't be a problem for the Raven.

* Raven can have the same or a better tank than a fleet Maelstrom, with the same resists.

* Raven have the same stability than all other BS.

* Raven is faster than an armor abaddon, a Rokh or a Maelstrom.

* Raven cruise dps at 70km is better than tengu, Drake, Rokh, Maelstrom or Abaddon.

* Cruise Raven can have a heavy and a medium neutralizers.

If it's not a single thing, it's a combination of things, or something else. My bet is that the Tengu and the Drake obsolete it completely because of their whole caracteristics. Though, IMO, HML having comparable performances with CML is high on the list of these obsoleting reasons.


Post this great Raven fit please!

I want to see a full rack of cruise missiles, heavy neut, speed, cap booster, MWD, long point, and tank.



This was posted earlier in this thread to show how ravens don't suck......it didnt really have the intended effect but works here Smile

Jorma Morkkis wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8aX60biCE4#t=6m04s

It's just a duel but it shows that Raven isn't as bad as some people make it look like.


In summary the "not bad raven" jams the rokh for god knows how long and STILL pops.
OT Smithers
A Farewell To Kings...
Dock Workers
#5864 - 2012-11-04 16:11:07 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:
Noemi Nagano wrote:
My bet is you should really just *fly* the thing, and then come back. CM Ravens suck for *way* longer in PvP than HML Drakes have really been used in PvP in numbers. You need to get a clue of a topic before you start examining stuff. You, Bouh, have no idea of missiles first hand. You cant fly a single medium or large Caldari combat ship. You throw around numbers (sometimes random made up stuff, sometimes you try to stick with formulas ..) and dont see how much you fail to get the point: missile ships in PvP do different on the server than they do in theory. In theory you can sometimes get the best numbers (like with HML Drakes!) but on the server it will somehow not work like you thought it would. Welcome to missile PvP. Thats also the reason why Eve is NOT Drake online. There are plenty of other ships which are used everywhere, and esp. in lowsec PvP (where fleet doctrines are not really an issue, and where anyone who likes to pew pew tries to use whats best for the job) the Drake is NOT OVERREPRESENTED AT ALL.

If you feel like getting into missile PvP, train for missiles, use them, and then (or better *then*, or even better THEN!!) you should come back and ask again. Not before.

Its a bit like telling a blind person about colours, and how they look. You just know black, and nothing else. How could we possibly explain to you anything? But you are lucky - you can do something to get over this blind state of yours. Dont wait any longer. Change your training queue now, and see the light.

But seriously, dont come back to missile threads before you did so.

Apart from that, even Lili did not say the Raven was viable or was obsoleted by HML Drake. She has too much reputation to lose with such a statement ;)

Best regards.

PS: What I mean here, Bouh, is not you should "believe" in something. I tell you more than that. You simply will not understand this thing if you dont get into it. And the fact you ask here for the 100th time when you have been given plenty of reasonable answers before just shows how right I am.

Either you understand missiles and you can try to explain, or you don't.

And just look at any lowsec pvp killboard. You *will* see drakes, and a *lot* of them. They most probably be the second most represented ship, just behind the hurricane. It's not like if I was *actually* fighting in lowsec. I prove you they do are overrepresented.

Now, the problem you are talking (years ago) most probably refer to missile velocity posing problem in fleet because of ships warping before they were hit by the missiles. Though, fleet fights these times were at far greater ranges than now (mind you, I heard it was the Megathron the best fleet ship at this time). But things evolved blablabla. You must know the story.

Finaly, in current EVE, missile flight time is not the problem.

But you don't care anyway, and I'm strating to doubt you can even understand these consideration (the whole picture, as you call it, though you certainly not look at the same picture).

May I ask you to stop trying to ban people from the conversation and actually take part to the discussion ?
I know it's hard to debate and actually use arguments instead of using ad hominem to discredit them, though that's what smart people do when they debate.

As a side note, asking me skill up and try myself is a bit stupid, or dishonest, because it would take me some months to do so and would not prove anything.

PS : if you think missiles do differently in TQ than in theory, then you really don't understand anything at the theory.


Yes, you will see Drakes in low sec. It's a good ship. You won't see as many of them as, for example, Hurricanes, but you will see quite a few. But let's look deeper as to why you see so many....


If a Minmatar pilot wants a great cruiser he would probably grab a Rupture.
The Caldari pilot doesn't have a good T1 cruiser, so he hops in his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants a Command ship he will hop into his Sliepner
The Caldari pilot has only his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants a tankier brawling BC he hops into his Cyclone
The Caldari pilot has his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants a Battleship he can hop into his Phoon or Tempest or Mael
The Caldari pilot has his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants something fast and deadly, he can hop into his Vagabond
The Caldari pilot has only his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants to snipe and alpha things at range he can grab a Muninn
The Caladri pilot has his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants a kick-ass faction cruiser he can hop into his Cynabol
The Caldari pilot, well, he has his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants an amazing navy cruiser he can grab himself an SFI
The Caldari pilot has his Drake.

If a Minmatar pilot wants a great Faction Battleship he can build himself a Mach
The Caldari pilot can't do that, he has his Drake

And I could go on. But you should get the point. And given what I said above, by all rights you aught to see more Drakes than anything else, but you don't. And the reason is that, while Drakes are a good ship, they are not anywhere near as good as some of the folks in this thread have tried to make out. People like me, who can fly them and even like them, usually have a better option.

THIS is what has Caldari players so angry. They don't have **** right now, it's all pretty much crap, and CCP is nerfing them even more. Were this not enough they also have to listen to a bunch of people shouting them down every time they ask for some freaking balance. People with thirty ships in their own hangers saying dumbass things like, "Well, if you spent an extra half year training, you could grab yourself a Moa or even a Rokh!"

With the exception of the Tengu, in the history of Eve the following words have never, even once, been spoken:

"I wish I had trained Caldari instead!"
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5865 - 2012-11-04 16:24:21 UTC
serras bang wrote:
sorry but he has a massively bloated sig and tbh no way to get out when his tank breaks that is such a bad fit


And for some weird reason you think that's my fit...
serras bang
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5866 - 2012-11-04 16:26:01 UTC
to put smithers point in another way how many turret users have botherd or feel like (with the exception of those that mission a lot)
they wanna train yet another system that encompus a few ship for the few ships they can uctively use in it ?

and why should missle specalists like some who have posted here be bent over and given the shaft stick because they have trained for the niche of true snipping ?
serras bang
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5867 - 2012-11-04 16:26:49 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
serras bang wrote:
sorry but he has a massively bloated sig and tbh no way to get out when his tank breaks that is such a bad fit


And for some weird reason you think that's my fit...


nrvrt once said that was your fit u saud "he has" i.e the guy that designed it
GeneralDouchbag
Apocalypse Lancers
#5868 - 2012-11-04 16:30:20 UTC
What about citadel missiles??? I find it quite sad that a nyx can outrun them.


I need Citadel buffs! D:

balls 2 u good sir

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5869 - 2012-11-04 16:31:00 UTC
OT Smithers wrote:
His seven or eight months gets him the Drake and a bunch of clowns on the forums telling him he should devote ANOTHER seven or eight months towards training gunnery skills so he can add the Rokh to his ship lineup. How in the world is that a reasonable thing to suggest? And why in the hell would a Caldari player do that? Why not instead train projectiles or lasers and have a complete fleet of ships at his diisposal


Ok, mr OG Smith

How long your Rifter survives against blaster Harpy?
Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#5870 - 2012-11-04 17:25:53 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
OT Smithers wrote:
His seven or eight months gets him the Drake and a bunch of clowns on the forums telling him he should devote ANOTHER seven or eight months towards training gunnery skills so he can add the Rokh to his ship lineup. How in the world is that a reasonable thing to suggest? And why in the hell would a Caldari player do that? Why not instead train projectiles or lasers and have a complete fleet of ships at his diisposal


Ok, mr OG Smith

How long your Rifter survives against blaster Harpy?



Frig vs AF....that's just a dumb comparison any way you cut it.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5871 - 2012-11-04 17:33:53 UTC
Morrigan LeSante wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
OT Smithers wrote:
His seven or eight months gets him the Drake and a bunch of clowns on the forums telling him he should devote ANOTHER seven or eight months towards training gunnery skills so he can add the Rokh to his ship lineup. How in the world is that a reasonable thing to suggest? And why in the hell would a Caldari player do that? Why not instead train projectiles or lasers and have a complete fleet of ships at his diisposal


Ok, mr OG Smith

How long your Rifter survives against blaster Harpy?



Frig vs AF....that's just a dumb comparison any way you cut it.


Well...

Rifter wins against Retribution
Rifter wins against Vengeance
Rifter wins against Enyo
Rifter wins against Ishkur
OT Smithers
A Farewell To Kings...
Dock Workers
#5872 - 2012-11-04 17:58:44 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
OT Smithers wrote:
His seven or eight months gets him the Drake and a bunch of clowns on the forums telling him he should devote ANOTHER seven or eight months towards training gunnery skills so he can add the Rokh to his ship lineup. How in the world is that a reasonable thing to suggest? And why in the hell would a Caldari player do that? Why not instead train projectiles or lasers and have a complete fleet of ships at his diisposal


Ok, mr OG Smith

How long your Rifter survives against blaster Harpy?


Answer #1: At least five YEARS or so. Prior to the rocket and hybrod fix the Caldari didn't even have a frigate. You might not remember that, but I can assure you that Caladri pilots damkn sure do.

Answer #2: You are comparing a T2 Assault Frigate to a T1 Frigate.

In any case, there is no question that today Caldari frigates are very nice. In fact, my current favorite frigate (for whatever that's worth) is the rail Harpy. However, every race now has solid frigates. Something that could not be said for most of this game's history. Is your point that Caldari players should be content to fly frigates?

CCP has earned the distrust of Caldari players. Again, they have EARNED it. Even now, with this winter update, they are still at it. They're nerfing missiles, nerfing ECM, and gleefully talking up even more nerfs coming down the line. Their originally proposed changes to the Moa and Caracal were a joke.

And yeah, now at least Fozzie is mentioning that the other Caldari ships are a wreck, one of their main weapons systems is a disaster, and he'd like to fix them one day. But first, first, he really needs to spend more development time *******ing the Caldari players. He can squeeze in some more Caldari nerfs. There's always time for that.

It's like a morale thing at CCP headquarters or something -- every time they feel a bit down they take a steaming crap on the most broken race in the game.





OT Smithers
A Farewell To Kings...
Dock Workers
#5873 - 2012-11-04 18:00:14 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Morrigan LeSante wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
OT Smithers wrote:
His seven or eight months gets him the Drake and a bunch of clowns on the forums telling him he should devote ANOTHER seven or eight months towards training gunnery skills so he can add the Rokh to his ship lineup. How in the world is that a reasonable thing to suggest? And why in the hell would a Caldari player do that? Why not instead train projectiles or lasers and have a complete fleet of ships at his diisposal


Ok, mr OG Smith

How long your Rifter survives against blaster Harpy?



Frig vs AF....that's just a dumb comparison any way you cut it.


Well...

Rifter wins against Retribution
Rifter wins against Vengeance
Rifter wins against Enyo
Rifter wins against Ishkur


Dude... wat?

The Rifter isn't even that great as a T1 Frigate these days. Let alone against any of those AFs.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5874 - 2012-11-04 18:14:20 UTC
OT Smithers wrote:
The Rifter isn't even that great as a T1 Frigate these days. Let alone against any of those AFs.


Rifter can render Retribution's lasers useless with neut.
Rifter can tank Ishkur's drones and Vengeance's rockets.
Rifter can, yeah, it just can beat Enyo.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5875 - 2012-11-04 19:47:55 UTC
OT Smithers wrote:
Post this great Raven fit please!

I want to see a full rack of cruise missiles, heavy neut, speed, cap booster, MWD, long point, and tank.

Already posted. No cap booster, the Maelstrom perform fine without one, so I thought a Raven, having capless weapons too, didn't need one ; long point, in a LR fleet BS... Funny you.

Do you know the Raven have the same number of midslot than the Maelstrom ?

As for the skill training : With missiles, caldari ALREADY have some great ships, drake and tengu being quite good at everything ; learning something else would bring them ANOTHER line of ships. Of course, frigates still don't exists, but nevermind.

With hybrids, as caldari pilot, you would earn some frigates (strangely though, caldari defenders here tend to ignore their ships despite them being among the best in their class), Eagle, Naga, Ferox, Rokh. And yes, ALL these ships are fairly good in the ASB era combined with blasters (and blasters + range bonus = kiting blaters win).

With ECM, you have another 4 more ships.

Of course you can train another race of ship and have more than only four, though no race is one weapon only, and even minmatar need to train some other skill trees (like armor tank on top of shield, and missiles). And minmatar ships are not Caldari ships. Even though there is only one ladder of power for some people here, caldari hybrid ships do have their strength. Indeed, if you are only looking for fotm, go for winmatar, but don't cry about caldari having less options than the others, it's wrong, and they don't need more time to train for all their things.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5876 - 2012-11-04 20:07:22 UTC
OT Smithers wrote:
Yes, you will see Drakes in low sec. It's a good ship. You won't see as many of them as, for example, Hurricanes, but you will see quite a few. But let's look deeper as to why you see so many....


If a Minmatar pilot wants a great cruiser he would probably grab a Rupture.
The Caldari pilot doesn't have a good T1 cruiser, so he hops in his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants a Command ship he will hop into his Sliepner
The Caldari pilot has only his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants a tankier brawling BC he hops into his Cyclone
The Caldari pilot has his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants a Battleship he can hop into his Phoon or Tempest or Mael
The Caldari pilot has his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants something fast and deadly, he can hop into his Vagabond
The Caldari pilot has only his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants to snipe and alpha things at range he can grab a Muninn
The Caladri pilot has his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants a kick-ass faction cruiser he can hop into his Cynabol
The Caldari pilot, well, he has his Drake

If a Minmatar pilot wants an amazing navy cruiser he can grab himself an SFI
The Caldari pilot has his Drake.

If a Minmatar pilot wants a great Faction Battleship he can build himself a Mach
The Caldari pilot can't do that, he has his Drake

And I could go on. But you should get the point. And given what I said above, by all rights you aught to see more Drakes than anything else, but you don't. And the reason is that, while Drakes are a good ship, they are not anywhere near as good as some of the folks in this thread have tried to make out. People like me, who can fly them and even like them, usually have a better option.

THIS is what has Caldari players so angry. They don't have **** right now, it's all pretty much crap, and CCP is nerfing them even more. Were this not enough they also have to listen to a bunch of people shouting them down every time they ask for some freaking balance. People with thirty ships in their own hangers saying dumbass things like, "Well, if you spent an extra half year training, you could grab yourself a Moa or even a Rokh!"

With the exception of the Tengu, in the history of Eve the following words have never, even once, been spoken:

"I wish I had trained Caldari instead!"

Jeez ! You mean, Caldari are bad at trying to be minmatar ?! Wow ! Amazing !

I have a scoop : caldari ships are not minmatar ships, but they do have strengths. Your list is largely exagerated BTW, you only emphazised minmatar strengths here and even forgot some caldari ships. The same list could be made to emphasize caldari strengths.

Question though : why does every caldari defender here compare caldari ships to the so called "winmatar" ships ? Why don't you compare your caldari ships to amarr or gallente ships ?
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5877 - 2012-11-04 20:27:27 UTC
OT Smithers wrote:
If a Minmatar pilot wants a Command ship he will hop into his Sliepner
The Caldari pilot has only his Drake


Vulture
or for pure boosting
6 gang link OGB Tengu
Lili Lu
#5878 - 2012-11-04 20:55:55 UTC
Giving my answers in underline.
OT Smithers wrote:
Yes, you will see Drakes in low sec. It's a good ship. You won't see as many of them as, for example, Hurricanes, but you will see quite a few. But let's look deeper as to why you see so many....
OT, it doesn't surprise me that you are echoing Noemi. But I've already pointed out the problem with this line of argument. It is anecdotal. Anecdotally I see more Drakes than Canes in lowsec. We could both be right, or wrong. It could depend what part of lowsec, what time of day, so many factors. The point is netiher of us can take a trully unbiased random sample of lowsec tier 2 BC use. Unless that were to happen, such a statment as you made has no factual value. It is purely opinion.

If a Minmatar pilot wants a great cruiser he would probably grab a Rupture.
The Caldari pilot doesn't have a good T1 cruiser, so he hops in his Drake
In FW I see lots of Caracals. Few Moas. A fair number of BBs. Anyway, with the rebalancing the Rupture is now appearing rather weak for the future. But at least the rebalancing with roles make pretty much all the cruisers rather more even.

If a Minmatar pilot wants a Command ship he will hop into his Sliepner
The Caldari . . . Drake
A Nighthawk is still better for pve than a Drake. For pvp the relative lack of a midslot and current fitting make the Nighthawk a problem. They haven't got to command ships yet. Sleipnir has been king of this category though for pvp, but in the future Question

If a Minmatar pilot wants a tankier brawling BC he hops into his Cyclone
The Caldari . . . Drake
Not sure what you are saying here. They are both BCs. And both can tank very well with current game circumstances. But Cyclone may drop out of it's present usage because ASBs are getting nerfed. Regardless, I think we would both agree anecdotally that Drakes still outnumber Cyclones in lowsec. And noone is making a nullsec blob of Cyclones afaikP

If a Minmatar pilot wants a Battleship he can hop into his Phoon or Tempest or Mael
The Caldari . . .Drake
Here I have to flat out disagree. Rokhs are getting usage in Nullsec. And in lowsec I rarely see any BSs. If you want to revise that statement to missile BS then yes, why fly a Raven (don't want to get into that argument though) when you can fly a much cheaper Drake.

If a Minmatar pilot wants something fast and deadly, he can hop into his Vagabond
The Caldari . . . Drake
Fast is not the Caldari forte. It's those pesky racial predispositions in the game. If someone wants "fast(est)" then they really should be training Minmatar. It's just the way the game is.Straight. Meanwhile though, every race has something that is deadly, even if not presently very evenly distributed. That is why there is rebalancing going on though.

If a Minmatar pilot wants to snipe and alpha things at range he can grab a Muninn
The Caladri . . . Drake
Actually again I don't agree. You can get a better sniper out of a Cerb (more distance) and almost as much alpha as a drake. It's just that again the Drake is cheaper and has 7 launchers to the Cerb's 5 even without the rof bonus of the cerb. Meanwhile the Muninn has 5 guns to the Cane's 6, as well as the range bonus. Arty needs a range bonus to snipe unlike current HMs. Sniping Canes are sorta fail. With rebalancing and this current nerf, the sniping Cerb will look better.

If a Minmatar pilot wants a kick-ass faction cruiser he can hop into his Cynabol. If a Minmatar pilot wants an amazing navy cruiser he can grab himself an SFI.
The Caldari . . . Drake
True enough. But the Caldair pilot also has two pirate faction cruisers. Unfortunately, they each require another weapon system to have been trained, unlike the Cyn or SFI for a minmatar pilot. SFI is getting way more use (anecdotallyP) than the Cyn. With my fw alt I'm seeing lots of CNI. But it may just be an artifact of their cheapness due to the former ease of lp farming. Faction ships appear to be last in line for rebalancing. They can't do everything at once.Straight

If a Minmatar pilot wants a great Faction Battleship he can build himself a Mach
The Caldari . . . Drake
Again this is an artifact of needing to train a differnt weapon system for the pirate ships that have a Caldari component. But here I think you are wrong on the whole. There are plenty of Navy Ravens. Granted almost none of them are bewing used in pvp. But they are quite prolific (anecdotally)

And I could go on. But you should get the point. And given what I said above, by all rights you aught to see more Drakes than anything else, but you don't. And the reason is that, while Drakes are a good ship, they are not anywhere near as good as some of the folks in this thread have tried to make out. People like me, who can fly them and even like them, usually have a better option. We must be playing different games. I see Drakes everywhere. And the eve-kill stats have been supporting this (again without addressing the disagreement we have about nullsec and lowsec use)

THIS is what has Caldari players so angry. They don't have **** right now, it's all pretty much crap, and CCP is nerfing them even more. Were this not enough they also have to listen to a bunch of people shouting them down every time they ask for some freaking balance. People with thirty ships in their own hangers saying dumbass things like, "Well, if you spent an extra half year training, you could grab yourself a Moa or even a Rokh!" running out of room, will give answer on this in another post.

With the exception of the Tengu, in the history of Eve the following words have never, even once, been spoken:

"I wish I had trained Caldari instead!"

Not true. I suppose you just don't hang with many folks from 2006 or 2007 that started as Amarr or Minmatar (anecdotal disagreement once again)P
Lili Lu
#5879 - 2012-11-04 21:33:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
OT Smithers wrote:
THIS is what has Caldari players so angry. They don't have **** right now, it's all pretty much crap, and CCP is nerfing them even more. Were this not enough they also have to listen to a bunch of people shouting them down every time they ask for some freaking balance. People with thirty ships in their own hangers saying dumbass things like, "Well, if you spent an extra half year training, you could grab yourself a Moa or even a Rokh!"


OT, training a gunnery tree is indeed a *****. But frankly, those that have avoided and been able to avoid it have been far too lucky. And I do not think it is half a year, but I could be wrong in that (I didn't do it all at one shot). Regardless, one could decide to go with meta 4 tech I guns for quite a while. It's not impossible. I pvp'd and pve'd with them for a time, until I trained tech II. Only elite assholes will turn you away. This is a game. People just need to find the right buddies.

But turning to my purpose for this post, I want to address your use of the phrase "Caldari players." At one point it may have had more meaning. Back when the learning skills were in the game, you started with a pitance of attribute strength and total starting sp, and your rolled race affected your starting attributes. I started in that environment Sad as the worst ass stink in the game Amarr (I liked the idea of lasers Lol). Even so, very early I recognized the importance of cross-training. Meanwhile 3 charsima Achura were flooding into the game and having a grand time getting into level 4 income making much faster with Drakes.

But enough about me P, the important thing is that much of those mechanics are gone and have been for a while. Anyone that has so far been able to get away with training Caldari Drake and Tengu and HMs only has been enjoying an anomaly. One that will be closing even more as this process continues I bet. This game has always been about diversifying. Sure it's good to concentrate in something (master it) but to think that that one area of mastery will/should be rewarded in perpetuity is misguided. One will always need to have some diversification in one's sp portfolio to survive and find wide enjoyment in the game.

I've been saying this for years in almost every post I put on the S&M threads. Every character should have two races of ships trained. And in so doing by extension, every character is going to have to have two general weapon systems trained. And an even smarter stretegy is to have two races that tank differntly trained even though is necessitates more sp investment as well.

Being diversified gives a player options. Options for pve. Amarr laser boats love to kill bloods and sanshas and are good at it, but the poor missioner that only has lasers if he for whatever reason finds himself getting loaded with anagel or gurista missions. More importantly for pvp, especially with the rise of logi supported and even monoculture fleets, if tank only one way you run the risk of being left out if your gang or alliance is running the other tanking modality.

Being diversified also gives one perspective on the game. This usually makes one a better poster. If you can not just see the performance of another races ships and weapons in eft or pyfa but also have actually used them you come to "know" the benefits and drawbacks of both races and weapons systems in relation to each other. Then you are better at seeing actual imbalances. Returning to me, I have had Lili trained in tech II lasers and projectiles but also all tech II missiles at all sizes for subcaps (and tech II drones through heavys and sentrys as well). Lili's first tech II weapons system was HAMs (other than tech II light and medium drones). I have another character that has tech II hybrids and missiles also (Gallente and Caldari being a rather easier pair to cross-train). I've run pve in drakes, and pvp in drakes (and falcons P). I know very well how strong the ship and the weapon system is and it informs my support of the present HM nerf.

Lastly, being diversified is the best, only insurance one has in the game, from being stuck in the suck. Whether that suck is real or perceived. A strategy of only training one weapon system and race (not even to BS) and expecting to be able to do everything in game with that is a fail strategy (even if up til now it has been possible to do for HMs and Drake/Tengu). Such a strategy should not be reinforced, encouraged, or salvaged. And going back to your second sentence, no, Caladari is not in the doldrums right now. Minmatar may be in the best position, but it is Gallente that one could most say has "****" right now. Caldari has been the major benficiary so far in the ship rebalancing. That they may be losing the hands down favorites for BC and Cruiser sized ships is not relegating them behind Gallente. When CCP has gone through a whole pass on the ships and mods we shall see. And as Fozzie says, they will start all over again.
Dato Koppla
Balls Deep Inc.
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#5880 - 2012-11-05 00:04:19 UTC
Arguments here have gotten too long winded so I'm lazy to join in, but just wanted to drop by and say:

Protip: Don't bother reading Jorma's posts, he has no idea what's going on, not in this thread, any other thread, or just EvE in general.