These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Thread has served - Please lock, thanks :)

First post
Author
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#241 - 2012-11-03 11:32:34 UTC
That's what they're doing and that's the cause of all the whining.
Krax As
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#242 - 2012-11-03 11:50:39 UTC
i got an idea and yeah it might be silly:

maybe the reason most indy / Miner "carebears" hate ganking so much is because they see NO reason for even doing it.
they mine, a gang drops in and kicks their teeth in. then gets pawned by concord.

new mechanic and more in the alley CCP envisions it maybe (and I would LOVE it even though i am mostly a carebear myself)

ransoms as a game mechanic.

so, in order to be able to attack someone in highsec, you need to ransom them.
righclick target, ransom option chosen, enter amount of ransom, enter ransom message (or use standard one)

the target receives a pop saying something like "you have been ransomed"
and then the actual ransom message including the ransom amount.

amount has to be equal or higher than market average of taregt hull ors something, dunno.

the moment the ransom is issued, a timer starts. its not an aggressive behavior just yet.
if the timer ends and nothing has happened (target just didnt react because he was afk or even is a bot or something)
ganker can gank and get a timer window of x seconds to get away before concord shows up and "looks into things".

the target can of course do all kinds of stuff to react: whine, talk, discuss, curse, swear, sing, try to leave or call for help or log or even pay.

if he pays, the ganker has t chose between accept ransoming and not conduct aggerssion, or screw it and attack anyways, thuis seeting normal concord reaction in motion.

this might sound fairly complicated but it would mean, gankers are not just stupid gankers per se, but at least have to behave more like real pirates and thus give the targets some perspective on how the game shows them to HTFU. without the ganers having to explain them any game mechanics anymore.


Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#243 - 2012-11-03 11:51:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Riot Girl wrote:
That's what they're doing and that's the cause of all the whining.


Nope. If they did, my work at my Mutual Funds (involving a lot including minerals and ices trading) would be much easier and profits would rise much better.

Bumping is just annoying, does not bring me any revenue.

Stay sure that if my Net Asset Value was 5 times bigger I would pay Bat Country to clean belts up.
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#244 - 2012-11-03 11:54:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Riot Girl
"Pay 100m ISK or we'll kill you.

Thanks. Now pay another 100m ISK or we'll kill you.

Thanks. Now pay another 100m etc..."

I guess you're not too knowledgeable about how ransoming and ganking works.
Krax As
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#245 - 2012-11-03 12:02:30 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
"Pay 100m ISK or we'll kill you.

Thanks. Now pay another 100m ISK or we'll kill you.

Thanks. Now pay another 100m etc..."

I guess you're not too knowledgeable about how ransoming and ganking works.



never pretended i was. but right now ransoming is a convo and direct money transfer. the ransoming mechanic would be something else, a bit clumsier maybe but with regulaions in place. hell i am not a game dev (are you ?) but if miners could and have to call gankers pirates instead of griefers, gankers and what not alo of public humiliation and whinery could be stopped.

imagine with the retribution system the ramsoned target issued an immediate bounty on the pirate, thus alerting a nearby merc / bounty hunter who frequently patrols the area as he knows miners are there that will be ransomed. (of course only if that information is available while in space)
they drop in on the "pirate gankers", giving them real pvp (isnt that what they wanted in the first place?)
i could envision something like this to work quiet nicely.


Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#246 - 2012-11-03 12:05:22 UTC
So you're saying a ganker can ransom a Miner and if the miner refuses to pay, the ganker gets a kill right, but whenever a ganker ransoms a miner, they also get a kill right placed on themselves which is open to anyone?
Krax As
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#247 - 2012-11-03 12:26:39 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
So you're saying a ganker can ransom a Miner and if the miner refuses to pay, the ganker gets a kill right, but whenever a ganker ransoms a miner, they also get a kill right placed on themselves which is open to anyone?


is that how it works right now ? ganker kils miner and everyone can attack he ganker ? i thought main ganker problem afterwards is concord ?

dunno. i wouldnt punish pirates if they play within rulesets of the game. i enjoy security of highsec, but concord as an omnipotent force protecting all who dont want to realize that this is not a themepark but a sandbox game is just wrong. as is the idea of consensual pvp. i read in one signature that you consent to pvp in eve once you hit undock, but many dont realize it. what i dont like is griefing in games that cost money or games in general. griefing as in taking the fun out of the game for some other player.
only because he doesnt like pvp doesnt give some other the right to grief him until he either leaves the game or decides to change his playstyle. in a sandbox, ther is no right playstyle, everything shpuld be allowed and possible.

bzw i think that being able to issue a bounty and whatever player / corp / alliance you chose is just wrong and will be severely exploited. bountys make sense if you want to retaliate, to make justice strike. so in order to be able to put a bounty on someone, the bounty target needs to do something to justify that bounty. and that has to be ingame, not being a political or metagaming reason.

and the bounty has to be in proportion to the target and the issuing party
White Quake
Doomheim
#248 - 2012-11-03 12:29:53 UTC
Ghazu wrote:
Yeah, our persecution of pve duders have resulted in inudstry coming to a crashing halt, literally nothing for sale in Jita.
Aint it amazing what people do for thin margins?


You're so stupid, it's funny.

Why do you think market prices have RISEN on everything from Trade Goods to Ships to modules to Ammo?

Hulkageddon - mining in Empire dropped by 49% percent.
Burn Jita - Small effect, not much tbfh.

Now, with miners being taken out non stop, the pvp pilots then complain about insurance prices on ships, module prices etc. whose to blame? Why do we have to spend so much to PvP? Why is PvP dropping off?

Simple answer and ill lay it out for you

Before Hulkageddon - Ship and module prices were reasonable, then came hulkageddon and prices started to rise, then came high sec freighter ganks and prices continued to rise

Who is to blame

Oh wait..... Now i remember whose to blame

the very people who are trolling this thread...

go figure?
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#249 - 2012-11-03 12:32:49 UTC
Krax As wrote:
is that how it works right now ?

No, I'm trying to figure out what your idea is.
Ghazu
#250 - 2012-11-03 12:35:42 UTC
White Quake wrote:
Ghazu wrote:
Yeah, our persecution of pve duders have resulted in inudstry coming to a crashing halt, literally nothing for sale in Jita.
Aint it amazing what people do for thin margins?


You're so stupid, it's funny.

Why do you think market prices have RISEN on everything from Trade Goods to Ships to modules to Ammo?

Hulkageddon - mining in Empire dropped by 49% percent.
Burn Jita - Small effect, not much tbfh.

Now, with miners being taken out non stop, the pvp pilots then complain about insurance prices on ships, module prices etc. whose to blame? Why do we have to spend so much to PvP? Why is PvP dropping off?

Simple answer and ill lay it out for you

Before Hulkageddon - Ship and module prices were reasonable, then came hulkageddon and prices started to rise, then came high sec freighter ganks and prices continued to rise

Who is to blame

Oh wait..... Now i remember whose to blame

the very people who are trolling this thread...

go figure?


Nice insult buddy boy. Simple answer inflation, too much isk faucet not enough sinks, and speculators.

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984

Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#251 - 2012-11-03 12:35:52 UTC
Mineral prices went up after CCP mass-banned a number of bots and introduced new mechanisms to counter botting. OTEC, nthe tech cartel also ensures their profits by keeping technetium prices high, affecting prices of T2 ships.

However, the biggest factor influencing prices has nothing to with industry- people just have more ISK. New Eden is full of abundant, endless sources of income, and players exploit them with great enthusiasm. Why sell a cruiser for 1.2 million, when you can move just as many units for 2.5 mil?

.

White Quake
Doomheim
#252 - 2012-11-03 12:37:49 UTC
Ghazu wrote:
White Quake wrote:
Ghazu wrote:
Yeah, our persecution of pve duders have resulted in inudstry coming to a crashing halt, literally nothing for sale in Jita.
Aint it amazing what people do for thin margins?


You're so stupid, it's funny.

Why do you think market prices have RISEN on everything from Trade Goods to Ships to modules to Ammo?

Hulkageddon - mining in Empire dropped by 49% percent.
Burn Jita - Small effect, not much tbfh.

Now, with miners being taken out non stop, the pvp pilots then complain about insurance prices on ships, module prices etc. whose to blame? Why do we have to spend so much to PvP? Why is PvP dropping off?

Simple answer and ill lay it out for you

Before Hulkageddon - Ship and module prices were reasonable, then came hulkageddon and prices started to rise, then came high sec freighter ganks and prices continued to rise

Who is to blame

Oh wait..... Now i remember whose to blame

the very people who are trolling this thread...

go figure?


Nice insult buddy boy. Simple answer inflation, too much isk faucet not enough sinks, and speculators.


No no and no same old crap answer given by pvpers to place the blame elsewhere, always the same answers, inflation, blah blah blah

Point of fact - pvp pilots who mess around with empire, destroy eve destroy the economy and then blame anyone else but themselves. i have been pvping for as long as i can remember and i have NEVER shot a barge or ganked sum one in high sec.

stop blaming other people for your own issues that you caused as a group, it is pathetic ad childish
White Quake
Doomheim
#253 - 2012-11-03 12:38:42 UTC
Roime wrote:
Mineral prices went up after CCP mass-banned a number of bots and introduced new mechanisms to counter botting. OTEC, nthe tech cartel also ensures their profits by keeping technetium prices high, affecting prices of T2 ships.

However, the biggest factor influencing prices has nothing to with industry- people just have more ISK. New Eden is full of abundant, endless sources of income, and players exploit them with great enthusiasm. Why sell a cruiser for 1.2 million, when you can move just as many units for 2.5 mil?



wrong, the bots banned were from drone regions and didn't effect the market at all

Another excuse
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#254 - 2012-11-03 12:39:57 UTC
White Quake wrote:
Now, with miners being taken out non stop, the pvp pilots then complain about insurance prices on ships, module prices etc. whose to blame?

They don't. You made this up.
Ghazu
#255 - 2012-11-03 12:42:44 UTC
lalalalalalalala i am a space knight otec royalty i like to roll around town blapping peasants lol.
So no more drone poo had zero effect on the mineral market? Don't make me insult you.

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984

White Quake
Doomheim
#256 - 2012-11-03 12:51:01 UTC
Ghazu wrote:
lalalalalalalala i am a space knight otec royalty i like to roll around town blapping peasants lol.
So no more drone poo had zero effect on the mineral market? Don't make me insult you.


idiotic response for some one who cannot come up with an answer when proven wrong
White Quake
Doomheim
#257 - 2012-11-03 12:51:21 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
White Quake wrote:
Now, with miners being taken out non stop, the pvp pilots then complain about insurance prices on ships, module prices etc. whose to blame?

They don't. You made this up.


Simple eve search will prove this statement wrong
Krax As
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#258 - 2012-11-03 12:53:29 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
Krax As wrote:
is that how it works right now ?

No, I'm trying to figure out what your idea is.



i think i drew a somewhat detailed picture. sorry for you not getting it, must be my fault.

what i would love is people stop blaming each other and all gettign heated up but people offering solutions and ways to improve.

to bad games and especially online games ar just that. games. and vents for peoples real life struggles and shortcomings.
when people work 40 hours / week the average player probably is not interested in organizing, structuring and effective colaboration. they want mindless, stupid and funny **** to release tension and to enjoy themselves.

the whole "stay away from us" whining on one side and "you people are pathetic carebears, live with it. adapt or die"-CRAP wouldnt even exist if players would find a way to implement risk vs reward themselves, instead of blaming CCP the game needs tweaking and is broken and whatnot.

make more indy guys WANT to go to null by REWARDING them to do so. help them, instead of luring them there, ganking them and then mocking them in local and in forums.
help them to built up a workable infrastrukcture and economy where you need them. then you can leave the oh so sad carebears alone and never have to worry about them highsec dwellers anymore at all.



Ghazu
#259 - 2012-11-03 12:54:20 UTC
White Quake wrote:
Ghazu wrote:
lalalalalalalala i am a space knight otec royalty i like to roll around town blapping peasants lol.
So no more drone poo had zero effect on the mineral market? Don't make me insult you.


idiotic response for some one who cannot come up with an answer when proven wrong

Oh another insult. Aren't you a big mang. I thought miners liked it when fruits of their labor could be sold at a higher price.

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#260 - 2012-11-03 12:56:41 UTC
Apparently not. Searching the terms 'Insurance Costs' just brings up a load of recent GD threads. None of which complain about insurance costs being an issue.

The only costs I ever hear anyone complain about is clone costs and Meta 4 being too cheap because high-sec needs to be nerfed.