EVE General Discussion

It's also the case when a ~big thing~ occurs, everyone gets excited, even if we have to alarm clock for it.

And then we get blueballed because we're ~evil blobbers.


But still, sometimes you get great fun like when we went to shoot that IRC CSAA. Good stuff.

OP thinks PVE wins wars.

Kult Altol thinks PvE constructs ships.

What you *loling* at? Or in your world do pvp pilots when fighting wear harry potter robes and make ships spin out of thin air?

ALAKAZAM

Yeah, our persecution of pve duders have resulted in inudstry coming to a crashing halt, literally nothing for sale in Jita.
Aint it amazing what people do for thin margins?

Miners strive to play something allowed by the EULA. As such as long as they don't cheat, they are free to do whatever and however they want.

unfortunatly it seems to be the major consent that we all can agree on.
if it was that easy then eve would have failed i guess.

especially funny for me is the fact that elitist pvp pilots or those who think of themselves that way clearly state "nerf highsec, get rid of carebears" and what not, but seem to have ABSOLUTELY no clue in how to balance out the loss of indy power that would mean for the game, their alliances and wars.

seems to me like this: even the biggest and best organized alliances do their main indy stuff in high because of said reasons (logistics, infrastructure, you named it all blah)

the memebers of those exact alliances whine about how highsec needs to get nerfed... errm. either you guys dont talk to each other or your whole group is kinda schizophrenic.

i say it again: the mechanics ingame are there. even though some stuff defo needs to be tweaked (corp / alliance use of pos infrastructure, corp-wide / alliance wide use of PI, sov mechanics-although i dont have to clue why and how but it comes up again and again)
if the corps and alliances would try to establish and improve infrastructure and indy possibilities in low / null, way way more people would go there.
as it comes to tweaks improving infrastructure in null without nerfing high:
what about more player owned stations possible per system? it would allow market and indy systems in well protected areas of space, lessen the risk for indy players while offering the same possibilities as in high (slots for stuff to build / research)

the galaxy in eve in total has become so small in the way it is just too easy to get into highsec to buy / get / build the stuff you want and get back to null that location basically matters not anymore. same with fleet warfare. thouands of people eploy for constellations and regions in a matter of minutes. dont get me wrong, i know it takes effort to establish a jump network of titans and scouts and cynos and ****, but still its way to easy. thats just my opinion.
if that would be harder, we would see less blobbing, more small gang warfare, more ways tofight and blow each other up. all spread out over a lot more areas and space. might be that i am wrong on it, but thats what i would loook into. plus the station tweak. plus general attitude of elitist pvp pilots. just think about where you get your ships from and please dont say "from jita" or "my corpmates". think about where they built that **** before you say something like "nerf highsec, carebears suck".

err. either i misread the "in dont trust miners " post and thought there was irony in there when there was not, or someone else got it the wrong way

Every single corp and alliance every of my TONS of alts have been, were exactly like that if not worse.

Then, those who are not fine allowing them to sit there have just to stop whining and go fix it.