These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Updated][Winter] Missile Rebalance 2.0 + Hurricane tweak

First post First post First post
Author
ROU Psychopath
Stalkers Asylum
#5801 - 2012-11-02 16:12:31 UTC
Now Lili, how does that egg feel?

Best regards, Noemi
Lili Lu
#5802 - 2012-11-02 16:40:04 UTC
ROU Psychopath wrote:
Now Lili, how does that egg feel?

Best regards, Noemi

It feels great Noemi. Big smile Now I have to hold my face over a frying pan and scramble that egg up. You finally did it. Do you feel better too. \o/ See, it wan't that bad.

So you get off on ganking noobs in Jita from Minmatar ships. Anyway, why haven't you been posting from ROU for the whole thread? Anyway, I'm sure you will not stop posting your displeasure with this nerf all the way to the day it hits tranquility. Here's to another 300 pages of this thread What?P
Lili Lu
#5803 - 2012-11-02 16:43:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Noemi Nagano wrote:
While I agree the stats after 2 days are not really a hot thing the point is dear Lili missed to post the end of the month weapons list and the entire top 20 ships in last month. And not only me thinks this is not a smart way to use stats .. when its so obvious what you try to hide :D


See, you're learning Noemi. A day and half of stats in isolation mean next to nothing. We'll see how things are looking later in the month. And we'll have to remember the continued trend that has been displayed over many months, indeed years.

As for the lack of posting all top 20 on my previous post, Noemi, it was already presented as somehow invalidating what I said, and countered by me. -

Lili Lu wrote:
Cazador 64 wrote:
Why not post the entire top 20 and see most of them are Winmatarr ships ? In fact just shy of 50% make up this list.
And the same thing happens with weapons systems and projectiles.
At any rate the cane was just a start to the bombardment of nerfs that are coming to a projectile winmatarr ship near you.

The fact is DEV made the right call with rebalancing the nerf,
they listened to the people who went onto test and tried the changes for them self and made adjustments.
Fozzie you made the right call I commend you for taking the time to read the forums and make the right call. Big smile


Because posting the entire top twenty is effort.Straight

Anyway you keep trying to satisfy yourself that I am some Minmatar chauvanist like you are a Caldari chauvanist. You are mistaken. I don't care if there are future adjustments to Minmatar weapons. I don't self identify in this game or rl like some of you appear to do with any in-game race. I outgrew any in-game affiliation within my first year, and started crosstraining and even got a second account for the other two races of ships.

As I've said multiple times in this thread I think it is the overdone TE buff that is the source of the Minmatar strengths in the current game. Maybe that will be addressed. But if and when doesn't matter for this thread in that you could be entirely correct that projectiles need a nerf and it would not invalidate any of the nerf on missiles or the coming direct nerfs to the Drake. Enjoy.Smile


Maybe you need to read the thread more Noemi. I wasn't ducking anything. I have no skin in projectiles. I have them trained, but I also have tech II lasers, and tech II missiles of all kinds trained (no capital size for either though). I have not been arguing that there isn't something collectively advantageous and overused with some projectile guns. But the mistakes you HM apologists make is to lump all projectile guns together and also to think that somehow the collective strength of them absolves the op status of HMs. Projectiles will see some adjustments I suspect. It could be specific gun stats adjusted or more likely a rethinking of the overdone TE buff of a while back. I really don't care, sorry to deflate your hope for my as irrational anger as yours to some possible impending projectile nerf.

Anyway, because it is something I care about, statistics and analysis of them, let me link something about analyzing polling data in the presidential election in the US. http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/01/in-nevada-obama-ryan-and-signs-of-a-new-democratic-leaning-normal/#more-36829
It's somewhat similar to eve-kill killmail stats. They are in essence data that has to be analyzed, like polling data. The more data you have, the better your conclusions and predictions are. I would love it if Eve-kill would give us more raw information, more complete information, and more ability to break down the information for analysis. Maybe in the future it will. Until then we have to deal with it as it is. And the simple point is that one day's data in isolation tells you very little.

edit - and won't a projectile nerf hurt ROU? Do we have a butthurt ROU to look forward to when the projectile nerf that he called for in fact comes as well? Maybe you will by that time understand that games change in response to overuse of overly advantaged items or paths. HMs were too far out in front for usage and parameters on damage and range compared to other medium long range weapons. The nerf was bound to happen. But other missiles are getting buffs. Change in action.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5804 - 2012-11-02 16:56:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
Lili Lu wrote:
edit - and won't a projectile nerf hurt ROU? Do we have a butthurt ROU to look forward to when the projectile nerf that he called for in fact comes as well? Maybe you will by that time understand that games change in response to overuse of overly advantaged items or paths.


Not just projectiles. I can see a Sleipnir nerf too when they get to that far with rebalancing.
But that's far in the future so let's not get to that yet.
Lili Lu
#5805 - 2012-11-02 17:02:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:
edit - and won't a projectile nerf hurt ROU? Do we have a butthurt ROU to look forward to when the projectile nerf that he called for in fact comes as well? Maybe you will by that time understand that games change in response to overuse of overly advantaged items or paths.


Not just projectiles. I can see a Sleipnir nerf too when they get to that far with rebalancing.
But that's far in the future so let's not get to that yet.


Possibly. Although I suspect with combat command ships there will likley be more buffing of the underperforming ships. There is a general acknowledgment that sp and isk investment being rather high for these ships that they should perform like a Sleip and not like the others.

With current rebalancing we are seeing buffs and not just nerfs. This class of ships seems more akin to the recent frig and cruiser situations, and less like the current tier 2 and 3 BC situations, imo.
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#5806 - 2012-11-02 17:37:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Noemi Nagano
Lili Lu wrote:

Lili Lu wrote:
Cazador 64 wrote:
Why not post the entire top 20 and see most of them are Winmatarr ships ? In fact just shy of 50% make up this list.
And the same thing happens with weapons systems and projectiles.
At any rate the cane was just a start to the bombardment of nerfs that are coming to a projectile winmatarr ship near you.

The fact is DEV made the right call with rebalancing the nerf,
they listened to the people who went onto test and tried the changes for them self and made adjustments.
Fozzie you made the right call I commend you for taking the time to read the forums and make the right call. Big smile


Because posting the entire top twenty is effort.Straight

Anyway you keep trying to satisfy yourself that I am some Minmatar chauvanist like you are a Caldari chauvanist. You are mistaken. I don't care if there are future adjustments to Minmatar weapons. I don't self identify in this game or rl like some of you appear to do with any in-game race. I outgrew any in-game affiliation within my first year, and started crosstraining and even got a second account for the other two races of ships.

As I've said multiple times in this thread I think it is the overdone TE buff that is the source of the Minmatar strengths in the current game. Maybe that will be addressed. But if and when doesn't matter for this thread in that you could be entirely correct that projectiles need a nerf and it would not invalidate any of the nerf on missiles or the coming direct nerfs to the Drake. Enjoy.Smile


Maybe you need to read the thread more Noemi.


Maybe *you* need to read what you quote here and who you want to adress .. but maybe its also just that egg in your face.
Lili Lu
#5807 - 2012-11-02 18:15:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Maybe *you* need to read what you quote here and who you want to adress .. but maybe its also just that egg in your face.

Noemi. Straight I know who I was quoting. I linked that quote to show you someone else had already posted the same retort and that it was no big deal. Anyway, I'm glad you're so glad about finally putting the egg I invited you to put on my face. I cooked up some lunch and am enjoying some chai spiced tea now.Smile

Honestly, I don't know why people use npc corp alts to post on the forums. People should lend more weight to their arguments by posting with a character that has some pvp history if what you are posting about involves pvp. If one is posting in the industry sub forum of whatever it doesn't matter. Or if one has a comedy alt for GD flaming that's fine too. But in a thread such as this, concerning the alterations to ships and weapons used in (or at least primarilly balanced around) pvp, then post with a character that has some pvp history.

Thanks for doing it Noemi. Feel free to keep posting with ROU, even though Noemi is more pleasant to look at. OopsP
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#5808 - 2012-11-02 18:17:45 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:


Thanks for doing it Noemi. Feel free to keep posting with ROU, even though Noemi is more pleasant to look at. OopsP


I always had the impression you were more into girls, yeah .. ;)

So, all of you enjoy the testserver, and hopefully this game will be a better one after the patch for all races :) .

Best regards.
Malango
A.D.I
#5809 - 2012-11-02 22:48:56 UTC
CCP are F***ing over PVE'ing carebear lazytown watchers in every way they can. that way if they drive out all the lazytown watchers it just leaves the PVP'ers who will buy plex off CCP to fund their fun, because they're to awesome to waste time with PVE when they're part of a big fancy alliance.


they've ruined drones for pve and missiles. SO for gallante and caldari pilots that leave railguns which suck more than any weapon in game!

I'm a drone pilot and with the new update coming i'll struggle to mission to fund my pvp. I'm trying my best to train large blasters now, as all that's left to fly for me fly as I refuse to use rails is the kronos or vindi being gallante, as i need the web bonus to kill the frigs as my drones will be useless.

I already run 2 alts and pay with RL cash as my isk goes on ships and pvp and pve.

If CCP make pve to hard for me I'll leave. I enjoy low sec pvp but if i can't pve there's no point.

But at least eve will be free of lazytown watchers and eve will just be blobs vs blobs in null, wooo.......
Spc One
The Chodak
Void Alliance
#5810 - 2012-11-02 22:53:53 UTC
291 pages ! and 5809 posts

CCP must be doing something VERY wrong to balancing weapons and missiles.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5811 - 2012-11-02 22:57:34 UTC
Spc One wrote:
291 pages ! and 5809 posts

CCP must be doing something VERY wrong to balancing weapons and missiles.

Another interpretation:

CCP must be doing something very right if so many were so completely reliant on HML's.
Malango
A.D.I
#5812 - 2012-11-02 23:02:28 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Spc One wrote:
291 pages ! and 5809 posts

CCP must be doing something VERY wrong to balancing weapons and missiles.

Another interpretation:

CCP must be doing something very right if so many were so completely reliant on HML's.



I'm being F'd in the A, and i have one mil sp in missiles! lol
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5813 - 2012-11-02 23:09:26 UTC
Malango wrote:
I'm being F'd in the A, and i have one mil sp in missiles! lol

Then the HML change won't have too great an impact on your overall performance.
Faora Zod
Don't mess with this DoJo
#5814 - 2012-11-02 23:48:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Faora Zod
Malango wrote:
CCP are F***ing over PVE'ing carebear lazytown watchers in every way they can. that way if they drive out all the lazytown watchers it just leaves the PVP'ers who will buy plex off CCP to fund their fun, because they're to awesome to waste time with PVE when they're part of a big fancy alliance.


they've ruined drones for pve and missiles. SO for gallante and caldari pilots that leave railguns which suck more than any weapon in game!

I'm a drone pilot and with the new update coming i'll struggle to mission to fund my pvp. I'm trying my best to train large blasters now, as all that's left to fly for me fly as I refuse to use rails is the kronos or vindi being gallante, as i need the web bonus to kill the frigs as my drones will be useless.

I already run 2 alts and pay with RL cash as my isk goes on ships and pvp and pve.

If CCP make pve to hard for me I'll leave. I enjoy low sec pvp but if i can't pve there's no point.

But at least eve will be free of lazytown watchers and eve will just be blobs vs blobs in null, wooo.......


I agree with you completely, one way or the other CCP is going to get people to buy GTCs it is funny how everyone bitched and moaned over the NEXstore and Pay to Win options but not pointing out how EVE is already pay to win with the GTCs and plexes, I can either pay 15 dollars a month or buy a GTC for 35, split into two months and sell one of them? Yeah pretty sure that puts a dollar value on isk makng it to where you can spend RL money to get isk.
Malango
A.D.I
#5815 - 2012-11-03 00:03:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Malango
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Malango wrote:
I'm being F'd in the A, and i have one mil sp in missiles! lol

Then the HML change won't have too great an impact on your overall performance.


Nope being all out drones I'm buggered also as the rats will target and kill my drones.

drone pilots have it worse than HML pilots! much worse.
Lili Lu
#5816 - 2012-11-03 00:08:37 UTC
Spc One wrote:
291 pages ! and 5809 posts

CCP must be doing something VERY wrong to balancing weapons and missiles.

Roll Yes because all 5809 posts were negative . . .

Don't ever change HM addicts. This is the end, your only friend, the end.
Cazador 64
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5817 - 2012-11-03 00:31:07 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:
Spc One wrote:
291 pages ! and 5809 posts

CCP must be doing something VERY wrong to balancing weapons and missiles.

Roll Yes because all 5809 posts were negative . . .

Don't ever change HM addicts. This is the end, your only friend, the end.


This simply isn't true you must make up at least 25% of these post with your trash, dogging on HML because they are the only real competition to your projectiles. And yet again you add nothing to the argument you are just here to rag on people and pick fun. And in my book that is what a troll is.

Spc One wrote:
291 pages ! and 5809 posts

CCP must be doing something VERY wrong to balancing weapons and missiles.


If you can manage to sort through the garbage post ignore everything Lili Lu you will see the valid arguments that have been made, and in my opinion these 5809 post are the reason the HML are not taking as big of a hit as initially proposed.
We are lucky enough to have the DEVs take the time to really sort through these post and make valid determinations and adjustments as needed.
serras bang
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5818 - 2012-11-03 02:18:19 UTC  |  Edited by: serras bang
Malango wrote:
CCP are F***ing over PVE'ing carebear lazytown watchers in every way they can. that way if they drive out all the lazytown watchers it just leaves the PVP'ers who will buy plex off CCP to fund their fun, because they're to awesome to waste time with PVE when they're part of a big fancy alliance.


they've ruined drones for pve and missiles. SO for gallante and caldari pilots that leave railguns which suck more than any weapon in game!

I'm a drone pilot and with the new update coming i'll struggle to mission to fund my pvp. I'm trying my best to train large blasters now, as all that's left to fly for me fly as I refuse to use rails is the kronos or vindi being gallante, as i need the web bonus to kill the frigs as my drones will be useless.

I already run 2 alts and pay with RL cash as my isk goes on ships and pvp and pve.

If CCP make pve to hard for me I'll leave. I enjoy low sec pvp but if i can't pve there's no point.

But at least eve will be free of lazytown watchers and eve will just be blobs vs blobs in null, wooo.......



erm chill mate funding an acount aint that hard i payed for a years worth of plex in about 3 months and plexed that 3 months also mission aint all that hard and continue not to be unless some unknown ramp up in diffuculty is comeing
Lili Lu
#5819 - 2012-11-03 04:37:55 UTC
Cazador 64 wrote:
This simply isn't true you must make up at least 25% of these post with your trash, dogging on HML because they are the only real competition to your projectiles. And yet again you add nothing to the argument you are just here to rag on people and pick fun. And in my book that is what a troll is.

If you can manage to sort through the garbage post ignore everything Lili Lu you will see the valid arguments that have been made, and in my opinion these 5809 post are the reason the HML are not taking as big of a hit as initially proposed.
We are lucky enough to have the DEVs take the time to really sort through these post and make valid determinations and adjustments as needed.


Good god, how many times have I tried to tell you I don't identify as a projectile only user like you identify as a HM only user.What?

Glad though that you are so mad at my posting, and that you still don't know what a troll is. The truth hurts. And definitions for words I guess are a challenge to you. Sarcasm /= troll Smile Some of you are such easy targets for sarcasm because you identify yourself with a fictional race in a video game.

And as for the subsequent watering down of the nerf adjustments, nbd. I'm hardly butthurt about them. You however still seem butthurt about the whole thing. My 11 mil sp in missiles are still happy with along with the 14 mil in gunnery.Bear Someday you will chill out and have a larger perspective on the game also. Smile
Acac Sunflyier
The Ascended Academy
#5820 - 2012-11-03 09:23:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Acac Sunflyier
Wait, is this google doc before or after skills? Like, are you assuming all lvl 5?