These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Thread has served - Please lock, thanks :)

First post
Author
Arcosian
Arcosian Heavy Industries Corp Holding
#161 - 2012-11-02 04:29:33 UTC
Null sec is perfectly capable of producing ships and modules there's just no one around to do it on a large enough scale. I think the main problems are most null alliances don't have a decent sized indy wing and even if they did nullsec isn't indy friendly. Why you might ask?

Well PVPers seem to look upon carebears aka miners/builders with disdain. PVPers don't think indy types are l33t enough to be in 0.0 unless they PVP and have a good killboard. For most "hardcore" indy guys they like doing indy stuff and could care less about their KB or PVP. They like building and selling stuff for you guys to blow up and nothing is wrong with that.

I've found PVPers are also very impatient. Unless they are constantly shooting stuff they start to twitch and whine to anyone that will listen about not having any fun. Nullsec isn't very friendly when it comes to doing "solo" indy stuff like mining so indy guys might need help locking down a system for mining/ratting or keeping the BS rats from popping their exhumers in belts or scouting JF/freighters moving supplies. So would PVPers run security for 3-4 hrs to help the indy guys? Hell no because that's beneath their l33t PVP skills and won't get them any KM.

Now on to nullsec in general. Nullsec indy is hampered by afk cloakers disrupting mining ops since you never know when that cloaker will warp in and hotdrop 15 supers on your mining op and by roaming fleets of neuts/reds. Indy stuff also requires a pretty substantial infrastructure especially in nullsec due to the lack of stations with slots for building/copy/invention. Couple this with the long times for researching/copying/inventing off BPOs and it becomes impractical since you don't know if 30 days from now your alliance will even own the system. This means your brand new capital BPO could get blown up in a POS or locked in a station you can't enter. The only way around this is doing the bulk of indy stuff in highsec and shipping it to nullsec.

Another thing I have found is most PVPers have no clue how indy works nor the massive amount of materials just 1 toon can burn through each day. A big time industrialist is going to base himself where he will have ready access to all the needed supplies to keep his lines going 24/7. He's not going to relocate to some backwater nullsec system where basic stuff is hard to find.

So instead of PVPers blaming the highsec carebear as the cause for them not having any fun and nullsec being broken maybe they should instead try working with industrialists and give them a reason to move to null in the first place. Maybe instead of calling for nerfs to highsec they should be yelling to CCP to buff nullsec and make it more indy friendly. Believe me if nullsec indy wasn't a PITA then there would be tons of indy guys there.
KrakizBad
Section 8.
#162 - 2012-11-02 04:38:20 UTC
Arcosian wrote:
Another thing I have found is most PVPers have no clue how indy works nor the massive amount of materials just 1 toon can burn through each day. A big time industrialist is going to base himself where he will have ready access to all the needed supplies to keep his lines going 24/7. He's not going to relocate to some backwater nullsec system where basic stuff is hard to find.

This is quite literally the only thing in that wall of rant that has any semblance of truth. The rest is just crap.
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#163 - 2012-11-02 05:09:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Touval Lysander
Lord Calus wrote:
I only hate those groups when the start to whine that 0.0 has it better than they do, and how we need to be nerfed.

Ive said it several times, if the opportunities of Sov 0.0 even MATCHED what empire had I would never go to high-sec again. Sadly I have to go to 4-4 several times per week to buy ships, mods, skill books, ammo, etc. because they cannot, due to game mechanics failures, be locally produced where I live.

Actually that is a lie, I would still go to high-sec, but I would go for entirely different reasons. I would just be less bitter about the constant flow of BAW coming from empire people.

The grass is always greener I guess.

What happened to Loquitor and the web app where you can just order, pay and it's all delivered to the station of your choice? That's what MOST of FA used to do....

Or you can "travel" (boing) to Jita for - what did you say - SEVERAL times a week.... Wo hoo. Me thinks that's a PLANNING problem not a "destroy highsec and make my life in 0.0 easier" decree.

Yet another CFC - "CCP nerf highsec because I am a [penny pincher] [lazy] [bad at planning] player" post.



Quote:
they cannot, due to game mechanics failures, be locally produced where I live

Lies. They can be produced. Apparently it's easier and cheaper to import - and yet, if they're not available then SOMEBODY is telling big fat boo-boos. Me thinx you guys need to get your stories straight. Roll

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Freakdevil
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#164 - 2012-11-02 05:17:23 UTC
It's not about hate, its about targets and easy pickings. High sec is target rich.

Funny how you played 9 yrs PVP and you need to post with an alt. Afraid you will be booted? P


TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#165 - 2012-11-02 08:50:23 UTC
I like the part where he claims to have played for 9 years as PVP pilot, but clearly doesn't understand core concepts of EVE Online or any mechanics at all - combat or industry related. Claiming the market and manufacturing scene isn't players competing with other players, saying you shouldn't be allowed to activate weapons in highsec, saying it should be more like WOW

lmao
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
#166 - 2012-11-02 08:57:17 UTC
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
People tend to forget that you have a choice in EvE


They don't forget they just want to dictate how others should play, which never works....

Tal


BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
#167 - 2012-11-02 09:23:00 UTC
Seriously,

Everyone can make logical arguments to the OP, but I doubt anyone will get through to him. Some peeps just are not capable of realizing that they possibly may be wrong about something and be willing to bend. That's too bad.

I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE!  Now... where's Ken?

Terminal Insanity
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#168 - 2012-11-02 09:53:51 UTC
No

In fact, PvP'ers need to interfere more with highsec.

Eve was never a game about collecitng the 'best armor' and waltzing around highsec showing off your epic lvl70 golem armor. Thats what WOW is for. Go collect things there.

Eve was built on RISK. on DANGER. EXCITEMENT. Why are you spending hours mining if you're not risking it? Simply to build up your 'best armor' and then what? sit in it? then what?

PvP'ers have spent too much time surrounding themselves with other PVP'ers and we've let highsec get out of control to the point they think they're entitled to be left alone in perfect safety. YOU PICKED THE WRONG GAME KID.

Do you see me creating a Hello Kitty Online account and raging that i cant PvP kill other players? NO! I didnt join HKO because im not interested in hugs and kisses games.

You should not have joined EVE if you dont like PVP. Its why eve exists.

"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#169 - 2012-11-02 09:54:33 UTC
BoSau Hotim wrote:
Seriously,

Everyone can make logical arguments to the OP, but I doubt anyone will get through to him. Some peeps just are not capable of realizing that they possibly may be wrong about something and be willing to bend. That's too bad.



which makes it that much more fun when we shoot them or otherwise interfere with them
Josef Djugashvilis
#170 - 2012-11-02 09:56:51 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
The moment any player undocks from a station outside of the training areas, they are expressing a willingness to engage in combat based PvP. These are the rules all players must adhere to.


^^^ This, as far as I can tell from many random chats in local is understood and agreed to by just about all hi-sec folk.

Sometimes new players are a bit surprised by how quickly and easily they can be ganked, but they soon get over it and accept ganking as part of the game.

So long as a player accepts that undocking from a station is consenting to pvp, then any playstyle is equally valid so long as CCP are happy with it.

This is not a signature.

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#171 - 2012-11-02 12:00:09 UTC
Arcosian wrote:
Null sec is perfectly capable of producing ships and modules there's just no one around to do it on a large enough scale. I think the main problems are most null alliances don't have a decent sized indy wing and even if they did nullsec isn't indy friendly. Why you might ask?



We dont have nearly enough slots in our stations for industry. I would be building stuff out there right now but its far far cheaper to build it all in empire and just ship it out.
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#172 - 2012-11-02 12:08:48 UTC
Simple: take a large fleet of pimp ships with dozens logis and get rid of those null sec bastards.

No one will rage at you, no one including CCP would do something else then applaud your determination.

brb

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#173 - 2012-11-02 12:24:48 UTC
White Quake wrote:
Hello

...wrote stuff I didn´t care to read


...can someone please gank this whiner?

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#174 - 2012-11-02 12:37:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
I shot a random noob rifter today.
I checked what he has lost and sent him the money plus a bit.

To his question of why i did it....

Because you where there!

He fully accepted and understood that.
Lost a cheap ship, gained much more experience.
Lord Calus
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#175 - 2012-11-02 14:13:53 UTC
Please tell me more about your vast knowledge of nullsec logistics, and seeding markets.

You still have not addressed that lack of locally available low end minerals, and the repeated CCP attempts to nerf compression.

You have not addressed the fractional amounts of production slots in player built stations.

You have not addressed the AFK mining that occurs 23/7 in highsec with NO risk until nullsec entities started popping miners en masse.

You sit high and mighty in your little sphere of ignorance and shout down everyone, yet you cannot even address the counter point. How easy the straw man is to yell at, and avoid the issue entirely.

Poor planning and wanting it easy is a handy excuse I guess. I mean, it isn't like the CFC is at war or anything. We sure don't blow through millions of rounds of missiles and projectiles every week. We NEVER suffer losses, so no need to import maelstroms, huginns, scimitars, sabres, drakes, lachesis, claymores, and every other ship in the doctrines we fly. No need to ever fit the ships that have to be brought in either, no sir. Doctrine change requiring entirely new set of modules to fit? Whoops, guess we need MORE modules too.

I guess my point is that you can cry and moan all you want about how the other peoples have things easier than you do, but it is just an opinion. Unless you can back it up with facts or data, you are just a sperging highsec whinge-tard. o7 thread.
fukier
Gallente Federation
#176 - 2012-11-02 14:31:04 UTC
pvp people dont hate pve people... its ust that most of them are easy targets...
At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box.
Destru Kaneda
Arzad Police Department
#177 - 2012-11-02 14:36:28 UTC
Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#178 - 2012-11-02 14:46:27 UTC
The OP has a point.

So long as they recognise that often it's the PvE players wanted to nerf PvP to keep them safe.

As a generalization though PvPers seem to whine on the forum significantly more than everyone else.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#179 - 2012-11-02 14:48:03 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
As a generalization though PvPers seem to whine on the forum significantly more than everyone else.


With good reason.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#180 - 2012-11-02 16:58:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Solstice Project wrote:
I shot a random noob rifter today.
I checked what he has lost and sent him the money plus a bit.

To his question of why i did it....

Because you where there!

He fully accepted and understood that.
Lost a cheap ship, gained much more experience.


That's what happened to me when I started almost 5 years ago, I was flying a Rifter in low sec and went to a belt because that's where people siad you can sometimes find fights, and a Brutix landed on me, webbed/scrammed me and killed me then gave me some isk and traded me my "loot" in station.

I never asked him why he did it. I knew why he did it, because like him I had downloaded a video game where most of the spaceships have GUNs on them and it was pretty easy to tell before installing what the focus of the game was lol.

Well it was easy to figure out for me anyways, according to these forums a few people are still struggling with the concept.....