These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev blog: Introducing Open Buddy Invites

First post
Author
Cerulean Ice
Royal Amarr Reclamation
#81 - 2012-10-31 11:44:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Cerulean Ice
CCP, can you share a larger version of that pony image? :3

EDIT: found it! http://www.allmystery.de/i/tfa4e68_cloudscape_pony_commission.png (thanks to uni friends)
Gadis Idaman
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#82 - 2012-10-31 12:11:10 UTC
PLEX prices are going down .. which is a good thing :D
Ding Schoo
Doomheim
#83 - 2012-10-31 12:45:41 UTC
I was a big fan of the PLEX-for-PLEX but I also understand how the system could be abused. There where no limitaions to the amount of accounts that could be created this way.

Many of my friends made good use of the PLEX-for-PLEX feature, some needed a cyno alt or 2, some made haulers and salvagers, others made mining alts. Having a few alts like this makes ones life a lot easier and you can be more self sufficient.

Can I suggest that CCP dont remove the PLEX-for-PLEX system compleatly but put in limitations that will prevents unlimited creations of new accounts.

How about limiting the number of PLEX-for-PLEX invites to the age of your account?
If your account is 1 year old, you have 1 PLEX-for-PLEX buddy invite per month.
If your account is 2 years old, you have 2 PLEX-for-PLEX buddy invite per month.
If your account is 3 years old, you have 3 PLEX-for-PLEX buddy invite per month.

Then maybe make 3 the max regadless of account age. This way people can still have their cyno, hauler, salvager, miner, scount, Jita market checker, what-ever-alt-character or give their friends a 51 day account to try out EvE. This also eliminates the unrestricted creations of new accounts as the new accounts will not have PLEX-for-PLEX invites.

What do you think CCP? Is this something that will curb the abuse while allowing people the comfort of having a few alts?
Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#84 - 2012-10-31 15:33:15 UTC
Matiel Shrike wrote:
(...) being able to mass invite people like that may/probably will destabilise the PLEX market. (...) Perhaps something to counteract the inevitable mass increase in supply to the market may be in order?
First of all, PLEX prices have been rather steeply rising for a while lately, so an increased supply at this point would not hurt the market at all.

That said, I don't think that these changes will significantly increase PLEX supply for two reasons:
1. One way to get PLEX out of the buddy program was removed. PLEX for PLEX was not only used for those 51 day alts, but also as it was intended when a new player used a PLEX to upgrade his trial account and the old player would end up with a PLEX.
2. As much as I'd like to be wrong about this, I don't think that hundreds or thousands of new players will suddenly be willing to pay for Eve just because it got a little bit easier to get a 21 day trial account. It's not like 14 or 21 day trials were terribly hard to come by till now. I don't see where you get this "inevitable mass increase" from. Are you aware that in The Forge alone about 3000 PLEXs are traded per day? Even if only a third of those are actual individual PLEXs (and not just the same ones traded back and forth) the new buddy program would have to be enormously successful at getting new players to even make a tiny dent in that number.

Ding Schoo wrote:
This way people can still have their cyno, hauler, salvager, miner, scount, Jita market checker, what-ever-alt-character or give their friends a 51 day account to try out EvE. (...) Is this something that will curb the abuse while allowing people the comfort of having a few alts?
What makes you think that creating those skill-unlimited 51 day alts for free is not already abuse even if you only create 1 per month, let alone 3? You are allowed to create as many skill-limited 21 day alts for free as you want and you can create as many unlimited alts as you are willing to pay for.
In my opinion alt proliferation is harmful to game play and in the case of those 51 day alts it doesn't even earn CCP money, so I can't see any reason why they should be desirable in any number. If you want convenience pay for it.
Reticle
Sight Picture
#85 - 2012-10-31 18:08:19 UTC
Abdiel Kavash wrote:
Since creating the account costs you nothing, any amount of ISK you can make during these 51 days is pure profit. Thus you can roll as many alts as you want, and collect the money at the end of two months - profit limited only by how many accounts you care to create. Taken to the extreme, a single person could theoretically keep a scout in every system in EVE 24/7 for absolutely free. (Free as in no RL or in-game payment.) It's up to CCP to determine to which extent this has actually been abused.

I have been using trial alts for various purpose for many years. The only thing different about the 51-day was the ability to remove the trial account restrictions. As has been pointed out, you can get the equivalent arrangement by turning the transaction around: the alt uses the PLEX to activate, you get the game time, rather than you giving the plex to alt, he activates, you get plex back, you resub your main account. It effectively limits you, at least in terms of PLEX costs, to one of these alts per month. In other words, if there is something wrong with 51-day alts, then it will still be wrong. There will be fewer, its true, but they will still exist.

The dev response above specifically mentions RMT concerns. I'm not sure how that sort of abuse works in this context, but if it is a genuine issue, then clearly it deserves a fix. Farming gifts is an odd one; I had thought that the plex for plex system was created after last Xmas, so perhaps this is a future concern. I can see the concern for farming, but really, more of the gifts makes them less valuable, not more valuable, so... meh.

As for any arguments about server/system/DB resources, you must be joking. No one person can bring enough online at a time to realistically impact performance and even if everyone brought one on online, we'd still be in the general vicinity of the all time concurrent users. Looking purely at logon stats, there has been no major increase in number of people logged on. I don't think the issue is resources or any sort of "too many alts" thing (in fact, I'm willing to bet the total subscriber numbers have been propped up by the 51 day alt accounts). I suspect that the main reason has something to do with RMT. If I had to guess, it probably makes botting a whole lot easier.
Reticle
Sight Picture
#86 - 2012-10-31 18:13:04 UTC
Ding Schoo wrote:
How about limiting the number of PLEX-for-PLEX invites to the age of your account?
If your account is 1 year old, you have 1 PLEX-for-PLEX buddy invite per month.
If your account is 2 years old, you have 2 PLEX-for-PLEX buddy invite per month.
If your account is 3 years old, you have 3 PLEX-for-PLEX buddy invite per month.

Not a bad solution. Limits like this wouldn't effect me and would allow me to do what I've been doing. It doesn't necessarily have to be age-related. It could be some other benchmark. Perhaps X number of invites per month + (total # of Buddy accounts that have paid for a SECOND month) additional invites.
Ding Schoo
Doomheim
#87 - 2012-11-01 11:39:24 UTC
Reticle wrote:
I suspect that the main reason has something to do with RMT. If I had to guess, it probably makes botting a whole lot easier.

I think you are right in this. Botters had an infinite supply to 51day accounts. If they got banned they could just start up new accounts and move operations somewhere else and keep botting. FW was probably another area that got abused by 51day alts but that’s just me speculating.

I dont see it as abuse if someone has 2 cyno and a salvager / hauler alts. If you live on the outer edge of the universe you might need 2-3 cynos to get where you want to go. If you have to rely on other people for cynos to get your Jump Freighter around things can get ugly real quick.

Anyway... I think CCP can remove majority of the abuse they are referring to by limiting the PLEX-for-PLEX invites while stil allowing people to have the occasional alt.

Would be good to get some input from CCP on this.
Reticle
Sight Picture
#88 - 2012-11-01 14:59:19 UTC
Just read this great Lowsec Lifestyle article by Sugar Kyle about EVE Vegas. In it, she details the RMT/Bot presentation. After you read it, it will become crystal clear that RMT is basically the sole reason for this change.

I would like to take this opportunity to say "**** you" to the RMT community for ******* up a good thing for everyone else.
Jack Ogeko
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#89 - 2012-11-01 21:15:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Jack Ogeko
:)
Hello, i sended invite to create alt before change, but i upgrade new accout by plex today, after change, my question is, becouse i chose plex for reword and didn't know abaut incoming changes, i get plex? game time for main acc or i must send petition for change reward, or i get nothing?

grats ccp nice one :)
have nice day
Needmore Longcat
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#90 - 2012-11-02 17:15:24 UTC
Ponies? Really?
Hunter Anod
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#91 - 2012-11-03 01:41:25 UTC
It does not take someone with superior intellect to see what CCPs true goal is they feel they are too large to rely on the buddy program this mass invite thing is just an excuse to stop paying out rewards for successful upgraded accounts

if say you start a trial account for your secondary or alt account through a buddy request U get a Plex exactly like the power of 2 but going about it a grayish way intern then U keep the account running, correct? so CCP wins ? yes. CCP still makes a monthly credit..

if a person sends out a mass request that would not hurt the game as what percent of people stop playing after purchasing 1st months account, not many, more people stop playing at the end of the trial.

the majority of player who play this game already play 3-4 other online game some of which already pay subscription and the money side is irreverent

CCP YOU may never read this cause you are big enough to not care what your loyal subscribers think :


-WHAT POSSIBLE GAIN DO I GET NOW FOR INVITING PEOPLE
-WHY SHOULD I GO THOUGH THE TROUBLE OF ADVERTISING TO ALL MY FRIEND ABOUT THIS GAME
AND ACTIVELY TRYING TO GET PEOPLE INTERESTED
-DOES CCP NEED US OR DO WE NEED ccp

I love this game but this relationship is a little one sided
Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#92 - 2012-11-03 09:28:43 UTC
Hunter Anod wrote:
-WHAT POSSIBLE GAIN DO I GET NOW FOR INVITING PEOPLE
Your possible gain is a PLEX or 30 days gametime, same as before. Did you actually read the devblog?
Quote:
-WHY SHOULD I GO THOUGH THE TROUBLE OF ADVERTISING TO ALL MY FRIEND ABOUT THIS GAME
AND ACTIVELY TRYING TO GET PEOPLE INTERESTED
Either because you want a PLEX/gametime, because you think they'd enjoy it or because you'd like more people to play Eve or possibly even a combination of all that.
Quote:
-DOES CCP NEED US OR DO WE NEED ccp
No clue, but I got another one: Does a smartbombing battleship in Rancer make a sound when there's no-one around to hear it?

Btw, you can turn off cruise control for cool now, space is already plenty cold.
Logicycle
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#93 - 2012-11-03 21:31:22 UTC
I ♥ the Ponies !!!

lol
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#94 - 2012-11-03 21:39:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Steve Ronuken
Hunter Anod wrote:
It does not take someone with superior intellect to see what CCPs true goal is they feel they are too large to rely on the buddy program this mass invite thing is just an excuse to stop paying out rewards for successful upgraded accounts



Actually, it's probably to stop the proliferation of 51 day accounts which make CCP /no/ money, while taking up server resources.

(create buddy account. upgrade it with a plex. get a plex in return. use it for 51 days, let it lapse. start another before it finishes to get some training done before you need to switch. People have done it for mining alts.)


Related:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1975674#post1975674

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Voxinian
#95 - 2012-11-04 11:32:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Voxinian
CCP Guard wrote:
The buddy system has been a great success
Yeah, buddy!



The buddy invite is the cause of spam on many forums and community sites, I don't call that a success. Seems like thousands of players are spending more time spamming forums then actually playing EVE.

New players in EVE = great. CCP inciting everyone to spam the internetz with buddy invites = bad.

What is a greater way to get new players in the game then by reading stories and experiences from EVE players on forums and other game sites instead of the mindless frikking annoying spam invites by people that farm rewards on every site they can post their stupid invite links. When I go to the Steam community hub and forum I only see topics with buddy invites while you should see community interaction and people sharing their EVE experiences (that should get people interested in EVE). How about spending some cash on advertisements yourself instead of letting the paying customers do it for you in return for a reward. That makes CCP pimps and the customers spamming invites ho's.
Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#96 - 2012-11-04 13:43:18 UTC
Seems sort of strange, that if I invite a friend to the game and send him a bil for a plex and ships, I dont get any game time in return.
Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#97 - 2012-11-04 17:19:35 UTC
Michael Harari wrote:
Seems sort of strange, that if I invite a friend to the game and send him a bil for a plex and ships, I dont get any game time in return.
I've got some good and some bad news for you. Bad news first: you didn't read the devblog you're commenting on. Now the good news: you still get game time.
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#98 - 2012-11-08 15:16:34 UTC
Warr Akini wrote:
Steve Ronuken wrote:
That's not a bad thing. It's not like they're bringing any RL cash to the game. Or using up any plex


Not emptyquoting for emphasis. The URL seems to be a pretty good way for getting the name out, but using that as a guise to nuke the PLEX-for-PLEX under the banner of "we're sure you understand" is simply not putting out enough effort to ~really~ gain understanding.
It is an asinine assumption -- something that CCP culture over the past few years has been inclined towards. Specifically, CCP has been making erroneous assumptions about usability, what players want / don't want and how customers will spend their hard earned RL currency on in-game currency.

This is a business culture and set of behaviors which can be changed for the better by wider player polling using controlled methods (NOT forums and NOT the ******* CSM) as well as ensuring that business decision makers and designers generate initiatives based upon facts and research rather than their own inclinations or unfounded assumptions.

There is a pattern of assumptions being the rule rather than the exception within CCP decision making. That has seriously hurt CCP's bottom line AND the quality of their subscription based EVE entertainment service.

+++++++ I have never shed a tear for a fellow EVE player until now. Mark “Seleene” Heard's Blog Honoring Sean "Vile Rat" Smith.

Ranzabar
Doomheim
#99 - 2012-11-11 06:12:49 UTC
As much as I've tried, I can't find buddies smart enough to play Eve

Abide

Razefummel
Unknown Dimension
#100 - 2012-11-25 02:16:13 UTC
Dunno if it was told yet, but IF somebody uses the new Link for Invites, he will just get in the Accountmanagement an Hint that someone has used it WHEN he has Subscribed.

Its quite difficult to bring the Player wich send me some Mails to claim the Reward for the Buddyinvite in line with the Information wich i get in the Accountmanagement.

Normaly i get the e-mail from the Buddy so i can compare it with the e-mail in the Accountmanagment so i can send the new Player his reward to the right Character.

Would be nice when i get the E-Mail Information from the Buddies witch uses that Link because it would make it safer for me and the new Buddys if i uses the Link for the Invites. As long as it is like now i will be forced to use "the old Method" to have an secure and serious Offer.

I apologize for my bad english, but its not my Mother tongue.

Greetings

Raze

250.000 Skillpunkte gratis zum Start:

Buddyinvite

Unknown Dimension Forum