These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

CCP, Give null everything they want

Author
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#1 - 2012-10-31 04:34:58 UTC
Please, take the most current 3 pages of forum threads, and consolidate all the things null wants done to high sec, and build an image and load it on Tranquility.

Just do one thing.
Give us a precise statement of how many active accounts there are (non Dust related), just before you do it.
Then keep the image up for 6 months, and then give us another snapshot of the sub base size.

I am not sure you can afford to do it, but from what all the null sec posters are inferring, your sub rate would soar.

If the sub rate is up, well, I guess the null sec propagandists were right all along since a higher sub rate would also infer that this new image was a better game, and EVE and CCP are both in a better place.

On the flip side, if the sub rate has fallen off a cliff, well then, you would have empirical evidence that maybe null sec is not as all-knowing as they think, and maybe, just maybe, high sec should be protected.

Of course, there is that risk that you could wipe out your cash flow for quite a few months, but hey, I am sure all the null sec players would gladly reactivate a ton of accounts, or start new ones, and CCP, well, you then you don't take that hit in subs.
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
#2 - 2012-10-31 04:37:58 UTC
CCP, Give highsecers everything they want, put it on the test server and see how many people are pl- wait... it's already on it.
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#3 - 2012-10-31 04:46:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Roll Sizzle Beef
The bad idea of bad ideas. Can I put you on a pedestal? Maybe shine some ambient light gently accentuating the horrid details. And just stare at it all day in morbid fascination.
Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2012-10-31 04:47:23 UTC
Quote:
CCP, Give null everything they want

tbh it would result in a far better game than giving high-sec everything they want.

CCP has no sense of humour.

Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2012-10-31 04:57:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Barrogh Habalu
Some Rando wrote:
tbh it would result in a far better game than giving high-sec everything they want.

Can I have a few links to threads describing what hi-sec wants? I'm pretty sure that there is already everything one could need, including income to aquire and access to more interesing playgrounds to spend it (or to earn more).

You OP make null players look worse than they are. From my forum experience, adequate null people want some nice things for living in null, they don't care about hi-sec really. Most people who complain about hisec are:

- people who reside exclusively in hisec to shoot clueless targets and moking them for not learning for years, and now pissed that people learned... to avoid them (security complaints);
- people failing at ratting, anom farming and sleepers murdering (income complaints);
- abstract haters who don't really visit hi-sec and don't care of it, but support s***storms when struck by bad mood;
- people who just post nonsense complaints to troll you (those are actually successful).

And if you ask about out-of-forums, well, I don't see people complaining there at all these days. They just play the dang game.
Herr Hammer Draken
#6 - 2012-10-31 05:14:52 UTC
I am in a good mood today . So why not give null everything they want then when it is too good and everybody does it, then nerf it to the ground.

Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet"

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#7 - 2012-10-31 05:16:41 UTC
Barrogh Habalu wrote:

You OP make null players look worse than they are. From my forum experience, adequate null people want some nice things for living in null, they don't care about hi-sec really.



If null wants nice things they have two choices.

1) Move to Empire
2) Stop bitching and make the nice things for themselves. That's why 0.0 is there.

Mr Epeen Cool
Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-10-31 05:17:22 UTC
Barrogh Habalu wrote:
Can I have a few links to threads describing what hi-sec wants? I'm pretty sure that there is already everything one could need, including income to aquire and access to more interesing playgrounds to spend it (or to earn more).

Look around the forums.

My statement is based on what I've read on these forums over roughly a year and a half. Null-sec (and low-sec and WH) players generally want the game balanced, usually by the risks you take to get your rewards. Since it is much easier to nerf one thing than to buff everything else, the answer is usually to nerf high-sec in some fashion. High-sec-only players naturally find this extremely distasteful.

High-sec encompasses a lot of different types of play and players so it is hard to generalize it, but then that also applies to pretty much the entire game. More precisely, high-sec PvE activities and players are what is referred to when speaking of nerfing "high-sec". In short, the reward for such activities are vastly out of proportion to the risk one takes doing them compared to similar activities done elsewhere.

CCP has no sense of humour.

Kara Vix
Perkone
Caldari State
#9 - 2012-10-31 05:20:31 UTC
I am sure that CCP is aware of the diversity of their player base and that giving in to any one game play ideology would be economic suicide for them, so all of these nerf this-buff that threads are really just wasted space and posturing in a segment of the most childish forum I have yet to see.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2012-10-31 05:34:27 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
2) Stop bitching and make the nice things for themselves. That's why 0.0 is there.

We still have to work within the limitations of the system. If you're implying otherwise, that's rather naive of you.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#11 - 2012-10-31 05:35:34 UTC
Kara Vix wrote:
I am sure that CCP is aware of the diversity of their player base and that giving in to any one game play ideology would be economic suicide for them, so all of these nerf this-buff that threads are really just wasted space and posturing in a segment of the most childish forum I have yet to see.


I agree about the childishness of the vast majority of these threads, including my own here.

But would it not be nice to see CCP actually give the high sec bashers everything they want, with the resulting financial fallout? From that moment on, anytime someone posts a plan to attack high sec, people could shut them down with a wave of a pixilated hand.

Of course, no sane CEO would allow it to happen.

Skydell
Bad Girl Posse
#12 - 2012-10-31 05:50:55 UTC
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
CCP, Give highsecers everything they want, put it on the test server and see how many people are pl- wait... it's already on it.


Quite the opposite.

If all you want to do is blow stuff up all day in pointless zerg fashion, the test server is a great place. 1000 ISK will get you a T2 fit anything.

Undock, Boom
Undock, Boom
Undock, Boom
Undock, Boom
Undock, Boom
Undock, Boom

Do it all day. Gets kinda boring though.
Kara Vix
Perkone
Caldari State
#13 - 2012-10-31 05:58:47 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Kara Vix wrote:
I am sure that CCP is aware of the diversity of their player base and that giving in to any one game play ideology would be economic suicide for them, so all of these nerf this-buff that threads are really just wasted space and posturing in a segment of the most childish forum I have yet to see.


I agree about the childishness of the vast majority of these threads, including my own here.

But would it not be nice to see CCP actually give the high sec bashers everything they want, with the resulting financial fallout? From that moment on, anytime someone posts a plan to attack high sec, people could shut them down with a wave of a pixilated hand.

Of course, no sane CEO would allow it to happen.



No, but I get your point. Honestly if that happened I would not care, remove hi sec and missions, etc. I will just play one of the other games I subscribe to and not look back. I have no intention of forum fighting over it. I like the game as it is now, it seems those in null crying the loudest don't like the game so perhaps they are the ones who should consider something else. I just get an image of a 4 year old holding his breath until his parents at CCP give him what he wants when I read the null sec demands.
pussnheels
Viziam
#14 - 2012-10-31 06:07:26 UTC
worse idea ever , giving both entities what they want , it probably be easier to create 2 seperate servers than

The whole idea like it is now that both need each other to thrive , null sec need high sec mostly as the market for their unique 0.0 items ( moongoo ; abc ore, faction modules etc ) while in return they need the low end minerals , ice and production capacities from high sec they lack in 0.0 so they can keep paying for their constant wars they need to wage in order to keep their influence
bit of a never ending viscious circle

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#15 - 2012-10-31 06:11:57 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Please, take the most current 3 pages of forum threads, and consolidate all the things null wants done to high sec, and build an image and load it on Tranquility.

Just do one thing.
Give us a precise statement of how many active accounts there are (non Dust related), just before you do it.
Then keep the image up for 6 months, and then give us another snapshot of the sub base size.

I am not sure you can afford to do it, but from what all the null sec posters are inferring, your sub rate would soar.

If the sub rate is up, well, I guess the null sec propagandists were right all along since a higher sub rate would also infer that this new image was a better game, and EVE and CCP are both in a better place.

On the flip side, if the sub rate has fallen off a cliff, well then, you would have empirical evidence that maybe null sec is not as all-knowing as they think, and maybe, just maybe, high sec should be protected.

Of course, there is that risk that you could wipe out your cash flow for quite a few months, but hey, I am sure all the null sec players would gladly reactivate a ton of accounts, or start new ones, and CCP, well, you then you don't take that hit in subs.

I detect a note of sarcasm Blink

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2012-10-31 06:23:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Barrogh Habalu
Some Rando wrote:
Look around the forums.

My statement is based on what I've read on these forums over roughly a year and a half. Null-sec (and low-sec and WH) players generally want the game balanced, usually by the risks you take to get your rewards. Since it is much easier to nerf one thing than to buff everything else, the answer is usually to nerf high-sec in some fashion. High-sec-only players naturally find this extremely distasteful.

High-sec encompasses a lot of different types of play and players so it is hard to generalize it, but then that also applies to pretty much the entire game. More precisely, high-sec PvE activities and players are what is referred to when speaking of nerfing "high-sec". In short, the reward for such activities are vastly out of proportion to the risk one takes doing them compared to similar activities done elsewhere.

I browse these forums here and there, but I don't really see many real suggestions on "improving hisec". I mostly see "hi-sec whiners" being referred in third-person by people making bitter comments on how CCP will cater to those almost inexistant people; few others really look more like trolls.

More on main topic, I understand that fixing something is better idea than overhaul about everything else, but let's have a look at real problems discussed by null/WH people.

Hi-sec income isn't really the problem for those I've spoken with. Sometimes you see posts in spirit of "herp derp no risk", but I had some discussion with null/WH guys hanging in random public channels and none of them would take hisec risk/reward over what they have now, so YMMV I think. Granted, we are not talking about guys who multibox entire incursions and mining fleets of dozens of vessels, but the former guy works pretty hard for what he has; latter is just an epitome of "alts online" ("working as intended", lol).

What they do see as problem, however, is not that hisec people have better lives, it's that they just don't have and can't even build what would be enough for them. They can't construct stations with enough production slots, for example. They can't make worthless space any useful. Nerfing hisec won't make their lives any better. Some maybe will feel better, but (since we already mentioned that, let's stick to the example), say, reducing hisec production capabilities will only aggravate problems of null dwellers who have to run some industry in high. What else? Sov gring, POS grind, more sov grind... It's going nowhere, no matter what you do to high.

Same goes pretty much to most WH complaints. Those from larger groups have arguably the best income in the game and it's not going to step down from that position even if you count in all undesirable loses to dangerous environement. By "undesirable" I mean, say, farming ops getting ganked, as opposed to roaming whelp fleets (when one qualifies as "whelp" depends on corp really, some seem to mind little even their T3 losses as long as they managed to eject in time and not being podded in the middle of WH space during something interesting which is PITA really, while some others run good ol' BC gangs like that).

So, what are they compalining about? Sucky POS intraface, inability to reconfigurate T3s (lol @ children of W-space not being adapted to W-space in this regard, really), logoffski safety of capital escalating gangs and people POS-upping which causes - guess what? - right, moar POS grind, sometimes with tier3s for the lack of possibility of capital assaults in most systems. None of these problems are solved by nerfing hi sec, no matter what and how hard. Arguably, sometimes you hear statements on that nerfing hisec would increase amount of daytrippers who have a good property of bringing some fun, but on the other hand that means more people joining carebear WH corps which means - again - even more POS grind for those who have chosen WHs for environement and not just ISK.

It actually quite funny that CW2.0 that upsets "1337 pvpers" so much for "catering to carebears" is actually welcomed by wormholers for screwing with "carebearish" logoffski of capital escalating gangs.

And btw CCP promised to fix infrastructure one day, we just have to cope with CCP's tempo. Though don't expect them to do it to the point where everyone will be self-sufficient. Interaction between spaces, as Pussnheels noted, is an important ingedient in EVE formula.

Mr Epeen wrote:
If null wants nice things they have two choices.

1) Move to Empire
2) Stop bitching and make the nice things for themselves. That's why 0.0 is there.

You can't really sculpt nullsec as it pleases you, you can only use tool CCP provides you with, and those became insufficient by modern standards. As I've said though, CCP is aware of the problem.

Though suggestion to move in empire isn't really good one. Null/low/high/WHs are not just places where you make fortunes, it's also different playgrounds for people who prefer to play by different rules. You don't move somewhere just because meadows there are greener.
Ghazu
#17 - 2012-10-31 06:31:37 UTC
Oh hey OP glad to see you get over the NPC AI changes and whine about something else.

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984

Iam a Spy2
solo and loveing it
#18 - 2012-10-31 06:40:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Iam a Spy2
Some Rando wrote:
Quote:
CCP, Give null everything they want

tbh it would result in a far better game than giving high-sec everything they want.



no just would hand goons everything.

Tell ya right now do this and iam done thats 3 accounts out.
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
#19 - 2012-10-31 06:41:47 UTC
Skydell wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
CCP, Give highsecers everything they want, put it on the test server and see how many people are pl- wait... it's already on it.


Quite the opposite.

If all you want to do is blow stuff up all day in pointless zerg fashion, the test server is a great place. 1000 ISK will get you a T2 fit anything.

Undock, Boom
Undock, Boom
Undock, Boom
Undock, Boom
Undock, Boom
Undock, Boom

Do it all day. Gets kinda boring though.


Seems to me like you are describing what highsec carebears label as "consensual risk-free pvp".

Skydell wrote:
Do it all day. Gets kinda boring though.


You say it better than I ever could Cool
Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#20 - 2012-10-31 06:44:11 UTC
Wow so much crying on the forums because everyone doesn't play the game the way they think it should be played. Pathetic.
123Next page