These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EVE reflect the true nature of humanity.

First post
Author
Brannsy
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#81 - 2012-10-30 06:10:08 UTC
Mars Theran wrote:
btw.. I disagree with you. Only some Humans have a dark nature



I disagree. Everyone has a dark side in their own way, however the fear of repercussions from outside forces keep those impulses and desires at bay. If you push a person hard enough, or persuade them to act on their fantasies, they are capable of horrible things. However without a strong enough force, or an environment free of potential intervention or punishment these things will never come to be.

That said, some people people are more inherently....evil? (Evil is a relative term and is subject to opinion and few point discrepancies) Or they are more inherently good, however everyone can be pushed hard enough, and some already know just how far down the rabbit hole goes.
Azumi Zimu
#82 - 2012-10-30 06:18:44 UTC
Have you guys considered how it would look if society crumbled and this veneer of civility were stripped away?

Look at what happens inside prisons, or certain areas of Africa for example.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#83 - 2012-10-30 06:28:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Signal11th wrote:

It's called Swindon


Matt is that you? P

Swindon is magnificent, just check out the magic roundaboutTwisted

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#84 - 2012-10-30 07:22:46 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
You can carry one of two mindsets in this situation - either he is unproductive and therefore needs to be culled so as not to weigh down humanity, or he is unproductive and therefore he can be MADE TO BE PRODUCTIVE and become a benefit to society. Why destroy what you can use yourself?One way of thinking is destructive and wasteful, the other is creative and useful. ...


All I've got to say is, "wtf?"
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#85 - 2012-10-30 07:38:31 UTC
Brannsy wrote:
Evil is a relative term

It's absolute, and resulting to the fall of entire civilizations (e.g. Rome).

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Dalneya Yakovtu
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#86 - 2012-10-30 10:37:27 UTC
Azumi Zimu wrote:
Have you guys considered how it would look if society crumbled and this veneer of civility were stripped away?

Look at what happens inside prisons, or certain areas of Africa for example.


Oh, you have it all backwards. Yes, the cultural pessimist's sloppy fantasy of society being suddenly "stripped away" would likely result in a lot of Bad Things(tm) happening. Leaving the ridiculous notion of such societal collapse aside for the moment, the resulting carnage is not caused by man being naturally violent and nasty - it's caused by man being naturally peaceful and cooperative.

Living in a structured society is man's natural state of being. Fifteen strangers become shipwrecked on a deserted island and the first thing that happens: someone takes charge and starts dividing tasks. Rudimentary society is born.

Now, take any particularly large and complexly structured society and strip that away, the shock is so great that a degree of anarchy sets in before society re-asserts itself. It's a neurosis. It's like a dog going apeshit when you try to make him live in a small room. It offends the natural state so much that behavioral patterns no longer "click." Unpredictable, destructive behavior emerges.

It never lasts very long, a generation or two at most. The anarchic state usually sprouts a new, structured society fairly quickly as people become fed up with getting beaten to death over the nearest loaf of bread. Where society fails to emerge, the remnants immolate themselves. Anarchy never thrives.
Azumi Zimu
#87 - 2012-10-30 10:58:25 UTC
Dalneya Yakovtu wrote:


Oh, you have it all backwards. Yes, the cultural pessimist's sloppy fantasy of society being suddenly "stripped away" would likely result in a lot of Bad Things(tm) happening. Leaving the ridiculous notion of such societal collapse aside for the moment, the resulting carnage is not caused by man being naturally violent and nasty - it's caused by man being naturally peaceful and cooperative.

Living in a structured society is man's natural state of being. Fifteen strangers become shipwrecked on a deserted island and the first thing that happens: someone takes charge and starts dividing tasks. Rudimentary society is born.

Now, take any particularly large and complexly structured society and strip that away, the shock is so great that a degree of anarchy sets in before society re-asserts itself. It's a neurosis. It's like a dog going apeshit when you try to make him live in a small room. It offends the natural state so much that behavioral patterns no longer "click." Unpredictable, destructive behavior emerges.

It never lasts very long, a generation or two at most. The anarchic state usually sprouts a new, structured society fairly quickly as people become fed up with getting beaten to death over the nearest loaf of bread. Where society fails to emerge, the remnants immolate themselves. Anarchy never thrives.


I didn't say society wasn't natural. I was pointing to two examples where the dark side of human nature can be observed. Even in our society now you can see selfishness and cruelty. Look at urban youths in nearly all American cities, attacking the defenseless in small groups for sport.

In one of the situations you described the people were intimately dependent on each other for their own survival (ship wreck). Their cohesion was a matter of their own individual survival and uniquely selfish.

We depend on a regulated ordered society precisely because of what happens when there is no authority.

And what happens? Bad things.
Lyrka Bloodberry
Spybeaver
#88 - 2012-10-30 11:44:47 UTC
Many people say that they act like criminals in EVE because they cannot do it in real life. Making other people's lifes miserable is not allowed in our real world. In EVE it is. But my question is why the desire to act that way is there in the first place?

I personally never felt like that that. I do not have fun making other people's life worse. Be it in a game or outside. Of course I play a game to do something I cannot do in real life. And of course I played a pirate or criminal in games before. The difference is: I only acted against the AI, never against real people.

And that is the aspect many here do not seem to understand. There is very few roleplay in EVE. When you interact with other players in EVE, you do not interact with fictional characters, but with the person behind the screen.
Actually, although I said people do not seem to understand that, I think people to understand that very well. And that's why they act the way they do.
They make other people's (not character's) life miserable and are allowed to do so, because of the often used excuse "It's just a game, I would not do it in real life!". That's not true. A game, in which you interact with other players is a part of real life.

That is why I think EVE can absolutely be regarded as a picture of what would happen, when you took away the rules of our society.

Another point is:
In EVE you can do what you want.
- You can join all the other players to build up a utopia without wars or conflicts between players (which you cannot do in real life)
- You can destroy everything other people try to build up. (which you cannot do in real life)
So when there's the option to do something you cannot do in real life, why do so many people pick the latter over the former?

Spybeaver

Dalneya Yakovtu
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#89 - 2012-10-30 11:51:38 UTC
Azumi Zimu wrote:
We depend on a regulated ordered society precisely because of what happens when there is no authority.

And what happens? Bad things.


My bone with that statement - and excuse me if I'm being daft - is that it is essentially meaningless.

"You know what happens to people if they don't breathe? They asphyxiate."

Well, yes, they do. So?
Azumi Zimu
#90 - 2012-10-30 11:57:06 UTC
Dalneya Yakovtu wrote:
Azumi Zimu wrote:
We depend on a regulated ordered society precisely because of what happens when there is no authority.

And what happens? Bad things.


My bone with that statement - and excuse me if I'm being daft - is that it is essentially meaningless.

"You know what happens to people if they don't breathe? They asphyxiate."

Well, yes, they do. So?


I was responding to the person I quoted, who brought up the formation of society? You're never going to understand the context if you don't read it.
Dalneya Yakovtu
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#91 - 2012-10-30 12:00:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Dalneya Yakovtu
Azumi Zimu wrote:

I was responding to the person I quoted, who brought up the formation of society? You're never going to understand the context if you don't read it.


Except for where you didn't quote anyone Ugh
Riedle
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#92 - 2012-10-30 12:00:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Riedle
Fluffy Sheep wrote:
Of course it doesn't.

It reflects the nature of some who play this particular niche game.

Don't be fooled into thinking that the lack of empathy from many who play this game and post on here is a cross section of life on the planet. I know all players I come across in the game are real people. Going by what I read here though, there's many who like to post that don't... Well I'd like to think that at least. Otherwise they truly are 1 dimensional self righteous arseholes who get kicks from stomping on others for their own gain & enjoyment.

I think most just don't quite get it and are riding the wave of anonymity / fantasy role play. If really faced with someone they just caused pain, I believe many would back track a little to undo any discomfort for them. Empathy, compassion.

Yes.

I'm a care bear.

I love you all... Unless you are a true toss wad without any remorse for willing or unwilling pain you inflict on others. Then I only care for those who may feel for you. You can go f@#k yourself.

Never mistake empathy for others as a weakness.

It's a strength.


What a bunch of incomprehensible pablum.

I still maintainn that if you feel 'pain' because I blew up your imaginary, internet spaceship - in a game about blowing up imaginary, internet spaceships - the problem is yours, not mine.

The self righteous, ridiculously entitled notion that you deserve EMPATHY because you are too emotionally stunted to be able to handle your imaginary internet spaceship being blown up is the height of ridiculousness and deserves all the mockery and scorn that can possibly be heaped upon it.

You candy asses who actually hand out such empathy and compassion (lol) to the immature, emotionally under developed, spoiled children are simply attempting to feather the nest of your self imagined superiority of others.

I think it can be said that you also have led a very sheltered life if you actually believe these imbeciles are worthy of your 'empathy.'

You should thank the gods that you have led a life that, thus far, has been so ridiculously luxiourious that you are able to argue, with a straight face mind you, that having your imaginary, internet spaceship blown up is genuine 'pain' and therefore worthy of your morally superioristic empathy.

The whole notion of it all makes me sick.

H
T
F
U

There. I feel better.

Riedle
stoicfaux
#93 - 2012-10-30 12:41:13 UTC
So if I understand the OP,
Step 1. A cooperative and civilized society creates the internet.
Step 2. Internet Anonymity allows/encourages people to act nasty and mean toward each other online.
Step 3. Ergo, the Nature of Humanity is Evilâ„¢.

The only people who should take Eve seriously enough to draw parallels between online behavior in a game and behavior in real life are CCP and the professional RMT'ers. Why? Because they actually have skin in the game since their next meal depends on selling services to people in the real world. Everyone else can just unsub and walk away from Eve.


Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Azumi Zimu
#94 - 2012-10-30 12:45:00 UTC
Dalneya Yakovtu wrote:
Azumi Zimu wrote:

I was responding to the person I quoted, who brought up the formation of society? You're never going to understand the context if you don't read it.


Except for where you didn't quote anyone Ugh


Dalneya Yakovtu
Dalneya Yakovtu
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#95 - 2012-10-30 13:10:41 UTC
Azumi Zimu wrote:
Dalneya Yakovtu wrote:
Azumi Zimu wrote:

I was responding to the person I quoted, who brought up the formation of society? You're never going to understand the context if you don't read it.


Except for where you didn't quote anyone Ugh


Dalneya Yakovtu


Aah gotcha, sorry I thought you were talking about some third party :)

OK then let's get back to the start of our discussion:

Quote:
Have you guys considered how it would look if society crumbled and this veneer of civility were stripped away?

Look at what happens inside prisons, or certain areas of Africa for example.


What was your point with this? I took it to mean something about how nasty you think human nature is, in line with your previous posts especially at the start of this thread. But if societal behavior is the natural state of man, then man's behavior in an unnatural state (ie. no society) is just as relevant as the assertion that man dies when he doesn't breathe. Which is not very relevant at all.
Azumi Zimu
#96 - 2012-10-30 13:24:53 UTC
Dalneya Yakovtu wrote:

What was your point with this? I took it to mean something about how nasty you think human nature is, in line with your previous posts especially at the start of this thread. But if societal behavior is the natural state of man, then man's behavior in an unnatural state (ie. no society) is just as relevant as the assertion that man dies when he doesn't breathe. Which is not very relevant at all.


Human nature pertains to the individual, society pertains to humanity.
Dalneya Yakovtu
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#97 - 2012-10-30 13:37:40 UTC
Azumi Zimu wrote:

Human nature pertains to the individual, society pertains to humanity.


The two can't be separated. Society is the sum of its parts. In order for a structured society to be the natural state of man, it must be "human nature" at the individual level to want to seek out other people and make societies with them.
Azumi Zimu
#98 - 2012-10-30 13:41:22 UTC
Dalneya Yakovtu wrote:
Azumi Zimu wrote:

Human nature pertains to the individual, society pertains to humanity.


The two can't be separated. Society is the sum of its parts. In order for a structured society to be the natural state of man, it must be "human nature" at the individual level to want to seek out other people and make societies with them.


You don't need to separate them, it's natural for humans to form society in order to protect themselves from other individuals.
Azumi Zimu
#99 - 2012-10-30 13:45:06 UTC
That's what I was trying to say here

Quote:
We depend on a regulated ordered society precisely because of what happens when there is no authority.
Dalneya Yakovtu
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#100 - 2012-10-30 13:48:19 UTC
Azumi Zimu wrote:

You don't need to separate them, it's natural for humans to form society in order to protect themselves from other individuals.


This assumes that society is an evolutionary adaptation to protect the species from itself, which is absurd.