These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Fiction

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Timeline doesn't make sense to me.

First post
Author
Turusk
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2012-10-29 10:12:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Turusk
Hey there,

I'm relatively new to Eve and I've been reading up on the lore. I think there are quite a few problems with the lore, like how the Amarr, Gallente and Caldari were conveniently able to unite their worlds under one state... it's pretty unthinkable for Earth.

But the biggest plothole seems to me how after the Eve Gate collapsed, there was a dark age of about 8000 years, without space exploration. This does not make much sense to me... While many of the colonists were there, the understanding of advanced technology must have still been there. The technology itself too, especially in the form of spaceships. Given a fertile earth-like planet and this advanced technology, a bunch of educated engineers, chemists, doctors and experts from other fields, this would have put the technology level at most a few decades before current earth level, and a lot of it could still be reconstructed from partially understanding how technology works. I understand that many died, but there must have still been a significant amount of people left to have restarted civilization. Even in the most pessimistic estimates it could turn technology back a few hundred years, but it would recover faster from just knowing what is possible.

So I think at most the dark ages should have lasted a few hundred years, if not a mere hundred years, at least for the inhabitants of some of the colonies. I just don't see civilization going back 8000 years or even a 1000, where wars were still fought with swords and we didn't know how electricity works and how it can be used.

I'm just curious what you guys think, and is there something I'm missing here?
AlleyKat
The Unwanted.
#2 - 2012-10-29 11:40:16 UTC
I agree.

But, I've often said the lore was written to appease game design mechanics, not logic.

AK

This space for rent.

Borascus
#3 - 2012-10-29 11:42:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Borascus
Turusk wrote:


But the biggest plothole seems to me how after the Eve Gate collapsed, there was a dark age of about 8000 years, without space exploration. This does not make much sense to me... While many of the colonists were there, the understanding of advanced technology must have still been there. The technology itself too, especially in the form of spaceships. Given a fertile earth-like planet and this advanced technology, a bunch of educated engineers, chemists, doctors and experts from other fields, this would have put the technology level at most a few decades before current earth level, and a lot of it could still be reconstructed from partially understanding how technology works. I understand that many died, but there must have still been a significant amount of people left to have restarted civilization. Even in the most pessimistic estimates it could turn technology back a few hundred years, but it would recover faster from just knowing what is possible.

So I think at most the dark ages should have lasted a few hundred years, if not a mere hundred years, at least for the inhabitants of some of the colonies. I just don't see civilization going back 8000 years or even a 1000, where wars were still fought with swords and we didn't know how electricity works and how it can be used.

I'm just curious what you guys think, and is there something I'm missing here?


There isn't much being missed.

New Eden was only accessible for 74 years, discovery in 7987 and collapse in 8061. The wormhole is still there, the gate is still there...

So in 74 years there were planet sales, explorers, and terraforming ventures. From such a quick turn around it's likely the tech support would be less dense of a population than "total immigration 8061". It would be harder for smaller groups like in the following example; an hydroponics expert, a meteorological expert and an electrician live within 20ft of each other, where do they get the lightbulbs?

Once the gate collapsed every piece of equipment had "warranty and product guarantee" but no supplier, no support, no parts ready made. It's kind of hinted that the wormhole was expected as a traversable intermediary, with supply lines. After it collapsed, all supercooled electronics for example, would be on a countdown, with bigger colonies lending 10% of their parts to smaller colonies etc.

During those Dark Ages some ancient races were definately in existence, but what they were actually doing is not clearly recorded.


The Alleykat rule listed above would apply to a fair chunk, then again the timing of the EVE Chronicles is before the content to which they applied: List of Chronicles with dates.
Roga Dracor
Gladiators of Rage
Fraternity.
#4 - 2012-10-29 12:39:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Roga Dracor
After a long inspection of the available material, it becomes clear there is more to the story than just, mankind comes through portal to build a brave new world, portal closes, leaving mankind unable to retain his technological advances.

The Yan Jung maintained a space going civilization for at least fifteen hundred years after the gate closed. There is simply more to the story than we know. A cataclysmic event destroyed the planets the Yan Jungs settled on, leaving only a broken starship hull on a moon where the survivors of this cataclysm struggled to survive, apparently failing, in the end.

War, famine, plague.. Just because we don't understand the mechanics, doesn't mean there is no sense in the model. The holes are holes in our understanding, not holes in the sensibility of it all.. That's my way of looking at it.

If you had read the book on day one, and knew all there was to know, would you still be here today?

The ancient Chinese, early in their history, had one of the most powerful navies in the world. Why did they abandon this technology later in their history? To say it just doesn't make sense, says you are not really looking for the truth behind it. You are looking for a truth that fits your own truth.

It's no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then, and it's a poor sort of memory that only works backward.

AlleyKat
The Unwanted.
#5 - 2012-10-29 12:53:06 UTC
The thing of importance is not the details, but the outcome.

If you focus on the details, you will be dissappointed; if you focus on the what the outcome was, you get a clean launching point into something more important.

This can be applied to any story, but particularly with stories which support something greater than the details of the story.

Lord of the Rings, for example, could have been avoided completely if Elrond just pushed someone into the fires of Mt Doom.

Problem solved.

AK

This space for rent.

Borascus
#6 - 2012-10-29 12:57:10 UTC
AlleyKat wrote:


Lord of the Rings, for example, could have been avoided completely if Elrond just pushed someone into the fires of Mt Doom.

Problem solved.

AK


With much rejoice from today's critics, walked in and saw the LoTR special features, with critics saying "JRR Tolkien would not have been able to get this book published in today's world. It's too long"
Roga Dracor
Gladiators of Rage
Fraternity.
#7 - 2012-10-29 13:17:27 UTC
Speaks worlds about modern human society.. Always looking for a shortcut.

I feel the rust creeping..

It's no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then, and it's a poor sort of memory that only works backward.

CCP Falcon
#8 - 2012-10-29 14:23:56 UTC
What a lot of people don't remember about the collapse of the EVE Gate when they're done reading is that it didn't just close.

It collapsed violently, and almost obliterated the entire system of New Eden with an enormous release of energy that decimated most of what was originally there, including most of the settlers. It's reasonable to assume that the sheer amount of energy released could have destroyed or fried a lot of the electronics for several systems over once they were hit with the blast wave.

Also bear in mind that based on an 80 year lifespan, 8000 year is 100 generations. That's 100 generations of attempting to rebuild society from shattered ruins.

I think it's safe to assume that they had it pretty rough for at least a couple of thousand years of that. Smile

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3

Borascus
#9 - 2012-10-29 15:13:19 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
What a lot of people don't remember about the collapse of the EVE Gate when they're done reading is that it didn't just close.

It collapsed violently, and almost obliterated the entire system of New Eden with an enormous release of energy that decimated most of what was originally there, including most of the settlers. It's reasonable to assume that the sheer amount of energy released could have destroyed or fried a lot of the electronics for several systems over once they were hit with the blast wave.

Also bear in mind that based on an 80 year lifespan, 8000 year is 100 generations. That's 100 generations of attempting to rebuild society from shattered ruins.

I think it's safe to assume that they had it pretty rough for at least a couple of thousand years of that. Smile




Yea, true. It's only 20 people living past 100yrs old back to 0BC/0AD
AlleyKat
The Unwanted.
#10 - 2012-10-29 15:46:53 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
What a lot of people don't remember about the collapse of the EVE Gate when they're done reading is that it didn't just close.

It collapsed violently, and almost obliterated the entire system of New Eden with an enormous release of energy that decimated most of what was originally there, including most of the settlers. It's reasonable to assume the sheer amount of energy released could have destroyed or fried a lot of the electronics for several systems over once they were hit with the blast wave.

Also bear in mind that based on an 80 year lifespan, 8000 year is 100 generations. That's 100 generations of attempting to rebuild society from shattered ruins.

I think it's safe to assume that they had it pretty rough for at least a couple of thousand years of that. Smile



Nice try.

It didn't affect the jumpgates, 'mate.

AK

This space for rent.

CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
#11 - 2012-10-29 15:58:21 UTC
The explosion of the EVE Gate would have ruined the jump gates in New Eden and surrounding systems. Considering that New Eden was the central hub of the cluster at the time, the loss of those gates could have easily been catastrophic to travel.

EVE Online/DUST 514 Community Representative ※ EVE Illuminati ※ Fiction Adept

@CCP_Eterne ※ @EVE_LiveEvents

Bloodpetal
Tir Capital Management Group
#12 - 2012-10-29 15:59:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Bloodpetal
AlleyKat wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
What a lot of people don't remember about the collapse of the EVE Gate when they're done reading is that it didn't just close.

It collapsed violently, and almost obliterated the entire system of New Eden with an enormous release of energy that decimated most of what was originally there, including most of the settlers. It's reasonable to assume the sheer amount of energy released could have destroyed or fried a lot of the electronics for several systems over once they were hit with the blast wave.

Also bear in mind that based on an 80 year lifespan, 8000 year is 100 generations. That's 100 generations of attempting to rebuild society from shattered ruins.

I think it's safe to assume that they had it pretty rough for at least a couple of thousand years of that. Smile



Nice try.

It didn't affect the jumpgates, 'mate.

AK


Who says it didn't affect jump gates? The ones we use are new jumpgates.


You're completely underestimating the infrastructure it would take to maintain an advanced civilization, not to mention our Earthly one.

If the sun has a bit of a tantrum our Satellites start ******* up, just to get started. If we lost Satellite systems, we might as well go back 80 years in communication infrastructure.

To manufacture advanced space-faring materials is another huge challenge. Are you telling me that every colony on every planet had a professional spaceship manufacturer? So, even if you could maintain those things for, 100 years, 200 years, they'd break and before you know it you'd end up having to rebuild what little you have and can do over the next thousands of years.

Not to mention the same ensuing chaos you mention on just trying to unite ONE world. If you were completely disconnected from your home world, even if you had completely functioning everything, you're saying you don't believe there'd be manic panic and self-induced destructive behavior that would tear down society to the point that you'd have to start over? Even if you were knocked down to "Earth" like living conditions.

And again, how many of those planets were under terraforming situations? They weren't truly livable and would have relied on some level of exports and imports while terraforming was underway.

You completely underestimate how much world manipulation we have done to EARTH just to maintain our current status quo - it could get undone very easily. And 100 times more easily for advanced civilization. We can barely get iPods/iPhones to not break. The universe is not very accomodating to the human condition.

Where I am.

CCP Falcon
#13 - 2012-10-29 16:01:26 UTC
AlleyKat wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
What a lot of people don't remember about the collapse of the EVE Gate when they're done reading is that it didn't just close.

It collapsed violently, and almost obliterated the entire system of New Eden with an enormous release of energy that decimated most of what was originally there, including most of the settlers. It's reasonable to assume the sheer amount of energy released could have destroyed or fried a lot of the electronics for several systems over once they were hit with the blast wave.

Also bear in mind that based on an 80 year lifespan, 8000 year is 100 generations. That's 100 generations of attempting to rebuild society from shattered ruins.

I think it's safe to assume that they had it pretty rough for at least a couple of thousand years of that. Smile



Nice try.

It didn't affect the jumpgates, 'mate.

AK


Bear in mind also that the jumpgates that exist now are not the same as the ones that were around back then. Completely different technology and completely different structure. Smile

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3

Esna Pitoojee
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#14 - 2012-10-29 16:48:26 UTC
2 things to keep in mind as well:

1, the old intro made it fairly clear that the colonists were, to varying degrees, dependent on technology still being imported through the gate. The Caldari, for instance, were only half-done terraforming Caldari Prime and the planet was only populated by the terraforming crews and those necessary to support them. [1] There was no fully developed civilization on Caldari Prime; it was a work outpost. Mishii IV, where the Ni-Kunni come from, was caught in a similar state - although in the inverse of the frigid Caldari Prime, Mishii IV was left a desert with little water available. [2]




The second thing to remember is that lack of spaceflight-related technological development does NOT mean that nothing was going on. The Amarr were split between squabbling warlords for a long time, as were the Gallente until both cultures were united by the first reclaiming and the reforms of Rouvenor III, respectively. The Minmatar tribes commonly warred among each other until they united into a worldwide culture - and in just over 1,000 years had begun their own interstellar civilization. In many other cases, the races of the 'big four' nations were tied up with internal conflicts for many thousands of years before they either united or were overrun by other cultures that had done so.
Callic Veratar
#15 - 2012-10-29 18:55:06 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
Also bear in mind that based on an 80 year lifespan, 8000 year is 100 generations. That's 100 generations of attempting to rebuild society from shattered ruins.

I think it's safe to assume that they had it pretty rough for at least a couple of thousand years of that. Smile


People tend to have children at the age of 20-30, not 80. From that, 8000 years is more like 250-400 generations. Unless Icelanders have some weird reproductive practices I'm not aware of.
CCP Falcon
#16 - 2012-10-29 19:28:21 UTC
Callic Veratar wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Also bear in mind that based on an 80 year lifespan, 8000 year is 100 generations. That's 100 generations of attempting to rebuild society from shattered ruins.

I think it's safe to assume that they had it pretty rough for at least a couple of thousand years of that. Smile


People tend to have children at the age of 20-30, not 80. From that, 8000 years is more like 250-400 generations. Unless Icelanders have some weird reproductive practices I'm not aware of.


I was considering the fact that in 7,000+ AD, the average lifespan is probably a lot longer, but yes, I do see your point. Smile

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3

Roga Dracor
Gladiators of Rage
Fraternity.
#17 - 2012-10-29 19:44:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Roga Dracor
And given that fact, it is likely they waited longer than 20-30 years to have kids.. Though, as things declined the mortality rate rose and the life expectancy dropped.. Given the situation, reading and other sedentary pastimes became secondary to survival.. Within a few generations, humanity's realities changed drastically. Especially if most of the technical data and owners manuals were in an electronic format.. As seems to be the way things are going.. Especially with the pushes toward "green" technology and conservation.. Hard to maintain that if the batteries wear out or an EM pulse shut everything down..

They came from the 70th century, not the 21st.. Look at where we are today, battery operated has replaced corded devices in many instances.. That is only going to advance as the centuries do. How many of you actually buy books, as opposed to downloading media to your ipads? How many of you are vocal about such things? Think about the world you push for, if you are of that mindset. Then think how fast it can come crashing down..

It's no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then, and it's a poor sort of memory that only works backward.

Romvex
TURN LEFT
#18 - 2012-10-29 21:33:29 UTC
I believe that another main cause of the dark ages may have simply been the mass hysteria caused by the news of the gate's closure. Lets say that you lived in Hawaii, and you got news that the rest of the world had just been wiped out by a nuclear catastrophe. Your supply routes to the mainland is gone, your central government is gone. Anarchy would ensue, probably causing a lot of damage in the process. It doesn't require much to make people revert to primitive violence under the right circumstances.
Borascus
#19 - 2012-10-29 22:24:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Borascus
The Caldari did the same again when their Hidden Colonies were found, eventually turning onto the Gallentean citizens still on Caldari Prime.

http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Caldari_Prime

500,000 is officially an act of genocide
Horatius Caul
Kitzless
#20 - 2012-10-30 01:49:21 UTC
Turusk wrote:
This does not make much sense to me... While many of the colonists were there, the understanding of advanced technology must have still been there. The technology itself too, especially in the form of spaceships.

What do you think is more valuable to a freezing and starving colony? A single functional spaceship, or the ample supply of heat and light and power that the ship's power core may offer the colony if the ship is stripped? Space travel is meaningless if the world is ending.

Even if two colonies in neighbouring star systems were able to slowboat ships to one another (Several days or weeks with an EVE-modern warp engine, IIRC), it still wouldn't save them. What would it give them? Trade? If neither colony has industry or agriculture, they will have nothing of value to trade that isn't also crucial to the survival of the home colony. In fact, a colony with functional agriculture with a few scout ships might not want to contact other colonies, out of fear that they have stronger military strength and will use superior ships and manpower to claim a functional colony.

So the colonies that may have been somewhat self-sustaining at the collapse would have had an interest in isolating themselves, which would have contributed to their eventual collapse.

Turusk wrote:
Given a fertile earth-like planet and this advanced technology, a bunch of educated engineers, chemists, doctors and experts from other fields, this would have put the technology level at most a few decades before current earth level, and a lot of it could still be reconstructed from partially understanding how technology works.
The colonies were at the most 70 years or so. Those oldest and best-developed colonies likely went on to become the Jove. As for the rest? The Amarr didn't properly settle on Athra until the year of the collapse. The Pator and Luminaire settlers had such luxurious lushness that it was probably assumed they didn't need much expertise to survive in the beginning. The Caldari had to live underground in Fallout-style vaults for hundreds of years.

And even the best technology can't run perfectly for centuries, even if the maintenance staff is educated. Computers will fail, taking with them ever-more crucial data. Survey equipment will seize, making the precious few geologists and engineers blind as to the potential civilization-saving resources the world might contain. And when the food supply falters, people will splinter, migrate and turn on each other in struggles for supremacy.


Turusk wrote:
I understand that many died, but there must have still been a significant amount of people left to have restarted civilization. Even in the most pessimistic estimates it could turn technology back a few hundred years, but it would recover faster from just knowing what is possible.
So many systems in our world are interdependent. Imagine if all technology was wiped off the Earth today - as in all factories, all cities just vanish into thin air. Where do you start? You need electricity? Where do you get the materials and fuels for generators? Building materials in general? Miners need engineers, and engineers need tools.

Before you have a complete chain of industry in place, your first couple of generations will have died. If you're lucky you managed to produce writing materials to allow your engineers, and scientists to save their knowledge, so someone else can carry on after them, but what happens when each generation is less literate than the one before? What happens when, out of necessity, a neighbouring society raids yours for food (without functioning agricultural industry you cannot support major populations, and people will break into factions) and destroys your library to stunt the development of your people?

You end up with a cyclical loss of information, and as the situation worsens your people will re-evaluate. What knowledge will be more important to invest in? The knowledge of how to make warp engines or the knowledge of how irrigation works? One will be selected for, the other selected against - until the civilization is stable enough to support it again, and at that point the original information will be lost.


Turusk wrote:
So I think at most the dark ages should have lasted a few hundred years, if not a mere hundred years, at least for the inhabitants of some of the colonies.
It didn't last very long for some colonies. The Jovian colonies were up and restored in a very short time, re-establishing interstellar travel and controlling much of the cluster for millennia before caving in on itself twice. The Yan Jung and the Talocan - if they weren't also a part of the Jove Empire - arose long before the currently dominant empires. Some colonies were more developed, and better suited to weather the collapse than others, and those did rise from the mud earlier. Basically, through a variety of lousy circumstances the original settlers of the Big Four colonies were left in the shittiest of positions and terrible odds of resurgence, and because of it the fight they had to fight to climb back to the stars was all the more difficult.
123Next pageLast page