These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Updated][Winter] Missile Rebalance 2.0 + Hurricane tweak

First post First post First post
Author
Lili Lu
#5421 - 2012-10-26 23:59:47 UTC
Cazador 64 wrote:
So just got off test did side by side with this pilot.
This guy flies CNR Sniper boats in incursions.
After this patch my CNR will be rendered useless for a Sniper boat in incursions.
With T2 Ammo flight time on cruise got taken down to under 120KM

As a incursion sniper I am needed to hit past 150. So I fit tech 1 as there are no faction ammo on test atm and I was back out to a good range but the DPS was way down. Looking at everything I would have to switch to faction ammo effectively nerfing my DPS by over 100 points. This these numbers there will be no need for anyone to take a CNR into an incursion as a sniper ever..

Great job CCP not only did you take the HML out of pvp and pve you took the Caldari missiles sniper boats out of incursions also.
Unless I missed something I will be canceling all my accounts and my rl friends will follow.
and no i will not be giving away any of my stuff or isk.


No it means you'll have a reason now to hope for the TC/TE/TD changes. Or to fit rigs for range. Start thinking past your current stale fitting habits.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5422 - 2012-10-27 00:01:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Bouh Revetoile
Noemi Nagano wrote:

How can it be Drake online, when the Drake is second? About that Cane nerf, we will see what it does. If the Cane gets worse, a Minmatar pilot has other options though. In every shipclass.

A Caldari can go frigs, or ECM. Or snipe with Nagas and Rokhs, but for missiles its game over.

It's lowsec numbers, the place where Drake should be beaten hand on by the hurricane. Truth, the real one, the one people actually doing pvp see, is that the drake is very popular in lowsec, way more than most other BC.

Remember, the Hurricane is OP, but it's nerfed. But if the Hurricane is OP, then the Drake is too, because there is almost as many of them as there is Hurricanes.

And after the nerf, Drake pilots will instantly have HAM, and HML will still be better than any other medLR turrets (you can check, they are used too, just not so much, but no doubt a missile pilot will use HML for the job).

Wow, that kind of invalidate your "argument" ?

And remember, something OP deserve to be nerfed, whatever the other conditions. If something else need to be buffed to compensate, that is a whole other matter, but I never saw you supporting more buff to HAM, CM and Torps.

Quote:

.. neither the Phoon nor the Cyclone came to my mind as Caldari ships so far. Maybe I was wrong there. Or maybe you missed the point, again? :)

This was about minmatar not skilling for missiles. A "truth" you wrote.
Cazador 64
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5423 - 2012-10-27 00:02:21 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:


Yes, Tyberius is being honest in stating he lacks any sample of lowsec. The point I have have been making over and over agian to you is that both you and I do as well. So your statement is false, you do not know of drake overrepresentation or underrepresentation in lowsec.Idea But CCP is able to sample usage.


Then why does CCP not see that Projectiles are over represented in pvp ?
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5424 - 2012-10-27 00:04:05 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:

2) Missiles also have a much lower tendency to miss completely. Especially at close range where LR turrets are useless.


Agreed on the first, the second depends a bit but is also not completely wrong :D

Yes, admittedly one can try to minimize angular velocity but in all reality with PvP if you are fighting short rage with LR guns you either are up against a bad opponent or did something wrong and are likely to have issues pulling it off.
Noemi Nagano wrote:

Tyberius Franklin wrote:

4) Yes really, look again for MEDIUM, LONG RANGE TURRETS. Count the number on the list. Combine them and see if they beat HML II. For the debate of whether HML is ballanced within it's class the number of people killed by 1400 Howitzers and 200mm autos is irrelevant.


Tyberius, I agree with you in medium long range HML are strong. But please dont forget the facts which are behind this: 1) the ship which uses them most is cheap to skill and fit and has good EHP 2) its the only missile system in the list apart from meta 4 Torps which are for bombers and for sure not used on Caldari PvP BS 3) the absence of all other missile systems in the list of working/viable stuff leaves all those missile skilled Caldari who want to PvP with HML and nothing but HML 4) PG reqs of HAM are higher than HML which means people who are risk averse and like to put more tank will gravitate even more to HML, having more range AND more tank unlike with the turret peers.

If PG reqs for HML and HAM would be exchanged and HAM would be working (which they maybe will, cant say for sure yet) then there might be a fair bit less HML and maybe some HAM in that list. And the numbers for HML would go down even more so if Torps and Cruises would work on Ravens in PvP.

The issue I have with this defense in that instead of looking at what HML's are now and trying to keep it we should instead be looking at what HAM's (and torp/cruise) should be and working towards that while putting HML in it's place. We have another balancing pass as well as Fozzie's confirmation that large systems are looking at some balance soon. As far as HML v HAM, soon we'll see if it's just that HAM is bad or if it's overshadowed by HML, OR if HML's advantages make it unimpeded in the areas where it currently shines.
Cazador 64
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5425 - 2012-10-27 00:04:53 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:

Or to fit rigs for range..

That will either lower my dps or tank even more and neither can take a hit even with lvl 5 skills.
CCP did a great job making it look like it was only a HML nerf when it was a Cruise nerf as well.
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#5426 - 2012-10-27 00:06:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Noemi Nagano
Bouh Revetoile wrote:

It's lowsec numbers, the place where Drake should be beaten hand on by the hurricane. Truth, the real one, the one people actually doing pvp see, is that the drake is very popular in lowsec, way more than most other BC..


Ok. You say the Drake is popular in lowsec. I didnt deny that. Now look at Caldari missile combat hulls overall used in lowsec. Esp. those in medium and large size. And now compare the numbers your get with the numbers of other races. Voila, there goes your overrepresentation. The Drake is used so much *not* because its OP, but because Caldari have *no other decent* missile PvP ship in medium and large. Other races DO have options, Caldari dont. Simple, eh?

Bouh, as long as you fail to see this its not helping to post in french or whatever. You will not get a clue of whats going on.

Its a bit like the Monty-Hall-Dilemma, if you know about that ... many people dont understand it if you tell it with 3 doors and 1 of them gets opened. They will understand it in the moment when you change it to 100 doors and 98 opened ;)

Imagine we remove every single working medium or large laser ship except one from the game, dont you think its numbers might get a bit too much? Or even more so with Projectiles .. dont forget: there are many Caldari pilots. Many of them chose Caldari because they were told its "easy to PvE" with them, which was true. And some of those started to feel like they want to do more than shooting NPC.

Bouh Revetoile wrote:

And after the nerf, Drake pilots will instantly have HAM, and HML will still be better than any other medLR turrets (you can check, they are used too, just not so much, but no doubt a missile pilot will use HML for the job).

Wow, that kind of invalidate your "argument" ?


I dont see how it does invalidate any of the points I made. If or if not HAM will be good after the patch has to be seen, same as your other assumption :)

Bouh Revetoile wrote:

And remember, something OP deserve to be nerfed, whatever the other conditions. If something else need to be buffed to compensate, that is a whole other matter, but I never saw you supporting more buff to HAM, CM and Torps.


Then, Bouh, you have severe reading issues. Seriously.



Bouh Revetoile wrote:

This was about minmatar not skilling for missiles. A "truth" you wrote.


I said most Minmatar pilots dont even bother with missiles because they dont need to. If they do bother with them, they have - oh wonder - fine ships to use. Would be nice if the same was true for Caldari. For Caldari it was until hybrid buff the other way round: they had sucky missile ships except the Drake/HML and wouldnt even think about skilling their hybrid ships,but instead crosstrain to Minmatar or Amarr.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5427 - 2012-10-27 00:09:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Bouh Revetoile
Noemi Nagano wrote:
fix this posting of yours, please .. its unreadable. Maybe better so, though ..

I can write in french if you prefer... Or was it the fail quote of mine ? I fixed the second. I can fix the first too. :p
Lili Lu
#5428 - 2012-10-27 00:11:52 UTC
Cazador 64 wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:


Yes, Tyberius is being honest in stating he lacks any sample of lowsec. The point I have have been making over and over agian to you is that both you and I do as well. So your statement is false, you do not know of drake overrepresentation or underrepresentation in lowsec.Idea But CCP is able to sample usage.


Then why does CCP not see that Projectiles are over represented in pvp ?


Maybe they don't because they aren't. Or maybe they think the direct Cane nerf is going to reduce those numbers. Or maybe because they are currently analyzing the TE falloff effect and ship falloff bonuses. In fact, one of the devs in a thread a couple months ago posted that he sort of regretted the 10% faloof ship hull bonuses.

We don't know what other changes are in store. But Drake and Tengu usage and HML activations were sitting hugely on top. The stats on HM performance were clearly outclassing other weapons in the same role. And their strengths were stepping on the ultility of other missile systems. And as the OP said they had to be brought back into line to make any sense of the rebalancing of ship bonus efforts.
Lili Lu
#5429 - 2012-10-27 00:13:57 UTC
Cazador 64 wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:

Or to fit rigs for range..

That will either lower my dps or tank even more and neither can take a hit even with lvl 5 skills.
CCP did a great job making it look like it was only a HML nerf when it was a Cruise nerf as well.


Have you ever fit a sniper turret BS, especially one that armor tanks? Welcome to fitting choices. It no longer is an easy matter to figure out.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5430 - 2012-10-27 00:16:28 UTC
About projectiles, there is also the ship rebalancing.

Even without modifying projectiles, they are rebalancing minmatar ships. Rifter is not the top dog anymore for example.

PS : and the hurricane do have its nerf.
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#5431 - 2012-10-27 00:17:48 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:

The issue I have with this defense in that instead of looking at what HML's are now and trying to keep it we should instead be looking at what HAM's (and torp/cruise) should be and working towards that while putting HML in it's place. We have another balancing pass as well as Fozzie's confirmation that large systems are looking at some balance soon. As far as HML v HAM, soon we'll see if it's just that HAM is bad or if it's overshadowed by HML, OR if HML's advantages make it unimpeded in the areas where it currently shines.


I would be with you here if it was not the only working missile system at all in Caldari PvP med and large. And esp. because I am sure how much the HML numbers would go down as soon as there are options. But yeah, we cant change anything right now anyway.

To Lili just one thing: the fact I didnt post killmails in lowsec does not mean I dont have any lowsec experience. I have more toons than the 2 you know about :) IMO Drakes are not overrepresented there. Hop into a ship of your choice and go there, you might very well see I am correct with this. Btw you stated before you had recent lowec exp, but in your last post you say you dont - which of the two is correct? It cant be both, you know ..

About the Droneboats I agree, their role in eve-kill is not existing. Although ships which rely on Drones can do well in PvP, esp. very small scale. Myrm and Dominix are strong, same as a Phoon (although not mainly Drones) or a Vexor or Ishtar. I heard also of people using Rattlesnakes with some success, although I have to admit I never saw one doing really great stuff.

I dont object to a drone rework so they will work better esp. in lowsec (gate guns ..).

Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#5432 - 2012-10-27 00:19:35 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:
Noemi Nagano wrote:
fix this posting of yours, please .. its unreadable. Maybe better so, though ..

I can write in french if you prefer... Or was it the fail quote of mine ? I fixed the second. I can fix the first too. :p


Yeah would be cool if you did. Would fit well to your Gallente char ;) but I meant the second, which I will check in a minute.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#5433 - 2012-10-27 00:21:13 UTC
Cazador 64 wrote:
So just got off test did side by side with this pilot.
This guy flies CNR Sniper boats in incursions.
After this patch my CNR will be rendered useless for a Sniper boat in incursions.
With T2 Ammo flight time on cruise got taken down to under 120KM

As a incursion sniper I am needed to hit past 150. So I fit tech 1 as there are no faction ammo on test atm and I was back out to a good range but the DPS was way down. Looking at everything I would have to switch to faction ammo effectively nerfing my DPS by over 100 points. This these numbers there will be no need for anyone to take a CNR into an incursion as a sniper ever..

Great job CCP not only did you take the HML out of pvp and pve you took the Caldari missiles sniper boats out of incursions also.
Unless I missed something I will be canceling all my accounts and my rl friends will follow.
and no i will not be giving away any of my stuff or isk.


i thought they didnt take u anyways.

train rokh?

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5434 - 2012-10-27 00:22:02 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:
To Lili just one thing: the fact I didnt post killmails in lowsec does not mean I dont have any lowsec experience. I have more toons than the 2 you know about :) IMO Drakes are not overrepresented there. Hop into a ship of your choice and go there, you might very well see I am correct with this. Btw you stated before you had recent lowec exp, but in your last post you say you dont - which of the two is correct? It cant be both, you know .

I showed you numbers of drake overrepresentation. Are you ignoring me ? Do you think I'm lying ? Do you know you can check these numbers yourself ?

I'm starting to think you don't do so much lowsec pvp.
Cazador 64
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5435 - 2012-10-27 00:22:24 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:

Have you ever fit a sniper turret BS, especially one that armor tanks? Welcome to fitting choices. It no longer is an easy matter to figure out.


No i fly shield fleets and as it is turret BS snipers out dps the caldari cruise snipers by a long shot.
Fitting choices or not the end result will be noone will take a CNR sniper into an Incursion fleet period.
There will be even less dps out of the CNR and less of a tank it simple will not work.
Cazador 64
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5436 - 2012-10-27 00:25:52 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:

i thought they didnt take u anyways.
train rokh?


So spend 4-5 months fixing what ccp broke ?
to get the gun skills to what they need to be to be worth anything its an easy 4 months at least.
I do not understand why this is such a hard concept to grasp every pilot should have a viable option to fly how they want to fly in EVE.
I should not have to retrain new skills just to get back to where I was before the nerf.
Cazador 64
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5437 - 2012-10-27 00:27:59 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:

I showed you numbers of drake overrepresentation. Are you ignoring me ? Do you think I'm lying ? Do you know you can check these numbers yourself ?


So how about the over representation of projectiles vs every other weapons system???
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#5438 - 2012-10-27 00:31:20 UTC
Cazador 64 wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:

Have you ever fit a sniper turret BS, especially one that armor tanks? Welcome to fitting choices. It no longer is an easy matter to figure out.


No i fly shield fleets and as it is turret BS snipers out dps the caldari cruise snipers by a long shot.
Fitting choices or not the end result will be noone will take a CNR sniper into an Incursion fleet period.
There will be even less dps out of the CNR and less of a tank it simple will not work.


Why are you flying a cruise CNR for incursion fleets? Certainly a range extended torp CNR (60+kmish if i remember right) would do you much better if you INSIST on flying a missile boat.


That said incurstions are a poor place for a Missile ship when you're comparason is the Machariel and the Nightmare. Turns out Turrent ships suck against Sansha plexes (they tracking disrupt) and up north where FOF's are your best friend. Sometimes if you use the wrong tool to do a job, you can still get the job done, just not as well as the right tool can.

Also fit up any other battle cruiser for long range, with the largest sized long ranged medium guns. Now do the same thing with a drake. Which ones (<-trick part of the question is here)needed fitting mods and couldn't squeeze on a tank and which ones still bricked out near 100k hp while doing the long range bit.

Tell me more about how HML's aren't out of whack.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5439 - 2012-10-27 00:33:47 UTC
Cazador 64 wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:

Have you ever fit a sniper turret BS, especially one that armor tanks? Welcome to fitting choices. It no longer is an easy matter to figure out.


No i fly shield fleets and as it is turret BS snipers out dps the caldari cruise snipers by a long shot.
Fitting choices or not the end result will be noone will take a CNR sniper into an Incursion fleet period.
There will be even less dps out of the CNR and less of a tank it simple will not work.

I checked it : T2 fit, only a Paladin can outdps a *Raven* at 150km, and it cap itself out rather fastly.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5440 - 2012-10-27 00:35:03 UTC
Cazador 64 wrote:
Bouh Revetoile wrote:

I showed you numbers of drake overrepresentation. Are you ignoring me ? Do you think I'm lying ? Do you know you can check these numbers yourself ?


So how about the over representation of projectiles vs every other weapons system???

See ship rebalancing and hurricane nerf.