These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

VAHFT Mutual Funds - Initial Public Offering

Author
Eu Daimon
Merchants of the Golden Goose
#61 - 2012-10-22 22:00:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Eu Daimon
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Eu Daimon wrote:
I'd like to reserve 250 mil on each (1 bil total).


There are five funds, therefore 250 mil on each = 1.25B not 1 bil total. Please restate your offer.


This gave me time to go over the thread once again. Also, finding some deeper pockets.

500 mil in the simple fund

250 mil in each of the other four

= 1,5 bil in total.
Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar
#62 - 2012-10-22 22:03:49 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Graygor wrote:
That's true, but 1kBR sounds too close to being something related to Brazil. Nothing against Brazil but I thought [1kB R] looked better. It was more aesthetic than anything else.

If it causes issues for you then I'm happy to have it all handled by Graygor instead.


Excel copy and pasting will handle spaces just fine Big smile.


I think Excel can even handle automatic OCD conversions ;)

Star Jump Drive A new way to traverse the galaxy.

I invented Tiericide

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#63 - 2012-10-22 23:28:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
* * * RESERVATIONS TEMPORARILY DISABLED * * *


I am calculating and inputting all the reservations gathered so far.

Once I am done, if there's still some space left I'll reopen the reservations.

In case I am already beyond the 100B cap, I am sorry but those who reserved last will have another option:

They have to wait for the exchange to open (ETA, end of the month) and then simply buy shares put for sale by some of the current Investors.
To do so, they will just need to fill in the order form with a buy order and send ISK.
Notice how LIMIT orders have not been implemented.

Therefore they'll have to use either direct (called MARKET orders) orders or buy orders (called BUY STOP orders, like in RL).
Both of those orders don't give guarantee of exact fill at the requested price (in EvE you either get that or you get an error message), if another trader's order arrived 1 second before yours, you'll get the next best price. The next best price could be the same (in case of several shares sold at same price) or the next higher price step.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#64 - 2012-10-23 01:16:54 UTC
Important Update please read and reply ASAP

The IPO met way, way more success than I'd believe.

The closed ended funds reservations space ran out at beginning of page 2, Towaoc is the last Investor who fit in.

I have not finished calculating the open ended (easy) fund - for reasons explained below - but we are at 34.25B / 40B at page 2 as well.
I am very afraid for people who I REALLY wanted in, like TornSoul and several first time small Investors I'd have loved to give a chance and experience something new in EvE.


Therefore, the following choices come up:

1) Everybody past Towaoc who reserved a closed fund cannot fit and will have to try his luck purchasing shares off the Investors who made it in (on the Exchange).

2) Expand the total fund NAV.


There's also a second decision to take limited to those who (past Towaoc) reserved both ESYFND and the other shares.

1) Preserve the ESYFND reservation and drop the closed end funds reservation.

2) Drop the whole reservations including ESYFND since your closed end funds reservation did not make in.

The ESYFND reservations too go beyond the 40B cap so, once again, not all will fit in.


I eyeball the total NAV required to hold every reservation to be 130-150B.


So, I am going to ask you, the Investors, two questions:


1) Are you against expanding the NAV to fit more Investors (but not above 150B, past that it becomes a nightmare to provide dividends).

If you are against, please write your name down.


2) In case point 1 shows people against the NAV increase:

If you reserved ESYFND plus closed end funds shares, are you OK dropping the closed funds reserved shares and just reserve the ESYFND shares? If you are not, it means you are cancelling the reservation.
Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar
#65 - 2012-10-23 02:43:42 UTC
Maybe, put a cap on each reservation per fund? I know a lot of people like to invest big in one basket, but that tends to push out others.

Maybe a 1 BN ISK cap for the closed and 2 BN ISK cap for the Easy. That way the big investors still get a sizeable chunk, but more investors can come to the table.

If that isn't an option, I'm willing to cut my investment in half to 250 million so some some others can invest. I much prefer the first idea though :p. PlanetCorp very much wants to make this our first big name investment in our portfolio and we tend not to invest less than 500 million if we can help it.

Anyway, I'll go either way on it.

Star Jump Drive A new way to traverse the galaxy.

I invented Tiericide

Graygor
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#66 - 2012-10-23 03:00:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Graygor
That's a shame but not unexpected.

Would it be possible to move other funds from the other baskets to the easyfund? So my 250mil each way becomes 1.25bil in one basket? Or am I limited to 250mil investment? I understand that not all the data has been tabulated so I am refraining from committing until that time.

And I share the same questions as Val'Dore, would this be a possibility? And likewise, if it is a case of the many before the few, I would also like to be limited to 250mil if it means more can get in on this.

Either way, this is your show and I respect your final say on judgements.

"I think you should buy a new Mayan calendar. Mine has muscle cars on it." - Kenneth O'Hara

"I dont think that can happen, you can see Gray has his invuln field on in his portrait." - Commissar "Cake" Kate

Dean Ozuwara
Oh My Oh My God
#67 - 2012-10-23 03:27:07 UTC
In case of 2) In case point 1 shows people against the NAV increase:

my choice would be dropping all reserves.
Irken Slushk
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#68 - 2012-10-23 03:30:35 UTC
Hello VV,

At the risk of sounding greedy or ignorant I'm going to post a couple of my thoughts, this post can always be edited.

One of the things you wanted to create was a secondary market for shares if I read things correctly, would keeping the NAV at the initial number not be a good thing to help stimulate trading of shares via players?

Will increasing the NAV cause more headache, bring about burnout? Can the NAV be increased at a later date, perhaps after you have ran this for a while and have a good feeling for the workload?

While I sympathize with the people who did not make the IPO in time, I feel that increasing the NAV may not be the best thing to do at this time.

Feel free to persuade me other wise, my scope of finances is still very limited.

- Irken
Samroski
Middle-Earth
#69 - 2012-10-23 04:22:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Samroski
Irken Slushk wrote:
Hello VV,

At the risk of sounding greedy or ignorant I'm going to post a couple of my thoughts, this post can always be edited.

One of the things you wanted to create was a secondary market for shares if I read things correctly, would keeping the NAV at the initial number not be a good thing to help stimulate trading of shares via players?

Will increasing the NAV cause more headache, bring about burnout? Can the NAV be increased at a later date, perhaps after you have ran this for a while and have a good feeling for the workload?

While I sympathize with the people who did not make the IPO in time, I feel that increasing the NAV may not be the best thing to do at this time.

Feel free to persuade me other wise, my scope of finances is still very limited.

- Irken

I agree with Irken Slushk's well worded post above. Do not increase NAV for the following very subjective reasons:
1. As a market maker it is in my interest that fewer people get the opportunity to invest now.
2. Increasing NAV at this stage indicates poor planning (also frequently seen in scams). There was enough interest in this project to predict that the ceiling will be hit pretty soon. Thus go with the original plan.
3. Do not overburden yourself. Managing this will be difficult enough.

As I said above, these are my subjective opinions and are not based on scientific inquiry (edit: nor on a sound understanding of the project)

Any colour you like.

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#70 - 2012-10-23 06:50:18 UTC
Ok, I'll stick with the original plan.

I'll post later a Google Docs Excel Sheet with all the Investors names, amounts etc.


As for those who reserved both ESYFND shares and other funds, I am going to temporarily put them in for ESYFND only.

If you are one of the Investors who reserved both kinds of shares please let me know if you are ok at proceeding as is (that is, you'll only participate in the ESYFND) or if you want to cancel the reservation entirely.


Important details you have not to miss in case you could not make in:

- This is not a bond (buy and hold), shares will be placed on the exchange (expecially by Market Makers) for everybody to buy, like a normal EvE market.

- Who will buy after launch will still pay ZERO fees or anything. That is, if you have 11M and buy shares at 1.1M each then you get 11 shares no less.

- Watch the first Market Makers sell orders, some might want to cash the discount in and propose shares at a convenient price.

- Expect some large oscillations in the first days, it happens in every new market (see what happened to PI materials when they implemented PI).
Graygor
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#71 - 2012-10-23 08:03:18 UTC
Apologies for being dense but work has melted my brain.

As of now my request has been transferred to being 1.25bil in the easy fund or 250mil only or am I out entirely?

Sorry its been a long morning.

"I think you should buy a new Mayan calendar. Mine has muscle cars on it." - Kenneth O'Hara

"I dont think that can happen, you can see Gray has his invuln field on in his portrait." - Commissar "Cake" Kate

Eu Daimon
Merchants of the Golden Goose
#72 - 2012-10-23 08:21:39 UTC
Stick to your original plan.

I'll still put some money in the open ended basket, but not all of it. So only the original 500 mil.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#73 - 2012-10-23 08:36:34 UTC
Graygor wrote:
Apologies for being dense but work has melted my brain.

As of now my request has been transferred to being 1.25bil in the easy fund or 250mil only or am I out entirely?

Sorry its been a long morning.


Your choice to be in for 250M on the ESYFND or opt out of all. The other funds are full.
Amon Calis
The Blackest Void
#74 - 2012-10-23 09:49:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Amon Calis
Please reserve 7.5bill for me spread accross all 5 funds.
Nanatoa
#75 - 2012-10-23 10:27:04 UTC
What Irken Slushk and Samroski said.
Changing the total NAV would hurt those who did get in on time.

"Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011

Graygor
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#76 - 2012-10-23 10:30:36 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Graygor wrote:
Apologies for being dense but work has melted my brain.

As of now my request has been transferred to being 1.25bil in the easy fund or 250mil only or am I out entirely?

Sorry its been a long morning.


Your choice to be in for 250M on the ESYFND or opt out of all. The other funds are full.


250mil it is. Ill have to get in faster next time.Smile

"I think you should buy a new Mayan calendar. Mine has muscle cars on it." - Kenneth O'Hara

"I dont think that can happen, you can see Gray has his invuln field on in his portrait." - Commissar "Cake" Kate

Amon Calis
The Blackest Void
#77 - 2012-10-23 10:59:36 UTC
Amon Calis wrote:
Please reserve 7.5bill for me spread accross all 5 funds.



Missed fact funds were full, if something opens up ill still be in
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#78 - 2012-10-23 11:07:43 UTC
Nanatoa wrote:
What Irken Slushk and Samroski said.
Changing the total NAV would hurt those who did get in on time.


I have heard the Investors concerns and as such (as I posted above), the 100B cap won't be changed.

However I'd like to give you a little clarification about "hurting" current Investors:

No, it would not since there's no share dilution before the funds start (the NAV and shares both are in a fixed proportion of 1M per share).

Actually, there'd be more markets liquidity.




Amon Calis wrote:
Amon Calis wrote:
Please reserve 7.5bill for me spread accross all 5 funds.

Missed fact funds were full, if something opens up ill still be in


You did not miss anything but the launch P. The Exchange will be up and running once the Market Makers sent me ISK (I will tell when to) and then all you'll have to do is to open this link and place your bid!


Nanatoa
#79 - 2012-10-23 11:34:13 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
However I'd like to give you a little clarification about "hurting" current Investors:

No, it would not since there's no share dilution before the funds start (the NAV and shares both are in a fixed proportion of 1M per share).


I don't care about the NAV, I care about what I can flip the shares for after launch. I want demand to be high, and supply to be low. Increasing the number of shares would decrease demand (since more people got in already) and increase supply. I'll leave it to your expert analysis what that would do with the price I could get for my shares.

"Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011

Rhat Dakota
Paksenarion Dorthansdotter
#80 - 2012-10-23 11:43:03 UTC
[quote=Vaerah Vahrokha]Important Update please read and reply ASAP

2) Drop the whole reservations including ESYFND since your closed end funds reservation did not make in.

The ESYFND reservations too go beyond the 40B cap so, once again, not all will fit in.




Do we happen to know about where the ESYFND people capped out?