These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Updated][Winter] Missile Rebalance 2.0 + Hurricane tweak

First post First post First post
Author
Spugg Galdon
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#4841 - 2012-10-18 14:19:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Spugg Galdon
Recoil IV wrote:
Dalto Bane wrote:
Well CCP, I have about 25 drake hulls and around 100 or so HML and HAM T2 mods that you need to reimburse me for, since the drake will be utterly useless in any capacity.


i will also ask for skill point reimbursement (caldari spaceshit command and missiles)



Don't hold your breath.

HML's will still be pretty good. Which means Drakes will still be pretty good. HAM's are getting a decent buff with the skill changes and the Caracal is going to be a very good T1 cruiser with either RLML's, HML's or HAM's.

You're grumbling is not really necessary. All will be fine. Trust me. In six months time when we're looking at the summer expansion no one will remember all of this unecessary whining.

........and I think Drake blobs will still exist.
OT Smithers
A Farewell To Kings...
Dock Workers
#4842 - 2012-10-18 14:21:32 UTC
Spugg Galdon wrote:
Recoil IV wrote:
Gypsio III wrote:
Recoil IV wrote:
Spugg Galdon wrote:
Hey, Recoil IV, has your avatar smelled something bad or are you in a permament state af rage?



rage


The perfect ship for you is surely a Rage HAM Drake then. :nod:



and that ship is getting ****** up.therefore : rage.



I think HAM Drakes will be all the "rage" after this patch though Blink


HAM Drakes were already decent on paper, but they had problems applying that DPS to anything but larger targets. The change to GMP skill will allow them to hit smaller targets. How effective they will be remains to be seen, but they could be quite good. And they need to be with the restrictive range.

This skill change should have happened years ago, as is removing the T2 ammo penalties from missiles. CCP did this for the other races and weapons, but they didn't bother with Caldari. Add it to the long list of reasons why so many Caldari pilots have absolutely no faith in CCP.

OT Smithers
A Farewell To Kings...
Dock Workers
#4843 - 2012-10-18 14:30:10 UTC
Recoil IV wrote:
Dalto Bane wrote:
Well CCP, I have about 25 drake hulls and around 100 or so HML and HAM T2 mods that you need to reimburse me for, since the drake will be utterly useless in any capacity.


i will also ask for skill point reimbursement (caldari spaceshit command and missiles)


I would LOVE this as an option. I've got a whole lot of SP invested into broken hulls and weapons, and despite all the non-Caldari pilots (as usual) assuring us that everything is just fine, I have absolutely no faith that CCP even being interested in balance. If they are, I damn sure haven't seen it.

OT Smithers
A Farewell To Kings...
Dock Workers
#4844 - 2012-10-18 14:46:28 UTC
Spugg Galdon wrote:

Don't hold your breath.

HML's will still be pretty good. Which means Drakes will still be pretty good. HAM's are getting a decent buff with the skill changes and the Caracal is going to be a very good T1 cruiser with either RLML's, HML's or HAM's.

You're grumbling is not really necessary. All will be fine. Trust me. In six months time when we're looking at the summer expansion no one will remember all of this unecessary whining.

........and I think Drake blobs will still exist.


This is a game in which people train for months or invest billions of isk for a few percent more damage. And CCP is hitting HMs with a damage nerf so hard it will be the equivalent of seeing your "Heavy Missile 5" skill reduced to level one. Will HMs they still work? Yes.... They will still apply damage at range. The damage will be a lot less, the range shorter, but they will still hit the target.

But you are wrong on this: Caldari pilots are not going to just forget. Not even close.

Many Caldari pilots are still angry with CCP over the Naga incident. I heard some guy in my corp ranting about that just the other day. Hell, I suspect a lot of Caldari pilots are still angry that it took them so many years to fix rockets. People don't just forget that kind of thing -- not when CCP is still doing it.

Do you seriously think that a Caldari pilot, looking at the broken Cerberus decorating his hangar, is going to forget that CCPs solution to fixing it was to nerf it further into the dust? You think he's going to hop into his still broken Raven and decide everything is okay? Caldari pilots are pissed because CCP has been f@cking them for years.

And remember, CCP has already said that they have more Caldari nerfs planned. They want TDs to impact missiles, and that want to castrate ECM.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4845 - 2012-10-18 14:48:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
I don't care what "whiners" say about HAM changes. I know my Sacrilege likes them a lot (especially that PG req change Twisted).

OT Smithers wrote:
I would LOVE this as an option. I've got a whole lot of SP invested into broken hulls and weapons, and despite all the non-Caldari pilots (as usual) assuring us that everything is just fine, I have absolutely no faith that CCP even being interested in balance. If they are, I damn sure haven't seen it.


As soon as I can get 13M SP back from gunnery if I want.
Lili Lu
#4846 - 2012-10-18 15:12:17 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
(some stuff)
(some response stuff, and then this)

I see even more why *you* dont post your combat alt - you simply dont have any. :) . . .

And to that postings of OT Smithers: Read them, understand them and follow his suggestions. He is right. Which is a shame, for CCP, but still truth.

Classic Noemi **** post.

1) We're all still waiting for you to post from a character with any pvp record. Come on Noemi, it's not difficult to do. If you do indeed have such a character. And, no, your posts will still be ****, just less ****, and I will still post replies pointing out how they are ****.

2) You can shove your command for others to "read, understand, and follow" OT's posts. You commanding anyone to do anything is laughable, and your commands are worth ****. Seriously why should anyone listen to you and even less a command from you. I don't see anyone else posting commands. I see people posting opinions and arguments. Where do you think you are, and who do you think you are to command anyone? Lol

3) Concerning OT, he seems like a decent guy. He's got a fun bio to read. Unfortunately though, he is only commenting on this game from the perspective of one race. And his persecution complex about CCP's treatment of that race in the game is actually, both sad, and funny at the same time. He flies minmatar, but posts like all he flies is Caldari. But I sorta like OT. He's not a posting alt, he has a pvp record, and hasn't spammed this thread with as much crap as you have, Noemi.
Lili Lu
#4847 - 2012-10-18 15:13:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Dear OT,

Let me tell you my sad/funny story of Lili and 2006. I see that you started in '09. In '06 the race that was indisputedly ass stink in the game was amarr. But I didn't know that. And back then your rolled race mattered. You started with a pitance of sp. And your attributes were single digits. You actually looked forward to training into higher tiers of frigates and cruisers because it took time. And there were no tech III ships or even tier 2 BCs. Anyway, I posted back then similar posts to yours, only about how amarr was the suck. But the difference was noone could even pretend amarr was not.

I quickly realized, like you suggest, that I should crosstrain if I wanted to avoid being stuck in the suck. I chose minmatar. Minmatar was no great shakes at that time either. Gallente was the best pvp race in the game. Caldari was the best pve race (and continued to be and still is btw, which is a horrible lack of balanceBlink), ******* Ravens everywhere ruling that domain. But Minmatar had some pvp options. Also, I started my first other account. I put that puppy straight into Caldari/Gallente.

Then came the tier 2 BCs. They changed everything. Initially Myrms were kickass. But incredibly fast, in response to Caldari whines (caldari being the predominant race of characters and ships in game, and always have been) it was nerfed immediately and harshly. No more 125 bandwidth Myrms ruling pvp. The Myrm receeded from view. Meanwhile lots of changes occurred. The brief Amarr revival of 2008-2009 died when the sniping Apocs lost their place with probing changes (as did all sniper BSs).

And simultaneous to this is the story of the Drake. That curious species of op'd pve tank regen Drakes, were allowing caldari characters (usually 3 charisma achuras, another story of wonderful imbalance in the game) to smugly gain entry into level 4 income making much faster than those flying other races.

And then some time in 2009-2010 due to the disappearance of the sniping BSs, some smart person said, wait a second, this drake thing is actually a BS, a cheaper and easier BS. Up until that moment bears were showing up for pvp in regen drakes as if that op'd pve regen tank was going to survive getting primaried. Poeple laughed at and derided drake pilots for this. But that smart person realized if buffer fit with extender rigs and not purgers, that resist bonused BC had essentially a BS sized buffer. And lo and behold those HMs put out much more damage at mid range combat (40-70km) than any other medium weapon, and even most short range weapon fit rr battleships at that range. Mid range was starting to be favored due to various changes in game.

Plenty of developments have occured, too complex to list them all. But suffice to say that Caldari has never been the worst pvp race. It was never good for "solo." But really who thinks solo is scrupulously honored and any way to play this game.Lol The drakes for which you whine, regularly out dps Gallente drone boats, and even sometime Canes, in low sec scraps that I fly now on my latest account. You think missile travel is a pita. Try drone travel time. 10-30 ship engagements do not only favor close range face melt. So, drake hm spam only experiences that initial volley delay and then it lays into the target. Probably a couple volleys have already landed before medium drones have traversed the 20-40kms as the fight weaves around. And those volleys are flying faster than the dual-neut Cane racing to get within 10km of the next target.

So, OT, all this is to say, I think you lack perspective. Both over time, and accross races. Over the last year Caldari has been second to Minmatar for number of ships regularly appearing on the eve-klill top 20. And its top two have dominated the first to third spots for a couple years. Meawhile Gallente has been stuck in the suck and lucky to have any representation (this month one ship) in the top 20, but sometimes that is only through an angel ship (so really only a half ship for representation). Amarr has had a few ships. But they are ships that take more training to get into. Zealots and Abaddons. And those ships really only shine with well developed skills. And yeah, we don't know what protion of lowsec v nullsec combat eve-kill is capturing. But it is definitely not only reflecting null-sec use.

No player in this game should think he can get away with training only one race and one particular weapon system. Heretofore it's been possible to do that with Caldari medium ships and HMLs. No other path has had that luxury. That luxury will go. Please try to find the grace to deal with it as CCP's finally serious rebalancing process progresses.Smile

Sincerely,
LiLu
OT Smithers
A Farewell To Kings...
Dock Workers
#4848 - 2012-10-18 15:18:59 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
I don't care what "whiners" say about HAM changes. I know my Sacrilege likes them a lot (especially that PG req change Twisted).

OT Smithers wrote:
I would LOVE this as an option. I've got a whole lot of SP invested into broken hulls and weapons, and despite all the non-Caldari pilots (as usual) assuring us that everything is just fine, I have absolutely no faith that CCP even being interested in balance. If they are, I damn sure haven't seen it.


As soon as I can get 13M SP back from gunnery if I want.


Heh-heh! We both know CCP isn't refunding anything. That's not their policy. But if they offered I would take it in a second. I don't bother with Caldari ships, I fly Minmatar and Gallente so I always have a better option, but I could certainly use those wasted Caldari points elsewhere.

I believe that the HAM Drake is going to be dangerous but situational. It's going to be fighting in scram range as that's the only place it can hit, and there are far better options there. The Myrmidon, for example. The Myrmidon (in anything except plated configurations) is significantly faster, does far more dps, offers multiple flavors of drones, and actually has a better tank. But you don't see many people using them, and for good reason.



OT Smithers
A Farewell To Kings...
Dock Workers
#4849 - 2012-10-18 16:26:39 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:
Dear OT,

Let me tell you my sad/funny story of Lili and 2006. I see that you started in '09. In '06 the race that was indisputedly ass stink in the game was amarr. But I didn't know that. And back then your rolled race mattered. You started with a pitance of sp. And your attributes were single digits. You actually looked forward to training into higher tiers of frigates and cruisers because it took time. And there were no tech III ships or even tier 2 BCs. Anyway, I posted back then similar posts to yours, only about how amarr was the suck. But the difference was noone could even pretend amarr was not.

........edit for space.......

Sincerely,
LiLu


Nice post. I have a "sad story" as well. This was back before the rocket fix. I was brand new to PvP. I had just finished training rockets to level 5, my very first T2 weapon, based on an old thread talking about how great rockets were. So off I went into battle. My victim didn't melt as the thread suggested. Instead, this clown started laughing at me and posting my damage numbers in local. OT Smithers Rockets hits for 30 damage...LULZ! OT Smithers Rockets hits you for 27 damage... I am there blasting away, and all of local is laughing and talking smack at the noob who trained rockets. The guy didn't even bother to kill me with his Rifter (which, now that I think about it, is pretty surprising). He just buzzed around soaking up my damage and laughing at me. I was like "WTF? the forums said this was supposed to be amazing!" So I rechecked the thread to see what I had done wrong, and discovered that it had been written like three years before. Doh!

Anyway, it's funny today.

We all have our own opinions. Like yours, mine is based on my experience and play style. I have tried to post reasonable and balanced suggestions based upon my experience in game. I am not arguing for anything that helps me in any way, I am not trying to get some advantage for myself. I don't fly Drakes very often, I fly against them. I am one of those folks flying against the so-called overpowered Drakes, and I am just not seeing it. Your experiences flying in null sec fleets are different than what I see flying (usually outnumbered) in tiny low sec pirate gangs, and I respect that your opinions are every bit as valid as my own within that framework. I can easily see how the Drake, in those environments, would be ridiculous.

I have said multiple times that an argument can be made that the HM Drake is somewhat overpowered. It OBJECTIVELY does better damage at range than other medium weapons, it's relatively fast, and it manages all this while maintaining a decent tank. It's a great ship. It's the best BC in certain situations, and one could argue (though I would disagree) that it is the best BC in the game (I think the Cane gets this honor).

None of this argues for a severe nerf. It's actually okay if the Caldari have the best BC (if you believe that the Drake earns this title). Someone has to, and there is no reason it cannot be Caldari. Particularly when we consider that BCs as a whole are pretty well balanced overall. The Harbi and Myrm could use a little love, but overall the entire class is pretty solid.

However, I do not actually have a problem with CCP nerfing the HM Drake. I've crunched the numbers myself, and interestingly enough I came up with almost the same damage reduction that CCP is suggesting. Almost, because they want to nerf it more than I though was strictly fair considering flight time.

My concerns are these:

1. The range nerf is fine. I would even dial the range back a bit more. It does not need to hit that far without rigs.
2. The damage nerf is too high once you take into account the delay and reload issues.
3. Before doing any of this, CCP needs to fix some of the other currently broken Caldari hulls.

This last is the most important. I think CCP is underestimating just how angry some Caldari pilots were even before all this was proposed. I have heard them in game and on TS over and over again. They have entire classes of ships that are selling for scrap prices in Jita, and CCP's response -- after years of waiting for a fix -- is to nerf those ships further. These folks trained for Caldari HACs and Command ships and BS's, and they want to use them in PvP. They trained for Cruise Missiles and Torpedos, they want to use those too.

Like I said, these are my opinions. And even when I disagreed with other posters I have tried to keep my comments respectful, constructive, and directed at the content of the post rather than the person making it.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4850 - 2012-10-18 16:32:58 UTC
Vengeance, yeah that ship looks great. Now have to train T2 rockets!

After trying some things:
What a crap ship! All tank and no damage.

Yeah, you Caldari pilots have it so hard.
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#4851 - 2012-10-18 16:57:20 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Vengeance, yeah that ship looks great. Now have to train T2 rockets!

After trying some things:
What a crap ship! All tank and no damage.

Yeah, you Caldari pilots have it so hard.


@ Lili, Jorma didnt even name a combat alt, unlike me. Still you dont seem to be bothering with encouraging him to do so, funny?

And you didnt answer my question. Will you GTFO and stop posting your stuff here as soon as I posted from my PvP toon? :)

and Jorma, about this Raven - I really really hope you will bring it to PvP. Really.
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#4852 - 2012-10-18 16:59:31 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Statements like that of Ravens outranging Nagas in theory show very well you have not much clue of whats going on.


[Raven, Raven fit]

Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II
Nanofiber Internal Structure II
Nanofiber Internal Structure II

Prototype 100MN Microwarpdrive I
Sensor Booster II, Targeting Range Script
Sensor Booster II, Targeting Range Script
Sensor Booster II
Large Shield Extender II
EM Ward Field II

Cruise Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Cruise Missile
Cruise Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Cruise Missile
Cruise Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Cruise Missile
Cruise Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Cruise Missile
Cruise Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Cruise Missile
Cruise Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Cruise Missile
[Empty High slot]
[Empty High slot]

Large Rocket Fuel Cache Partition II
Large Hydraulic Bay Thrusters II
Large Core Defense Field Extender I


Zainou 'Snapshot' Cruise Missiles CM-605
Zainou 'Deadeye' Missile Projection MP-706

But of course main problem is that you want missile to work like turrets: instant damage.


Posting this ship here is ... great. :) I sincerely hope you fly that with your combat alt, er wait - you dont have any, right?
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#4853 - 2012-10-18 17:19:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Noemi Nagano
Just a few things out of this ..

Lili Lu wrote:
Caldari was the best pve race (and continued to be and still is btw, which is a horrible lack of balanceBlink)


You seem to be the only one who is claiming Caldari dominate PvE atm. A Vargur and esp. a Machariel will wipe the floor in missions with every Caldari ship.

Lili Lu wrote:

So, OT, all this is to say, I think you lack perspective. Both over time, and accross races. Over the last year Caldari has been second to Minmatar for number of ships regularly appearing on the eve-klill top 20. And its top two have dominated the first to third spots for a couple years. Meawhile Gallente has been stuck in the suck and lucky to have any representation (this month one ship) in the top 20, but sometimes that is only through an angel ship (so really only a half ship for representation). Amarr has had a few ships. But they are ships that take more training to get into. Zealots and Abaddons. And those ships really only shine with well developed skills. And yeah, we don't know what protion of lowsec v nullsec combat eve-kill is capturing. But it is definitely not only reflecting null-sec use.


The Zealot numbers seem to show its mostly nullsec, but it wont matter much. CCP has made a decision, and they will see what they get :)

Lili Lu wrote:

No player in this game should think he can get away with training only one race and one particular weapon system.


I sincerely doubt ANY of those guys who are by you and others called whiners here is interested in sticking with just one particular weapon system. Thats been my credo from the very start: give us variety, give us options. Heck, even nerf HML but in return for the love of god, give us WORKING HAMs, WORKING TORPs, WORKING CMs. Used in WORKING NHs, Cerbs, Ravens. And then I am sure not a single one of those who are opposing to the incoming nerf will seriously complain. I for sure wont.

But as long as projectile BS wipe the floor with missile BS I dont see why a Drake should not be able to be first of 4 in *its* domain. Change one ok, but change the others too. And not sometime later, but right now.

So yeah, backing up OT Smithers again. Is there one of you who thinks OT is wrong with what he said about the Moa in comparison to its peers, or the Caracal compared to the Bellicose (!!!!)? If so, bring facts please.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4854 - 2012-10-18 17:27:11 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:
You seem to be the only one who is claiming Caldari dominate PvE atm. A Vargur and esp. a Machariel will wipe the floor in missions with every Caldari ship.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kj6xTEFUs0s

Feel free to show Legion, Loki or Proteus doing same.
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#4855 - 2012-10-18 17:32:48 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Noemi Nagano wrote:
You seem to be the only one who is claiming Caldari dominate PvE atm. A Vargur and esp. a Machariel will wipe the floor in missions with every Caldari ship.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kj6xTEFUs0s

Feel free to show Legion, Loki or Proteus doing same.


Post your combat alt. Thanks.

The relevance of your video is as big as your combat record Jorma ..
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4856 - 2012-10-18 17:41:35 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Noemi Nagano wrote:
You seem to be the only one who is claiming Caldari dominate PvE atm. A Vargur and esp. a Machariel will wipe the floor in missions with every Caldari ship.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kj6xTEFUs0s

Feel free to show Legion, Loki or Proteus doing same.


Post your combat alt. Thanks.

The relevance of your video is as big as your combat record Jorma ..


There's a lot more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UL0c7dn6TEE
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#4857 - 2012-10-18 17:53:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Noemi Nagano
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Noemi Nagano wrote:
You seem to be the only one who is claiming Caldari dominate PvE atm. A Vargur and esp. a Machariel will wipe the floor in missions with every Caldari ship.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kj6xTEFUs0s

Feel free to show Legion, Loki or Proteus doing same.


Post your combat alt. Thanks.

The relevance of your video is as big as your combat record Jorma ..


There's a lot more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UL0c7dn6TEE


Yeah, this here has the same relevance to this topic like your awesome Raven fitting. I bet it will PWN eve-kill.net stats from now on. You wont post your combat alt, is that correct?
Buzzy Warstl
Quantum Flux Foundry
#4858 - 2012-10-18 18:08:37 UTC
@Noemi: do you even lift?

http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm Richard Bartle: Players who suit MUDs

Manfred Hideous
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#4859 - 2012-10-18 18:57:17 UTC
Quote:

I will ask everyone to please keep your feedback and your interactions with each other civil. Remember that this is the Features and Ideas forum, not the wild untamed expanse of General Discussion or the brutal gladiatorial pit of CAOD. This is the section of the forums where intellectual equals meet in mutual admiration to calmly and rationally discuss potential changes to the game, muse casually about overnight interest rates, and sip tea with our pinky extended.
Feedback is always more useful when it includes details about the problems you foresee from a specific change.

"I don't agree with change X because I believe it will have effect Y for reasons A, B and C" is excellent and very persuasive feedback and I thank the large numbers of you who have provided this kind of feedback so far.
"DIE IN A FIRE" is an example of significantly less useful feedback. It doesn't tell us which changes you object to, or what the reasons for your position are. In fact it even makes it hard to tell whether you actually object to the content of the change or are just experiencing an unusually strong craving for S'mores.


Well, I guess that didn't work out. 3/4 of this thread is S**t posting.

Unit757
North Point
#4860 - 2012-10-18 19:43:58 UTC
Yep, drakes and tengus really are going to be horrible after this. Its such a shame that HAMs are restricted from being fit on them.

Seriously, this isnt the end of the world, the nerf isnt that bad. HAMs still outrange the turret based short range guns, and HMLs still outrange and out dps most long range. Your losing at most 30-40 dps. HML drakes will still do more damage then a triple mag stabbed 250mm ferox, even using non kinetic missiles.