These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

pirate battle cruisers

Author
onegun
x13
Pandemic Horde
#1 - 2012-10-16 15:01:03 UTC  |  Edited by: onegun
we have pirate frigs, cruisers, and battleships, can we get some pirate battlecruisers.............and yes im bored, waiting out the new patch update...............but i still like the idea
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#2 - 2012-10-16 15:15:04 UTC
I'm gonna get a reputation for just linking to old threads pretty soon here, but this has been discussed at great length recently. So have a linky.
Goldensaver
Maraque Enterprises
Just let it happen
#3 - 2012-10-16 15:24:42 UTC
Zhilia Mann wrote:
I'm gonna get a reputation for just linking to old threads pretty soon here, but this has been discussed at great length recently. So have a linky.

But that was a good thread, with lots of discussion on the fact, so I think it's reasonable to do so.
Alexa Coates
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2012-10-16 16:29:12 UTC
at least it wasnt the typical derp navy drek pls post.

That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers.

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#5 - 2012-10-16 16:48:49 UTC
Who needs Pirate BCs when you can have a Cynabal?
Dibblerette
Solitude-Industries
#6 - 2012-10-16 22:43:30 UTC
Pirate Battlecruisers? You mean besides the Machariel? Roll
Lili Lu
#7 - 2012-10-16 23:13:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Alexa Coates wrote:
at least it wasnt the typical derp navy drek pls post.

But that's just it. This is just another stealth givens me a faction draek plz thread. These things pollute S&M and other subforums on a regular basis. Anyway, at least the gap between cruisers and BCs will shrink with rebalancing and that may help halt the parade of these bad threads.Ugh
Vilnius Zar
SDC Multi Ten
#8 - 2012-10-17 07:55:41 UTC
It's this thread again...

As stated many times before (including statements by DEVS) it would be silly OP and completely mess up any sort of balance.
Flurk Hellbron
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#9 - 2012-10-17 08:10:15 UTC
As if there should be any balance now?
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#10 - 2012-10-17 08:20:57 UTC
Well at least they balanced Harbinger and Hurricane.
Mike Whiite
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#11 - 2012-10-17 09:20:59 UTC
Well they actualy mantioned it in one of their Ballincing one ship at a time Dev blogs.

With the reballancing of ships and the racialisation of Destroyers and Battlecruisers there would be an opening for navy and Pirate ships.

so there might be navy/pirate battlecruiser but not before the reballance gets there, which isn't anytime soon I imagion.
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#12 - 2012-10-17 14:40:11 UTC
Dibblerette wrote:
Pirate Battlecruisers? You mean besides the Machariel? Roll


It's a cruiser, just bigger.

brb

Kaikka Carel
Ziea
#13 - 2012-10-17 17:16:36 UTC
How do I fit an Apoc for LVL4s?
Bernard 2007
The Scarlet Storm
#14 - 2012-10-17 18:26:50 UTC
Zhilia Mann wrote:
I'm gonna get a reputation for just linking to old threads pretty soon here, but this has been discussed at great length recently. So have a linky.


So what? That's not a good reason not to discuss it again. Between each time this same subject is discussed, new players join the game, old players come back and some players keep thinking about the subject while looking for a good answer on how it could be implented.

And without a constant stream interesting new threads popping up, people stop visiting the forum, so when someone posts a question, nobody answers, people leave the game, the forum dies, the game dies.

On the subject of new ships though, Navy Battlecruisers make way more sense then Pirate ones. A Gurista Battlecruiser would have to step in between the Gila and the Rattlesnake as well as have a Drone bonus combined with a Rocket setup, making it almost completely pointless or invalidating other currently viable choices. Hence making it an overall bad idea.
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#15 - 2012-10-17 18:55:35 UTC
Well if you look at navy ships, they are generally geared to be something like a stepping stone between T1 and T2 ships. You pay a bit more for something like a T1.5 ship. When you apply that to BCs and create a ship that is half way between a BC and a Command Ship, I can see why CCP probably thought it was pointless.
RobinAnne
The Terrifying League Of Dog Fort
Deepwater Hooligans
#16 - 2012-10-18 00:57:52 UTC  |  Edited by: RobinAnne
Riot Girl wrote:
Well if you look at navy ships, they are generally geared to be something like a stepping stone between T1 and T2 ships. You pay a bit more for something like a T1.5 ship. When you apply that to BCs and create a ship that is half way between a BC and a Command Ship, I can see why CCP probably thought it was pointless.


He did say "pirate". And generally it is T1-Faction-T2-Pirate
Alexa Coates
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2012-10-18 13:26:53 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
Well if you look at navy ships, they are generally geared to be something like a stepping stone between T1 and T2 ships. You pay a bit more for something like a T1.5 ship. When you apply that to BCs and create a ship that is half way between a BC and a Command Ship, I can see why CCP probably thought it was pointless.

and then you have the navy exeQQuror, which says **** you to sense.What?

That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers.

onegun
x13
Pandemic Horde
#18 - 2012-10-18 14:12:17 UTC  |  Edited by: onegun
Bernard 2007 wrote:
[quote=Zhilia Mann]I'm gonna get a reputation for just linking to old threads pretty soon here, but this has been discussed at great length recently. So have a linky.


So what? That's not a good reason not to discuss it again. Between each time this same subject is discussed, new players join the game, old players come back and some players keep thinking about the subject while looking for a good answer on how it could be implented.

And without a constant stream interesting new threads popping up, people stop visiting the forum, so when someone posts a question, nobody answers, people leave the game, the forum dies, the game dies.

On the subject of new ships though, Navy Battlecruisers make way more sense then Pirate ones. A Gurista Battlecruiser would have to step in between the Gila and the Rattlesnake as well as have a Drone bonus combined with a Rocket setup, making it almost completely pointless or invalidating other currently viable choices. Hence making it an overall bad idea.[ ........................................................................................................................................................................... sorry to those that complain about this thread being disscused over and over again, .........but im not a forum whore i dont read this stuff every day or even every month, ...........................i still like the idea
Beat General
Doomheim
#19 - 2012-10-18 16:30:37 UTC
sansha bc now pls.
Soon Shin
Scarlet Weather Rhapsody
#20 - 2012-10-18 22:32:05 UTC
Would prefer if they released Navy Tier 3 Battleships and racial variants of other cruisers than BC's.
12Next page