These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Gallente Ice Interdiction Resumes

First post
Author
Taiwanistan
#121 - 2012-10-16 06:32:57 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:

Taiwanistan wrote:
How do I mine ice without any mining skills trained?


Gun mining sir, explode the containing vessel, steal the ice Pirate


Question was rhetorical sir.

Also I heard an -A- dude was summarily kicked after he was suicide ganked in hisec while mining, funny eh?

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#122 - 2012-10-16 06:36:30 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:


Question was rhetorical sir.

Also I heard an -A- dude was summarily kicked after he was suicide ganked in hisec while mining, funny eh?


My mistake, 'tis early here & lol

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Taiwanistan
#123 - 2012-10-16 06:39:25 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
Powers Sa wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:

Go to belt, launch drones, turn on ice harvester and go do something else. 116,662 EHP. For added fun toss in Tengu shield bonuses to bring that up to 157,352 EHP. Welcome to AFK PvP.

Sure you won't be getting that amazing ice yield, but instead you will bask in the glory of ganker tears and after all, can you really put a price on those? Cool


PLEASE do this, and tell me what system you are in. Please oh please oh please.


Not done the the actual Skiff, but I have been using a tanked out Mackinaw. Skiff right now screams tank, so they will avoid it till last. As far as me informing you of the alt I am using, no. If for some reason I do lose the ship, I will post it here on the forums and give you a tiny battle report of what it took and anything else juicy like chat logs from what I already have been seeing when they fail to kill me.

My only suggestion is to keep ganking and keep hoping. So far for today and yesterday I have managed to cause the death of 4 Tornadoes and 16 Catalysts. Granted it is not much, but like I mentioned before, the rage and tears from the gankers has been more than worth it.

I am a bit out of the loop on how you guys went from claiming on the forums that the new mining barges were the result of too many miners crying because you were suicide ganking them, and thus claiming the mining barge tank buff was over the top. Yet here you are. Ganking again, when you claimed it was impossible/completely not worth it. But please carry on, this has been amusing. I would have to say the best part was when I went afk to see a sneak peak of the new James Bond movie, Skyfall and came back to see my ship was still alive (missing one drone, strange) and had 4 Catalyst kill mails.

P.S. Skyfall is bad ass.


Ohhhh I get it, didn't want that space anyways can always mine in hisec.

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#124 - 2012-10-16 06:41:46 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:

I am a bit out of the loop on how you guys went from claiming on the forums that the new mining barges were the result of too many miners crying because you were suicide ganking them, and thus claiming the mining barge tank buff was over the top. Yet here you are. Ganking again, when you claimed it was impossible/completely not worth it. But please carry on, this has been amusing. I would have to say the best part was when I went afk to see a sneak peak of the new James Bond movie, Skyfall and came back to see my ship was still alive (missing one drone, strange) and had 4 Catalyst kill mails.

inb4 someone says - "duh, we can gank, we just can't do it PROFITABLY".

on the km's... AFK PvP - how dare you??!!

It's gotta be against the EULA or sumthin'.....

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

captain foivos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#125 - 2012-10-16 06:48:45 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
So far for today and yesterday I have managed to cause the death of 4 Tornadoes and 16 Catalysts. Granted it is not much, but like I mentioned before, the rage and tears from the gankers has been more than worth it.


I went through and checked the Goonswarm killboard for Tornadoes that had been involved in a kill or been lost in highsec in the last five days and found nothing, as was the case when I checked for any kills involving exhumers or mining barges. I checked Battleclinic for kills and losses by you, and found that you have been active in Tribute, not in highsec.

Surprise surprise, Marlona Sky is making **** up. Even if you did use an alt, you could have done nothing more than tag along on the killmail for a small percentage of damage as Concord Police Commander did all the work.

Plus, I haven't seen any of this "ganker rage." I have seen a bunch of dead miners, though.

Is it any surprise you were banned from Kugu?
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#126 - 2012-10-16 06:57:21 UTC
captain foivos wrote:

Surprise surprise, Marlona Sky is making **** up. Even if you did use an alt, you could have done nothing more than tag along on the killmail for a small percentage of damage as Concord Police Commander did all the work.

Plus, I haven't seen any of this "ganker rage." I have seen a bunch of dead miners, though.

She did use an alt and said so.

And really, she got in on the KM, even a "Concord" mail is a little tick against the ganker and a little tick for the gankee. It's wonderful stuff.

And no ganker rage??!! My dear fellow, where HAVE you been?

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

captain foivos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#127 - 2012-10-16 07:08:54 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
And really, she got in on the KM, even a "Concord" mail is a little tick against the ganker and a little tick for the gankee. It's wonderful stuff.


Killboard's green, go go go, amirite?

I couldn't find a single tornado death, in highsec, from Concord, in the CFC, anywhere on the killboards. Anywhere. Perhaps you could point me in the right direction by finding these tornadoes Marlona speaks of?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#128 - 2012-10-16 07:10:35 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Touval Lysander wrote:


And no ganker rage??!! My dear fellow, where HAVE you been?


Pointing out imbalances is not whining. Crying untill CCP gives you a pre tanked ship that does it all however...
pussnheels
Viziam
#129 - 2012-10-16 07:25:47 UTC
Tarassse wrote:
pussnheels wrote:
some people never learn , as was predicted when the mining barges rebalance came out
If people AFK mine in their unprotected mack , that is up to them , nobody is to blame only the AFK miner


So let me get this straight.

Before the mining barges' improvements, it was the miners' fault if they were suicide-ganked, because they did not tank their ship. I can understand that and agree.
Now, after they had an improvement on their ships to tank better, and even if the rigs,low/med slots are used to tank, it is their fault if they die, because they mine AFK? Do note that whether their mackinaw is tanked or not, it still dies to 2 catalysts in 0.6.

Have you ever mined? Even if you begin doing it while being completely awake, it is sooooo boring that you'll end up falling asleep anyway.

The barge buff was not that necessary. The mining profession just needed to be less boring to entertain miners and force them to stay awake in front of their screen.

and to complete my previous post , yes i do mine i have other accounts pure industrial, and to be honest 75% of the fun in mining is the (social àchatter on teamspeak with your corpmattes, this is a game that needs teamwork afterall right

a few days ago i went out to the icebelt in my local system , with a ship scanner and from the 8 mack there others aswell but i didn't bother with them, of those 8 , 6 of them were untanked or fitted for max yield with a third MLU so i decided to grab a tornado and fly in the belt , only the hulks and some retrievers warped off the rest all of the macks stayed happily mining away obvious afk

so again yes if they get ganked they only got themselves to blame

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#130 - 2012-10-16 07:28:52 UTC
^ Yeah mining ice does scare me. Only so few spots of ice fields, so its easy for gankers to find you. I probably would fit a tank if I went ice mining, but for ore mining, I usually don't fit a tank. Just too many systems have roid belts, complete opposite for ice mining.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

TharOkha
0asis Group
#131 - 2012-10-16 07:38:37 UTC
So exhumers are still vulnerable after that massive whinefest.... Big smile
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#132 - 2012-10-16 07:41:33 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
A profit might be possible. Consider this:

gank every miner except your own, be the only one mining the resource. Profit?
That's profit from market manipulation, not ganking. The ganks are still hugely unprofitable.

Touval Lysander wrote:
I'll argue this till the cows come home.
Then you'll be incorrect until the cows come home.

It doesn't matter how you acquired stuff — when you lose them, you've been burdened by a non-zero cost because you end up with less value than you had before.

If you mine enough minerals to build a destroyer, you now sit on ~1M ISK worth of minerals. You now have three options: you can rclick-trash them, you can sell them, you can refine and add value to them by building a destroyer out of them. If you rclick-trash them, your assets have lost 1M ISK in value. If you sell them, you replace the mineral value by ISK value. If you build a destroyer out of them, you lose 1M ISK worth of materials and get 1.1M ISK worth of destroyer. You now have three options again: you can destroy that destroyer. You can sell it. Or you can refine it by building a dictor out of it. If you destroy it, your assets have lost 1.1M ISK in value. If you sell it, you replace the ship value by ISK value. And if you refine it, you lose 1,1M ISK worth of destroyer (and 37M ISK of other materials) and gain 31M ISK worth of interdictor, thereby reducing your asset value by 7M ISK. Oh, and you could of course always just fly around in it, at which point your assets remain the same.

At no point was anything free. At every point, you could incur a loss (including the attempt to add value to the destroyer by T2-ifying it). Opportunity costs are still costs, even if you never see a single ISK come or go, and the notion that just because you own stuff, it has no value (which is essentially what you're saying) is, shall we say, flawed.
Melikor Tissant
Odd Fluffy Bunnies
#133 - 2012-10-16 07:55:24 UTC
TharOkha wrote:
So exhumers are still vulnerable after that massive whinefest.... Big smile


No one said they will not be. So I don't understand the happiness you are suddenly being basked with.
Currently it is just not as profitable to just gank them, nor its possible to gank with just 1 or 2 catalysts, depends on the system and the fit.

Ganking and losing isk in order to manipulate the market and gaining that isk back and than some, its just fine.

And still, when we go ice mining, we do so in 100K+ EHP skiffs. We have seen suicide ganks from time to time, but we are always being avoided.


And to be honest, maybe I'm missing something, but I don't understand the specific gallente ice ganking.
The caldari ice cost more because of all the caldari high-sec towers for research. Won't that be more profitable to gank and sell?
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#134 - 2012-10-16 08:04:11 UTC
Melikor Tissant wrote:
And to be honest, maybe I'm missing something, but I don't understand the specific gallente ice ganking.
The caldari ice cost more because of all the caldari high-sec towers for research. Won't that be more profitable to gank and sell?
Gallente towers are better for gathering and manipulating moon goo and gallente ice is one of the main sources of the products used to jump around gallente capships… and those are quite popular.
Josef Djugashvilis
#135 - 2012-10-16 08:18:56 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:


And no ganker rage??!! My dear fellow, where HAVE you been?


Pointing out imbalances is not whining. Crying untill CCP gives you a pre tanked ship that does it all however...



Perhaps the miners also felt that they were pointing out - imbalances.

One mans crying is another mans imbalance.

This is not a signature.

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#136 - 2012-10-16 08:21:17 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
Saw nine tornados on scan, aligned out. When they landed I warped off. Was immediately called a "f****** f**** coward!" in local. Please explain the amount of extreme rage these gankers have? Why are they so mad? Might be due to a couple of them smashing their face into my brick tanks fist seven times, but I thought this was just a game.

Saving the logs for now to milk them a bit longer before reporting the two highly upset gankers for their unkind words. Also having fun using a Kitsune with Gallente jammers to jam all these Catalysts the moment they go flashy.

I love this!




Why would a suicide ganker be mad? Were I do do this I'd be somewhat giddy, like sneaking up on people in COD2 and hitting them with a rifle butt, whilst giggling like Loreena Bobbit in a sausage factory.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#137 - 2012-10-16 08:27:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Perhaps the miners also felt that they were pointing out - imbalances.
That would be a hypothesis. The problem is that it's immediately falsified by the fact that they couldn't point out any imbalances. Refusing to fit their ships to make the problem the go away is not a balance problem — it's piloting error.
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#138 - 2012-10-16 08:44:17 UTC
I must be doing something wrong.

I am unable to find any killmails on any boards which even come close to the incident Marlona refers to.

Marlona - KM's or this never happened and it becomes like the cake in the first episode of Portal.

7 pages of posts and no proof. Doesn't wash.

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#139 - 2012-10-16 09:22:11 UTC
Tippia wrote:
......and the notion that just because you own stuff, it has no value (which is essentially what you're saying) is, shall we say, flawed.

I do not agree. Value is an intangible. What is given - in exchange - is tangible.

Only when a conversion occurs is the value - percieved or actual - realised.

But meh. I'm not going to go around and round on a philosophical discussion on when something actually attains value. You say it has an intrinsic value at creation, I say it does not until conversion to a tangible is achieved.

Either way, I'm not going to try to "win" a Tippia paragraphing contest. I'll die of sheer boredom. Your tenacity in pursuit of the singular is legendary. Bad for debate but legendary. So yep. You win. Whatever.



"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#140 - 2012-10-16 09:24:02 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
I do not agree. Value is an intangible. What is given - in exchange - is tangible.
…and that's your problem. It means you don't understand the concept of opportunity cost, and makes you completely miscalculate your costs and assets.