These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Bond ideas ...

Author
Adunh Slavy
#1 - 2011-10-15 04:23:08 UTC
Bonds

For those that recall, I had a couple of bond proposals, on the old forums (http://eve-search.com/thread/1524146), prior to the whole Aurum/Nex/Vanity/Yellow Question events.

I am considering drawing this up and sending it over to the assembly hall. Prior to that, wondering if anyone had any other suggestions or ideas?

Thanks

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Adunh Slavy
#2 - 2011-10-18 02:22:13 UTC
Not one thought eh? Ok then.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2011-10-18 02:23:21 UTC
Bonds are dead.
Adunh Slavy
#4 - 2011-10-18 02:25:54 UTC
Elise DarkStar wrote:
Bonds are dead.



The above link is an idea on an in-game bond market, that is coded in as part of the game, and not the MD stuff we have today.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2011-10-18 02:30:45 UTC
never happen
Adunh Slavy
#6 - 2011-10-18 02:32:05 UTC
Elise DarkStar wrote:
never happen



*yawns*

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

egola
NSFW federation
#7 - 2011-10-18 04:51:52 UTC  |  Edited by: egola
its true though, you know they're not gonna put some complex meta portion of game play and make it as an in game feature. the only thing thats even remotely close to that was scams, and that was people abusing human psychology as opposed to CCP making a feature explicitly for it.

your suggestions have way too many implication similar to the real world that can be abused by both loaner and the loan-e.

first off you can't create an ingame feature for credit that has no real consequences towards a player's account or actual person. they can easily buy a new character, or just transfer the isk and dump the character, most scamming characters are ALL station toons that'll never see the light of day so getting kill rights is utterly pointless, overall theres too many RL loopholes within this video game that makes the ingame feature utterly pointless for most people as the isk'll simply "vanish" in your system.

sure you can lease it to others but theres no real way someone's gonna collect and it'll simply be a phantom isk sink on the economy as a whole.

assuming that it DOES go well all along and the phantom isk sink due to people scamming the system disappears, theres still the issue of aggressive credit that might give an incompetent player an all too real version of our world's credit system. people play a video game to enjoy themselves, not so that they can simulate an actual business that might go bankrupt and force them to pay back TWICE the original principle. if theres no further repurcussion then the players'll take forever to pay off, if there ARE further repurcussions for paying off a late loan then the player might just abandon that character altogether and start a new one and repeat the cycle.

heck there definitely needs more rules and regulations to make it work, altogether its just not a worthwhile venture for CCP to dwell into, you might like the numbers game but its not within everyone's interest to create an ever growing vortex of isk sinks on individual players or create an infinite pool of money that scammers might not have to pay off.
Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2011-10-18 05:01:25 UTC
ya, that's what i said
Serene Python
#9 - 2011-10-18 05:18:34 UTC
Elise DarkStar wrote:
Bonds are dead.


If that's the case the ship poasters saying MD should have a loan/bond section got their wish, now let's look at the front page today... Looks like the sides of my toilet bowl right now.
Adunh Slavy
#10 - 2011-10-18 06:33:17 UTC
egola wrote:

stuff


There is no doubt that creating a capital market in Eve, coded into the game, is not a straightforward task. It is however doable.

Do note there are two suggestions in that thread. It is easy to over look the second if you give the thread a casual scan. The second suggestion ties bond obligations to alliances and not individuals.

As for aggressive credit as you put it, the system is such that, the player/allaince is the initiator of the credit. They are not out taking loans from possibly "predatory lenders". Secondly, the rates of interest would be set by the market, not by any one authority, like a central bank.

The second suggestion, if you care to look, starts with post number 32.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

egola
NSFW federation
#11 - 2011-10-18 07:54:21 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
egola wrote:

stuff


There is no doubt that creating a capital market in Eve, coded into the game, is not a straightforward task. It is however doable.

Do note there are two suggestions in that thread. It is easy to over look the second if you give the thread a casual scan. The second suggestion ties bond obligations to alliances and not individuals.

As for aggressive credit as you put it, the system is such that, the player/allaince is the initiator of the credit. They are not out taking loans from possibly "predatory lenders". Secondly, the rates of interest would be set by the market, not by any one authority, like a central bank.

The second suggestion, if you care to look, starts with post number 32.


so the second suggestion is regarding bonds being tied to alliances, alright even assuming this there is still no real "consequence" that might make an ingame feature any more worthwhile then in the forums. there are a few problems with tying loan/bond obligations to alliance:

A) alliance and character ownership is really fluid, it gets passed and traded around all too easily.

B) being able to shoot the defaulting alliance is not really much of a consequence specifically for null sec alliances as players have to venture out to null sec which makes them targeted by everyone. even if the alliance with a bond isn't able to shoot them in high sec, in null sec its all fair game, even if they implement a system that they can't shoot the corporations even in null sec they can circumvent that by having proxy alliances or allied alliances do it for them.

C) only real risk is character training required to operate alliance bonds even so, if the reward is worth it, i wouldn't call it a risk, more of an investment.

D) attempting to create a scam free capitals market is against the general theme of eve itself, last few commercials featured corp theft and other scamming opportunities that is the core image of eve, by creating something like they are essentially alienating a chunk of the user base
Adunh Slavy
#12 - 2011-10-18 10:55:27 UTC
egola wrote:

stuff


A - The obligation remains attached to the alliance, not the individual characters.

B - That would be part of an investor's calculations. If they are in an area of space in which you are not comfortable, then do not buy their bonds. If you as an investor see some tiny alliance as a proxy for some larger alliance, then you as an investor can refuse to buy bonds from them.

Many null sec alliance members do venture into high sec to do this or that, buy skill books, sell some stuff, jump a JF out. Being red blinky to random people in high sec is going to be difficult to manage. Not like the debtor can shoot first in high sec.

C - Ok

D - Read more carefully. There's no "100% scam free" goal here. The goal is severe consequences. Also, the scam events CCP promotes are not "gimmie 10 mil ISK and I'll double it" armature stuff, but long involved events that promote a sense of intrigue. How many games can promote a bond market crash due to some scams? Would likely perk the ears of people from Bernake to OWS protestors.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2011-10-18 13:19:25 UTC
Serene Python wrote:
Elise DarkStar wrote:
Bonds are dead.


If that's the case the ship poasters saying MD should have a loan/bond section got their wish, now let's look at the front page today... Looks like the sides of my toilet bowl right now.


Looks great to me. And maybe people will start using the forum again now that it's not page after page of copypasted scam attempts.

Good riddance to all you latecomer, unoriginal scamming fucks.

It's a new day.
RAW23
#14 - 2011-10-18 16:31:23 UTC
Elise DarkStar wrote:


Good riddance to all you latecomer, unoriginal scamming fucks.

It's a new day.


Yours wasn't that original Blink. But I do applaud the initiative of you as Pied Piper trying to move the rats over to GD.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2011-10-18 16:38:33 UTC
RAW23 wrote:
Yours wasn't that original Blink. But I do applaud the initiative of you as Pied Piper trying to move the rats over to GD.


Oh, absolutely. I wasn't try to imply anything great about myself, just how incredibly tired and formulaic bond scamming has become.

We can all rejoice now that it is dead.