These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

CCP's Stealth Nerf to Hi, Lo, and Nullsec PVP All in One Stroke!
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#21 - 2012-10-12 22:45:58 UTC
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:

  • It will only hurt level 5 mission runners and those who do 10/10 sites such as the infamous maze. Level 4 missions, belt ratting, sanctums, etc, will still be perfectly soloable by one man in a drake. Yes I solo sanctums in drakes, you mad bro?


    • They are nerfing the drake as well this patch. Otherwise I would be tempted to be mad at my bro.

    Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
    Lucy Ferrr
    Sebiestor Tribe
    Minmatar Republic
    #22 - 2012-10-12 23:16:03 UTC
    Dumb OP is dumb. Threads this low of caliber do not deserve real responses. Quit crying and adapt, otherwise give me your stuff.
    Spurty
    #23 - 2012-10-12 23:20:12 UTC
    No

    We now know this alt fears change.

    Post with main (or biomass them)

    There are good ships,

    And wood ships,

    And ships that sail the sea

    But the best ships are Spaceships

    Built by CCP
    Devon Krah'tor
    Native Freshfood
    Minmatar Republic
    #24 - 2012-10-12 23:28:17 UTC
    Hmm forced to adapt your fit, or your tactics?
    Not liking the inability to insta-win your 'gank'?
    possibility of a fair fight???

    Perhaps mission runners will actively engage pvpers if its a fair fight, instead of Constantly Evading PvP.

    hmm....

    More PvP = Good

    Possibility of actually losing said fight = unacceptable??

    fail's to you sir.
    Greater.Insight.Skill.Knowledge
    Eli Green
    The Arrow Project
    #25 - 2012-10-12 23:58:25 UTC
    OP fails to realize that people have been soloing WH sites for years

    wumbo
    PlasTic LiTTle
    Sebiestor Tribe
    Minmatar Republic
    #26 - 2012-10-13 00:44:13 UTC
    Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:
    As you are aware CCP is changing the behavior of NPCs in missions, complexes, and belts so that they switch targets. This is a good idea for increasing variety in missions except, well, it actually isn't.


    • It will only hurt level 5 mission runners and those who do 10/10 sites such as the infamous maze. Level 4 missions, belt ratting, sanctums, etc, will still be perfectly soloable by one man in a drake. Yes I solo sanctums in drakes, you mad bro?
    • It will just make drones tedious in missions and nerf gallente missioning paradigms such as the famous sentry drone dominix.


    Without buffing the strength of the level 4 and belt rat NPCs significantly to the level of a miniature incursion, the target switching won't matter because it's one man in a drake still taking the same amount of incoming dps.

    Why would CCP implement this change? I have no idea why they actually did, but I hope they realize this is going to happen.

    CCP is killing off these entire types of PVP.

    • Solo afk cloaking in a recon ship. Now when your pilgrim warps into that sanctum the rats will nuke you and the target will escape.
    • Solo Mission runner hunting. Whether you baited them by being a "ninja" or are at war with them, mission NPCs will nuke you when you enter the site with your pvp ship.
    • Solo Belt Hunting. Now the rats will nuke you when you warp into the belt to kill the ratter.


    To me this seems like a nerf to solo pvp in hi, lo, and nullsec in one relatively small change. I really want to think this isn't some part of a larger plan to turn EVE into hello kitty online, and I want to have faith that EVE is still going to be a cold harsh universe, but these changes seem to contradict that.
    PlasTic LiTTle
    Sebiestor Tribe
    Minmatar Republic
    #27 - 2012-10-13 00:45:35 UTC
    Alavaria Fera
    GoonWaffe
    #28 - 2012-10-13 00:48:45 UTC
    Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:
    To me this seems like a nerf to solo pvp in hi, lo, and nullsec in one relatively small change. I really want to think this isn't some part of a larger plan to turn EVE into hello kitty online, and I want to have faith that EVE is still going to be a cold harsh universe, but these changes seem to contradict that.

    Maybe some of us needed the thermostat turned up a little.

    Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
    Taihbea
    Doomheim
    #29 - 2012-10-13 01:02:05 UTC
    Yay for another dumbass noob cloak ganker whine thread.
    Aldeb Haraz
    Habitual Euthanasia
    Pandemic Legion
    #30 - 2012-10-13 01:25:36 UTC
    In other news, the pilgrim is going to be even more **** than it was before this change.

    Activating TD's, warp scram, web, and neut at the same time seems like a good way for the rats to instantly primary you.
    Smiknight
    Smiknight Corporation
    #31 - 2012-10-13 03:11:48 UTC
    Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:
    I know I'm not the first to say this stuff and it has been said before, but CCP has proven they listen to the group that whines the loudest. If I don't whine on the forums I'll never get the game I want.


    If that were true, then the claim that carebears are ruining the game would be false.
    A reward devoid of risk is no reward at all, but is instead a handout.
    Touval Lysander
    Zero Wine
    #32 - 2012-10-13 03:53:17 UTC
    Smiknight wrote:
    Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:
    I know I'm not the first to say this stuff and it has been said before, but CCP has proven they listen to the group that whines the loudest. If I don't whine on the forums I'll never get the game I want.


    If that were true, then the claim that carebears are ruining the game would be false.

    i saw what you did there Twisted

    "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
    Alexa Coates
    Center for Advanced Studies
    Gallente Federation
    #33 - 2012-10-13 04:05:24 UTC
    LilRemmy wrote:
    Touval Lysander wrote:
    Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:
    CCP is killing off these entire types of PVP.

    • Solo afk cloaking in a recon ship. Now when your pilgrim warps into that sanctum the rats will nuke you and the target will escape.
    • Solo Mission runner hunting. Whether you baited them by being a "ninja" or are at war with them, mission NPCs will nuke you when you enter the site with your pvp ship.
    • Solo Belt Hunting. Now the rats will nuke you when you warp into the belt to kill the ratter.


    Yet another tough guy bitching that they might actually get killed in Eve.

    And they reckon carebears whine. Roll

    Instead of SOLO, bring a friend. Let him get primary, 50/50 - HALF the risk.



    In my experience, the l33t players are the once that cry the loudest when they die in EVE. Not the carebears.

    I can vouch for this, being a carebear myself. I'm welcoming the changes. It makes missions not mind-numbingly easy without being over the top dangerous, like incursions or sleeper sites.

    That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers.
    Jonah Gravenstein
    Machiavellian Space Bastards
    #34 - 2012-10-13 04:10:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
    Eli Green wrote:
    OP fails to realize that people have been soloing WH sites for years


    Op also fails to realise that people have been ganking people in wormhole sites for years even with a particularly nasty AI, the new NPC AI is a watered down version of sleeper AI, if people can PvP in wormhole sites they can damn well PvP in mission sites.

    As for killing the ability of drone boats to solo missions, pay attention, fit ewar, RR your drones. If sleeper AI is anything to go by the NPCs will hate you for it and target you not your little helpers.

    In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

    New Player FAQ

    Feyd's Survival Pack
    Souxie Alduin
    Anarchy in the Eve
    #35 - 2012-10-13 04:34:50 UTC
    baltec1 wrote:
    III ZiggyBang wrote:
    I'd like to respond to this thread but I'm worried that some patronizing ass of a moderator will edit my post. change it's meaning, and treat me like a juvenile who needs constant scrutiny & supervision to express himself.


    This only happens if you act like a juvenile who needs scrutiny & supervision to express himself.


    Or if you insist on spewing racist nonsense, but those two surprisingly often overlap.

    Regarding the OP: OH NOES! I can't pvp against people who don't want to pvp without risk anymore! Shocked
    Kill your babies, sell your PLEX and give away your stuff! Quick! Before the sky falls!
    Andski
    Science and Trade Institute
    Caldari State
    #36 - 2012-10-13 04:50:52 UTC
    Souxie Alduin wrote:
    baltec1 wrote:
    III ZiggyBang wrote:
    I'd like to respond to this thread but I'm worried that some patronizing ass of a moderator will edit my post. change it's meaning, and treat me like a juvenile who needs constant scrutiny & supervision to express himself.


    This only happens if you act like a juvenile who needs scrutiny & supervision to express himself.


    Or if you insist on spewing racist nonsense, but those two surprisingly often overlap.

    Regarding the OP: OH NOES! I can't pvp against people who don't want to pvp without risk anymore! Shocked
    Kill your babies, sell your PLEX and give away your stuff! Quick! Before the sky falls!


    this just in: "juvenile" is racist

    Twitter: @EVEAndski

    "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
    Souxie Alduin
    Anarchy in the Eve
    #37 - 2012-10-13 05:48:20 UTC
    Andski wrote:
    Souxie Alduin wrote:
    baltec1 wrote:
    III ZiggyBang wrote:
    I'd like to respond to this thread but I'm worried that some patronizing ass of a moderator will edit my post. change it's meaning, and treat me like a juvenile who needs constant scrutiny & supervision to express himself.


    This only happens if you act like a juvenile who needs scrutiny & supervision to express himself.


    Or if you insist on spewing racist nonsense, but those two surprisingly often overlap.

    Regarding the OP: OH NOES! I can't pvp against people who don't want to pvp without risk anymore! Shocked
    Kill your babies, sell your PLEX and give away your stuff! Quick! Before the sky falls!


    this just in: "juvenile" is racist


    Um, no. But the bit(s) that got snipped by the mods were. Read faster.
    Oh, wait. You're a goon. Never mind.Blink
    Thor Kerrigan
    Guardians of Asceticism
    #38 - 2012-10-13 06:30:38 UTC
    So you're saying people will actually have to bring 2 logistics to run level 5's?

    Eve is dieing.
    Herzog Wolfhammer
    Sigma Special Tactics Group
    #39 - 2012-10-13 07:22:03 UTC
    If the NPC AI is anything like sleepers, then some serious drone fu and missile fu can keep even a lowly BC alive - been soloing sleepers in class 1-3 that way.

    But if they got just a little smarter, there will be trouble.

    Bring back DEEEEP Space!
    Roime
    Mea Culpa.
    Shadow Cartel
    #40 - 2012-10-13 08:56:55 UTC
    Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
    If the NPC AI is anything like sleepers, then some serious drone fu and missile fu can keep even a lowly BC alive - been soloing sleepers in class 1-3 that way.

    But if they got just a little smarter, there will be trouble.


    I know people don't normally read the dev blogs before posting on the forums about some changes, but here you go:

    Quote:
    Q) Will NPC's kill my drones?

    A) Yes, but they don't hate them nearly as much as sleepers. I ran 9 level 4 missions and lost 2 drones. It does mean you need to pay more attention though. We can adjust their hatred of drones though which is why we are asking for feedback when this hits a test server.


    .
    Previous page123Next page