These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Specific Examples of Where Risk Should Be Inserted Successfully Into High-sec

First post
Author
Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#401 - 2012-10-11 16:59:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
Seniae 0n3 wrote:
Everytime I read these Hisec vs Nullsec stories and ideas I get this image in my mind where they let a group of prisoners loose in the center of a big civilized city. Prisoners running around like barbarians with clubs and maces, whacking their way through the streets to loot and kill whatever they come across, screaming MINE MINE MINE!!!!

This post does nothing but attack a specific playstyle. There are others like it.

There is no information presented here. No question asked. This is pure prejudice and nothing more.

It's also a strawman, as we are not prisoners. We are people trying to play a game set in a cold, harsh universe where "HTFU" has always been the mantra.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#402 - 2012-10-11 17:16:03 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:

So thank you for finally giving me a good reason to block you. Your insipid, weak arguments and homiletics will not be missed, nor will the strawmen you so favor to argue against.

Dear Darth

We only have emus in Australia. Wasn't aware of ostriches in yours.

Regards
Strawman.

Oh wait. I'm blocked.... So "my insipid, weak arguments and homiletics will be missed".

PS: GankerMan is now not only poor and singled out. He's also angry, and yet it would be sooooo easy to make the change to correct it.

Hang on.

WHERE have I heard THAT before?????







Your arguments are pretty terrible I can't blame Darth for not wanting to try and match wits with such a mentally unarmed person. They basically consist of ~grass is greener~, ~honorable pvp~, or ~adapt like the miners did~. All of those are terrible arguments. Ebushido was weeded out via natural selection, CCP had no hand in it. The miners did not adapt CCP merely gave them crash helmets as if they were epileptics. Grass is greener or not the system is broken and is not as it should be, this is the one case CCP should intervene in (aside from reverting barge EHP buffs for hulk/mack).

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#403 - 2012-10-11 17:19:32 UTC
Feel free to put bountys on your favourite targets and concord will not even come to defend them.

What more do you want?
Do you want CCP to change rat belt ships for mining barges?

brb

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#404 - 2012-10-11 17:19:51 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:

So thank you for finally giving me a good reason to block you. Your insipid, weak arguments and homiletics will not be missed, nor will the strawmen you so favor to argue against.

Dear Darth

We only have emus in Australia. Wasn't aware of ostriches in yours.

Regards
Strawman.

Oh wait. I'm blocked.... So "my insipid, weak arguments and homiletics will be missed".

PS: GankerMan is now not only poor and singled out. He's also angry, and yet it would be sooooo easy to make the change to correct it.

Hang on.

WHERE have I heard THAT before?????







Your arguments are pretty terrible I can't blame Darth for not wanting to try and match wits with such a mentally unarmed person. They basically consist of ~grass is greener~, ~honorable pvp~, or ~adapt like the miners did~. All of those are terrible arguments. Ebushido was weeded out via natural selection, CCP had no hand in it. The miners did not adapt CCP merely gave them crash helmets as if they were epileptics. Grass is greener or not the system is broken and is not as it should be, this is the one case CCP should intervene in (aside from reverting barge EHP buffs for hulk/mack).

You forgot the omnipresent strawman.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#405 - 2012-10-11 17:20:17 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Feel free to put bountys on your favourite targets and concord will not even come to defend them.

What more do you want?
Do you want CCP to change rat belt ships for mining barges?

This is purely misinformation. You should feel bad.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#406 - 2012-10-11 17:20:20 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Feel free to put bountys on your favourite targets and concord will not even come to defend them.

What more do you want?
Do you want CCP to change rat belt ships for mining barges?


Concord will still destroy my ship after I have destroyed them. Concord does not protect concord is only there to punish.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

veritas primus
Kat 5 Kaos
#407 - 2012-10-11 17:29:24 UTC
So you're bored out in 0.0 with nothing to shoot and you think coming here and putting down on High Sec dwellers will solve your problem.

Oh me.

I've played since Castor, Lived in High Sec for a year or so until I got a foundation under me (isk, ships, skills), and then I....I said I decided to take the plunge to 0.0. It wasn't because I was bored in HighSec, or because some doucher was stealing my ore, or someone was popping my miners, it was because I wanted to be something more in game.

Guess what......not EVERYONE in Eve wants to live in 0.0. SURPRISE!

Crazy stuff huh, that someone might want to play the game differently than you?

It's post like this that make people want to stay in high sec, because you sound like an Elitist Doucher.

I lived in 0.0 for several years and hell even had stations named after me, but at some point it got old so I came back to high sec. When I'm ready I'll move back to 0.0.....it will be because once again I made another decision, and it won't be because I was forced.

See how that works?
Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#408 - 2012-10-11 17:38:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
veritas primus wrote:
So you're bored out in 0.0 with nothing to shoot and you think coming here and putting down on High Sec dwellers will solve your problem.

Oh me.

I've played since Castor, Lived in High Sec for a year or so until I got a foundation under me (isk, ships, skills), and then I....I said I decided to take the plunge to 0.0. It wasn't because I was bored in HighSec, or because some doucher was stealing my ore, or someone was popping my miners, it was because I wanted to be something more in game.

Guess what......not EVERYONE in Eve wants to live in 0.0. SURPRISE!

Crazy stuff huh, that someone might want to play the game differently than you?

It's post like this that make people want to stay in high sec, because you sound like an Elitist Doucher.

I lived in 0.0 for several years and hell even had stations named after me, but at some point it got old so I came back to high sec. When I'm ready I'll move back to 0.0.....it will be because once again I made another decision, and it won't be because I was forced.

See how that works?

Did you actually read the thread?

Do you understand that regardless of whether or not 0.0 people are "douchers" as you so eloquently put it, there is still a very simple economic formula governing the value of commodities and the professions which produce them?

The formula is "Value = Demand / Supply", and as you can see, when supply increases and demand decreases, value goes down. So ganking added value to successful mining.

At no point was asking miners to mine aligned too much to ask - if they were ATK and not AFK or botting. Mining aligned and paying attention results in avoiding ganks in just about 99 out of 100 gank attempts. The 1% is usually due to operator error. Warping out when aligned is instantaneous. Coming out of warp when landing on-grid isn't.

So, if I am a "doucher" for seeing the truth behind simple economics and the benefits of risk, so be it.

It still doesn't change the facts.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#409 - 2012-10-11 17:40:09 UTC  |  Edited by: La Nariz
So you're bored out in 0.0 with nothing to shoot and you think coming here and putting down on High Sec dwellers will solve your problem.

Oh me.


You completely missed the point of this thread. The point is that risk has been gradually decreased in highsec to the point that there is close to no risk for almost all professions. This is not healthy for EVE and must be resolved. It can be resolved in two ways consistent with EVE's core ideas: reducing reward in highsec or increasing risk in highsec. If you read the title you'll see which this thread focuses on.

I've played since Castor, Lived in High Sec for a year or so until I got a foundation under me (isk, ships, skills), and then I....I said I decided to take the plunge to 0.0. It wasn't because I was bored in HighSec, or because some doucher was stealing my ore, or someone was popping my miners, it was because I wanted to be something more in game.

Good that's part of the idea behind the game, people want more of any commodity so they move to an area where it is more freely available.

Guess what......not EVERYONE in Eve wants to live in 0.0. SURPRISE!

Perfectly fine but their reward should not be equal to mine out in nullsec.

Crazy stuff huh, that someone might want to play the game differently than you?

If only every highsec pubbie understood this.

It's post like this that make people want to stay in high sec, because you sound like an Elitist Doucher.

Now you are just being a moron.

I lived in 0.0 for several years and hell even had stations named after me, but at some point it got old so I came back to high sec. When I'm ready I'll move back to 0.0.....it will be because once again I made another decision, and it won't be because I was forced.

See how that works?


See we aren't trying to force anyone into nullsec we just want the game to return to a focus on risk:reward. If I do a high risk activity like ratting in nullsec I should reap reward than I could in the highest risk highsec activity. Unfortunately incredibly low risk activities in highsec like mission running make comparable reward to high risk activities when they clearly shouldn't.

Basically with the current trend in changes people are being FORCED out of nullsec and into highsec because the risk is lower yet the reward is the same. I respect that you do not want to be forced into nullsec and I expect you to respect that I do not want to be forced into highsec. The easiest way to balance this problem without a stupid wow-like power creep is to decrease the reward in highsec yet that is not what this thread is about.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#410 - 2012-10-11 17:48:22 UTC
La Nariz wrote:


Guess what......not EVERYONE in Eve wants to live in 0.0. SURPRISE!

Perfectly fine but their reward should not be equal to mine out in nullsec.




It's not

The highsec miner has no access to
Arknor
Bistot
Crokite
Mercoxit

If the Highsec Miner is part of a playercorp, he has no access to Moon Materials.

John Ratcliffe
Tradors'R'us
IChooseYou Alliance
#411 - 2012-10-11 17:52:44 UTC
Gogela wrote:
Get the NPC money out of empire. Level 3 and 4 missions all move to low and null, only veldspar available in .5+ systems, etc...

Will solve *most* problems.


The most ret@rded idea ever. I would never mission in Low or Null. If I was forced to then I'd just quit. I like my PVE and PVP to be distinct and I only like to engage in PVP when it suits me to do so.

I'm sure I'm not alone in that view.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#412 - 2012-10-11 17:52:54 UTC
Kitty Bear wrote:
La Nariz wrote:


Guess what......not EVERYONE in Eve wants to live in 0.0. SURPRISE!

Perfectly fine but their reward should not be equal to mine out in nullsec.




It's not

The highsec miner has no access to
Arknor
Bistot
Crokite
Mercoxit

If the Highsec Miner is part of a playercorp, he has no access to Moon Materials.


Your point is accepted. Now why would you want to drive down the prices of commodities which are available in high-sec on a macroeconomical scale by removing any risk?

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

John Ratcliffe
Tradors'R'us
IChooseYou Alliance
#413 - 2012-10-11 17:54:26 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
That is one of the core problems of the game & things will only get worse if more people aren't encouraged out of highsec.


Why? Why can't you accept that people might like to stay in HighSec? There's no need for them to leave and they shouldn't be forced to.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#414 - 2012-10-11 17:56:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
John Ratcliffe wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
That is one of the core problems of the game & things will only get worse if more people aren't encouraged out of highsec.


Why? Why can't you accept that people might like to stay in HighSec? There's no need for them to leave and they shouldn't be forced to.

The answer to your quesiton is very simple.

Value = Demand / Supply.

When risk is not present, there is no barrier to successfully increasing supply.

Risk also has a nasty way of increasing demand. Remove it, and demand goes down.

That lowers the value of both the commodity and, by extension, the profession itself.

Getting people out of high-sec introduces risk and drives up the value of commodities, the professsions that produce them, and even the game itself.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

John Ratcliffe
Tradors'R'us
IChooseYou Alliance
#415 - 2012-10-11 17:57:11 UTC
Gogela wrote:
The ironic thing is that you lamers that cower in empire are the ones always crying about anything that mildly perturbs in any way your closed-in repetitive game play. I'm trying to open it up. You want everything to stay exactly the same.

You aren't as important as you think, empire tools. Nobody would even notice if you weren't there. In many ways it's already as if you aren't.

I have about had it w/ empire people.


Such delicious tears. Cuddle?

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#416 - 2012-10-11 18:00:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Kitty Bear
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kitty Bear wrote:
La Nariz wrote:


Guess what......not EVERYONE in Eve wants to live in 0.0. SURPRISE!

Perfectly fine but their reward should not be equal to mine out in nullsec.




It's not

The highsec miner has no access to
Arknor
Bistot
Crokite
Mercoxit

If the Highsec Miner is part of a playercorp, he has no access to Moon Materials.


Your point is accepted. Now why would you want to drive down the prices of commodities which are available in high-sec on a macroeconomical scale by removing any risk?


why are you so determined in removing, or limiting the effectiveness of an ISK sink ?
John Ratcliffe
Tradors'R'us
IChooseYou Alliance
#417 - 2012-10-11 18:00:56 UTC
Darth Gustav wrote:
John Ratcliffe wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
That is one of the core problems of the game & things will only get worse if more people aren't encouraged out of highsec.


Why? Why can't you accept that people might like to stay in HighSec? There's no need for them to leave and they shouldn't be forced to.

The answer to your quesiton is very simple.

Value = Demand / Supply.

When risk is not present, there is no barrier to successfully increasing supply.

Risk also has a nasty way of increasing demand. Remove it, and demand goes down.

That lowers value of both the commodity and, by extension, the profession itself.

Getting people out of high-sec introduces risk and drives up the value of commodities, the professsions that produce them, and even the game itself.


I don't accept this. Why would I want to take one of my multi-billion ISK mission ships into Low/Null just for some lame cheesers to blow me up and steal my loot? That's not fun or enjoyable to me. It's happened once and I won't do it again. I'm quite happy running missions in HighSec and joining RvB when I want to PVP. I don't see why that should change just to cater to the whims of those who are butthurt that me and others like me won't present ourselves as targets for griefers.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#418 - 2012-10-11 18:03:27 UTC
John Ratcliffe wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
John Ratcliffe wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
That is one of the core problems of the game & things will only get worse if more people aren't encouraged out of highsec.


Why? Why can't you accept that people might like to stay in HighSec? There's no need for them to leave and they shouldn't be forced to.

The answer to your quesiton is very simple.

Value = Demand / Supply.

When risk is not present, there is no barrier to successfully increasing supply.

Risk also has a nasty way of increasing demand. Remove it, and demand goes down.

That lowers value of both the commodity and, by extension, the profession itself.

Getting people out of high-sec introduces risk and drives up the value of commodities, the professsions that produce them, and even the game itself.


I don't accept this. Why would I want to take one of my multi-billion ISK mission ships into Low/Null just for some lame cheesers to blow me up and steal my loot? That's not fun or enjoyable to me. It's happened once and I won't do it again. I'm quite happy running missions in HighSec and joining RvB when I want to PVP. I don't see why that should change just to cater to the whims of those who are butthurt that me and others like me won't present ourselves as targets for griefers.

Because if you are successful the rewards will be higher and if you aren't, the result is a boon to Eve's economy. It's pretty simple unless you're disinclined to HTFU.

But ultimately it's your choice to stay in high-sec. I respect that. But that doesn't change the fact that adding some RISK to high-sec is good for the economy of Eve both in-game and out.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#419 - 2012-10-11 18:11:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Kitty Bear
Theres plenty of risk in hisec

You can be wardecced
You can be ganked
You can get a socket error mid-mission

all working as intended.





edit
cept the last one, i doubt ccp do that deliberately ...
Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#420 - 2012-10-11 18:14:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
Kitty Bear wrote:
Theres plenty of risk in hisec

You can be wardecced
You can be ganked
You can get a socket error mid-mission

all working as intended.





edit
cept the last one, i doubt ccp do that deliberately ...

LOL, wardecs can be evaded.
LOL, ganks against the new exhumers
Fair point about the socket error. Lol

Risk shouldn't come solely in the form of disconnecting from your AFK ice mining farm, though. Roll

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom