These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

How to Boil a Frog

First post
Author
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2012-10-08 21:26:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
from http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.ca/2012/10/how-to-boil-frog.html

Every player meet, every fanfest, CCP Soundwave trots out the same tired vision, how one day he would like to turn off CONCORD and leave policing in the players hands.

Every time he does this, I'd like to smack him upside the head. Because it's an empty statement. If this is really his vision, he should discuss in some broad terms how he sees this happening. Under what conditions could this be made possible? He never goes beyond the platitude, though.

Why? Because it is never going to happen. Never. Never. Never. Ever. Not unless highsec is effectively turned into a gank-free zone.

But first, frogs.

Toss a frog into some boiling water, it's going to freak the hell out and immediately try to escape. But, put a frog in some cool water, very slowly increase the temperature of the water over time and the frog will not perceive the danger, eventually boiling to death. Or so the hypothesis goes. Turns out it is complete bunk, the frog will hop out of the water when it becomes uncomfortably warm. As a metaphor, though, the boiling frog anecdote is instructive.

Before Incarna, CCP had the mentality that they could do no wrong. Players would accept and be happy with anything released. Subscriptions would continue to slowly grow. CCP was the company that hubris built. And then thesummer of 2011 came, the **** hit the fan, the players were unhappy, subscriptions were cancelled. CCP was faced with the realization that what they did might not be appreciated. The goose might not lay golden eggs in perpetuity. CCP discovered fear. CCP was the company that EVE built, and all future CCP plans were dependent on EVE's continuing success. There would have been no DUST without EVE. There will be no vampires without EVE. Fear had CCP paying close attention to the tears of their players.

Historically, the most whining, the most threats of ending subscriptions, have come from the carebear segment of the playerbase. Those players that spend the majority of their time in highsec, refusing to understand the game they signed up for, refusing to understand the concept of the sandbox. Carebears want to play their game, without inconvenience, and hell-or-high-water the game should cater to them, or else.

For the past year, since Crucible, CCP has been paying attention to their superbears. They do happen to be a significant portion of the playerbase. Fear of the threat of losing subscribers. You cannot blame CCP, they are a business, they need their subscribers. But the fear comes from many directions. How to satisfy the superbears, without pissing off the people who understand and accept the harsh realities of EVE Online? It's a slender tightrope to walk.

So CCP learned how to boil a frog.

CCP feels they need to cater to the carebears, mollify their threats, but all the while they cannot do so in a way that will anger the PvPers. You can't toss in a tonne of changes that protect carebears all at once. That's tossing the frog into a boiling pot of water. CCP has to raise the temperature slowly.

So, we've been seeing incremental changes to highsec. A little here. A little there. All the while, hoping nobody would notice the overall direction they were taking.

Increasing the costs of wardecs. Buffing mining ships to an obscene, nearly ungankable level. Removing insurance if killed by CONCORD. The so-called idiot switch to protect players from their own stupidity. The removal of can-flipping. Buffing CONCORD response. A change here, a change there. Control the message of those changes ("this behaviour was never intended," even when those behaviours have existed for years and never classified as exploits.)

The mining barge buff. It sounded all good in the soundbites leading up to the changes. "We wish to create mining roles. A different ship for different situations." Yet, in all their wisdom, CCP created a single ship that outstripped every other in utility. A massive tank, a massive ore hold, and an almost top-end mining yield. Did CCP honestly expect that every miner was not going to gravitate straight to the Mackinaw? CCP could remove every other mining barge from the game tomorrow, and nobody would notice.

And then the rumoured idiot switch to be introduced with Crimewatch. Three levels. Green, yellow and red. Set to green by default. And when set to green, the game does not allow a player to do anything that might set them to the new suspect level. No dialogue windows that ask "Are you sure?" The game will simply fail on any action that would lead to a suspect or criminal flag. The sandbox now protects you from your own stupidity. There's no need to understand how the game works, the switch protects you from the game. The sandbox now comes equipped with some chainlink fencing. Fence your carebear gameplay off from the rest of the game. Sure, chainlink can be breached with some effort, but most players won't bother.

(cont'd next post)
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2012-10-08 21:26:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
I would not be surprised to see some change in 2013 that greatly limits the effectiveness of freighter ganking.

If certain segments of the player population begin to notice that the water is warming, then redirect the hell out of these potentially damaging conversations with "one day we'd like players to take over for CONCORD." And the rising complaints are mollified as those players forget about the temperature of the water and begin fantasizing themselves in the role of space police. They'll say "CCP understands where to take this game. These new features change the nature of the sandbox, but it's meant to move us to the promised land. So we'll wait and see."

But what is this promised land? Under what conditions could CCP remove CONCORD and not break the game? As it stands now, to turn off CONCORD would be to turn all of highsec into lowsec. And that's definitely not going to happen. Never. Ever. So the promised land has to be a place where space has become so safe, so regimented, so rules restricted, that CONCORD is an entity that is rarely required. Suspect and criminal flags such a rare occurence, that players can become the police, because the need for a super-police is now moot. And this might be the situation that CCP Soundwave envisions. The only real instance in which CONCORD can be safely removed from the game is one where they are no longer needed. Players can then call themselves the space police, except that there's nothing left to police.
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#3 - 2012-10-08 21:28:28 UTC
TL;DR >> It's tough being a frog.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#4 - 2012-10-08 21:34:04 UTC
@ OP

I agree! Smile
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#5 - 2012-10-08 21:39:09 UTC
James 315 wrote:
@ OP

I agree! Smile

Agree with what? You bypass aggression mechanics and Concord anyway Roll

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#6 - 2012-10-08 21:39:38 UTC
Soundwave is French?

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2012-10-08 21:40:23 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
James 315 wrote:
@ OP

I agree! Smile

Agree with what? You bypass aggression mechanics and Concord anyway Roll

Pray do explain how that works.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#8 - 2012-10-08 21:42:31 UTC
tl/dr

Only 1 way to play the sandbox ?

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#9 - 2012-10-08 21:43:16 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
James 315 wrote:
@ OP

I agree! Smile

Agree with what? You bypass aggression mechanics and Concord anyway Roll

Pray do explain how that works.

Did they make bumping red flashy while I was asleep?

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#10 - 2012-10-08 21:44:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Roll Sizzle Beef
Me patently awaits for all standard weapons to have a .4 or under restriction. All missions to be moved to low, low to be policed by concord ships, low to be renamed high, and high to be renamed as simply Empire, no resources in empire and any or all empire pvp is FW, who have the only empire legal faction weapons.

The world starts in the center, not the top. Then you migrate to unrestricted or restricted worlds.
Arec Bardwin
#11 - 2012-10-08 21:44:51 UTC
The highsec hate has really been heating up the forums lately, hasn't it? Big smile

James Amril-Kesh wrote:

Pray do explain how that works.
You know, bumping?
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2012-10-08 21:45:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Surfin's PlunderBunny
damnit Arec Bardwin, whenever I see that I have to say it out loud like Kim Jong Il (video is NSFW, strong language right off the bat. The thought is shared usually around once a day every time I log on the forums) P

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#13 - 2012-10-08 21:45:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
The flip side of the new idiot switch is that CCP are trying to appeal to a wider demographic, hopefully drawing them in from other MMOs where molly coddling and hand holding are the norm. Some of the current mechanics are arcane and convoluted to say the least and it's very easy to trick the uneducated into doing something unwise. Personally I hope they succeed in bringing in new players so that we can introduce them to a proper game that doesn't involve cartoon pets and proper PvP where if you die you actually lose stuff.

However if they go too far with the idjit proofing they risk alienating their current players, and the current players are the ones that have created Eves reputation as the pinnacle of what a game can be.

TL;DR Gaining new players is good, losing old players is not.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Silk daShocka
Greasy Hair Club
#14 - 2012-10-08 21:47:03 UTC
Maybe CCP is just trying to entice the frog back into an area of the sandbox that suits it's lifestyle better.

Or maybe it takes time to develop these things, such as it takes time to bring water to a boil. Perhaps even, changes are being implemented at a slow pace to observe the results and to avoid breaking things.
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#15 - 2012-10-08 21:49:41 UTC
Posting because I like frogs and oppose them being boiled.

Also: Frog joke.

Q: What did Kermit the Frog say when Jim Henson died?
A: Nothing.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#16 - 2012-10-08 21:52:15 UTC
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:
Me patently awaits for all standard weapons to have a .4 or under restriction. All missions to be moved to low, low to be policed by concord ships, low to be renamed high, and high to be renamed as simply Empire, and any or all empire pvp is FW, who have the only empire legal faction weapons.

So the Empire miners will be just cheery? Cool story.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#17 - 2012-10-08 21:52:44 UTC
Gogela wrote:
Posting because I like frogs and oppose them being boiled.

Also: Frog joke.

Q: What did Kermit the Frog say when Jim Henson died?
A: Nothing.


Gogela you're slacking, you missed the opportunity to ask

Q: What's green and smells of pork?
A: Kermits middle finger

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#18 - 2012-10-08 21:54:13 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Gogela wrote:
Posting because I like frogs and oppose them being boiled.

Also: Frog joke.

Q: What did Kermit the Frog say when Jim Henson died?
A: Nothing.


Gogela you're slacking, you missed the opportunity to ask

Q: What's green and smells of pork?
A: Kermits middle finger

You win Big smile

Signatures should be used responsibly...

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#19 - 2012-10-08 21:55:12 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
James 315 wrote:
@ OP

I agree! Smile

Agree with what? You bypass aggression mechanics and Concord anyway Roll

Pray do explain how that works.

Did they make bumping red flashy while I was asleep?

Oh, that? You're just lucky it doesn't do any damage.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#20 - 2012-10-08 21:57:02 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:

However if they go too far with the idjit proofing they risk alienating their current players, and the current players are the ones that have created Eves reputation as the pinnacle of what a game can be.

TL;DR new players are good, losing old players is not.

Are you seriously suggesting that we need the ability to grief new guys simply because they make a mistake (which is what the "switch" is for) as a reason to keep Eve "real" for the old guys?

Most armies in the world would probably prefer their soldiers to have the ability to walk before they give them a gun.

When the new guy "turns the switch on" (as it were), he'll know when and more importantly, he'll know why.




"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

123Next pageLast page