These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Buff Ganking--Nevermind, Nerfed Again

First post First post
Author
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#681 - 2012-10-08 01:02:54 UTC
Matriarch Prime wrote:
New equilibrium achieved. There's nothing wrong in EvE with finding a high value target and taking them out.

And with crimewatch 2.0, that "equilibrium" is being ****** with yet again.

Matriarch Prime wrote:
This talk about how you could make it unprofitable before is rose tinted at best. It was cheap fitting and ships taking out much more expensive ships, not as an isolated event, but en mass that prompt a response. We all get giggles with someone goofs and lose a faction battleship to a frigate or something silly, but this was an epidemic brought solely to point. Something needed to be done, and there was.

If miners had fitted a tank and done a few minor behavioral modifications, this "epidemic" wouldn't have gone on for as long as it did, and it wouldn't have gotten as bad as it did. They were being horrible sheep just standing around, staring dumbfoundedly at you as they got ganked, while the rest of the world was telling them what to do to fix it.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#682 - 2012-10-08 01:03:04 UTC
Chicken **** gankers with no skill crying because they can't take out defenseless targets with zero risk. What else is new? Why don't you grow a set and move out to nullsec? Oh right...then you have to risk losing ISK.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#683 - 2012-10-08 01:04:51 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Chicken **** gankers with no skill crying because they can't take out defenseless targets with zero risk. What else is new? Why don't you grow a set and move out to nullsec? Oh right...then you have to risk losing ISK.

Now, see, this is what a ragepost looks like.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#684 - 2012-10-08 01:06:27 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Chicken **** gankers with no skill crying because they can't take out defenseless targets with zero risk. What else is new? Why don't you grow a set and move out to nullsec? Oh right...then you have to risk losing ISK.

lolz. I did put up a proposal to increase risk in 0.0.

The nullbears didn't like that either.

Apparently the only people who deserve risk are the ones that least deserve risk.

Sandbox my ass.......

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#685 - 2012-10-08 01:06:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Chicken **** gankers with no skill crying because they can't take out defenseless targets with zero risk. What else is new? Why don't you grow a set and move out to nullsec? Oh right...then you have to risk losing ISK.

1) Miners activate modules on objects that are also defenseless and do so for profit without resistance.Roll

2) Another new thing is the aggression mechanics changes. Shocked

3) I already live there and PVP there quite successfully, thanks for your concern though. Blink

4) Obviously PVP is a risk. I've lost billions to awesome pvp. Strange that miners would do the same for stupid PVE which fuels runaway deflation.Lol

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#686 - 2012-10-08 01:09:37 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Chicken **** gankers with no skill crying because they can't take out defenseless targets with zero risk. What else is new? Why don't you grow a set and move out to nullsec? Oh right...then you have to risk losing ISK.

lolz. I did put up a proposal to increase risk in 0.0.

The nullbears didn't like that either.

Apparently the only people who deserve risk are the ones that least deserve risk.

Sandbox my ass.......

Surprise: Another strawman fallacy from Touval Lysander.

You should add to your signature that this is your special move dude.

ULTRA-COMBO!

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#687 - 2012-10-08 01:10:21 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Chicken **** gankers with no skill crying because they can't take out defenseless targets with zero risk. What else is new? Why don't you grow a set and move out to nullsec? Oh right...then you have to risk losing ISK.

lolz. I did put up a proposal to increase risk in 0.0.

The nullbears didn't like that either.

That wasn't a proposal to "increase risk", that was a proposal to "completely **** over nullsec so nobody wanted to live there". I counter-proposed fixing the sov system, fixing the industry etc so people actually lived there, so roaming gangs would actually be viable again and thus increase risk, but you kept harping on and on about some weird idea about making POSes killable in a single go.

It was a terrible proposal, and everyone told you why, repeatedly.

Touval Lysander wrote:
Apparently the only people who deserve risk are the ones that least deserve risk.

Sandbox my ass.......

This is you substituting facts with fiction.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Matriarch Prime
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#688 - 2012-10-08 01:11:29 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Matriarch Prime wrote:
New equilibrium achieved. There's nothing wrong in EvE with finding a high value target and taking them out.

And with crimewatch 2.0, that "equilibrium" is being ****** with yet again.

Matriarch Prime wrote:
This talk about how you could make it unprofitable before is rose tinted at best. It was cheap fitting and ships taking out much more expensive ships, not as an isolated event, but en mass that prompt a response. We all get giggles with someone goofs and lose a faction battleship to a frigate or something silly, but this was an epidemic brought solely to point. Something needed to be done, and there was.

If miners had fitted a tank and done a few minor behavioral modifications, this "epidemic" wouldn't have gone on for as long as it did, and it wouldn't have gotten as bad as it did. They were being horrible sheep just standing around, staring dumbfoundedly at you as they got ganked, while the rest of the world was telling them what to do to fix it.


Do you really believe so many people would be so stupid? Or maybe, just maybe, there was nothing that could be done. Maybe that tank that was their magic pill in your book really was just placebo. Because if the first gank failed, the ganker could just bring more ships and likely had them on hand. Like I said, both parties were using optimal strategies, and one was getting curb stomped. Something was done, and now we have 30 page thread on how the clever, and adaptable gankers are having a hard time giving up their loot grab.

I like big guns. I can not lie. You other suckas can't deny. When I warp in, with an itty bity sig, with an arty in your face, you get sprung. You want to pull out your debuffs, 'cause you want to loot my stuff...deep, in a worm with nary, an escape but you can't stop staring. 'Cause, Oh crap!, Baby's got Point!

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#689 - 2012-10-08 01:13:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
Matriarch Prime wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Matriarch Prime wrote:
New equilibrium achieved. There's nothing wrong in EvE with finding a high value target and taking them out.

And with crimewatch 2.0, that "equilibrium" is being ****** with yet again.

Matriarch Prime wrote:
This talk about how you could make it unprofitable before is rose tinted at best. It was cheap fitting and ships taking out much more expensive ships, not as an isolated event, but en mass that prompt a response. We all get giggles with someone goofs and lose a faction battleship to a frigate or something silly, but this was an epidemic brought solely to point. Something needed to be done, and there was.

If miners had fitted a tank and done a few minor behavioral modifications, this "epidemic" wouldn't have gone on for as long as it did, and it wouldn't have gotten as bad as it did. They were being horrible sheep just standing around, staring dumbfoundedly at you as they got ganked, while the rest of the world was telling them what to do to fix it.


Do you really believe so many people would be so stupid? Or maybe, just maybe, there was nothing that could be done. Maybe that tank that was their magic pill in your book really was just placebo. Because if the first gank failed, the ganker could just bring more ships and likely had them on hand. Like I said, both parties were using optimal strategies, and one was getting curb stomped. Something was done, and now we have 30 page thread on how the clever, and adaptable gankers are having a hard time giving up their loot grab.

We don't just believe that so many people could be so stupid.

We have empirical data that irrevocably demonstrates that so many people could be (and in fact were) precisely that stupid.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#690 - 2012-10-08 01:16:07 UTC
Darth Gustav wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Chicken **** gankers with no skill crying because they can't take out defenseless targets with zero risk. What else is new? Why don't you grow a set and move out to nullsec? Oh right...then you have to risk losing ISK.

3) I already live there and PVP there quite successfully, thanks for your concern though. Blink

With an SRP and as good as unlimited isk to protect you. Roll

Must admit, I am curious how it's only CFC making all the whiney on this topic - why? Tech moons not producing enough income? The ratting and mining is soooo poor in CFCville that you need to gank highsec miners to make a profit?

Maybe you guys need to actually become true to your socialist viva le revolution ideaology instead of preying on the weak like a raging right-winger.

You know, rob the rich to pay the poor.

Just sayin'

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#691 - 2012-10-08 01:16:10 UTC
Matriarch Prime wrote:
Do you really believe so many people would be so stupid?

They were precisely that stupid.

Matriarch Prime wrote:
Or maybe, just maybe, there was nothing that could be done. Maybe that tank that was their magic pill in your book really was just placebo. Because if the first gank failed, the ganker could just bring more ships and likely had them on hand.

So the ganker flubbed the gank, guess what? He's in the red. Bringing more ships just means going even further into the red, and this is not sustainable in the long run.

Matriarch Prime wrote:
Like I said, both parties were using optimal strategies, and one was getting curb stomped. Something was done, and now we have 30 page thread on how the clever, and adaptable gankers are having a hard time giving up their loot grab.

The gankers were using the optimal strategy for a concord-inhabited area of space, where as much damage must be laid to bear on the target within x seconds as possible, whereas the miner was using the optimal strategy for space where no gankers existed.

One strategy is correct, one strategy is deluded. I'll leave it up to you to figure out which is which.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#692 - 2012-10-08 01:21:27 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Chicken **** gankers with no skill crying because they can't take out defenseless targets with zero risk. What else is new? Why don't you grow a set and move out to nullsec? Oh right...then you have to risk losing ISK.

3) I already live there and PVP there quite successfully, thanks for your concern though. Blink

With an SRP and as good as unlimited isk to protect you. Roll

Must admit, I am curious how it's only CFC making all the whiney on this topic - why? Tech moons not producing enough income? The ratting and mining is soooo poor in CFCville that you need to gank highsec miners to make a profit?

Maybe you guys need to actually become true to your socialist viva le revolution ideaology instead of preying on the weak like a raging right-winger.

You know, rob the rich to pay the poor.

Just sayin'

Just want to correct one minor error...

It's the left wing that are the socialist, rob the rich to feed the poor, as evidence by our president of the last 4 years.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#693 - 2012-10-08 01:21:38 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Chicken **** gankers with no skill crying because they can't take out defenseless targets with zero risk. What else is new? Why don't you grow a set and move out to nullsec? Oh right...then you have to risk losing ISK.

3) I already live there and PVP there quite successfully, thanks for your concern though. Blink

With an SRP and as good as unlimited isk to protect you. Roll

Must admit, I am curious how it's only CFC making all the whiney on this topic - why? Tech moons not producing enough income? The ratting and mining is soooo poor in CFCville that you need to gank highsec miners to make a profit?

Maybe you guys need to actually become true to your socialist viva le revolution ideaology instead of preying on the weak like a raging right-winger.

You know, rob the rich to pay the poor.

Just sayin'

More CFC than others, but not strictly CFC if you scroll up.

Also, you did it again. That fallacy. You can't lay off it.

Finally, I'd hardly call folks with training to access unlimited risk-free wealth (allegedly impervious to deflation, according to you and others) "the weak and the poor."

I would call them "the stupid, timid, and unadaptable" though. Because that's precisely what their behavior warrants.

Those are qualities traditionally associated with success in Eve Online by neither the "nullsec zealots" of the CFC nor the more moderate developers at CCP.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Pipa Porto
#694 - 2012-10-08 01:37:27 UTC
Matriarch Prime wrote:
Do you really believe so many people would be so stupid? Or maybe, just maybe, there was nothing that could be done. Maybe that tank that was their magic pill in your book really was just placebo. Because if the first gank failed, the ganker could just bring more ships and likely had them on hand. Like I said, both parties were using optimal strategies, and one was getting curb stomped. Something was done, and now we have 30 page thread on how the clever, and adaptable gankers are having a hard time giving up their loot grab.


You're making the ridiculous assumption that suicide gankers are both randomly vindictive and stupid enough to piss away vast sums of ISK in order to gank people.

That's simply not true. If it were true, there wouldn't have been any decrease in ganking with the barge buffs.

Ganking was done, by and large, for a profit. That profit was only possible because the miners didn't bother to fit a tank or take active measures to protect their 200m ISK investment. Had the miners adjusted their behavior to the new level of risk that their activity entailed, we'd be congratulating them for proving that they are at least as smart as the average dog because they've learned how to avoid pain (though, taking close on 6 months to do so is kind of...).

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#695 - 2012-10-08 01:42:56 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Chicken **** gankers with no skill crying because they can't take out defenseless targets with zero risk. What else is new? Why don't you grow a set and move out to nullsec? Oh right...then you have to risk losing ISK.

3) I already live there and PVP there quite successfully, thanks for your concern though. Blink

With an SRP and as good as unlimited isk to protect you. Roll

Must admit, I am curious how it's only CFC making all the whiney on this topic - why? Tech moons not producing enough income? The ratting and mining is soooo poor in CFCville that you need to gank highsec miners to make a profit?

Maybe you guys need to actually become true to your socialist viva le revolution ideaology instead of preying on the weak like a raging right-winger.

You know, rob the rich to pay the poor.

Just sayin'

Just want to correct one minor error...

It's the left wing that are the socialist, rob the rich to feed the poor, as evidence by our president of the last 4 years.

That's what I said.

.......become true to your socialist viva le revolution ideaology..... You know, rob the rich to pay the poor.

...... instead of preying on the weak like a raging right-winger.

Lol

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#696 - 2012-10-08 01:45:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
Touval Lysander wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Chicken **** gankers with no skill crying because they can't take out defenseless targets with zero risk. What else is new? Why don't you grow a set and move out to nullsec? Oh right...then you have to risk losing ISK.

3) I already live there and PVP there quite successfully, thanks for your concern though. Blink

With an SRP and as good as unlimited isk to protect you. Roll

Must admit, I am curious how it's only CFC making all the whiney on this topic - why? Tech moons not producing enough income? The ratting and mining is soooo poor in CFCville that you need to gank highsec miners to make a profit?

Maybe you guys need to actually become true to your socialist viva le revolution ideaology instead of preying on the weak like a raging right-winger.

You know, rob the rich to pay the poor.

Just sayin'

Just want to correct one minor error...

It's the left wing that are the socialist, rob the rich to feed the poor, as evidence by our president of the last 4 years.

That's what I said.

.......become true to your socialist viva le revolution ideaology..... You know, rob the rich to pay the poor.

...... instead of preying on the weak like a raging right-winger.

Lol

There's more than one kind of weakness. I bet you think miners are weak because they refuse to shoot back and that their weakness stems from meekness or pacifism.

I feel their weakness is more centralized in the cerebral region, where decision making skills and; failing that, the principles of behaviorism itself should have provided miners with the strength to adapt to the nuisance of the threat of ganks.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#697 - 2012-10-08 01:49:32 UTC
Anyway chaps. Been nice chatting.

I'm off to do real work in a real world where despite the morons, the psychos and the wars, I can still walk down the street to do my job without needing a kevlar vest or a police escort.

For truth, decency is my tank and I don't need to be a moron to make my money. I hope you all do the same today/tomorrow.

Au revoir

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#698 - 2012-10-08 01:54:47 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Anyway chaps. Been nice chatting.

I'm off to do real work in a real world where despite the morons, the psychos and the wars, I can still walk down the street to do my job without needing a kevlar vest or a police escort.

For truth, decency is my tank and I don't need to be a moron to make my money. I hope you all do the same today/tomorrow.

Au revoir


Au revoir. Remember the formula. Blink

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#699 - 2012-10-08 02:00:04 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Matriarch Prime wrote:
Do you really believe so many people would be so stupid?

Hell ******* yes I do.

Matriarch Prime wrote:
Or maybe, just maybe, there was nothing that could be done.

We have, repeatedly, for quite a while now, detailed several things that miners could have done, before the barge/exhumer buff, to protect themselves, which were effective, some of which having a practically 100% success rate of avoiding ganks if the miner was at all paying attention.
Miners still die by the dozens every day. So yeah, there's an awful lot of stupid people out there.

Matriarch Prime wrote:
Maybe that tank that was their magic pill in your book really was just placebo. Because if the first gank failed, the ganker could just bring more ships and likely had them on hand. Like I said, both parties were using optimal strategies, and one was getting curb stomped.

The tank is a placebo. No ganker is going to put up the effort of ganking somebody with a tank. The point is not to survive a gank attempt, because if they really want to gank you they can no matter how much tank you have. You could be mining in a Damnation with T2 1600mm plates, Corpum A-type energized membranes, T2 trimarks, a full slave set, and an off grid Legion booster, and someone would figure out how to gank your 800k EHP mining ship if they really, really wanted to. They might even make a profit off your T2 salvage and A-types, if they dropped.

The entire point is that when you significantly reduce the profitability of ganking, you significantly reduce any incentive to gank in the first place. The end result is that miners are safer because of nothing at all that they did, but an action by CCP on part of a group who did absolutely nothing to protect themselves.

People tanked their exhumers before the patch, and I'd invite you to show me a killmail of an exhumer that fitted an actual tank and was ganked. You won't be able to, because gankers see the tank and move on to easier targets. Their optimization includes looking for targets that are stupid. The mining barge EHP buff is a buff to stupidity and nothing more. A PROPER buff would have been the addition of CPU and PG to allow fitting of more shield extenders and invuln fields, but CCP seems to have recognized that even that enormous handout wouldn't have led many of you to take measures to protect yourselves.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

EglantinFinfleur
Ecpyrosis
#700 - 2012-10-08 02:03:28 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:

If miners had fitted a tank and done a few minor behavioral modifications, this "epidemic" wouldn't have gone on for as long as it did, and it wouldn't have gotten as bad as it did. They were being horrible sheep just standing around, staring dumbfoundedly at you as they got ganked, while the rest of the world was telling them what to do to fix it.


If a certain category of gamers, which is however a minority, albeit very vocal and very active, had any sense of common decency and played video games so that everyone, including their opponents, has at least some modicum of fun, instead of using said videogames as Schadenfreude generators (i.e. annoy some random dude across the internet, gank and grief him until he ragequits), then

- Ultima Online would never have been trammelized
- MMORPGs wouldn't have developed into a PvE/PvP server dichotomy
- No virtual universe in which combat can take place would need to hardcode PvP limitations
- There would be absolutely no need for CONCORD in New Eden, players would roleplay and enforce space justice themselves

Lolrandum ganking and online sociopathic griefing (however condoned/coddled by the rules), the aims of which are to revel in the grief caused (You mad? you ragequit? you unsubscribe?), have effectively killed any hope of having true sandbox games with absolute freedom.

It would take a company taking a hard stance against this category of gamers, such as permabanning them, to enable absolute sandbox games.


Enjoy your trammelized highsec! You brought it upon yourself : )