These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Buff Ganking--Nevermind, Nerfed Again

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#581 - 2012-10-07 13:28:24 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Yes tell me how much at Jita market average prices those catalyst cost: 1.4M
But you actually over estimate and have far too much adoration for your so beloved market economy you're about to tell me the dow jones is going up because gallente might get a buff, right?


My dear fellow posters, take this post as a warning: Whoever supports Jorma ends up becoming stuck in a loop of non-sensical posting.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#582 - 2012-10-07 13:29:17 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Yes tell me how much at Jita market average prices those catalyst cost: 1.4M
But you actually over estimate and have far too much adoration for your so beloved market economy you're about to tell me the dow jones is going up because gallente might get a buff, right?

Jorma Morkkis claimed he had 1000 catalysts in amarr at 200k. Buildcost is closer to 1.2m. What's the problem you have with Pipa's argument?


My shït-o-meter just started to get really hot at that point. But you fail to understand the background.

brb
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#583 - 2012-10-07 13:29:32 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
"Shoot something that can shoot back" is a terrible ebushido argument. Ebushido has been selected against without any CCP intervention. So I gues for you pubbies that sill don't get it your ~honorable pvp~ arguments are stupid and bad.


I remember there was once this alliance that was big on e-bushido, but they seem to have been wiped out Lol

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
Pipa Porto
#584 - 2012-10-07 13:30:13 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:


Which one of those cost 200k ISK? That's what that train of discussion is talking about.

Coming to Jorma's defense is never a good idea. Mainly because he lies about the dumbest things, and when caught in those lies, he doubles down on them instead of coming clean.



Yes tell me how much at Jita market average prices those catalyst cost: 1.4M
But you actually over estimate and have far too much adoration for your so beloved market economy you're about to tell me the dow jones is going up because gallente might get a buff, right?


What are you talking about now?

Here's what's going on.
Jorma Morkkis claimed that Destroyers cost 200k ISK (he implied that that included fittings, but eh).
When he was called on that claim being bull, he claimed to have put 1000 Catalysts on the market in Amarr for 200k ISK.
Market Data from CCP indicates that that was a lie.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#585 - 2012-10-07 13:31:25 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Yes tell me how much at Jita market average prices those catalyst cost: 1.4M
But you actually over estimate and have far too much adoration for your so beloved market economy you're about to tell me the dow jones is going up because gallente might get a buff, right?


My dear fellow posters, take this post as a warning: Whoever supports Jorma ends up becoming stuck in a loop of non-sensical posting.



You win the price Lol This thread badly started is getting really interesting now. Thx Lol

brb
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#586 - 2012-10-07 13:32:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
Pipa Porto wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
First, Battleclinic
Second, what are you on about now? You claimed people in this thread weren't fighting people who could shoot back.


How you can shoot if you have all your modules in cargohold?


Battleclinic: There's a reason nobody uses them for killmails.

Here's what that kill looks like on a Big Boy killboard.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14779632


Why do you insist on lying about the dumbest things?


Are you saying Battleclinic modifies killmails? That's a different killmail.

Hint: compare original killmails.
ISD TYPE40
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#587 - 2012-10-07 13:33:53 UTC
Well, this thread has certainly been interesting. I would like to remind some people that personal insults are not welcome, all they do is mess up a perfectly good discussion. So keep those to yourself and lets see how far this topic goes Big smile

[b]ISD Type40 Lt. Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department[/b]
Pipa Porto
#588 - 2012-10-07 13:37:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
First, Battleclinic
Second, what are you on about now? You claimed people in this thread weren't fighting people who could shoot back.


How you can shoot if you have all your modules in cargohold?


Battleclinic: There's a reason nobody uses them for killmails.

Here's what that kill looks like on a Big Boy killboard.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14779632


Why do you insist on lying about the dumbest things?


Are you saying Battleclinic modifies killmails? That's a different killmail.

Hint: compare original killmails.


I'm saying that Battleclinic is terrible at being a killboard.

Same Date, Same Time, Same System, Same Victim, Same number of people involved, Same Damage Taken, same Kill.

Why do you keep doubling down on your lies?

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto
Weiland Taur
The Icarus Expedition
Solyaris Chtonium
#589 - 2012-10-07 13:37:57 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Weiland Taur wrote:


Is there any proof that gankers made any impact on the number of bots or simply drove them to null and the backwaters of the major powers there? Most of the miners that I know who have been ganked aren't bots and if it's bots we are against then thats a programming issue with CCP. The "we're saving them by killing them," argument gets old really fast.


You mean aside from the fact that for 8 months the high sec ice belts were almost empty aside from a few well tanked macks and hulks?


I am not sure this proves that bots were destroyed. I know plenty of regular miners that just gave up and wandered away to do other stuff during that period. But even if you are correct which you may very well be, it only proves they stopped mining there. This was one of the activities that finally helped push me to null sec. Not the ganking, but having to listen to the nonsense that they elicit from angry miners in local. I would also argue that the interdiction did not operate so much as a ganking operation but as a full scale wardec against a particular aspect of highsec in order to manipulate the market and thus is not so applicable here. I could be wrong.
Weiland Taur
The Icarus Expedition
Solyaris Chtonium
#590 - 2012-10-07 13:38:31 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
"Shoot something that can shoot back" is a terrible ebushido argument. Ebushido has been selected against without any CCP intervention. So I gues for you pubbies that sill don't get it your ~honorable pvp~ arguments are stupid and bad.


I remember there was once this alliance that was big on e-bushido, but they seem to have been wiped out Lol


Who was that?
Pipa Porto
#591 - 2012-10-07 13:39:11 UTC
Weiland Taur wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
"Shoot something that can shoot back" is a terrible ebushido argument. Ebushido has been selected against without any CCP intervention. So I gues for you pubbies that sill don't get it your ~honorable pvp~ arguments are stupid and bad.


I remember there was once this alliance that was big on e-bushido, but they seem to have been wiped out Lol


Who was that?


He's talking about BOB.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#592 - 2012-10-07 13:40:49 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
I'm saying that Battleclinic is terrible at being a killboard.

Same Date, Same Time, Same System, Same Victim, Same number of people involved, Same Damage Taken, same Kill.

Why do you keep doubling down on your lies?


Did you compare original killmails?
Weiland Taur
The Icarus Expedition
Solyaris Chtonium
#593 - 2012-10-07 13:41:29 UTC

And it seems I will be taking e-bushido out of my plan to form the ultimate alliance to conquer all of nullsec...
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#594 - 2012-10-07 13:41:54 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Yes please, show us all your bot-o-meter detector and prove your words because right now my shït-o-meter while exploring your post is exploding.

Warp to any hisec ice belt, and you can safely assume that a large majority of them are bots. Especially the ones which keep warping their pod back and forth to the ice belt after they get ganked.

Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
My shït-o-meter just started to get really hot at that point. But you fail to understand the background.

Actually, no, I didn't. You apparently did, though.

Weiland Taur wrote:
This was one of the activities that finally helped push me to null sec. Not the ganking, but having to listen to the nonsense that they elicit from angry miners in local.

Huh. Guess we should be holding more ice interdictions, if we manage to release even one pubbie from hisec-dom. Op success.

Weiland Taur wrote:
I would also argue that the interdiction did not operate so much as a ganking operation but as a full scale wardec against a particular aspect of highsec in order to manipulate the market and thus is not so applicable here. I could be wrong.

Buy this man a beer, he actually seems to understand what it was.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#595 - 2012-10-07 13:42:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Mallak Azaria
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
I'm saying that Battleclinic is terrible at being a killboard.

Same Date, Same Time, Same System, Same Victim, Same number of people involved, Same Damage Taken, same Kill.

Why do you keep doubling down on your lies?


Did you compare original killmails?


You seem to have missed the part where they're api verified. The only difference between them is battleclinic has been having some issues with killmails lately.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#596 - 2012-10-07 13:43:43 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
You seem to have missed the part where they're api verified. the only difference between them in battleclinic has been having some issues with killmails lately.


I thought EVE-kill had HW problems...
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#597 - 2012-10-07 13:44:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Zim
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
I'm saying that Battleclinic is terrible at being a killboard.

Same Date, Same Time, Same System, Same Victim, Same number of people involved, Same Damage Taken, same Kill.

Why do you keep doubling down on your lies?


Did you compare original killmails?

Wait, wait, hold on. Are you saying that CCP's killmail generator has bugs?! Or that battleclinic's killmail slurper is buggy?!

SAY IT ISN'T SO!

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#598 - 2012-10-07 13:44:51 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
You seem to have missed the part where they're api verified. the only difference between them in battleclinic has been having some issues with killmails lately.


I thought EVE-kill had HW problems...


Where did I mention anything about hardware problems?

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#599 - 2012-10-07 13:50:02 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
So much nonsense


You "assume" too much. You take your assumptions for facts and post accordingly, you're actually making of yourself the pro boot finder and I'd strongly recommend you to get Shreegs place if you really think you're so much better.

For the meanwhile, and for players like me (seems we're a lot thinking it) you're arguing around false facts witch makes you post so much nonsense.

Again, since your assumptions are so true post here those players nicks botting and accuse them openly like a men does, assuming his sayings. Otherwise please stop posting.

brb
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#600 - 2012-10-07 13:56:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Zim
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
So much nonsense


You "assume" too much. You take your assumptions for facts and post accordingly, you're actually making of yourself the pro boot finder and I'd strongly recommend you to get Shreegs place if you really think you're so much better.

For the meanwhile, and for players like me (seems we're a lot thinking it) you're arguing around false facts witch makes you post so much nonsense.

Again, since your assumptions are so true post here those players nicks botting and accuse them openly like a men does, assuming his sayings.

Ah, the age-old "you're just spouting nonsense, CCP are technically competent and have removed absolutely all bots from hisec" refrain. It was spouted prior to the ice interdiction, it was spouted while pods kept warping back and forth between station and ice belt, and it seems to be spouted even now.

How times don't change.

Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Otherwise please stop posting.

Nope.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat