These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Buff Ganking--Nevermind, Nerfed Again

First post First post
Author
xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers
#361 - 2012-10-06 09:50:57 UTC  |  Edited by: xxxTRUSTxxx
Sarah Schneider wrote:

Eve is a sandbox MMO it is Eve's core concept and it's base game design.


sandbox is a bad name for a universe controlled by rules.

Sarah Schneider wrote:

Sandbox means everyone can do whatever they want.


you cannot do whatever you want, you can only do whatever is within the creators rule set.

Sarah Schneider wrote:

Everyone can do whatever means you can do your own thing, build your own sandcastle or just hang around and do nothing.


again within the creators rule set.

Sarah Schneider wrote:

The thing is, being able to do whatever we want also means anyone can also bug you around, kick your sandcastle or shove them in your face.


the thing is as long as doing these things are within the creators rules all is ok, but you CAN'T do whatever you want (EVE is not a real sandbox)


Sarah Schneider wrote:

You are the one who's FORCING people to stop doing "whatever they want" not the OP.


i'm sorry but again rules be rules, we are all restricted by the creators rule set in this universe. OP can whine all he wants, everyone else in this thread can whine all they want. play the ******* game and get on with it, i'm sure you'll find a new way to **** **** up. the fact that this whine thread was created by an alt says it all. Roll anyone wanna take a guess at which corp/alliance owns the alt. Roll
Beat General
Doomheim
#362 - 2012-10-06 10:09:28 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Beat General wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:

Can be grinded back


So can the stuff of the guy who got ganked.

Whats your point?


There's a difference between "kill BS rat and get enough money to buy Catalyst and mods" and "grind L4s for a week and buy new exhumer".


Suicide ganking = 100% chance of sec loss and ship loss.

Mining not so much.

Also killing one BS rat won't get your sec status back up. Have you ever actually grinded sec before?

All the miners really gotta do is not mine ~2 jumps away from Jita.
ToFastToYou
Bugged Overview
#363 - 2012-10-06 10:34:03 UTC  |  Edited by: ToFastToYou
Another therad caled ( im noob i cant pvp) please give me easy target, i dont like low sec, i dont like null space, i dont like ward dec :( i love easy kamikaze, i fell as badass while kiling poor victims with no tank modules at last it must be a pve fit, because while somone web and disput my ship i got weet pants, also no offence just a definition of people like you.

Sorry OP but you fail.

EvE online status few years ago.

Mission runers were on missions.
Miners on asteroid belts.
Pirates were in low sec.
Other who love pvp were in 0.0.
No obsesion and hate about miners-mining.
Everyone feel more happy than these days.
Sarah Schneider
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#364 - 2012-10-06 10:38:49 UTC
xxxTRUSTxxx wrote:
i'm sorry but again rules be rules, we are all restricted by the creators rule set in this universe. OP can whine all he wants, everyone else in this thread can whine all they want. play the ******* game and get on with it, i'm sure you'll find a new way to **** **** up. the fact that this whine thread was created by an alt says it all. Roll anyone wanna take a guess at which corp/alliance owns the alt. Roll

We all "live" and play in a virtual world with constraints put in place by CCP, sandbox is a theme, a concept in which the game, this game is based upon. Just like a car, I can ride it however I want it to, but of course that doesn't mean I can disregard traffic or local authority and rules, much less the rules of physics. You can do anything you want in Eve as long as it's something both within the constraints made up by CCP (eg. EULA or other form of rules put in place) and the game mechanics itself; that is the base concept, the thing CCP advertised to their customers and the thing they (said) the game is all about. You're missing the context of what I and people were talking about.

"I'd rather have other players get shot by other players than not interacting with others" -CCP Soundwave

Pipa Porto
#365 - 2012-10-06 10:41:14 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
We did.


No you didn't. Only thing you were interested was is it still profitable to gank tanked Hulks.


Quote and Link, or stop lying.

Quote:
Beat General wrote:
sec loss

Can be grinded back to 0 or above in few days. And in next expansion with tags.


A barge can be ground back in much less time than Sec status via ratting.

Quote:
200k isk destroyer hull...


Show me the 200k ISK destroyer that can solo an Exhumer of any flavor or stop lying.

Hell, show me a Destroyer that costs 200k ISK.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Amber Coldheart
Doomheim
#366 - 2012-10-06 12:10:52 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:

A barge can be ground back in much less time than Sec status via ratting.

Quite a lot of the ganking is done with disposable alts (at least in the past, i've recently returned to the game and as such, are a tad rusty on the various mechanics)... train a character for a week or two in the relevant skills, gank until his sec status gets too low, recycle the alt and make a new one...

Yes, i know that its "against CCP rules" (at least i think it is), but somehow i dont imagine that'll stop too many people..

But all that aside, on the spesific "barge can be ground back faster than standing", that rather depends on a lot of things, doesnt it ? If its a solo player, you can just forget about that. Even if he has an alt, i'd say its doubtful.

If he has 3+ characters that are dedicated to mining, then yes, it'll be a nuisance rather than a problem to mine back 250'ish million ISK. for new ship and fitting .
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#367 - 2012-10-06 12:27:34 UTC
Amber Coldheart wrote:

Quite a lot of the ganking is done with disposable alts (at least in the past, i've recently returned to the game and as such, are a tad rusty on the various mechanics)... train a character for a week or two in the relevant skills, gank until his sec status gets too low, recycle the alt and make a new one...

Yes, i know that its "against CCP rules" (at least i think it is), but somehow i dont imagine that'll stop too many people..



We have never recycled alts or broken any other rules or used exploits.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#368 - 2012-10-06 12:28:33 UTC
ToFastToYou wrote:
Another therad caled ( im noob i cant pvp) please give me easy target, i dont like low sec, i dont like null space, i dont like ward dec :( i love easy kamikaze, i fell as badass while kiling poor victims with no tank modules at last it must be a pve fit, because while somone web and disput my ship i got weet pants, also no offence just a definition of people like you.

Sorry OP but you fail.

EvE online status few years ago.

Mission runers were on missions.
Miners on asteroid belts.
Pirates were in low sec.
Other who love pvp were in 0.0.
No obsesion and hate about miners-mining.
Everyone feel more happy than these days.


Look up what M0o did back in the day.
Gun Gal
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#369 - 2012-10-06 13:41:29 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
ToFastToYou wrote:
Another therad caled ( im noob i cant pvp) please give me easy target, i dont like low sec, i dont like null space, i dont like ward dec :( i love easy kamikaze, i fell as badass while kiling poor victims with no tank modules at last it must be a pve fit, because while somone web and disput my ship i got weet pants, also no offence just a definition of people like you.

Sorry OP but you fail.

EvE online status few years ago.

Mission runers were on missions.
Miners on asteroid belts.
Pirates were in low sec.
Other who love pvp were in 0.0.
No obsesion and hate about miners-mining.
Everyone feel more happy than these days.


Look up what M0o did back in the day.


Why bother I was there.
Smartass response, but there was hardly any content or people in the game
Heck, there wasn't even battleships at the beginning, moo was one of the first to use em in coordinated combat.

Missions? Lol thunk there was something there, but hardly worth the name
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#370 - 2012-10-06 15:28:17 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
admiral root wrote:
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:
Go to any mining facility in any stable first world country. The ONLY risk those miners have is from potential accidents on the Job site. Sure a criminal can walk up and shoot any one of those miners in the face. But not without consequence, it just does not happen.


In Eve, however, it does just happen and anyone who's been playing more than 5 minutes knows this. Miners in possession of this knowledge who fail to act appropriately deserve everything they get from gankers.

and i didn't see any good reasons to have this broken mechanic in first placeCool


Gentlemen, we all have to live with that possibility every single day no matter which country you are from. Senseless or motivated it makes little difference, lethal or excessive violence happens in every city on Earth every single day.

Do you people even watch the news, or are you too busy playing EVE?

Now when you throw into the mix that in EVE:

A: There is a multi national law enforcement branch in this universe that serves as judge jury and executioner... and the punishment form most crimes is unavoidable instant death.

B: The more fortunate members of this society have the advantage of clone tech that makes them immune to death, but not to financial loss.

It's difficult to stop crime perpetrated by the elite as your primary form of punishment is ineffective against them, only financial loss has any noticeable effect.

The criminal elite know this, Concord knows this, and frankly so do the miners... especially since they fall into the same elite class that is immune to death.

There is no logical reason why if a miner fears financial loss they would not take simple precautions to guard himself from that... unless they are so simple minded as to sit back staring blankly at their mining lasers and ignore the realities of the society that surrounds them.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#371 - 2012-10-06 15:30:21 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
Hell, show me a Destroyer that costs 200k ISK.


Go check Amarr.

I have there 1000 Catalysts for 200k each.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#372 - 2012-10-06 16:12:36 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Hell, show me a Destroyer that costs 200k ISK.


Go check Amarr.

I have there 1000 Catalysts for 200k each.

So you are selling them at five times below build cost?
Ziranda Hakuli
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#373 - 2012-10-06 16:24:45 UTC
John Ratcliffe wrote:
captain foivos wrote:
Retribution is all about balancing ships and what not, so why not balance out ganking a bit while you're at it? Over the last eight years, ganking has been nerfed nearly into the ground, with only a few select groups of highly skilled, well funded individuals continuing to separate stupid highsec mongoloids from their precious shiny things. Why not buff immoral activity for a change? Reward smart people for taking basic precautions against dying and loss, like not traveling around with billions in their hold, not clicking on the contracts in Jita local, and not traveling the Rancer Pipe with hundreds of PLEX in the cargo bay.

Ganking keeps getting hit with more and more nerfs: pretty soon there won't be that "cold harsh universe" left that CCP keeps going on about in their promos. EVE belongs to the violent, the venal, and the brilliant. Buff ganking. Nerf dumb people.


Stupid OP is stupid.

The only way I would agree with this is if Hi-Sec was made completely 100% safe. No ganking, no griefing, no spamming, no scamming - nothing. Let Null & Low-Sec be the Wild West.

Care Bears should be able to mission away to their little hearts are content in completely safety, free from the actions of dicks that just want to f*ck them over.

so i been thinking long an hard on this thread. no need to feint i know how to use my brain unlike many here. The reason i can see why the op is being butt hurt on this is he is a bully.the point of the matter many folks do not like this it is empire space where many of their enemies hide out in sites AFK with a drone boat domi all day while they are at work. There is a solution. its called a WARDEC! omg! but i know what you are thinking you may have missed the DEV Blog on the AI where they are making improvements which will screw with the folks that sit in a site all day long making iskies but with the new AI tweaking they could come back to a shiny pod

Basicly the 0.0 space is the lawless West
Low Sec is kinda like the old New York City Gang land
Empire space is where you find Homeland security carry a baby cooing and giggling at it.

and now you want to hurt someone's money maker. gank them and get powned or wardec and watch them hide or fight.

I think my question is "why you crying? is their sand in your taco?"
Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#374 - 2012-10-06 17:07:38 UTC
Ziranda Hakuli wrote:
John Ratcliffe wrote:
captain foivos wrote:
Retribution is all about balancing ships and what not, so why not balance out ganking a bit while you're at it? Over the last eight years, ganking has been nerfed nearly into the ground, with only a few select groups of highly skilled, well funded individuals continuing to separate stupid highsec mongoloids from their precious shiny things. Why not buff immoral activity for a change? Reward smart people for taking basic precautions against dying and loss, like not traveling around with billions in their hold, not clicking on the contracts in Jita local, and not traveling the Rancer Pipe with hundreds of PLEX in the cargo bay.

Ganking keeps getting hit with more and more nerfs: pretty soon there won't be that "cold harsh universe" left that CCP keeps going on about in their promos. EVE belongs to the violent, the venal, and the brilliant. Buff ganking. Nerf dumb people.


Stupid OP is stupid.

The only way I would agree with this is if Hi-Sec was made completely 100% safe. No ganking, no griefing, no spamming, no scamming - nothing. Let Null & Low-Sec be the Wild West.

Care Bears should be able to mission away to their little hearts are content in completely safety, free from the actions of dicks that just want to f*ck them over.

so i been thinking long an hard on this thread. no need to feint i know how to use my brain unlike many here. The reason i can see why the op is being butt hurt on this is he is a bully.the point of the matter many folks do not like this it is empire space where many of their enemies hide out in sites AFK with a drone boat domi all day while they are at work. There is a solution. its called a WARDEC! omg! but i know what you are thinking you may have missed the DEV Blog on the AI where they are making improvements which will screw with the folks that sit in a site all day long making iskies but with the new AI tweaking they could come back to a shiny pod

Basicly the 0.0 space is the lawless West
Low Sec is kinda like the old New York City Gang land
Empire space is where you find Homeland security carry a baby cooing and giggling at it.

and now you want to hurt someone's money maker. gank them and get powned or wardec and watch them hide or fight.

I think my question is "why you crying? is their sand in your taco?"

I think this is a tactic that gankers were recently forced to learn from miners, another group who seem to want to profit from activating modules on things that don't shoot back - except at least gankers were willing to take a ship loss.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#375 - 2012-10-06 17:46:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
Darth Gustav wrote:
I think this is a tactic that gankers were recently forced to learn from miners, another group who seem to want to profit from activating modules on things that don't shoot back - except at least gankers were willing to take a ship loss.


Do you want to try your theory? Maybe we can arrange something for you.

Just keep in mind the fact that untanked Catalysts don't last long under direct fire from Nado's 800s.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#376 - 2012-10-06 18:24:42 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
I think this is a tactic that gankers were recently forced to learn from miners, another group who seem to want to profit from activating modules on things that don't shoot back - except at least gankers were willing to take a ship loss.


Do you want to try your theory? Maybe we can arrange something for you.

Just keep in mind the fact that untanked Catalysts don't last long under direct fire from Nado's 800s.

They don't last very long against CONCORD death ray either.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#377 - 2012-10-06 18:44:07 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
They don't last very long against CONCORD death ray either.


20-30 seconds. ~4 seconds against 800s.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#378 - 2012-10-06 19:05:29 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
They don't last very long against CONCORD death ray either.


20-30 seconds. ~4 seconds against 800s.

There you go. Yet another gank prevention technique. And we didn't even have to tell you how to do it.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Vanyr Andrard
VacuumTube
#379 - 2012-10-06 19:20:27 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Hell, show me a Destroyer that costs 200k ISK.


Go check Amarr.

I have there 1000 Catalysts for 200k each.




No catalysts were sold today at 200k each in amarr according to the market history, and none are currently up anywhere under 1m each. If you're going to lie, tell a more interesting one.
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#380 - 2012-10-06 21:11:22 UTC
baltec1 wrote:

Touval Lysander wrote:
So Goon, *I* didn't cause anything. You did.

You only screwed over every miner out there to a greater degree than goons could ever have managed.


So you're STILL claiming you were all being valiant and courageous by killing miners to help miners. Kinda sad really.

But, oh noes, wait, you're NOW convinced that because miners metagamed a change to stop the killing, they screwed up there own game.

So they transformed from what? Constant death/harassment AND pathetic prices to good prices and miner deaths down bigtime.

And that's BAD for miners? How so? baltec, seriously man, even IF prices drop, MinerMan still safer than ever before. Prices will simply be where they were originally so no change.


I think you guys need to fess up that you messed up.

1) You misunderstood how markets really work.
2) You misunderstood that metgaming is not the sole domain of a Goon.
3) You misunderstood CCP's reaction.

You were told, you were warned. You persisted. You lost.

HTFU and stop crying in your warm milk, it's embarrassing.

If miners can claim victory for the buff, then they should rejoice. If YOU are not comfortable with it, go gank ém again.

And hey, hey, before you get angry with me - ask WHY CCP made the buff... It'll go some-way towards understanding what you obviously never understood.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."