These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Buff Ganking--Nevermind, Nerfed Again

First post First post
Author
Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#101 - 2012-10-03 08:31:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
TharOkha wrote:
Nothing more than cry for easy targets, Big smile Lol, do you know that you can still gank? But instead of cheap catalyst you need to fit more expensive (but still relative cheap) Talos or Tornado. And crimewatch? You comit a crime, you will be hunted. No more risk-free ganking. Bounty office will finaly have a purpose. Not as nowadays as ego advertising service.

This is nothing more than an argument for AFK resource gathering in total safety. Roll

This is tedious. You talk about easy targets?

Yeah I bet rocks put up a good fight there. +1.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Pipa Porto
#102 - 2012-10-03 08:50:35 UTC
Alexila Quant wrote:


You contradicted yourself in your first two sentences lol.

>>'If they choose not to fit a tank then they made it possible to gank them'
>>'if they take precautions they are no safer than one who doesn't take precautions'
Ipso facto why fit a tank?
Paraphrasing of course, but it's all there.


You're making my point for me.

Two different time periods. Before the mining ship buff, the only way a Hulk could be profitably ganked was if it did not fit a proper tank. I.E. The people who took precautions (and paid for them in yield/cargo or effort) didn't get ganked. Fitting a proper tank served a purpose (you didn't get ganked).


Now that the mining ship buff has hit, the Mackinaw can't be profitably ganked regardless of its use of its lowslots. I.E. Nobody gets ganked, so the people who would take precautions don't derive any benefit over those who would not. So, why fit a proper tank?

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Pipa Porto
#103 - 2012-10-03 08:58:15 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:

Look, MINERMAN could have MINED in safety pre-buff by MINING aligned or with a tank or in low or in null or with friends. Roll

Not going to go down this road.

For point friend, when you tell MinerMan that, you cut into HIS profits and he had to swallow the bad-pill while you had a risk-free, PROFITABLE venture.

I can understand your angst, but really, we're just seeing exact same from the OTHER SIDE of the coin.


Ganking was only profitable if the Miner chose not to take precautions against it.

As for Risk-Free, you do realize that as soon as you go GCC, anyone can shoot you. Miners had every opportunity to set up effective defense fleets. The fact that they didn't is irrelevant because they could have.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#104 - 2012-10-03 08:59:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
Pipa Porto wrote:
Alexila Quant wrote:


You contradicted yourself in your first two sentences lol.

>>'If they choose not to fit a tank then they made it possible to gank them'
>>'if they take precautions they are no safer than one who doesn't take precautions'
Ipso facto why fit a tank?
Paraphrasing of course, but it's all there.


You're making my point for me.

Two different time periods. Before the mining ship buff, the only way a Hulk could be profitably ganked was if it did not fit a proper tank. I.E. The people who took precautions (and paid for them in yield/cargo or effort) didn't get ganked. Fitting a proper tank served a purpose (you didn't get ganked).


Now that the mining ship buff has hit, the Mackinaw can't be profitably ganked regardless of its use of its lowslots. I.E. Nobody gets ganked, so the people who would take precautions don't derive any benefit over those who would not. So, why fit a proper tank?

Similarly, miners continue to enjoy the option of being able to mine aligned and warping out at the first sign of trouble.

What changed are the options available to gankers due to the built-in tank of the new Exhumers. There aren't any efficient options.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#105 - 2012-10-03 09:39:07 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:

You want your easy kills back and hide it under the guise of making profit. CCP gave the gankers a very nice run with a ship line customized for ganking: the Tier 3 Battlecruisers. Many of you "profited" during this period before the hammer came down because someone figured out an exploit to get max kills in a short period of time. Congrats to that person. Now you're back to having to work for the kills, but you complain. No Easy Button. So some few have figured out that if you get large gangs together, do some REAL intelligence work, and hit freighters, you can make a profit. Serious props there for doing something REAL. But that's too much work for those that choose to "profit" on easy kills in mining belts.

It's not about profit, so give me a break. It's about easy kills for a variety of reasons I leave you to think about. You want profit, but insist on easy kills? Go wardec some mining corps. Or join James666 or whatever in his 'leet mindset of bumping miners to brag about making money from them.

Edit: used "ban" up there when no ban happened (that I know of)


It was Bat Country who came up with the destroyer ganking of poorly fitted miners and its was us again who came up with the current Freighter gank. It has never been about easy kills just easy money for us and no exploit has ever been used.

If I was only in this for easy kills why the hell am I supporting the Skiff, an anti gank boat?

For the love of god you super carebears need to read more and rage less when talking about gankers. It was us that got you great ice prices and it was us that killed off most of the mining bots in caldari high sec. I have spent months giving you people fits to survive ganks, I have told you time and time again we are only in it for the isk and that you can stop us simply by tanking your ships.

The Mack needs a nerf to its tank, its simply too good and is taking away to roles of the other barges in the same way the Hulk used to.
TharOkha
0asis Group
#106 - 2012-10-03 09:55:33 UTC  |  Edited by: TharOkha
(please delete this double post)
TharOkha
0asis Group
#107 - 2012-10-03 10:06:59 UTC  |  Edited by: TharOkha
Darth Gustav wrote:

What changed are the options available to gankers due to the built-in tank of the new Exhumers.


Build-in tank? What advantage do they have againist any other ships out there? They have similiar basic HP as any other T1 cruiser/Tier3 BC and T2 versions have same resist bonuses as any other selected T2 ganking ship.


Quote:
There aren't any efficient options


Yes they are. There are still dumb miners out there who fits expensive modules and no tank. One cheap fitted Talos will make shreds from them. Problem with pre-patch was that even ordinary T2 fitted barge was profitable for low cost catalyst ganker (and yes, even if you fitted tank on it). So do your homework and fit one ship scaner and search for your piniata.

No more "random target" on icebelt and profit. Now its "search for your target" and profit.
TharOkha
0asis Group
#108 - 2012-10-03 10:16:38 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
The Mack needs a nerf to its tank.


The mack needs yeld nerf (or buff to hulk yeld), not the tank nerf.
Pipa Porto
#109 - 2012-10-03 10:19:27 UTC
TharOkha wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:

What changed are the options available to gankers due to the built-in tank of the new Exhumers.


Build-in tank? What advantage do they have againist any other ships out there? They have similiar basic HP as any other T1 cruiser/Tier3 BC and T2 versions have same resist bonuses as any other selected T2 ganking ship.


Hahah, no.

A Mackinaw has at least 1k more base EHP than any HAC.
A Mackinaw has something like 5k more base EHP than any Recon.
A Mackinaw has about 1k more base EHP than any HIC.
A Mackinaw has about 4k more base EHP than any Logi.

That's not similar.

Quote:
Yes they are. There are still dumb miners out there who fits expensive modules and no tank. One cheap fitted Talos will make shreds from them. Problem with pre-patch was that even ordinary T2 fitted barge was profitable for low cost catalyst ganker. So do your homework and fit one ship scaner and search for your piniata.

No more "random target" on icebelt and profit. Now its "search for your target" and profit.


Nope. A Hulk tanked with simple T2/Meta mods could not be profitably ganked pre-buff.

What significant risk do miners who don't take any significant precautions against suicide ganks currently run? Looking at the numbers of 3x ILU Mackinaws AFK in the Ice belts...

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Pipa Porto
#110 - 2012-10-03 10:24:04 UTC
TharOkha wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
The Mack needs a nerf to its tank.


The mack needs yeld nerf (or buff to hulk yeld), not the tank nerf.


How will that make the Skiff worthwhile?

The Mack needs a Tank Nerf, the Skiff needs a Cargo Nerf, and The Hulk needs it's tank reverted to pre-buff (why did the Hulk get a Tank buff, anyway?).

You want to avoid the need for hauling? You should pay attention to stay safe (and mine less than the maximum).
You want to be safe without effort? You should need hauling support (and mine less than the maximum).
You want to mine the best ore/hr? You should need to do both.

Right now, the Mackinaw provides one and two. Changing its yield won't change that.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Keno Skir
#111 - 2012-10-03 10:27:02 UTC
I see nothing about you on any killboards OP. You are therefor a silly hisecer like you make fun of in your post or you are a forum alt, equally worthless.

Nerf forum alts and original posters who make no sense.
pussnheels
Viziam
#112 - 2012-10-03 10:34:48 UTC
captain foivos wrote:
Retribution is all about balancing ships and what not, so why not balance out ganking a bit while you're at it? Over the last eight years, ganking has been nerfed nearly into the ground, with only a few select groups of highly skilled, well funded individuals continuing to separate stupid highsec mongoloids from their precious shiny things. Why not buff immoral activity for a change? Reward smart people for taking basic precautions against dying and loss, like not traveling around with billions in their hold, not clicking on the contracts in Jita local, and not traveling the Rancer Pipe with hundreds of PLEX in the cargo bay.

Ganking keeps getting hit with more and more nerfs: pretty soon there won't be that "cold harsh universe" left that CCP keeps going on about in their promos. EVE belongs to the violent, the venal, and the brilliant. Buff ganking. Nerf dumb people.

you had the ultimate gank machine in the form of the tornado last winter so either stop whinning or learn how to put in some effort for your kills

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire

Pipa Porto
#113 - 2012-10-03 10:45:26 UTC
pussnheels wrote:
you had the ultimate gank machine in the form of the tornado last winter so either stop whinning or learn how to put in some effort for your kills


Crucible increased the cost of Suicide Ganking all around. Or did you decide to forget about the insurance nerf?

The Tornado is more expensive to use than the Maelstrom was pre-Crucible. The Catalyst is more expensive (in your choice of ISK or manpower) to use than the Thorax/Brutix was pre-Crucible.

The only reason the Tornado was a great Ganker was deemed an exploit (~5+ years after the "exploit" was discovered).

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#114 - 2012-10-03 11:04:02 UTC
TharOkha wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
The Mack needs a nerf to its tank.


The mack needs yeld nerf (or buff to hulk yeld), not the tank nerf.


The Macks tank invalidates the skiff.
TharOkha
0asis Group
#115 - 2012-10-03 11:25:59 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:

Hahah, no.

A Mackinaw has at least 1k more base EHP than any HAC.
A Mackinaw has something like 5k more base EHP than any Recon.
A Mackinaw has about 1k more base EHP than any HIC.
A Mackinaw has about 4k more base EHP than any Logi.

That's not similar.


T1
Retriever 9614HP
Maller 9137Hp

similar

T2
Mack 14.531 HP
Devoter or Sacrilege 13.310HP.

although 1k more HP but i think that 14 vs 13k is still similar.

Not to mention that those gank ships can fit large shield/armor extenders. (powergrid 43 vs 1000-1500 !!! - NOT SIMILAR AT ALL)

Quote:
Nope. A Hulk tanked with simple T2/Meta mods could not be profitably ganked pre-buff.


Wrong..... Also what about pre-patch macks?

Quote:
What significant risk do miners who don't take any significant precautions against suicide ganks currently run?
.

Same as pre-patch. They can be suicide ganked (but not with extremely cheap t1 hull).


Quote:
How will that make the Skiff worthwhile?

skiff lack its purpose. It should be ninja miner. Ability to fit covops cloak would do that. (at te expense of yeld of course). But this is just my opinion.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#116 - 2012-10-03 11:36:12 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
TharOkha wrote:

Quote:
Nope. A Hulk tanked with simple T2/Meta mods could not be profitably ganked pre-buff.


Wrong..... Also what about pre-patch macks?



No he is right. A 20k tank was all you needed and all 3 exhumers could easily get that as well as the covetor.

TharOkha wrote:


skiff lack its purpose. It should be ninja miner. Ability to fit covops cloak would do that. (at te expense of yeld of course). But this is just my opinion.


Its job is the tanky ship, a job taken by the Mack.
TharOkha
0asis Group
#117 - 2012-10-03 11:53:34 UTC
Quote:
Its job is the tanky ship, a job taken by the Mack

Mack is not tanky ship. It has standard HP as any other ship in his class in this game now. ( I know, i know... you miss cheap catalyst killmails).
Pipa Porto
#118 - 2012-10-03 12:17:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
TharOkha wrote:
Quote:
Its job is the tanky ship, a job taken by the Mack

Mack is not tanky ship. It has standard HP as any other ship in his class in this game now. ( I know, i know... you miss cheap catalyst killmails).


It has the most base EHP of any T2 Cruiser (besides the Skiff). That's not "Standard," that's "Best in Class." It can fit a bigger tank (with 2 MLUs) than many T2 Cruiser's standard Fittings. That's also not "Standard."

But none of that's relevant.

The Mack can, with 2 MLUs be fit to be absolutely unprofitable to gank (and unprofitable to gank by reasonable people with 3 MLUs), meaning that miners give up nothing when they use the Mackinaw over the Skiff.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

flakeys
Doomheim
#119 - 2012-10-03 12:18:51 UTC  |  Edited by: flakeys
captain foivos wrote:
Retribution is all about balancing ships and what not, so why not balance out ganking a bit while you're at it? Over the last eight years, ganking has been nerfed nearly into the ground, with only a few select groups of highly skilled, well funded individuals continuing to separate stupid highsec mongoloids from their precious shiny things.



Lol , yeah takes a LONG time to train an alt for tornado/talos for sure.Instead of ganking retrievers they're ganking freighters now ... yup ganking need s abuff Roll

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

Pipa Porto
#120 - 2012-10-03 12:24:11 UTC
flakeys wrote:
captain foivos wrote:
Retribution is all about balancing ships and what not, so why not balance out ganking a bit while you're at it? Over the last eight years, ganking has been nerfed nearly into the ground, with only a few select groups of highly skilled, well funded individuals continuing to separate stupid highsec mongoloids from their precious shiny things.



Lol , yeah takes a LONG time to train an alt for tornado/talos for sure.Instead of ganking retrievers they're ganking freighters now ... yup ganking need s abuff Roll


SP != Skill

What significant risk are HS miners exposed to now?

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto