These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Avatar Resculpting - Plex?

First post First post First post
Author
Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#161 - 2012-09-30 12:12:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Webvan
Pipa Porto wrote:



"things become cheaper."


Only this convo is becoming "cheaper". Resculpting is still not a "service" when the chair is now empty as support is no longer needed. Tech support is a service, you deal with a live person. Character renaming is a service, if the chair is again not empty due to support needing to intervene to make it work. Character transfers are a service if once again the chair in not empty so to finalize the process. Here, with sculpting/resculpting, the chair is empty. I don't tip parking meters, only a valet if there is one there to park my Harley. Tell me where in the process of resculpting does it take human intervention to make it work as it did before?


Morar Santee wrote:
utterly pointless

^^This
lol


Mara Rinn wrote:

These days, most cars are built by robots, not people.

On a side note, Big smile I used to do that, while I was working my way through collage in computer science. Well... not with cars, but with other things. I used to set those huge mech warriors up (same machines used at GM), program them and train employees (on two shifts) how to operate them... well to press the start button hehe. Yes, you could hit the start button and walk away 20 minutes, come back and hit the button again. Good time for homework Blink
Before the company had the machines (long ago), it took 10 people to do most of the work by hand, of what could be done w/o a machine. Robotics are cool!

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#162 - 2012-09-30 16:28:45 UTC
And again you try to redefine a service, this time as requiring human interaction. That hasn't been true for decades.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#163 - 2012-09-30 17:08:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Morar Santee wrote:
Okay, got it it bubba...... you managed to identify this procedure as a "service" for the sole reason that you have to pay for it.
No. I managed to identify it as a service because it is one. They're doing something for me that I would otherwise not be able to do on my own. It's a service that has been around for ages and their updating their methodology doesn't suddenly turn a service into a non-service.

It's the same service as always: a complete revamp of your appearance.

Quote:
You even made this funny freudian slip: "[...] it still is a service that requires you to flag your account". It's a service because it requires me to do something? Whoa, really now!?
No. It's a service because they're doing something for me that I would otherwise not be able to do on my own. The part you quoted (out of context) is a response to why the old one was a service: because it wasn't in-game. It still isn't. They're still doing something for you: they're giving you a resculpt. As with all services, you have to go and request it — it isn't something you can automatically do on your own. It's not a game mechanic, for instance, since nothing in the game lets you do a resculpt.

In short: nothing has changed. It was a service half a decade ago. It's a service today, for the exact same reasons.

Webvan wrote:
Tell me where in the process of resculpting does it take human intervention to make it work as it did before?
Human interaction is not a prerequisite for it being a service. In fact, an increasing amount of services these days are all about removing human interaction and this automation, on its own, is sometimes sold as its own service on top of the (probably just as automated) service that the poor obsolete human used to provide.
ISD TYPE40
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#164 - 2012-09-30 17:37:59 UTC
Just to try and calm this cyclical argument a little, here is how the term "Service" is defined with regards to IT services at the University of California: Santa Cruz.


Is it a Service?


Hopefully that clears a few things up - ISD Type40.

[b]ISD Type40 Lt. Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department[/b]

Pipa Porto
#165 - 2012-09-30 20:27:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
Webvan wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:



"things become cheaper."


Only this convo is becoming "cheaper". Resculpting is still not a "service" when the chair is now empty as support is no longer needed. Tech support is a service, you deal with a live person. Character renaming is a service, if the chair is again not empty due to support needing to intervene to make it work. Character transfers are a service if once again the chair in not empty so to finalize the process. Here, with sculpting/resculpting, the chair is empty. I don't tip parking meters, only a valet if there is one there to park my Harley. Tell me where in the process of resculpting does it take human intervention to make it work as it did before?


You still pay parking meters, don't you? You don't complain that it doesn't cost the city anything for you to park there because they don't have a parking attendant, do you?

A Resculpt used to cost some amount. It now costs less. You are complaining that a Resculpt's price was reduced. You are complaining that an ability not normally available to you (resculpting your face) is not free.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#166 - 2012-10-01 00:08:17 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:


You still pay parking meters, don't you? You don't complain that it doesn't cost the city anything for you to park there because they don't have a parking attendant, do you?.
You still pay for a sub, don't you? Or even in PLEX as it's still being payed for but just through barter on your part. I don't tip parking meters, no. But for a valet I pay for the parking space and tip the valet for his service. If it were just a meter, I pay the fee and that's it, I may even park across the street where it's free.

But we already pay for the service, that being able to access this game server. That is a service (in a business sense and IT sense - my minor was IT and I love servers). Buying the box is a license, you don't "own" the game, CCP does. You are granted permission to use the game client to access their service, and you pay for THAT service. Techy support is usually included in that service, though it is a separate service, and some games (EQ1 for example) would allow subscribers to pay a higher rate to access better support services than the one included as well as access to a special server (no longer available).

When swapping portraits needed human intervention, that was a service, just as tech support, pizza delivery, valet parking, clearly a business service job and not included in the initial pricing for goods. You are paying extra because it takes human intervention beyond what you can do yourself beyond the initial costs for the goods. Now, resculpting is automated within the code, it takes no human intervention beyond the service we already pay for to access the servers. It's no different than say pressing the undock button, same exact thing, it's in the code and take no human intervention beyond the general service of operating the server.

I think that the difficulty for most that don't understand the concept of business services is that f2p games abuse this horribly and has seemingly become the norm, becoming acceptable. So they nickle and dime you to get money out of you of which they wavered the initial service fee which would have covered the charge for goods and services. This is just a matter of bringing in extra revenue, not fulfilling an extra service. An easy avenue.

CCP could do better than this. Where it took human intervention to do this, but now not needed, those employees, they could be put to provide a new service, one at which CCP could generate additional revenue as they seem to want to do. There is also the in game store as well as the merchandise store, both needing additional items to say the least. But calling an automated feature of the game a service, well just doesn't look good.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Pipa Porto
#167 - 2012-10-01 00:26:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
Webvan wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:


You still pay parking meters, don't you? You don't complain that it doesn't cost the city anything for you to park there because they don't have a parking attendant, do you?.
You still pay for a sub, don't you? Or even in PLEX as it's still being payed for but just through barter on your part. I don't tip parking meters, no. But for a valet I pay for the parking space and tip the valet for his service. If it were just a meter, I pay the fee and that's it, I may even park across the street where it's free.


You still pay your taxes, don't you? Taxes pay for the street. Just like your Sub pays for the game. Parking/Resculpting is an extra.

Quote:
When swapping portraits needed human intervention, that was a service, just as tech support, pizza delivery, valet parking, clearly a business service job and not included in the initial pricing for goods. You are paying extra because it takes human intervention beyond what you can do yourself beyond the initial costs for the goods. Now, resculpting is automated within the code, it takes no human intervention beyond the service we already pay for to access the servers. It's no different than say pressing the undock button, same exact thing, it's in the code and take no human intervention beyond the general service of operating the server.


It is not a normal part of gameplay, so it costs extra. Changing your character's basic appearance has never been a normal part of gameplay.

A backend change doesn't change anything. When CCP optimizes their backend and reduces their hosting costs, do you demand a reduction in your Sub cost?

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Alexila Quant
Versatility Production Corporation' LLC
#168 - 2012-10-01 00:36:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Alexila Quant
Yes CCP, keep adding more services for plex. I love it when my subscription price jumps 10% in a week.

[*****]
The more services you continue to add in exchange for plex only increases the barrier of entry for disabled or otherwise poor people who can't afford to pay a monthly subscription to play the game. You may gain some money in the short term but you will lose subscribers in the long term for the simple reason that the higher plex prices get, the higher the percentage of that 1 month subscription time it grants will be spent just paying for the game. At one point in the not so distant past Plex cards costed around 300 million isk. Easily achievable within a week or so for even low level players. They have damn near doubled since then. In just the past week or so alone they have risen by around 50 million isk per card no doubt due to this new 'service'.

I guess though, at the same time, why should you care? The people who you benefit most from by the plex system are people who buy them in bulk to sell on the market. The more they're worth on the market the more inclined these folks will be to buy a few for some quick pvp isk.

inb4lrn2makeisk
[/*****]

EDIT: I miss the good ol' days when such services were just a flat fee. Need to rename your character?? SURRREEE just pay $20. Perhaps you should go that route instead of tacking more and more stuff onto plex cards until they are just a new form or currency for most people.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#169 - 2012-10-01 00:42:58 UTC
Webvan wrote:
When swapping portraits needed human intervention, that was a service
Again, human intervention does not a service make. What makes it a service is that they offer something that you can't (or don't want to, but in this case it's “can't”) do on your own using what's available to you.

Or, as in the link posted previously, it's a service if it fulfils a need and adds value to the customer.

The resculpt does all of that: it fulfils a need; it adds value; it gives you the opportunity to do something that is normally not available to you. It has been that way since the day it was introduced and all you're doing is complaining that this age-old service has gotten better and cheaper. Their internal improvements do not in any way suddenly stop it from being a service.
Selinate
#170 - 2012-10-01 00:48:42 UTC
serv·ice
1   [sur-vis] noun, adjective, verb, serv·iced, serv·ic·ing.
noun
1.
an act of helpful activity; help; aid: to do someone a service.
2.
the supplying or supplier of utilities or commodities, as water, electricity, or gas, required or demanded by the public.
3.
the providing or a provider of accommodation and activities required by the public, as maintenance, repair, etc.: The manufacturer guarantees service and parts.
4.
the organized system of apparatus, appliances, employees, etc., for supplying some accommodation required by the public: a television repair service.
5.
the supplying or a supplier of public communication and transportation: telephone service; bus service.




I really don't get what people are bitching about this for. It's rather simple and will only marginally affect plex prices in game (if at all).

But whatever. ******* cunts...
Morar Santee
#171 - 2012-10-01 03:02:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Morar Santee
ISD TYPE40 wrote:
Just to try and calm this cyclical argument a little, here is how the term "Service" is defined with regards to IT services at the University of California: Santa Cruz.


Is it a Service?


Hopefully that clears a few things up - ISD Type40.


Thank you for providing this helpful link, ISD Type40.

I especially like this part:

Quote:

  • If it can be viewed as an add-on or an option of a service, it should be considered a part of that service and not a service of its own

It really cleared things up for me. So why is it that I have to pay additional fees for character resculpting - which must be defined as an add-on to a service that I already paid for, and therefore is part of that same service - when it does no longer cause additional expenses for the service provider?

I also want to apologize in advance. Even though the definition you linked is really very clear in this regard, Tipia will never accept it. She will insist that because CCP is charging money to make this "service" available, it must be a service. While, in fact, it is part of a service I already paid for and does not require additional work performed by the service provider at this point in time. As has been explained for the umptieth time now. Even with the help of our much esteemed colleagues at UCSC.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#172 - 2012-10-01 03:20:33 UTC
Morar Santee wrote:
So why is it that I have to pay additional fees for character resculpting - which must be defined as an add-on to a service that I already paid for
What service is that? Why “must” resculpting be defined as an add-on to it?

Selinate wrote:
I really don't get what people are bitching about this for.
They're upset over how the nasty evil capitalist pigdogs over at CCP has the audacity to gouge their customers by making a service better and less expensive!
Morar Santee
#173 - 2012-10-01 03:44:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Morar Santee
Tippia wrote:
Morar Santee wrote:
So why is it that I have to pay additional fees for character resculpting - which must be defined as an add-on to a service that I already paid for
What service is that? Why “must” resculpting be defined as an add-on to it?

Selinate wrote:
I really don't get what people are bitching about this for.
They're upset over how the nasty evil capitalist pigdogs over at CCP has the audacity to gouge their customers by making a service better and less expensive!


At this stage we both know you are just fail-trolling.. but I totally have to hand it to you.. you're usually more classy than most trolls on this board.

Just to highlight why Tippia is falling short of her usual performance:

She is now calling into question that character resculpting in the service that is EVE Online is an add-on to that same service. She also violently denied it is actually part of that service in terms of regular gameplay earlier.
So if it is neither an add-on to the service, nor a part of it, then it must be completely and entirely unrelated. To be a service of its own, it must display the following characteristic, according to UCSC's definition, kindly provided by ISD Type40: " * Is perceived by the customer as a coherent whole or consumable product"

Except, well, the procedure is changing your portrait in the service that is EVE Online. The procedure is part of the client and server back-end coding (and has been since the introduction of Incarna), it requires no human interaction and there was no additional coding involved in making it available to customers of the existing service.
The only additional work invested in altering the code related to character resculpting was done in order to make it require a PLEX exchange. So the customer paying for the service that is EVE Online paid for the alteration of code that requires him to pay more to use an aspect (or at best add-on) to that same service.


TL;DR: You are paying CCP for them to find ways for you to pay more for the same thing. Tippia is still whoring for negative attention - nothing new on that front, either.


Edit: I apologized in advance, ISD Type40. Told you this was inevitable.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#174 - 2012-10-01 03:53:35 UTC
Morar Santee wrote:
At this stage we both know you are just fail-trolling.
No. I'm merely asking you a (two-part) question. Could you please answer it?

What is the service you're already paying for? Why “must” sculpting be defined as an add-on to it?

You wrote a whole lot of words there, but you didn't really address that. I get the impression that you want to see EVE as the service, is that correct?
Liafcipe9000
Critically Preposterous
#175 - 2012-10-01 03:58:31 UTC
Bagrat Skalski wrote:
PLEX prices through the roof.


\Big smile/
Morar Santee
#176 - 2012-10-01 04:11:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Morar Santee
Tippia wrote:
Morar Santee wrote:
At this stage we both know you are just fail-trolling.
No. I'm merely asking you a (two-part) question. Could you please answer it?

What is the service you're already paying for? Why “must” sculpting be defined as an add-on to it?

You wrote a whole lot of words there, but you didn't really address that. I get the impression that you want to see EVE as the service, is that correct?


The subscription fee you pay to play EVE grants you the limited license to install CCP's proprietary software and access the servers required to run the game. CCP are supplying these servers, bandwidth for data download, customer service, game development and content - which actually constitutes a service. Therefore the subscription fee is, yes you guessed it, payment for a service. EVE Online.

As you are still arguing, and suggesting that a character resculpting is not in fact an add-on to this service - please demonstrate how it is not. Please demonstrate very clearly that resculpting a character using the existing infrastructure of a service that is already paid for - limited by the EULA of that same service for use with only that same service - is an independent service of its own; that has value outside of the service that is provided by CCP, which we refer to as EVE Online.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#177 - 2012-10-01 04:22:23 UTC
Morar Santee wrote:
The subscription fee you pay to play EVE online grants you the limited license to install their proprietary software and access the servers required to run the game. CCP are supplying these servers, bandwidth for data download, customer service, game development and content - which actually constitutes a service. Therefore the subscription fee is, yes you guessed it, payment for a service. EVE Online.
Ok. Setting aside for a moment that this comes dangerously close to failing the third consideration, that takes care of the first part. Now, why “must” resculpting be considered an add-on or an option of it?

We'll get back to your question once you've answered that…
Morar Santee
#178 - 2012-10-01 04:31:54 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Morar Santee wrote:
The subscription fee you pay to play EVE online grants you the limited license to install their proprietary software and access the servers required to run the game. CCP are supplying these servers, bandwidth for data download, customer service, game development and content - which actually constitutes a service. Therefore the subscription fee is, yes you guessed it, payment for a service. EVE Online.
Ok. Setting aside for a moment that this comes dangerously close to failing the third consideration, that takes care of the first part. Now, why “must” resculpting be considered an add-on or an option of it?

We'll get back to your question once you've answered that…


Gotcha. You are unable to demonstrate character resculpting is in fact an independent service and not an add-on to an existing service.

But of course you are also not willing to accept my reasoning for why it is an add-on (which I provided three times by now), because that means you would have to stop trolling.

GF.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#179 - 2012-10-01 04:43:09 UTC
Morar Santee wrote:
You are unable to demonstrate character resculpting is in fact an independent service and not an add-on to an existing service.
No, I'm merely waiting for you to answer the question I asked: why “must” resculpting be considered an add-on or an option of this supposed service you pay for? Why does a change on the back-end suddenly turn a service into a mere add-on?
Morar Santee
#180 - 2012-10-01 04:46:00 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Morar Santee wrote:
You are unable to demonstrate character resculpting is in fact an independent service and not an add-on to an existing service.
No, I'm merely waiting for you to answer the question I asked: why “must” resculpting be considered an add-on or an option of this supposed service you pay for? Why does a change on the back-end suddenly turn a service into a mere add-on?


As I said, GF. It's over. You lost. Keep pretending you are "just waiting for a reply", it's cool, if that's what it takes to make you feel better.