These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev blog: New Eden Open $10.000 Tournament

First post First post First post
Author
CCP Fozzie
C C P
C C P Alliance
#181 - 2012-09-30 14:12:17 UTC
Admiral Goberius wrote:
So I have been looking closely at the rules post and the dev replies in this thread and cannot find any details about the whole B team deal.

I get that this is a character based tournament and alliance affiliation doesnt matter.

I see nothing in the rules against the same alliance or group fielding multiple teams as long as:
1. all the teams are made up of independent characters played by independent players
2. no collusion happens if these teams were to face each other on tourney day


HOWEVER

there is quite a big precedent for good players and bad posters getting banned for touching dicks on sisi so could you clarify whether there is *any* restriction to the same alliance fielding multiple teams as long as they do not collude?


Since this tournament is based on teams not alliances the concept of alliance B teams doesn't really apply. We expect that for the first couple times many teams will be from specific alliances but hopefully teams will start developing identities of their own eventually.

There is no restriction against an alliance, corp or any other benefactor sponsoring multiple teams as long as those teams are distinct and are working for their own victory.

As in all previous eve tournaments, the tournament team completely reserves the right to do whatever is needed to ensure that the matches are competitive.

Game Designer | Team Five-0

Twitter: @CCP_Fozzie
Twitch chat: ccp_fozzie

Admiral Goberius
Horde Vanguard.
Pandemic Horde
#182 - 2012-09-30 14:39:25 UTC
rgr thanks for the answer

the next obvious question:


Is there any rules against sparring on the test server as long as the sparring teams compete as independent entities and avoid all collusion on tourney day?

Quote:
There is no restriction against an alliance, corp or any other benefactor sponsoring multiple teams as long as those teams are distinct and are working for their own victory.


I am asking because "working for their own victory" could be interpreted as a statement against sparring; is this the case?
Bloodpetal
Tir Capital Management Group
#183 - 2012-09-30 14:42:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Bloodpetal
CCP Fozzie wrote:

Since this tournament is based on teams not alliances the concept of alliance B teams doesn't really apply. We expect that for the first couple times many teams will be from specific alliances but hopefully teams will start developing identities of their own eventually.
.


This is generally called a corporation in EVE, a guild in other MMOs, and so on, since that is the metric by which identity is formed.

Sure, the occassional lone wolf from the group is out there roaming... but this is a matter of identity...

Point being, I don't see why you'd want to see many cross-corporate/alliance teams in the tournament. It's mostly irrelevant. The only relevance to lifting the restriction is to allow corporations+alliances to field more than one team, since that is the metric with which we identify groups of people in EVE.

As you go, It will never matter that "Team Indigo Slap Face" won the tournament. It will matter that 5 goonz, a PL dude, and 3 random dudes from an alt corp guys won the tournament. And that's all people will ever see. The only way a Team will ever get a true identity as you want is to form a separate corp/alliance and do so. Which eventually means if this takes off you will have tournament corps out there.

Where I am.

CCP Fozzie
C C P
C C P Alliance
#184 - 2012-09-30 15:00:50 UTC
There are already alliances that were formed just for tournaments and that's fine. This team format also allows people from multiple alliances who like to work together in the tournament but who enjoy having distinct alliances in normal gameplay form one unified team. I'm going to be very interested in seeing the social structures that players continue to develop around these kinds of things.

If teams want to have exhibition matches against each other that's fine. However there's a difference between watching two teams spar against each other and watching one team with two names have internal practices. We know the difference.

Game Designer | Team Five-0

Twitter: @CCP_Fozzie
Twitch chat: ccp_fozzie

Sable Moran
Moran Light Industries
#185 - 2012-09-30 15:01:50 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:
Aineko Macx wrote:
Ship banning will cause lots of tears Twisted


We are hoping for lots of variety Blink


In tears?

Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Labs Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene.

Admiral Goberius
Horde Vanguard.
Pandemic Horde
#186 - 2012-09-30 15:27:50 UTC
CCP Fozzie wrote:
If teams want to have exhibition matches against each other that's fine. However there's a difference between watching two teams spar against each other and watching one team with two names have internal practices. We know the difference.


Ok, in the case of this character based tournament the only way to have one team enter twice is if the same player competed in two different teams by account sharing right?

Two teams made of independent players from the same alliance/affiliation sparring against each other is allowed right?


I know you mostly already answered this and I apologize if I come across as pedantic but I just want to understand 100% what is cool and what isnt. Thanks again.
Slaktoid
Perkone
Caldari State
#187 - 2012-09-30 15:28:02 UTC
I'm gonna be cautiously optimistic this time, even though it sometimes feels like CCP are preaching sportsmanship and stroking the player with one hand, while slapping him with the other. This is a highly subjective opinion though, I may be somewhat biased by bittervet syndrome.

I'm concerned about how this will go down in mainstream gaming media though. I can certainly see some harmful headlines, especially from those who aren't fully aware of how the PLEX system works. Judging by the comments (or lack thereof) by the CSM, I assume they were sidelined and as surprised as the rest of us by this announcement. They may not be the best to consult on esports matters, but they have easy access to those of us who have been involved and have been following the esports scene for a long time.

A few words for Bro and Fozzie specifically (and the other who organize this). I hope there is a future for this. I would strongly urge you to limit participation to one character pr person. I want to see Kil2, Garmon, Prom (their actual names, not alts) and all these guys we already know from media productions, compete with eachother. It's the storylines we need to create for this thing to explode. Nobody would watch the UFC if Joe Blows were fighting Dim Sums every time. It's the Anderson Silvas and the Randy Cotoures who makes it interesting. It's the Brazillian Top Team vs Chute Box rivalries that engage us so deeply. We need our own Nadas and Boxers and Nesteas to emerge. We need our own Clan 9 vs Death Row, or fnatic vs SK Gaming rivalries to get the blood boiling and the stakes raised.

You need to focus on the Teams and the names, they need to create the brand. We need to be able to recognize and pick out those we know to be good pvp'ers, so we can cheer for them, worship or hate them. If we can't easily recognize who are fighting, we don't have a stake in the outcome of the fight, and the result won't matter. It won't draw us back another time. After this initial round, you need to look to preserve the "teambrands" or at least encourage them to "bring it" to the next tourney. This could be done by invites for example. Maybe the top 8 teams will be invited back to the next tournament, provided they keep roster changes limited and such.

I would also suggest to try to reach out to people who truely know what this is all about. The likes of Marcus "djWHEAT" Graham, Rod "Slasher" Breslau and so forth. They are contractbound by other companies to some extents, but that probably don't prevent anyone from reaching out informally. Talk to maybe MLG management. A lot of those guys are passionate about what they do, and I would imagine guys like Sundance DiGiovanni could give excellent advices about the most important things to look out for.

We can't just go ahead in the usual way of "This is Eve Online. We do it our own way, we don't care bla bla bla". We need to pay attention to mainstream gaming media coverage, stream numbers etc, because that is what will bring the external sponsors like Razer, MSI, TT and others. And those are the companies one would like to attract to an E-Sport.

Good Luck. And may the best team win!
CCP Fozzie
C C P
C C P Alliance
#188 - 2012-09-30 15:40:45 UTC
Admiral Goberius wrote:
CCP Fozzie wrote:
If teams want to have exhibition matches against each other that's fine. However there's a difference between watching two teams spar against each other and watching one team with two names have internal practices. We know the difference.


Ok, in the case of this character based tournament the only way to have one team enter twice is if the same player competed in two different teams by account sharing right?

Two teams made of independent players from the same alliance/affiliation sparring against each other is allowed right?


I know you mostly already answered this and I apologize if I come across as pedantic but I just want to understand 100% what is cool and what isnt. Thanks again.


A certain amount of vagueness in the rules is a necessary evil so that people won't think they can wiggle through the letter of the law, so sorry if we can't spell things out quite as cleanly as many people would like.

In the last Alliance Tournament there were two reasons for the "B team" rule:

1) To ensure that as many alliances as possible get a chance to compete
2) To ensure that each team will try to win when faced with any other team

Since we're team based for this one the first reason isn't valid. We don't care what alliance any members of any teams are from.
Basically make sure it's clear that your team is distinct from other teams and is in this thing to win. That's what I mean by "one team with two names". If two teams have the same leadership and are working towards getting their "A team" through instead of for themselves it becomes fairly obvious.

Game Designer | Team Five-0

Twitter: @CCP_Fozzie
Twitch chat: ccp_fozzie

Admiral Goberius
Horde Vanguard.
Pandemic Horde
#189 - 2012-09-30 16:10:39 UTC
Oki I think I see what you mean, thank you. Also good idea with the bans imho it makes for a lot of interesting strategy / meta.
Duncan Tanner
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#190 - 2012-09-30 16:50:35 UTC
I think two years ago there was a comment that Eve Tournaments were something that CCP no longer really budgeted for because they were costly and did not provide a measurable return. Has that changed at all?

In order to create a truly competitive e-sport out of Eve you need to make the competition that happens in the tournament a way that you can play the game normally. This is the case in every other e-sport. As it is now, because of how much effort it is, only very dedicated groups go out of their way to recreate the environment of the competition for practice. More and more people are doing this but it is still a lot of effort. Some people have suggested that Eve needs some sort of arenas. Do you have any thoughts on this?

"Players who are suspected of joining multiple teams to disrupt the tournament or auction process may be subject to administrative penalties including loss of access to their accounts."

This sounds like accounts are being banned from Eve not the tournament. If this is true, banning accounts from Eve based on suspicion alone is pretty drastic. What will be done to prevent someone suspected but not guilty from getting their accounts banned? Will there be some communication between CCP and the player before action is taken?

Thanks.

.

Idris Helion
Doomheim
#191 - 2012-09-30 16:56:01 UTC
I wonder if running some "regional" tournaments to qualify for entry into the big tournament might work as a mechanism to get the smaller corps and less-wealthy players into the matches.

Most sporting events work that way: you have qualifying matches at the local and regional level to qualify for the big tournament. It's an organizational hassle for CCP, I guess, but then again there's no reason that CCP itself has to coordinate all this: player councils could handle running the regional tourneys. Using this model, any level of team could get to the tourney if they won the local and regional matches.
Salpun
Global Telstar Federation Offices
Masters of Flying Objects
#192 - 2012-09-30 17:14:25 UTC
Which server will be seeded for tournament practice?

If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide

See you around the universe.

Jhone Cahos
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#193 - 2012-09-30 18:01:30 UTC
it will be nice to see the stream live into our desk officier on our big hd flat tv !!!
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#194 - 2012-09-30 19:33:43 UTC
from http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.ca/2012/09/cash-money-tournament-20-plex-too-much.html

FWEDDIT'S PERSPECTIVE

There has been some real interest from within Fweddit to join in on the fun this November in the Own3D.tv/EVE Online cash-money tournament. As much as a number of us would love to get in on the action, the twenty plex (minimum) entry fee is a real limiting factor.

Twenty months of playtime to get in on two, maybe three matches (if we're lucky), have a bit of fun, is a pretty steep price. We're neither a ship rich nor a skill rich group of players. But to show up, have some fun, get the word out on Fweddit and faction warfare, that would have made it worthwhile.

I'm not quite sure why twenty plex is CCP's magic number. How twenty plex somehow assures people take the tournament seriously, where ten plex assumes people won't? Ten plex and I'm sure fielding a Fweddit team would be a no-brainer. Twenty plex, and people are humming and hawing, and Magic Eight Ball says "Not likely" when asked if Fweddit will get together a team.

Fweddit is not a rich alliance. We don't have tech moons. And only 4B ISK in the alliance wallet, which goes to pay for all of our ship reimbursements for our newbros. It costs money to keep the Stanzielcat doctrine up and running. It costs money to keep our "shitting up local" methodologies at their highest level, one step ahead of the competition, we can't let slip our dominance in the cultural war for one moment.

On the one hand CCP states that they want to open up the tournament to more people, a wider variety of people, yet the twenty plex (minimum) fee seems to ensure that it is open to the exact same group of people that take part in the alliance tournament.

Twenty plex. Them's rich stakes.

And there may be EVE groups or EVE businesses that might be interested in sponsoring Fweddit. I would hope we would turn them down. By accepting charity, we send the wrong message to CCP. We roll over and accept their twenty plex minimum as acceptable.
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#195 - 2012-09-30 19:44:43 UTC
CCP Bro wrote:
Every tournament we have run in the past has focused on Alliances and has, for better or worse, excluded a vast portion of EVE players who are members of player and NPC corporations.


and

CCP Bro wrote:
A minimum of 20 PLEX is required to bid.
This made me Roll and Lol at the same time. A $360 - 400 floor (20x PLEX) is an interesting way to open the bidding. Larger groups of non-alliance players should be able to come up with the scratch to submit teams.

But this bidding method still favors those with the mega-deep pockets and the egos to match, i.e., tech-fueled alliance space jockeys.

Alternatively, why not have a team lottery (transparently managed) with the same participation restrictions? This certainly would make team involvement more equitable.

If concerned about the sincerity of the teams vying for competition, then host preliminary tournaments to weed out those who are simply looking to troll the event and your company.

+++++++ I have never shed a tear for a fellow EVE player until now. Mark “Seleene” Heard's Blog Honoring Sean "Vile Rat" Smith.

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#196 - 2012-09-30 19:45:45 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
from http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.ca/2012/09/cash-money-tournament-20-plex-too-much.html

FWEDDIT'S PERSPECTIVE

There has been some real interest from within Fweddit to join in on the fun this November in the Own3D.tv/EVE Online cash-money tournament. As much as a number of us would love to get in on the action, the twenty plex (minimum) entry fee is a real limiting factor.

Twenty months of playtime to get in on two, maybe three matches (if we're lucky), have a bit of fun, is a pretty steep price. We're neither a ship rich nor a skill rich group of players. But to show up, have some fun, get the word out on Fweddit and faction warfare, that would have made it worthwhile.

I'm not quite sure why twenty plex is CCP's magic number. How twenty plex somehow assures people take the tournament seriously, where ten plex assumes people won't? Ten plex and I'm sure fielding a Fweddit team would be a no-brainer. Twenty plex, and people are humming and hawing, and Magic Eight Ball says "Not likely" when asked if Fweddit will get together a team.

Fweddit is not a rich alliance. We don't have tech moons. And only 4B ISK in the alliance wallet, which goes to pay for all of our ship reimbursements for our newbros. It costs money to keep the Stanzielcat doctrine up and running. It costs money to keep our "shitting up local" methodologies at their highest level, one step ahead of the competition, we can't let slip our dominance in the cultural war for one moment.

On the one hand CCP states that they want to open up the tournament to more people, a wider variety of people, yet the twenty plex (minimum) fee seems to ensure that it is open to the exact same group of people that take part in the alliance tournament.

Twenty plex. Them's rich stakes.

And there may be EVE groups or EVE businesses that might be interested in sponsoring Fweddit. I would hope we would turn them down. By accepting charity, we send the wrong message to CCP. We roll over and accept their twenty plex minimum as acceptable.


1 plex= 15 USD/EUR
20 PLEX = 20 x 15= 300 USD/EUR
32 teams x 20 plexes each= 9,600 USD/EUR

It almost pays itself back and will buy way more media & public exposure than spend 10,000 $ in advertising.

Cunning dudes.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#197 - 2012-09-30 19:56:25 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
*snip*

1 plex= 15 USD/EUR
20 PLEX = 20 x 15= 300 USD/EUR
32 teams x 20 plexes each= 9,600 USD/EUR

It almost pays itself back and will buy way more media & public exposure than spend 10,000 $ in advertising.

Cunning dudes.
$9600 Assuming that the auction bids go no higher than the price of entry.

I'm counting the posts until a CCP employee or surrogate 'cries poor' and bemoans the incredible financial burden this tournament will place on their organization.

+++++++ I have never shed a tear for a fellow EVE player until now. Mark “Seleene” Heard's Blog Honoring Sean "Vile Rat" Smith.

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#198 - 2012-09-30 20:08:34 UTC
Hakaru Ishiwara wrote:
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
*snip*

1 plex= 15 USD/EUR
20 PLEX = 20 x 15= 300 USD/EUR
32 teams x 20 plexes each= 9,600 USD/EUR

It almost pays itself back and will buy way more media & public exposure than spend 10,000 $ in advertising.

Cunning dudes.
$9600 Assuming that the auction bids go no higher than the price of entry.

I'm counting the posts until a CCP employee or surrogate 'cries poor' and bemoans the incredible financial burden this tournament will place on their organization.


The bids are the cherry that tops the cake. CCP could actually be earning money by advertising itself for free. Lol

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#199 - 2012-10-01 00:37:58 UTC

I really don't see what the big fuss is about CCP charging plex for entry like this.

Firstly this is the first ever tournament. If they find what is being charged etc isn't providing the correct results, it will change. It's all experimental (like the best college years) and therefore the best thing for everyone to do is just run with it and see what happens.

Secondly if CCP are trying to make this the "Premier League" of EVE (or the "Major Leagues" or whatever) PvP tournaments then it kind of makes sense to cost a lot to enter. EVE players has constantly proven to be more then capable of creating organisations and social structures where none exist. How long before someone figures out that if they get sponsored by say... Somer Blink for 8 Plex and they call their Team "The Somer Blink Giants" and agree to mention them in any posts/interviews etc that it's already reduced the rest of the Plex they need to raise? Not saying Somer Blink are interested in sponsoring anyone but you get the point.

Thirdly, you think anyone runs a tournament out of charity and good will? It's a sodding company! The Olympics is, on the face of it, run as a charity but even then there's a lot of money thrown in from Sponsors and then the host nation pays a hell of a lot of money to host it.

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

Pipa Porto
#200 - 2012-10-01 00:39:16 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
1 plex= 15 USD/EUR
20 PLEX = 20 x 15= 300 USD/EUR
32 teams x 20 plexes each= 9,600 USD/EUR

It almost pays itself back and will buy way more media & public exposure than spend 10,000 $ in advertising.

Cunning dudes.


You're missing the substantial production costs.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto