These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Wasted space

Author
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#81 - 2012-09-25 02:03:31 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:

It is a stupid concept tbh but it doesn't have anything to do with why people aren't living in truly worthless 0.0 systems.
Making it so the 4 belt, -0.01 truesec corridor system in a region with no valuable moons now takes 30 jumps to get to highsec isn't gonna add to its appeal to small alliances.

It doesn't?! Ahahahahaha!!![/quote]
Nope, that's why all the small alliances are one jump from highsec, like Geminate and Providence.
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#82 - 2012-09-25 02:03:50 UTC
Samahiel Sotken wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:
Doddy wrote:
CCP killed eve when they introduced the jump drive, people are just really really slow in noticing.

I agree. How is it that capital ships (the biggest ships in the game) are able to travel across the galaxy faster than an interceptor? Seriously. No troll or exaggeration. Capital ships can move from one extreme side of the galaxy to the other extreme side in 15 minutes or less. This of course is provided a cyno chain is ready to go, but my point stands.

The entire galaxy.

In 15 minutes.

Anyone else find this absurd??


Think of it this way, and it makes perfect sense. You have to get from the Isle of Mann to Manhattan by boat, are you going to take a speed boat or an ocean liner? You need to get from Beijing to Los Angeles by plane, Cesna or 777? Larger ships almost always have higher sustained speeds and longer ranges due to fuel reserves.

This is very true and jump ability is not the problem.

Being able to get back in 15 minutes or even 2 hrs is moot because I can come back in 24 hours anyway.

But if my stuff is being hit and it IS vulnerable then I HAVE to come back immediately. Having a 15 minute jump back is prudent and neccessary.

But the result? Staying @ 100% offensive ability without adequate homeland defense will ultimately be impossible.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#83 - 2012-09-25 02:10:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Touval Lysander
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
What about your proposal of making it possible to wipe out a lone guy's POS within 15 minutes while he's at work or asleep and destroying all his stored loot and ships is 'tenuous' on the big alliance's part exactly? Is it when you logs on to find everything you've built destroyed without getting to fight for it that's tenuous on our part, or the part when he has to go to highsec to buy a hauler, another POS and fuel, then slowboat it 30 jumps there and back? Is that's what going to sweat the big alliances? How many other NPC corp alts do you expect to be down with this exactly?

Not reading mate.

The trade-off is that tower production is offline. The tower is now a very serious bloody hard nut to crack open on defensive mode.

If you wanna tackle a fully pimped defense tower while I am in bed then try. It's gonna hurt you.

However, the converse also applies that AS LONG AS the tower is in defensive mode, I can't produce anything.

If you want to make ISK, you MUST be ready to defend in REAL TIME while the tower is producing because it is soft - very soft while it's pumping out the coin.


And a side benefit in all this. Sov becomes sorta moot. If it proves too hard to hold hundreds and hundreds of systems you're ultimately going to need to retract. Your size will be very specifically governed by your immediate ability to defend your infrastructure if you want that same infrastructure to produce.

Seriously, I am looking for the holes in this - for mine, it just seems to be an obvious fix to sov without actually changing anything else.

Keep it coming. Please.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Shepard Wong Ogeko
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#84 - 2012-09-25 02:12:00 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:

And you're right. Having said that, running out of a staging POS is NOT expensive. But I can't.

But maybe I don't even want "sov".

Maybe I would be happy with a single POS so I can just do rats, belts, plexes. For some this is good coin.

Maybe I just wanna make you EARN your iskies. Maybe I just want a staging POS to harrass and give YOU a hard time. Maybe I just want to make your production of those massive iskies TENUOUS...

Isn't that the biggest beef in the game? Minerman got it easy. Incursionman got it easy. FWman got it easy.

What if YOU have to choose whether to produce in your POS and defend it with a defesne fleet or whether you simply max-defend your POS and make NO production WHILE you are fielding 100% of your forces on offense.

My idea is guns or butter.

Atm it's butter, butter butter, butter butter, butter. AFK defense. AFK isk generation. The timer is the fault here.

Under my idea, a small to medium force could make you think VERY seriously about your expansion abilities and the amount of space you own. While you play at being strategically superior space-Gods, I can apply tactical harrassment and slow you down.

Proof of small guerilla forces able to defeat/impede very large superior forces is evident both in history AND in current world affairs.

Why? Da big boy don't got a PAUSE button!


If you just want to shoot rats, harass random people, aren't interested in sov, and don't mind living out of a POS, then why not just go live in a worm hole or npc nullsec?

What is stopping you from going to npc nullsec, dropping a POS and harassing the near by super power? There are plenty of defense oriented POS fits out there.

Also, you do know that when a POS goes into reinforced mode, most of the modules go offline? You can hobble a mining or production POS but just repeatedly putting it into reinforcement.
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#85 - 2012-09-25 02:26:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Touval Lysander
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote:
If you just want to shoot rats, harass random people, aren't interested in sov, and don't mind living out of a POS, then why not just go live in a worm hole or npc nullsec?

What is stopping you from going to npc nullsec, dropping a POS and harassing the near by super power? There are plenty of defense oriented POS fits out there.

Also, you do know that when a POS goes into reinforced mode, most of the modules go offline? You can hobble a mining or production POS but just repeatedly putting it into reinforcement.


On point 1. I could, I have, but it's not the issue. And to be fair, my argument is not about "giving" space to the small dudes. My argument is making the big guys rethink their size. The small dudes will actually work out what to do with the space if it's available.

On point 2. Harrassment is easy. There are multiple ways to harrass you but it's all rather pointless because I can't actually slow you down if you get what I mean. If I want to stop your production and make you think twice about invading me (wherever I am) I have to project a massive force and I have to hold for 24 hours and go again. If I am smaller than you I simply cannot both defend my territory and go on the offensive to hurt you. I can't win. Period

On point 3. I've said that. And again, small tactical ops are not going to be able to produce this effect because you can simply bring overwhelming force back to stop me.

Reread my point about how effective guerilla warfare is even against the biggest there is (in history and currently).

Using well placed tactical forces I should be able to make some inroads to curtail your size. I can never eliminate you but I can make you pay for your bloat. If my actions tighten up your operation then I have a chance at you.

Mind, I have to be realistic in my ability to slow your production. And I made that point clear also.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Ghazu
#86 - 2012-09-25 02:36:35 UTC
Lol defend against what? We have to "show up at work and sit there just because?" At the end of the day if you don't have enough dudes for fleets you aint gonna accomplish jack. You are missing the fact that behind that empty space there are a bunch of duders who will log in when needed, which sadly isn't true for all alliances.

You are just whining about how you want to mount sov assaults but poo poo it is too much :effort: Also you are in the wrong place wondering why nobody is home, you need to harass the richer ratting grounds.

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#87 - 2012-09-25 02:53:47 UTC
Ghazu wrote:
Lol defend against what? We have to "show up at work and sit there just because?" At the end of the day if you don't have enough dudes for fleets you aint gonna accomplish jack. You are missing the fact that behind that empty space there are a bunch of duders who will log in when needed, which sadly isn't true for all alliances.

You are just whining about how you want to mount sov assaults but poo poo it is too much :effort: Also you are in the wrong place wondering why nobody is home, you need to harass the richer ratting grounds.

Yeah. You do have to show up. How much money do you make when you're NOT a work.

PXF was empty. Used to be prime. What changed? Only bots ratters I saw was B-DB. But the argument you're heading towards is moot.

And I ask again. How much money do you make when you're NOT a work.

For all the bitching about (supposed) AFK iskies that everyone else makes (particularly against Incursion runners/FW etc.) , the worst area in Eve is POS's that produce with a safe mode for defense.

And it's still making money while you are actually somewhere else taking MOAR ground.

Who else can do that in Eve?

Is this idea getting scarey for you guys because it might actually make sense? Just imagine having to look after what you actiually own and have to think about your expansion dreams - all at the same time.

I can see why you're getting tetchy about it.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#88 - 2012-09-25 02:54:42 UTC
Ghazu wrote:
Lol defend against what?

npc corp solo fighters grinding out our tens of millions of ehp structures
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#89 - 2012-09-25 03:41:03 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:
Doddy wrote:
CCP killed eve when they introduced the jump drive, people are just really really slow in noticing.

I agree. How is it that capital ships (the biggest ships in the game) are able to travel across the galaxy faster than an interceptor? Seriously. No troll or exaggeration. Capital ships can move from one extreme side of the galaxy to the other extreme side in 15 minutes or less. This of course is provided a cyno chain is ready to go, but my point stands.

The entire galaxy.

In 15 minutes.

Anyone else find this absurd??

It is a stupid concept tbh but it doesn't have anything to do with why people aren't living in truly worthless 0.0 systems.
Making it so the 4 belt, -0.01 truesec corridor system in a region with no valuable moons now takes 30 jumps to get to highsec isn't gonna add to its appeal to small alliances.

It doesn't?! Ahahahahaha!!!

Nice troll. Anyways, as I have always said, power projection (which is what jump drives enable) is one of several problems in null. In no way can anyone point to one single thing and say that if it was to change all would be fixed.

Oh man. You are amusing for sure. Big smile

Which part of "power projection" stops people from living in "truly worthless 0.0 systems"?

Absolutely nothing, that's what.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Shepard Wong Ogeko
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#90 - 2012-09-25 03:49:58 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:


Reread my point about how effective guerilla warfare is even against the biggest there is (in history and currently).


It is possible to use guerrilla tactics to wear down a larger enemy.

And from what I've read so far, you are not the T.E. Lawrence of Eve.

Think about the numbers you are talking about. If Goons are in the thousands, you'll need to get hundreds of friends to form a group one tenth the size. Also, find a successful guerrilla campaign that didn't have military or financial backing from another power.

I'm not saying it is not or should not be possible. Right now, with current game mechanics, you can definitely wear down a large alliance's will to live in and defend their space to the point that you could eventually start dropping sbu's and only get token resistance.

The hard part about this is not the POS or the general structure grind. That stuff is just boring. With a couple hundred people, the right skill sets, some dedication, and either deep pockets or a sugar daddy, you could start grinding down some large alliance. The hard part is finding people to organize and lead all this. If you had that, you wouldn't be here crying about empty space. You would be working on taking it.

Ghazu
#91 - 2012-09-25 03:54:06 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Ghazu wrote:
Lol defend against what? We have to "show up at work and sit there just because?" At the end of the day if you don't have enough dudes for fleets you aint gonna accomplish jack. You are missing the fact that behind that empty space there are a bunch of duders who will log in when needed, which sadly isn't true for all alliances.

You are just whining about how you want to mount sov assaults but poo poo it is too much :effort: Also you are in the wrong place wondering why nobody is home, you need to harass the richer ratting grounds.

Yeah. You do have to show up. How much money do you make when you're NOT a work.

PXF was empty. Used to be prime. What changed? Only bots ratters I saw was B-DB. But the argument you're heading towards is moot.

And I ask again. How much money do you make when you're NOT a work.

For all the bitching about (supposed) AFK iskies that everyone else makes (particularly against Incursion runners/FW etc.) , the worst area in Eve is POS's that produce with a safe mode for defense.

And it's still making money while you are actually somewhere else taking MOAR ground.

Who else can do that in Eve?

Is this idea getting scarey for you guys because it might actually make sense? Just imagine having to look after what you actiually own and have to think about your expansion dreams - all at the same time.

I can see why you're getting tetchy about it.

What money moon money? Are you whining about tech or timers christ make up your mind. BTW someone is there to do that moon stuff, the logistic dudes, it's like PI, what's the problem?

Look i agree with you nobody likes timers but you are a shiteposting whiner with no coherent points.

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984

Ghazu
#92 - 2012-09-25 04:02:05 UTC
What exactly is it that you want? You want us to rat more, to not stay in front-line staging systems and hold our dicks at home? to defend against some phantom threat that does not exist?

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#93 - 2012-09-25 05:54:48 UTC
Ghazu wrote:

What money moon money? Are you whining about tech or timers christ make up your mind. BTW someone is there to do that moon stuff, the logistic dudes, it's like PI, what's the problem?

Look i agree with you nobody likes timers but you are a shiteposting whiner with no coherent points.

get out.

Tech moons and timers are not mutually exclusive. The tech keeps pumping right up until that timer get's tripped then you just blueball to save it and you can be a trillion light years away because you got a whole day to come back on your steed and rescue the iron maiden.

I say change it.

While your tower is pumping isk, it's at serious risk. Be there or I can kill it - and quickly. Which part of that haven't you got?

You wanna keep churning out the coin, be there. If you don't wanna stay and look after it, put it in defense mode and go play MOAR space invaders. But it STOPS making money while it's like that. The longer you are gone, the longer it's not working.

And every new piece of territory you want to take is going to have the same problem. How big could you grow? How small will you have to become?

If a smaller force CAN hurt you repeatedly, quickly, without faffing between 2 ops, they will try. atm, no-one bothers.

And really, whether people want to keep/invade/use or ignore the space you vacate is up to them. Once you vacate, and you will have to, what happens is not your concern anymore.

Currently you say you shouldn't have to be there 23/7 to defend it. That's where we differ. BIG TIME.

Me thinx you should be.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#94 - 2012-09-25 06:27:01 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Tech moons and timers are not mutually exclusive. The tech keeps pumping right up until that timer get's tripped then you just blueball to save it and you can be a trillion light years away because you got a whole day to come back on your steed and rescue the iron maiden.

I guess you haven't heard of this thing called "timezones".

Touval Lysander wrote:
While your tower is pumping isk, it's at serious risk. Be there or I can kill it - and quickly. Which part of that haven't you got?

The part where you haven't figured out this interesting thing called "timezones".

Touval Lysander wrote:
You wanna keep churning out the coin, be there. If you don't wanna stay and look after it, put it in defense mode and go play MOAR space invaders. But it STOPS making money while it's like that. The longer you are gone, the longer it's not working.

Again, timezones.

Touval Lysander wrote:
And every new piece of territory you want to take is going to have the same problem. How big could you grow? How small will you have to become?

If a smaller force CAN hurt you repeatedly, quickly, without faffing between 2 ops, they will try. atm, no-one bothers.

Actually, the problem with alliances not being attacked to a greater degree is the fact that the SOV system enables the defender to not give a **** for almost a full week, and then blob that one system ONCE, and reset all progress back to square one. This means that you can defend anything up to 6 or 7 fronts at the same time, at 6 or 7 different points in your space. It'll be strenuous, but it's possible, as long as you're able to win that final timer. What needs to happen is that the act of taking a system needs to be a much more gradual process, where the attacker's progress can't be reverted at the last timer.

But I doubt you'll see this, because you're sitting somewhere in hisec and frothing at the mouth about how we can "make isk without expending effort", nevermind the fact that we've expended a lot of isk to get those moons.

Touval Lysander wrote:
Currently you say you shouldn't have to be there 23/7 to defend it. That's where we differ. BIG TIME.

Me thinx you should be.

Let me, again, remind you of this wonderful idea called "timezones".

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#95 - 2012-09-25 06:29:26 UTC
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:


Reread my point about how effective guerilla warfare is even against the biggest there is (in history and currently).


It is possible to use guerrilla tactics to wear down a larger enemy.

And from what I've read so far, you are not the T.E. Lawrence of Eve.

Think about the numbers you are talking about. If Goons are in the thousands, you'll need to get hundreds of friends to form a group one tenth the size. Also, find a successful guerrilla campaign that didn't have military or financial backing from another power.

I'm not saying it is not or should not be possible. Right now, with current game mechanics, you can definitely wear down a large alliance's will to live in and defend their space to the point that you could eventually start dropping sbu's and only get token resistance.

The hard part about this is not the POS or the general structure grind. That stuff is just boring. With a couple hundred people, the right skill sets, some dedication, and either deep pockets or a sugar daddy, you could start grinding down some large alliance. The hard part is finding people to organize and lead all this. If you had that, you wouldn't be here crying about empty space. You would be working on taking it.


See, I reckon this is where you guys are getting mixed up. I shouldn't need hundreds of friends to grind off little pieces off you and THAT's what I'm aiming at - not the demise or destruction of the entire alliance.

atm people cannot sustainably take or hold ANY of your sov - pure numbers, no brains needed. Sure, they can tinker, they can play but let's be realistic about it k?

I just need to chip little pieces of you that you can't or won't repeatedly defend. If you ain't home a small force should be able to put some quick pain on you. Your own size will be the grinder. You simply will not be able to be everywhere.

And I don't need to take a system. I'm going to make you give it up because it's not worth defending anymore. You get to chose what to look after and what you can't be bothered with.

A point will be reached where you CAN defend it all 24/7 regardless of who comes at you.

THAT's how big your alliance territory should be.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#96 - 2012-09-25 06:32:26 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
stuff.....

Let me, again, remind you of this wonderful idea called "timezones".

And which part of "timezones" haven't I got?

I'd suggest it was discovered and discussed earlier - in depth.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Ghazu
#97 - 2012-09-25 06:47:09 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Ghazu wrote:

What money moon money? Are you whining about tech or timers christ make up your mind. BTW someone is there to do that moon stuff, the logistic dudes, it's like PI, what's the problem?

Look i agree with you nobody likes timers but you are a shiteposting whiner with no coherent points.

get out.

Tech moons and timers are not mutually exclusive. The tech keeps pumping right up until that timer get's tripped then you just blueball to save it and you can be a trillion light years away because you got a whole day to come back on your steed and rescue the iron maiden.

I say change it.

While your tower is pumping isk, it's at serious risk. Be there or I can kill it - and quickly. Which part of that haven't you got?

You wanna keep churning out the coin, be there. If you don't wanna stay and look after it, put it in defense mode and go play MOAR space invaders. But it STOPS making money while it's like that. The longer you are gone, the longer it's not working.

And every new piece of territory you want to take is going to have the same problem. How big could you grow? How small will you have to become?

If a smaller force CAN hurt you repeatedly, quickly, without faffing between 2 ops, they will try. atm, no-one bothers.

And really, whether people want to keep/invade/use or ignore the space you vacate is up to them. Once you vacate, and you will have to, what happens is not your concern anymore.

Currently you say you shouldn't have to be there 23/7 to defend it. That's where we differ. BIG TIME.

Me thinx you should be.

So you think POSes, ihubs, stations everything should be killed in one "go" like killing a ship, no stront no timers? Sure why not but do you realize this help us more than any "small alliances".
Not my problem your friends can't fleet up 2 days in a row yet you expect us to "defend" 23/7 christ quit your forlorn bitching be there be there sounding your date stood you up or somethin.

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#98 - 2012-09-25 06:48:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Zim
Touval Lysander wrote:
I'd suggest it was discovered and discussed earlier - in depth.

That's not in-depth, that's you handwaving "yarr make life miserable"-"solutions" into the mix. It was god-awful. It would mean that if we wanted to, we could just win a single fight (or no fight if we're in a different timezone from the defenders) and roll over large swathes of space in one go, because the defenders had gotten beaten and given up that day, only to have to log in the next day to rebuild their entire space or recapture stations and re-freighter in ihubs, tcus etc.

No, you don't ~get timezones~.

Touval Lysander wrote:
See, I reckon this is where you guys are getting mixed up. I shouldn't need hundreds of friends to grind off little pieces off you and THAT's what I'm aiming at - not the demise or destruction of the entire alliance.

The SOV system needs to be changed. Everyone in nullsec (who aren't ********) has been saying this for years.

Touval Lysander wrote:
atm people cannot sustainably take or hold ANY of your sov - pure numbers, no brains needed. Sure, they can tinker, they can play but let's be realistic about it k?

Huh. "Be realistic" you say, and then completely ignore the whole "timezones" bit and say that everything can be killed without a reinforcement timer? Because a system where you can roll over someone's entire space and flip/destroy everything in one go is "a realistic option"?

Touval Lysander wrote:
I just need to chip little pieces of you that you can't or won't repeatedly defend. If you ain't home a small force should be able to put some quick pain on you. Your own size will be the grinder. You simply will not be able to be everywhere.

And I don't need to take a system. I'm going to make you give it up because it's not worth defending anymore. You get to chose what to look after and what you can't be bothered with.

Let's talk about a sov system which makes it harder to defend more than 1 front at a time (as opposed to today's system, which easily allows for multiple fronts to be easily defended at the same time). That is, if you actually want to improve things, instead of just "ARRRR KILL NULLSEC ARRRR".

As to "don't need to take a system", this is possible today. We did this with Raiden.

Touval Lysander wrote:
A point will be reached where you CAN defend it all 24/7 regardless of who comes at you.

THAT's how big your alliance territory should be.

And with a better sov system (no, not your awful abortion of a suggestion), this would be possible.

Or, we could of course just go back to the old days of pre-sov, where stations being flipped was a daily occurrence. I hear that was ~fun~.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Shepard Wong Ogeko
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#99 - 2012-09-25 07:31:01 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:

See, I reckon this is where you guys are getting mixed up. I shouldn't need hundreds of friends to grind off little pieces off you and THAT's what I'm aiming at - not the demise or destruction of the entire alliance.


Well, you are wrong. It is a matter of proportion. To grind little pieces off an organization of around 10,000 members, you are going to need hundreds of people. One guy is a minor nuisance, unless he has a cyno and some friends.

If you, as 1 guy, want to grind little piece of some organization, it is going to have to be a much smaller organization.












Eve needs a Total Perspective Vortex for guys like this.
Rellik B00n
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#100 - 2012-09-25 08:18:21 UTC
Been this way for a long time, there are often reports exactly like the OP. I personally have done this several times, I once shot a station for a while with 2 thoraxes because it was completely empty.

You just try and settle in that space though....

Null has always suffered from that thing you see toddlers do: They play with a toy, then they drop it and move on to something else. If another child picks up the 1st toy they run back and snatch it back and say 'mine' even if they werent actually using it.

I dont blame them: in the end you are probably just there to fight them or stop the PVE they are doing, possibly to afk cloak.

Has someone already mentioned power projection?

I think that covers most of it Smile
[Of a request for change ask: Who Benefits?](https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=199765)