These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

U-MAD: A terrible guide to griefing

Author
Gaylord Fappington
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#21 - 2012-09-21 14:04:00 UTC
I'm brand new to this game but when people talk about grief and the morals of it I think I need to say something, and maybe its because I'm new that I see things this way.

Eve is a video game. Yeah things you do in it can cause people grief in the video game but that grief doesn't really matter if it stays inside the video game. If that grief does get outside of the video game and into the person's real life then its the person's problem for taking a video game too seriously.

I mean yeah I was disappointed when Eve U rejected me for my name. But did I carry that grief to out to my life? Was I sad about it at football practice the next day? No way. It's only when I am playing the game or talking about the game that any of that even counts, and then it's still a game so it doesn't even 'count' really.

So, people who just want to cause grief to people, I don;t se what the big deal is, because they should only be able to cause grief in the real game. I mean it's not like one of the real colleges I am applying to right now is going to reject me because my name is Gaylord and its not like someone from eve is gonna come and blow up my bike.
Cannibal Kane
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2012-09-21 17:08:00 UTC
Griefing is illegal in the context of the game...

EVE Uni is not being griefed, they are being denied the freedom to supply their bloat flies which consist of their Directors from making isk of all the taxes they recieve.

"Kane is the End Boss of Highsec." -Psychotic Monk

Yaaar's Revenge
Lightning Squad
Snuffed Out
#23 - 2012-09-21 17:09:00 UTC
Cannibal Kane wrote:
Griefing is illegal in the context of the game...

EVE Uni is not being griefed, they are being denied the freedom to supply their bloat flies which consist of their Directors from making isk of all the taxes they recieve.


What he said. I am illiterate and don't know what words mean. I get in trouble with that a lot you know...

Follow me on Twitter @Yaaars_Revenge

Pinky Feldman
Dirt 'n' Glitter
Local Is Primary
#24 - 2012-09-21 17:26:23 UTC
Ristlin Wakefield wrote:

And I only say that because I believe in eHonor and I don't think I've ever seen the university act "invincible."

Edit: Actually I don't believe in eHonor, but I do believe in good education. Griefing is something that we all learn eventually, but must we teach new players so soon?


1) EVE uni were the ones responsible for all war dec evasion tactics being declared legal and the birth of dec shielding. Prior to them doing this, they were generally known for not being a very good war dec since most of them would dock up, run, or blob the crap out of you with ECM. However, they wanted to be even more invincible from being dec'd and started abusing the war dec system in unenforcable ways until CCP threw up their hands. Most of the war decs they have been under since Inferno is just payback for this attitude.

2) I would argue that its never too early to be war decced. The problem with the Uni is they help foster the carebear self-entitlement attitude rather than teaching players how to deal with these aspects of the game. The things they tell their members in regards to those "being griefed" and non-consensual PVP is absolutely ridiculous and ruins more players in the longterm than it helps.
Ristlin Wakefield
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2012-09-21 17:44:53 UTC
Pinky Feldman wrote:
Ristlin Wakefield wrote:

And I only say that because I believe in eHonor and I don't think I've ever seen the university act "invincible."

Edit: Actually I don't believe in eHonor, but I do believe in good education. Griefing is something that we all learn eventually, but must we teach new players so soon?


1) EVE uni were the ones responsible for all war dec evasion tactics being declared legal and the birth of dec shielding. Prior to them doing this, they were generally known for not being a very good war dec since most of them would dock up, run, or blob the crap out of you with ECM. However, they wanted to be even more invincible from being dec'd and started abusing the war dec system in unenforcable ways until CCP threw up their hands. Most of the war decs they have been under since Inferno is just payback for this attitude.

2) I would argue that its never too early to be war decced. The problem with the Uni is they help foster the carebear self-entitlement attitude rather than teaching players how to deal with these aspects of the game. The things they tell their members in regards to those "being griefed" and non-consensual PVP is absolutely ridiculous and ruins more players in the longterm than it helps.


Thank you for your thoughtful and balanced response! Much appreciated :)

I have a lover, her name is EVE. I see her every night and all she asks in return is that I have a pilot's license.

Yaaar's Revenge
Lightning Squad
Snuffed Out
#26 - 2012-09-21 19:19:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Yaaar's Revenge
Iam Widdershins wrote:
u-mad is pretty terrible actually. they would love for people to think that they are really good and i'm sure they have delusions of competence themselves, but that really means very little.


No we don't think we're good. We really are terrible. I've said many times how terrible we are. Apparently people aren't getting the message.....

Follow me on Twitter @Yaaars_Revenge

Naginata Rios
Game.Theory
GameTheory
#27 - 2012-09-21 19:34:47 UTC
lol people need to understand what "griefing" means,the M.A.D is not griefing. We are using war deccing mechanics to have fun in a sandbox game.. Eve Uni CEO has said himself that "we are not a threat to him". So tell me, what are we doing wrong?
Kane the Black
Doomheim
#28 - 2012-09-21 19:48:39 UTC
Naginata Rios wrote:
lol people need to understand what "griefing" means,the M.A.D is not griefing. We are using war deccing mechanics to have fun in a sandbox game.. Eve Uni CEO has said himself that "we are not a threat to him". So tell me, what are we doing wrong?


You aren't providing enough popcorn for this show. Sad It's better than watching movies, though. Big smile

Combat Boosters for sale - http://combatboosters.blogspot.com/

Serena Serene
Heretic University
#29 - 2012-09-21 19:57:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Serena Serene
Edit: This post is mostly a response to Naginata Rios and Gaylord Fappington, trying to clarify what I mean.

TL;DR: It's different to enjoy winning at the game, or to enjoy if the loser is upset and aiming for that.

---

What I read from the first post in this thread is, among other things, the joy of denying new (or new'ish) players the ability to actually play.

Now don't get me wrong. I'm all for attacking each other, using whatever means to shift the odds to your own side and so on.
I understand you want to make a point, eve uni did things you don't like so you're fighting against them. You don't agree with what they teach their "students" so you try to show them what's wrong with that.
That's all okay, some of that even great.

I just don't get the joy over camping people into a station so they don't come out at all. Denying them playing the game at all.
I mean, I understand that can happen, I understand you can try to provoke a fight and your targets can be too cautious or cowardly, or whatever you want to call it, to do anything

But why are you glad about that? Why do you enjoy when players, who might not know better because they really are new, effectively don't do anything, can't do anything because of you? Especially if you don't get the fights you're out for.

and @Gaylord Fappington: I agree. It's a game, you shouldn't take it so seriously, and if you do it's basically your fault. If I shoot at someone I accept the risk he's going to be upset IRL. If that case really happens, though, I won't enjoy it. I usually won't fret over it either, but that's a difference.

There are people hinting at, or explicitly stating that they aim for these reactions, because they enjoy them.
Not the feeling of superiority because their enemies appear to be or are helpless, not their win, but the grief they cause others.
And that's, as I said, sad.

And that's the vibe I got from parts of the first post in this thread.

If I misunderstood that, my apologies.

Doesn't make my opinion any different about those people who are like I described, though.
Pinky Feldman
Dirt 'n' Glitter
Local Is Primary
#30 - 2012-09-21 20:21:42 UTC
Serena Serene wrote:
Edit: This post is mostly a response to Naginata Rios and Gaylord Fappington, trying to clarify what I mean.

TL;DR: It's different to enjoy winning at the game, or to enjoy if the loser is upset and aiming for that.

---

What I read from the first post in this thread is, among other things, the joy of denying new (or new'ish) players the ability to actually play.

Now don't get me wrong. I'm all for attacking each other, using whatever means to shift the odds to your own side and so on.
I understand you want to make a point, eve uni did things you don't like so you're fighting against them. You don't agree with what they teach their "students" so you try to show them what's wrong with that.
That's all okay, some of that even great.

I just don't get the joy over camping people into a station so they don't come out at all. Denying them playing the game at all.
I mean, I understand that can happen, I understand you can try to provoke a fight and your targets can be too cautious or cowardly, or whatever you want to call it, to do anything

But why are you glad about that? Why do you enjoy when players, who might not know better because they really are new, effectively don't do anything, can't do anything because of you? Especially if you don't get the fights you're out for.

and @Gaylord Fappington: I agree. It's a game, you shouldn't take it so seriously, and if you do it's basically your fault. If I shoot at someone I accept the risk he's going to be upset IRL. If that case really happens, though, I won't enjoy it. I usually won't fret over it either, but that's a difference.

There are people hinting at, or explicitly stating that they aim for these reactions, because they enjoy them.
Not the feeling of superiority because their enemies appear to be or are helpless, not their win, but the grief they cause others.
And that's, as I said, sad.

And that's the vibe I got from parts of the first post in this thread.

If I misunderstood that, my apologies.

Doesn't make my opinion any different about those people who are like I described, though.


Only the bad groups play station games or station camp. Somehow a lot of people seem to think thats all highsec wars are because they were decced at one point by a group that camped them in station, but its generally and widely accepted that unless you're a group like Nova Ardour, station camping doesn't get many kills and just wastes everyone's time.

Honestly, you're looking into things a bit too much and really coming across as a bit pretentious, looking down on someone else's gameplay style because its not what you would do in EVE. I find it interesting how "pirates" are some of the biggest space bushido guys in EVE, given their title. I bet it also upsets you that highsec guys don't really honour ransoms as well.
Naginata Rios
Game.Theory
GameTheory
#31 - 2012-09-21 21:23:25 UTC
Serena Serene wrote:
Edit: This post is mostly a response to Naginata Rios and Gaylord Fappington, trying to clarify what I mean.

TL;DR: It's different to enjoy winning at the game, or to enjoy if the loser is upset and aiming for that.

---

What I read from the first post in this thread is, among other things, the joy of denying new (or new'ish) players the ability to actually play.

Now don't get me wrong. I'm all for attacking each other, using whatever means to shift the odds to your own side and so on.
I understand you want to make a point, eve uni did things you don't like so you're fighting against them. You don't agree with what they teach their "students" so you try to show them what's wrong with that.
That's all okay, some of that even great.

I just don't get the joy over camping people into a station so they don't come out at all. Denying them playing the game at all.
I mean, I understand that can happen, I understand you can try to provoke a fight and your targets can be too cautious or cowardly, or whatever you want to call it, to do anything

But why are you glad about that? Why do you enjoy when players, who might not know better because they really are new, effectively don't do anything, can't do anything because of you? Especially if you don't get the fights you're out for.

and @Gaylord Fappington: I agree. It's a game, you shouldn't take it so seriously, and if you do it's basically your fault. If I shoot at someone I accept the risk he's going to be upset IRL. If that case really happens, though, I won't enjoy it. I usually won't fret over it either, but that's a difference.

There are people hinting at, or explicitly stating that they aim for these reactions, because they enjoy them.
Not the feeling of superiority because their enemies appear to be or are helpless, not their win, but the grief they cause others.
And that's, as I said, sad.

And that's the vibe I got from parts of the first post in this thread.

If I misunderstood that, my apologies.

Doesn't make my opinion any different about those people who are like I described, though.



You know nothing of the war. M.A.D is not a staion camping group, we dont camp the eve uni station, that would be suicide, eve uni would just undock their hordes of black birds and we would die in a fire,.

We are a small gang ROAMING group, any new player with any brains can watch local,

You should learn about the people you judge,
Naginata Rios
Game.Theory
GameTheory
#32 - 2012-09-21 21:25:50 UTC
i agree with pinky, station camping isnt worth the time, you get 0 kills and waste 3 hrs, when you couldve gone on a roam,
Ji Sama
Akira Industries
#33 - 2012-09-21 21:59:24 UTC
Page 2 SNIPA!
Serena Serene
Heretic University
#34 - 2012-09-22 02:52:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Serena Serene
Edit: Just to make this clear, though I think most people will know that anyway, but since Pinky was referring to my status as "pirate" to talk about "pirates":
I am only speaking for myself here.

Pinky Feldman wrote:
Serena Serene wrote:

[pretentious stuff]


Only the bad groups play station games or station camp. Somehow a lot of people seem to think thats all highsec wars are because they were decced at one point by a group that camped them in station, but its generally and widely accepted that unless you're a group like Nova Ardour, station camping doesn't get many kills and just wastes everyone's time.

Honestly, you're looking into things a bit too much and really coming across as a bit pretentious, looking down on someone else's gameplay style because its not what you would do in EVE. I find it interesting how "pirates" are some of the biggest space bushido guys in EVE, given their title. I bet it also upsets you that highsec guys don't really honour ransoms as well.


I don't care whether some random guy honours ransoms or not. It's Heretic policy to honour them, but whether others do is their decision.
Sorry for coming across pretentious, though I tried to make clear I'm not talking about a gameplay style, but about the attitude to aim for and enjoy another person's grief.
Again: if I misunderstood the words of the OP in that regard, my apologies.

Station camping was just an example taken from the OP's post.

Naginata Rios wrote:
Serena Serene wrote:

[same pretentious stuff]



You know nothing of the war. M.A.D is not a staion camping group, we dont camp the eve uni station, that would be suicide, eve uni would just undock their hordes of black birds and we would die in a fire,.

We are a small gang ROAMING group, any new player with any brains can watch local,

You should learn about the people you judge,


I know nothing about that war, and, as above, station camping was used as an example taken from the first post.

And also as above: Even if you did station camp, that'd be your way to play and I'd be fine with that.
If you did do that to try to get fights (as unwise or unsuccessful or what ever it might be, I really don't have much experience with that) or to gain some strategic or tactical advantage in a war or just to have a good time hanging out with friends, chatting away, and popping a ship or two every now and then, or something like that: more power to you.

If the reason is to make some newbies' lives miserable, I'd still find that sad.

What I am talking about is not what people do, but which reasons they have.
Maybe it's my fault for misunderstanding the OP's words in his first post in this regard.


My opinion I stated in this thread refers to the attitude of enjoying to cause grief for other persons (which is, I'm trying to be clear here, something entirely different than enjoying to do things which, among other things, could lead to other persons' grief, if the latter is not your goal).

I tried to talk about this attitude I perceived, not about specific persons, and as such also not about your corp. Sorry if that wasn't clear either.

Though from the first post here I thought the OP was such a person. I might be wrong, I apologize then.
Yaaar's Revenge
Lightning Squad
Snuffed Out
#35 - 2012-09-22 03:50:28 UTC
Serena Serene wrote:
Edit: Just to make this clear, though I think most people will know that anyway, but since Pinky was referring to my status as "pirate" to talk about "pirates":
I am only speaking for myself here.

Pinky Feldman wrote:
Serena Serene wrote:

[pretentious stuff]


Only the bad groups play station games or station camp. Somehow a lot of people seem to think thats all highsec wars are because they were decced at one point by a group that camped them in station, but its generally and widely accepted that unless you're a group like Nova Ardour, station camping doesn't get many kills and just wastes everyone's time.

Honestly, you're looking into things a bit too much and really coming across as a bit pretentious, looking down on someone else's gameplay style because its not what you would do in EVE. I find it interesting how "pirates" are some of the biggest space bushido guys in EVE, given their title. I bet it also upsets you that highsec guys don't really honour ransoms as well.


I don't care whether some random guy honours ransoms or not. It's Heretic policy to honour them, but whether others do is their decision.
Sorry for coming across pretentious, though I tried to make clear I'm not talking about a gameplay style, but about the attitude to aim for and enjoy another person's grief.
Again: if I misunderstood the words of the OP in that regard, my apologies.

Station camping was just an example taken from the OP's post.

Naginata Rios wrote:
Serena Serene wrote:

[same pretentious stuff]



You know nothing of the war. M.A.D is not a staion camping group, we dont camp the eve uni station, that would be suicide, eve uni would just undock their hordes of black birds and we would die in a fire,.

We are a small gang ROAMING group, any new player with any brains can watch local,

You should learn about the people you judge,


I know nothing about that war, and, as above, station camping was used as an example taken from the first post.

And also as above: Even if you did station camp, that'd be your way to play and I'd be fine with that.
If you did do that to try to get fights (as unwise or unsuccessful or what ever it might be, I really don't have much experience with that) or to gain some strategic or tactical advantage in a war or just to have a good time hanging out with friends, chatting away, and popping a ship or two every now and then, or something like that: more power to you.

If the reason is to make some newbies' lives miserable, I'd still find that sad.

What I am talking about is not what people do, but which reasons they have.
Maybe it's my fault for misunderstanding the OP's words in his first post in this regard.


My opinion I stated in this thread refers to the attitude of enjoying to cause grief for other persons (which is, I'm trying to be clear here, something entirely different than enjoying to do things which, among other things, could lead to other persons' grief, if the latter is not your goal).

I tried to talk about this attitude I perceived, not about specific persons, and as such also not about your corp. Sorry if that wasn't clear either.

Though from the first post here I thought the OP was such a person. I might be wrong, I apologize then.


No no no I apolgize because I stated my opinions wrong. But the main focus of the war is to prove EVE Uni wrong in it's statement of us not being any kind of threat, and the main way to achieve that is to make its members feel bad. So that's an error on my part of phrasing it badly. My apologies....

Follow me on Twitter @Yaaars_Revenge

Serena Serene
Heretic University
#36 - 2012-09-22 04:26:01 UTC
Yaaar's Revenge wrote:
Serena Serene wrote:

[stuff]


No no no I apolgize because I stated my opinions wrong. But the main focus of the war is to prove EVE Uni wrong in it's statement of us not being any kind of threat, and the main way to achieve that is to make its members feel bad. So that's an error on my part of phrasing it badly. My apologies....


Well, then let's stop apologizing and just be friends again :)

I got a little too worked-up there.

Good luck in your endeavor!
Reppyk
The Black Shell
#37 - 2012-09-22 05:12:40 UTC
Serena Serene wrote:
Edit: This post is mostly a response to Naginata Rios and Gaylord Fappington, trying to clarify what I mean.

TL;DR: It's different to enjoy winning at the game, or to enjoy if the loser is upset and aiming for that.
http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Wartime_Standard_Operating_Procedures

To that end, the SOP is intended to:
[...] Deny the enemy any enjoyment from the conflict.


My my, EVEuni is a griefing alliance ? Lol

I AM SPACE CAPTAIN REPPYK. BEWARE.

Proud co-admin of frugu.net, a French fansite about EVE !

Chip Mint
Central Sausage Freight
#38 - 2012-09-22 11:45:23 UTC
Both E-UNI and RVB can mass up huge fleets to kill your **** very fast when pushed. Sure you can hang about killing noobs in ships mining etc, but beware that you can be waking up a sleeping giant here. E Uni can be effective if pushed.
Marlin Spikes
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#39 - 2012-09-22 12:15:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Marlin Spikes
I don’t speak for U-Mad…

I’ve seen many posts that try to convince us that Eve-Uni is the only good place that can train a noob... that we must all be thankful for all of the great things Eve-Uni has done for our community….that we will have a bright future because Eve-Uni will help make it so….

Eve-Uni is NOT the Vatican folks! They are an alliance with a great sales pitch making isk.

Our future in Eve is heavily dependent on new players, which is why we want to encourage new players to join small developing corporations and alliances. They should take advantage of those “smaller classroom sizes” and create long lasting relationships with other players (Kumbaya and all that). They should learn to develop their leadership skills and diversify their income streams. They should learn to fight as a team.

Best noob training I had was getting war dec’d by a much more experienced pvp corp. At the time, I thought of them as a griefer corp. Our little noob corp (Kai Z) fought back under the guidance of just one experienced player who wanted to help a small corp grow (Thanks Sting). Killing our first T3 using an FC’d small inexperienced gang is my most memorable pvp fight. That one encounter sealed the deal for me – I was hooked on Eve.

You want to save Eve’s future? Experienced players should dedicate more of their time to small/start-up corporations filled with new players and help them grow into the next mega alliance. Many of our current members have alts in small corporations, helping to train the future pilots of Eve.

We are not anti-noobs. We recognize that without new players, this game will eventually die out. We do believe that our future in Eve should NEVER be dependent on one organization – an organization left unchecked to decide, develop, and train new players – twisting our future gameplay into compliance with their own beliefs of what should be fun and good. Never worry…don’t bother to think… big brother Eve-Uni knows what’s best for us.

No alliance should ever become too big to fail.

Bombers Rule!!!

Belthazor4011
Battle BV Redux
#40 - 2012-09-22 16:46:21 UTC
If over half the posts in this thread are from one corp/alliance why is it a thread at all?

Dont you kids have corp/alliance chat in game?

Thats all...
Previous page12