These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM7 - Disenchantment

First post
Author
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2012-09-20 09:35:31 UTC
from http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.ca/2012/09/csm7-disenchantment.html

I was a very strong supporter of CSM7. I've a number of posts either cheerleading their efforts (especially the work of Hans Jagerblitzen) or attacking those who would (unfairly) decry their efforts.

It's not that I don't still support the work they are doing, but I have soured somewhat on aspects of the CSM7 administration.

What lead to this recent disenchantment?

First, there was the Voting Reform thread (the original, not the reboot by CCP Xhagen). Except for Trebor, who had the misfortune of creating the thread, the rest of CSM7 cries innocence, that they had nothing to do with Trebor's proposals. They seek out CCP Xhagen to save them from themselves. They can tell us that they didn't spill the milk, except that we can clearly see them standing in a puddle of it.

There's little doubt in my mind that Trebor did not go rogue, that his proposal and, more importantly, the criteria for submitted proposals were not created in a vacuum. Trebor ran this by his colleagues. They told him "Looks good, go ahead and post it." It's not in Trebor's nature to do things on his own without the input and approval of his fellow representatives.

So when they try to distance themselves from the proposal, leave Trebor hanging out to dry, it smacks of nothing less than political opportunism. Word is that Trebor does not plan to run for CSM8, that this is his last term. So, if someone is going to be the fall guy, might as well be the guy with no further CSM aspirations. Super convenient that he planted that tree in the first place, it becomes super easy to hang him from it.

I'm fine with throwing people under the bus, if they're not contributing, not pulling their weight. But to throw someone under the bus for something the group agreed upon, that's kind of sickening. If CSM7 representatives had disagreements with Trebor's voting reform criteria, then he definitely would not have created the reform thread until there was that consensus. I don't even know Trebor, but it's obvious (to me) that is how he operates.

The entire voting reform debacle reminds me of a section of the CSM Report. The Crimewatch section where CCP Greyscale presents an idea for solving the gatecamp "problem." During the session, as presented in the report, a few CSM members agreed with the idea, that it seemed sound. Not a single concern or objection was voiced (not even from the lowsec candidates, who this would affect the most). It wasn't until two months later, when the players got to see what went down in that session, when player objections began appearing, that the CSM suddenly realized that, yeah, it was a bad idea.

Crimewatch and gate guns. Voting reform proposals. There's little reason to think that the CSM can even recognize a bad idea when it's presented to them. They only acknowledge an idea as bad for the game when the playerbase starts hollering, "This idea is bad for the game." The playerbase is proving to be a better CSM than the CSM itself.

Second thing that lead to my current disenchantment, was the Ripard Teg podcast on Alekseyev's Declarations of War. This entire discussion was a trainwreck. Hans, Seleene, and Aleks entered the conversation looking for a fight. Aleks was constantly on the attack, never deigning to listen to a thing Ripard had to say. Ripard had some excellent points on using the media to get messages out to a wider audience or to pressure CCP in certain areas. The CSM dismissed him out of hand. Ripard had some excellent points on how the CSM could improve their messaging. Again, his suggestions were disregarded. The CSM was blinded by it's own need to defend itself from previous attacks and accusations. They missed an opportunity to win over somebody who has a good degree of influence in the community. The CSM came out of the proceeding looking petty and self-absorbed.

Now that some **** has come down, instead of manning up, admitting mistakes, really attempting to improve, I feel they're hunkering down. Groups hugs all around whenever a bad person says something bad about any of them. They're insulating themselves with their own group-perpetuating approval loop. Recursive group-esteem boosting. "Don't listen to them Aleks. I think all your interjections and speaking-before-thinking during the Ripard podcast were a-okay! Keep on truckin', brah!"
Rengerel en Distel
#2 - 2012-09-20 12:16:20 UTC
Ever think perhaps you should step back from the game sometimes? It seems most of your day is spent writing blogs about eve, listening to podcasts about eve, and perhaps if you have time, maybe actually playing eve a bit? When you're spending more time working on/worrying about the game than the devs themselves, you might be going a bit overboard.

With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.

Yeep
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2012-09-20 13:06:41 UTC
I disenchanted a CSM once, all I got was some arcane dust.
Milton Middleson
Rifterlings
#4 - 2012-09-20 22:32:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Milton Middleson
And here we see the drama llama in its natural habitat.
Borisk Zeltsh
Alcohlics Anonymous
#5 - 2012-09-24 03:22:22 UTC
To op

step away from the keybord and breath go outside smoke a joint av a beer go find a gf do somthing man your becoming obsessed with csm funny but kinda getting sad now
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#6 - 2012-09-25 11:53:47 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
from http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.ca/2012/09/csm7-disenchantment.html

I was a very strong supporter of CSM7. I've a number of posts either cheerleading their efforts (especially the work of Hans Jagerblitzen) or attacking those who would (unfairly) decry their efforts.

It's not that I don't still support the work they are doing, but I have soured somewhat on aspects of the CSM7 administration.

What lead to this recent disenchantment?

First, there was the Voting Reform thread (the original, not the reboot by CCP Xhagen). Except for Trebor, who had the misfortune of creating the thread, the rest of CSM7 cries innocence, that they had nothing to do with Trebor's proposals. They seek out CCP Xhagen to save them from themselves. They can tell us that they didn't spill the milk, except that we can clearly see them standing in a puddle of it.

There's little doubt in my mind that Trebor did not go rogue, that his proposal and, more importantly, the criteria for submitted proposals were not created in a vacuum. Trebor ran this by his colleagues. They told him "Looks good, go ahead and post it." It's not in Trebor's nature to do things on his own without the input and approval of his fellow representatives.

So when they try to distance themselves from the proposal, leave Trebor hanging out to dry, it smacks of nothing less than political opportunism. Word is that Trebor does not plan to run for CSM8, that this is his last term. So, if someone is going to be the fall guy, might as well be the guy with no further CSM aspirations. Super convenient that he planted that tree in the first place, it becomes super easy to hang him from it.

I'm fine with throwing people under the bus, if they're not contributing, not pulling their weight. But to throw someone under the bus for something the group agreed upon, that's kind of sickening. If CSM7 representatives had disagreements with Trebor's voting reform criteria, then he definitely would not have created the reform thread until there was that consensus. I don't even know Trebor, but it's obvious (to me) that is how he operates.

The entire voting reform debacle reminds me of a section of the CSM Report. The Crimewatch section where CCP Greyscale presents an idea for solving the gatecamp "problem." During the session, as presented in the report, a few CSM members agreed with the idea, that it seemed sound. Not a single concern or objection was voiced (not even from the lowsec candidates, who this would affect the most). It wasn't until two months later, when the players got to see what went down in that session, when player objections began appearing, that the CSM suddenly realized that, yeah, it was a bad idea.

Crimewatch and gate guns. Voting reform proposals. There's little reason to think that the CSM can even recognize a bad idea when it's presented to them. They only acknowledge an idea as bad for the game when the playerbase starts hollering, "This idea is bad for the game." The playerbase is proving to be a better CSM than the CSM itself.

Second thing that lead to my current disenchantment, was the Ripard Teg podcast on Alekseyev's Declarations of War. This entire discussion was a trainwreck. Hans, Seleene, and Aleks entered the conversation looking for a fight. Aleks was constantly on the attack, never deigning to listen to a thing Ripard had to say. Ripard had some excellent points on using the media to get messages out to a wider audience or to pressure CCP in certain areas. The CSM dismissed him out of hand. Ripard had some excellent points on how the CSM could improve their messaging. Again, his suggestions were disregarded. The CSM was blinded by it's own need to defend itself from previous attacks and accusations. They missed an opportunity to win over somebody who has a good degree of influence in the community. The CSM came out of the proceeding looking petty and self-absorbed.

Now that some **** has come down, instead of manning up, admitting mistakes, really attempting to improve, I feel they're hunkering down. Groups hugs all around whenever a bad person says something bad about any of them. They're insulating themselves with their own group-perpetuating approval loop. Recursive group-esteem boosting. "Don't listen to them Aleks. I think all your interjections and speaking-before-thinking during the Ripard podcast were a-okay! Keep on truckin', brah!"


You're in the penultimate phase before burnout.

The last phase is usually characterised by "doubling down", saying more loudly than ever that you're committed to EVE, the most passionate commentator, etc etc.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#7 - 2012-09-25 12:41:39 UTC
Borisk Zeltsh wrote:
To op

step away from the keybord and breath go outside smoke a joint av a beer go find a gf do somthing man your becoming obsessed with csm funny but kinda getting sad now


Well there is a girl on the CSM now, perhaps this is his courting ritual. He is just trying to wear them down, until they have no option but to submit and become his conjugal lover.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-09-25 15:28:25 UTC
rodyas wrote:
Well there is a girl on the CSM now . . .
Who? Issler is a French dude.
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#9 - 2012-09-25 18:43:28 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
rodyas wrote:
Well there is a girl on the CSM now . . .
Who? Issler is a French dude.


What I like the most about your posts is the detailed research that results in such accuracy in your claims! It really adds to your credibility.

Issler
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-09-25 18:45:57 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
rodyas wrote:
Well there is a girl on the CSM now . . .
Who? Issler is a French dude.
What I like the most about your posts is the detailed research that results in such accuracy in your claims! It really adds to your credibility.
A good troll needs no detailed research. Thanks for coming out.
Rengerel en Distel
#11 - 2012-09-25 21:10:05 UTC
Yeep wrote:
I disenchanted a CSM once, all I got was some arcane dust.


The thread really should have just ended there.

With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#12 - 2012-09-26 03:37:04 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
rodyas wrote:
Well there is a girl on the CSM now . . .
Who? Issler is a French dude.


Massive slam to french men everywhere. Hopefully they can eat some freedom fries to restore their stamina, then launch a counter attack.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Signal11th
#13 - 2012-10-03 14:01:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Signal11th
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
from http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.ca/2012/09/csm7-disenchantment.html

I was a very strong supporter of CSM7. I've a number of posts either cheerleading their efforts (especially the work of Hans Jagerblitzen) or attacking those who would (unfairly) decry their efforts.

It's not that I don't still support the work they are doing, but I have soured somewhat on aspects of the CSM7 administration.

What lead to this recent disenchantment?

First, there was the Voting Reform thread (the original, not the reboot by CCP Xhagen). Except for Trebor, who had the misfortune of creating the thread, the rest of CSM7 cries innocence, that they had nothing to do with Trebor's proposals. They seek out CCP Xhagen to save them from themselves. They can tell us that they didn't spill the milk, except that we can clearly see them standing in a puddle of it.

There's little doubt in my mind that Trebor did not go rogue, that his proposal and, more importantly, the criteria for submitted proposals were not created in a vacuum. Trebor ran this by his colleagues. They told him "Looks good, go ahead and post it." It's not in Trebor's nature to do things on his own without the input and approval of his fellow representatives.

So when they try to distance themselves from the proposal, leave Trebor hanging out to dry, it smacks of nothing less than political opportunism. Word is that Trebor does not plan to run for CSM8, that this is his last term. So, if someone is going to be the fall guy, might as well be the guy with no further CSM aspirations. Super convenient that he planted that tree in the first place, it becomes super easy to hang him from it.

I'm fine with throwing people under the bus, if they're not contributing, not pulling their weight. But to throw someone under the bus for something the group agreed upon, that's kind of sickening. If CSM7 representatives had disagreements with Trebor's voting reform criteria, then he definitely would not have created the reform thread until there was that consensus. I don't even know Trebor, but it's obvious (to me) that is how he operates.

The entire voting reform debacle reminds me of a section of the CSM Report. The Crimewatch section where CCP Greyscale presents an idea for solving the gatecamp "problem." During the session, as presented in the report, a few CSM members agreed with the idea, that it seemed sound. Not a single concern or objection was voiced (not even from the lowsec candidates, who this would affect the most). It wasn't until two months later, when the players got to see what went down in that session, when player objections began appearing, that the CSM suddenly realized that, yeah, it was a bad idea.

Crimewatch and gate guns. Voting reform proposals. There's little reason to think that the CSM can even recognize a bad idea when it's presented to them. They only acknowledge an idea as bad for the game when the playerbase starts hollering, "This idea is bad for the game." The playerbase is proving to be a better CSM than the CSM itself.

Second thing that lead to my current disenchantment, was the Ripard Teg podcast on Alekseyev's Declarations of War. This entire discussion was a trainwreck. Hans, Seleene, and Aleks entered the conversation looking for a fight. Aleks was constantly on the attack, never deigning to listen to a thing Ripard had to say. Ripard had some excellent points on using the media to get messages out to a wider audience or to pressure CCP in certain areas. The CSM dismissed him out of hand. Ripard had some excellent points on how the CSM could improve their messaging. Again, his suggestions were disregarded. The CSM was blinded by it's own need to defend itself from previous attacks and accusations. They missed an opportunity to win over somebody who has a good degree of influence in the community. The CSM came out of the proceeding looking petty and self-absorbed.

Now that some **** has come down, instead of manning up, admitting mistakes, really attempting to improve, I feel they're hunkering down. Groups hugs all around whenever a bad person says something bad about any of them. They're insulating themselves with their own group-perpetuating approval loop. Recursive group-esteem boosting. "Don't listen to them Aleks. I think all your interjections and speaking-before-thinking during the Ripard podcast were a-okay! Keep on truckin', brah!"



Spamming much....

God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster!