Wormholes

for example
http://www.staticmapper.com/index.php?system=J154449

Fixed it for you

OK thanks for the replies.

So you're saying that C4,5 and 6 CAN NOT have a static to 0.0?

It's just that if you type Z142 into the static mapper site, it comes up with a load of C5 sites that have the Z142 static?

Am I right in saying the best way of finding a site (C1-6) with a 0.0 static is to keep looking for WHs FROM 0.0 ?

c4-6 can have regional wormholes to k-space. Z142 is a regional wormhole to NS. Unlike static wormhole that respawn in the same system, they will respawn in a random system (of the same region we suppose).

I believe there have been one or two C3 holes in sell orders fairly recently with 0.0 statics
Worth keeping your eye on there to see what pops up.

Always imagined the logistics from a static 0.0 hole would be a nightmare tho but might be wrong.

You should look at this List of all w-space systems, all systems and their statics are listed...

There are a total of 174 systems (of the 2498 total systems) with static exits to null sec.

28 Class 1 systems, with static Z060 (region 1, constellations 311-323)
50 Class 2 systems, with static E545 (region 7, all constellations in region)
96 Class 3 systems, with static K346 (region 14, all constellations in region)

...simply search the list I linked for these wormholes to find the system's names. You can identify Region and Constellation through the show info for the system when you jump through a wormhole if you plan to find the systems yourself.

You may also note in that wormhole interconnection charts, that there are several other types of wormholes known to exit into null sec. These are all "wandering" wormholes rather that statics, so they will appear rather infrequently. From class 5 and 6 systems, wormhole Z142 is the only wandering wormhole which goes to null sec, and there are no known wormholes which go from class 4 to null sec (be they static or wandering).

Class 2 and 3 systems will be the only systems which have a static capable of transporting a battleship, as all wormholes to and from Class 1 systems will only allow 20,000,000 kg through. You can, however, build battleships inside a class 1 wormhole if you so desire.

Only problem with the C2 idea is that of the C2 holes, the ones with a null static can only have a C5 or C6 as the other static, so the options are pretty limited. See C2 static wormhole totals:

B274 and Z647 (128 systems) [to high sec and class 1]
A239 and D382 (141 systems) [to low sec and class 2]
B274 and O477 (104 systems) [to high sec and class 3]
B274 and Y683 (102 systems) [to high sec and class 4]
E545 and N062 (40 systems) [to null sec and class 5]
E545 and R474 (10 systems) [to null sec and class 6]

Keep in mind also that, C5 definitely has a high affinity for wandering null sec wormholes, incoming and outgoing, but, with no static, rolling for a new destination would be out of the question.

WHs with nullsec statics are generally unoccupied in my experience and C2/C5+nullsec are fairly common. I actually was in a C3/nullsec, so those exist too :)